Bone tissue and plasma concentrations of linezolid and vancomycin in rabbits with prosthesis-related infection due to MRSA.

BACKGROUND: Due to its safety profile and ease of oral administration, linezolid became an alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. The aim of our study was to compare bone tissue and plasma concentrations of linezolid and vancomycin in prosthesis-related MRSA infection in a rabbit model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During implantation of titanium cylinders into the femurs of nine rabbits, a bacterial suspension of MRSA was added to induce infection. Antibiotic treatment was started eight hours later. Antibiotic concentrations in plasma (day one, three and seven) and bone (day seven) were determined by HPLC analysis. RESULTS: At steady state the mean peak and trough plasma levels of linezolid were 29.0 microg/mL and 8.2 microg/ mL and for vancomycin 39.1 microg/mL and 28.2 microg/mL. On day seven the mean peak concentration of linezolid in plasma was 28.5 microg/mL and after six hours 26.3 microg/mL and for vancomycin 53.8 microg/mL and 29.1 microg/mL after six hours. Vancomycin showed a penetration into the infected bone (femur) of 53% of plasma concentration, into the uninfected 28%, linezolid 11% (for both six hours after administration). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we observed a higher rate of tissue penetration for vancomycin than for linezolid into femur bone in this animal model. As linezolid offers the option for oral treatment of gram-positive organisms, results of further studies comparing vancomycin and linezolid are keenly awaited.

[Improving the diagnosis of septic arthritis by use of a pediatric blood culture system]. / Optimierung der mikrobiologischen Diagnostik von Gelenkpunktaten mittels eines pädiatrischen Blutkultursystems.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis and outcome of bacterial joint infections are dependent on the fast and reliable identification of pathogens in the synovial fluid. Previous studies have suggested the possible advantage of using a blood culture system in contrast to conventional culture methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 synovial specimens from patients presenting with symptoms suggesting septic arthritis were taken by aspiration with a sterile syringe. We compared the diagnostic results of automated analysis in a blood culture system against conventional culture on solid agar plates. RESULTS: Some 67 specimens (66.3%) were found to be negative in both preparations, while samples from 21 patients (20.8%) yielded the same microorganisms. In 13 cases (12.9%), the isolation of a pathogen was possible only with the blood culture method, whereas the conventional method never yielded a positive result when the blood culture was negative. Thus, the diagnostic yield was significantly improved by use of the blood culture system (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of a commonly available blood culture system offers a fast, reliable and cost-effective approach for the diagnosis of septic arthritis and should therefore be considered as an useful alternative to conventional culture methods.

[Improving microbiological diagnostics in septic orthopaedic surgery. Comparative study of patients receiving systemic antibiotic therapy]. / Mikrobiologische Diagnostik in der septisch-orthopädischen Chirurgie. Vergleichsstudie bei Patienten unter Antibiotikatherapie.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study included 63 patients with confirmed infections of soft tissue, joints, bones or implants. During 110 surgical interventions, 124 swab and deep tissue sample pairs were taken and analysed microbiologically using standard procedures. RESULTS: In 40 patients who had not received prior antibiotic treatment, 57 sample pairs (swabs/tissue) were taken. In 70%, growth of microorganisms could be observed in both swabs and tissue samples. Growth in tissue sample only was observed in 14% and in 14% no growth could be detected. In 67 sample pairs taken from 23 patients who had received systemic antimicrobial treatment prior to surgery, microbial growth in both specimens was detected in 40%. Growth in tissue sample only was observed in 22% and 34% of the samples remained without detectable growth. The overall sensitivity of the tissue samples (70%) was significantly higher than in swab samples (44%) for the pretreated group. CONCLUSION: The use of intraoperative tissue samples for microbiological diagnostics in septic orthopaedic surgery must be considered a "gold standard". The higher sensitivity of intraoperative tissue samples is particularly important in patients receiving systemic antibiotic therapy prior to surgical interventions.

Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in southwest Germany as determined by the E test.

We have studied the prevalence of anti-microbial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Southwest Germany. One hundred seventy-four clinical isolates of pneumococci collected from hospitalized patients between October 1992 and April 1994 were used for MIC determinations. MICs for penicillin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, and rifampicin were assessed by the E test. Eleven of the 174 strains (6.3%) were intermediately resistant to penicillin (MIC between 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml) and four of the 174 strains (2.3%) were intermediately resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC between 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml). All four isolates with a reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone also demonstrated intermediate resistance to penicillin. Six of the 174 strains (3.5%) were highly resistant (MIC > or = 8 micrograms/ml) to erythromycin. Resistance to rifampicin was not observed. Our results demonstrate that pneumococcal resistance to penicillin and erythromycin has increased markedly in Germany over the last decade. Our findings underline the need for continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae.