Updates in the management of cancer therapy-related hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide a comprehensive review of hypertension among patients with cancer. Several cancer therapies cause hypertension which has resulted in a growing and vulnerable population of patients with difficult to control hypertension which has significant downstream effects. RECENT FINDINGS: Hypertension affects up to 50% of cancer patients and higher comorbidity when compared to the general population. Many anticancer therapies can cause hypertension through their treatment effect. Antihypertensive treatment is crucial given cardiovascular mortality is a leading cause of death among cancer patients. It is already known that hypertension is poorly controlled in the general population, and there are additional challenges in management among patients with cancer. Patients with cancer suffer from multimorbidity, are on multiple medications creating concern for drug interactions, and often have blood pressure lability, which can worsen clinical inertia among patients and their providers. It is crucial to effectively treat hypertension in cancer patients to mitigate downstream adverse cardiovascular events. SUMMARY: In recent years, there have been significant changes in management guidelines of hypertension and simultaneously as influx of new cancer therapeutics. We provide an update on hypertension treatment among patients with cancer on different chemotherapeutic agents.

Major cardiovascular adverse events in older adults with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane + anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens: A SEER-medicare study.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive as compared to other subtypes of breast cancer with characteristic metastatic patterns and a poor prognosis. The standard of care for early-stage TNBC is historically anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (ATAX). Despite the effectiveness of this regimen, anthracyclines carry a small but important risk of cardiotoxicity, which is specifically a concern in the older population. This study evaluates major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in older women with TNBC treated with ATAX compared to taxane-based chemotherapy (TAX). METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified women aged 66 and older with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 (N = 2215). We compared patient and clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate three-year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmia, and cerebral vascular incidence. Few patients experienced a cardiac death and therefore this was excluded in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2215 patients in our cohort, most patients (n = 1334; 60.26%) received TAX compared to ATAX (n = 881; 39.78%). Patients who received ATAX were not statistically significantly more likely than those who received TAX to experience acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), or potentially fatal arrhythmia when controlling for traditional risk factors. Among patients who experienced MACE, there was no difference in OS or CSS in patients who received TAX vs ATAX. Patients who received ATAX were less likely to develop heart failure than those who received TAX (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.45-0.88], p < 0.01). Patients who developed MACE and who were > 76 years old had worse OS compared to those who experienced MACE and were age 66-75 years old (HR 1.67, 95% CI [1.07-2.62], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Among older women with TNBC, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX was not associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. For those who experienced a cardiac event, there was no difference in survival amongst those who received TAX vs ATAX. Other factors including additional chemotherapy toxicities should be investigated as a potential etiology for the inferior OS previously observed with ATAX vs TAX in older women with node negative or 1-3 positive lymph nodes.

Update on Immunotherapy Cardiotoxicity: Checkpoint Inhibitors, CAR T, and Beyond.

OPINION STATEMENT: Immunotherapy is an innovative approach to cancer treatment that involves using the body's immune system to fight cancer. The landscape of immunotherapy is constantly evolving, as new therapies are developed and refined. Some of the most promising approaches in immunotherapy include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): these drugs target proteins on the surface of T-cells that inhibit their ability to attack cancer cells. By blocking these proteins, checkpoint inhibitors allow T-cells to recognize and destroy cancer cells more effectively. CAR T-cell therapy: this therapy involves genetically modifying a patient's own T-cells to recognize and attack cancer cells. CAR T-cell therapy exhibits favorable response in many patients with refractory hematological cancers with growing clinical trials in solid tumors. Immune system modulators: these drugs enhance the immune system's ability to fight cancer by stimulating the production of immune cells or inhibiting the activity of immune-suppressing cells. While immunotherapy has shown great promise in the treatment of cancer, it can also pose significant cardiac side effects. Some immunotherapy drugs like ICIs can cause myocarditis, which can lead to chest pain, shortness of breath, and heart failure. Other cardiac side effects of ICIs include arrhythmias, pericarditis, vasculitis, and accelerated atherosclerosis. It is important for patients receiving immunotherapy to be monitored closely for these side effects, as prompt treatment can help prevent serious complications. Patients should also report any symptoms to their healthcare providers right away, so that appropriate action can be taken. CAR T-cell therapy can also illicit an exaggerated immune response creating cytokine release syndrome (CRS) that may precipitate cardiovascular events: arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Overall, while immune modulating therapy is a promising and expanding approach to cancer treatment, it is important to weigh the potential benefits against the risks and side effects, especially in patients with high risk for cardiovascular complications.

COVID-19 severity and cardiovascular outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Background: Data regarding outcomes among patients with cancer and co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD)/cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited. Objectives: To compare Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related complications among cancer patients with and without co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from 03/17/2020 to 12/31/2021. CVD/CVRF was defined as established CVD or no established CVD, male ≥ 55 or female ≥ 60 years, and one additional CVRF. The primary endpoint was an ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome including need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, ICU or mechanical ventilation plus vasopressors, and death. Secondary endpoints included incident adverse CV events. Ordinal logistic regression models estimated associations of CVD/CVRF with COVID-19 severity. Effect modification by recent cancer therapy was evaluated. Results: Among 10,876 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer (median age 65 [IQR 54-74] years, 53% female, 52% White), 6253 patients (57%) had co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Co-morbid CVD/CVRF was associated with higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]). Adverse CV events were significantly higher in patients with CVD/CVRF (all p<0.001). CVD/CVRF was associated with worse COVID-19 severity in patients who had not received recent cancer therapy, but not in those undergoing active cancer therapy (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.31-1.74] vs. OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.90-1.20], pinteraction <0.001). Conclusions: Co-morbid CVD/CVRF is associated with higher COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer, particularly those not receiving active cancer therapy. While infrequent, COVID-19 related CV complications were higher in patients with comorbid CVD/CVRF. (COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium Registry [CCC19]; NCT04354701).

Clinical outcomes of adjuvant taxane plus anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens in older adults with node-positive, triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare study.

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer associated with an aggressive clinical course. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with node-positive TNBC. The benefit of anthracycline plus taxane (ATAX) regimens compared with non-anthracycline-containing, taxane-based regimens (TAX) in older women with node-positive TNBC is not well characterised. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we identified 1106 women with node-positive TNBC diagnosed at age 66 years and older between 2010 and 2015. We compared patient clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyse OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumour characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1106 patients in our cohort, 767 (69.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX (364/767, 47.5%), TAX (297/767, 39%) or other regimens (106/767, 13.8%). Independent predictors of which patients were more likely to receive ATAX versus TAX included more extensive nodal involvement (≥4), age, marital/partner status and non-cardiac comorbidities. There was a statistically significant improvement in 3-year CSS (81.8% versus 71.4%) and OS (70.7% versus 51.3%) with the use of any chemotherapy in our cohort (P < 0.01). Three-year CSS and OS for patients who received ATAX versus TAX were similar at 82.8% versus 83.7% (P = 0.80) and 74.2% versus 72.7% (P = 0.79), respectively. There was a trend towards improved CSS and OS in patients with four or more positive lymph nodes who received ATAX versus TAX (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36-1.23, P = 0.19 and hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.14, P = 0.14, respectively). CONCLUSION: Among older women with node-positive TNBC, a majority of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, which was associated with an improvement in CSS and OS. When compared with TAX chemotherapy, there was a trend towards better outcomes with ATAX for patients with ≥4 nodes.

Current Practice in Carcinoid Heart Disease and Burgeoning Opportunities.

OPINION STATEMENT: Cardiac surgery with tricuspid valve and potentially pulmonic valve replacement at an experienced center is currently the most effective strategy available for the treatment of carcinoid heart disease. Cardiac surgery for carcinoid heart disease requires a multidisciplinary team including cardiology, medical oncology, cardiothoracic anesthesia, and cardiac surgery. Without cardiac surgery, morbidity and mortality from carcinoid heart disease is high. Aggressive management of carcinoid before and after cardiac surgery is critical. Over time, though, circulating carcinoid hormones can lead to destruction of prosthetic valves as well, resulting in recurrent right heart failure. Percutaneous options for valve repair may be on the horizon for management of carcinoid heart disease.

Innovations in Cardio-oncology Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OPINION STATEMENT: The COVID pandemic has transformed our approach to patient care, research, and training in cardio-oncology. While the early phases of the COVID pandemic were exceptionally frightening, we now can reflect on the innovative changes that brought more effective and patient-centered care to our doorsteps: expansion of telemedicine, integration of digital health, wider adoption of cardiac biomarkers, consolidation, and coordination of cardio-oncology testing. Normally, it takes years for health care systems to adopt new technology or modify patient care pathways; however, COVID pushed healthcare providers and the health systems to change at warp speed. All of these innovations have improved our efficacy and provided a more "patient-centered" approach for our cardio-oncology patients. The changes we have made in cardio-oncology will likely remain well beyond the pandemic and continue to grow improving the cardiovascular care of oncology patients.

Evaluating anthracycline + taxane versus taxane-based chemotherapy in older women with node-negative triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER-Medicare study.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces recurrence in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, data are lacking evaluating anthracycline + taxane (ATAX) versus taxane-based (TAX) chemotherapy in older women with node-negative TNBC, as they are often excluded from trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant ATAX versus TAX on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in older patients with node-negative TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we selected patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with Stage T1-4N0M0 TNBC between 2010 and 2015 (N = 3348). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate 3-year OS and CSS. Multivariant Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with use of ATAX compared to TAX. RESULTS: Approximately half (N = 1679) of patients identified received chemotherapy and of these, 58.6% (N = 984) received TAX, 25.0% (N = 420) received ATAX, and 16.4% (N = 275) received another regimen. Three-year CSS and OS was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy from 88.9 to 92.2% (p = 0.0018) for CSS and 77.2% to 88.6% for OS (p < 0.0001). In contrast, treatment with ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year CSS and OS. Three-year CSS was 93.7% with TAX compared to 89.8% (p = 0.048) for ATAX and OS was 91.0% for TAX and 86.4% for ATAX (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: While adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes, the administration of ATAX compared to TAX was associated with inferior 3-year OS and CSS in older women with node-negative TNBC. The use of adjuvant ATAX should be considered carefully in this patient population.

Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Treated Patients: Reconciling Adjudicated and Coded Outcomes.

Background: There is growing recognition of the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, particularly myocarditis, in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy; however, true event rates in real-world populations and in the background of CV disease remain uncertain. Objectives: The authors sought to determine CV event occurrence in ICI-treated patients and assess the accuracy of diagnosis by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code compared with adjudication using established definitions and full-source documentation review. Methods: Electronic medical record extraction identified potential CV events in ICI-treated patients in the University of Colorado Health system. Two cardiologists independently adjudicated events using standardized definitions. Agreement between ICD codes and adjudicated diagnoses was assessed using the kappa statistic. Results: The cohort comprised 1,813 ICI-treated patients with a mean follow-up of 4.6 ± 3.4 years (3.2 ± 3.2 years pre-ICI and 1.4 ± 1.4 years post-ICI). Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were the most common event, occurring in 11.4% of patients pre-ICI and 11.3% post-ICI therapy. Post-ICI therapy, the crude rates of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and stroke were 3.0%, 2.8%, and 1.6%, respectively. Six patients (0.3%) developed myocarditis post-ICI. Agreement between the ICD code and adjudication was greater for VTE (κ = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.79-0.85) and MI (κ = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66-0.82) and worse for myocarditis (κ = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.20-0.80) and heart failure (κ = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.40-0.54). Conclusions: ICD codes correlated well with adjudicated events for VTE and MI, but correlation was worse for heart failure and myocarditis. Adjudication with standardized definitions can enhance the understanding of the incidence of CV events related to ICI therapy.

Future Perspectives of Cardiovascular Biomarker Utilization in Cancer Survivors: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Improving cancer survival represents the most significant effect of precision medicine and personalized molecular and immunologic therapeutics. Cardiovascular health becomes henceforth a key determinant for the direction of overall outcomes after cancer. Comprehensive tissue diagnostic studies undoubtedly have been and continue to be at the core of the fight against cancer. Will a systemic approach integrating circulating blood-derived biomarkers, multimodality imaging technologies, strategic panomics, and real-time streams of digitized physiological data overcome the elusive cardiovascular tissue diagnosis in cardio-oncology? How can such a systemic approach be personalized for application in day-to-day clinical work, with diverse patient populations, cancer diagnoses, and therapies? To address such questions, this scientific statement approaches a broad definition of the biomarker concept. It summarizes the current literature on the utilization of a multitude of established cardiovascular biomarkers at the intersection with cancer. It identifies limitations and gaps of knowledge in the application of biomarkers to stratify the cardiovascular risk before cancer treatment, monitor cardiovascular health during cancer therapy, and detect latent cardiovascular damage in cancer survivors. Last, it highlights areas in biomarker discovery, validation, and clinical application for concerted efforts from funding agencies, scientists, and clinicians at the cardio-oncology nexus.

Mechanisms and Insights for the Development of Heart Failure Associated with Cancer Therapy.

Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognized late effect among childhood cancer survivors. With various pediatric cancers becoming increasingly curable, it is imperative to understand the disease burdens that survivors may face in the future. In order to prevent or mitigate cardiovascular complications, we must first understand the mechanistic underpinnings. This review will examine the underlying mechanisms of cardiotoxicity that arise from traditional antineoplastic chemotherapies, radiation therapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as well as newer cellular therapies and targeted cancer therapies. We will then propose areas for prevention, primarily drawing from the anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity literature. Finally, we will explore the role of human induced pluripotent stem cell cardiomyocytes and genetics in advancing the field of cardio-oncology.

Assessment of Oncology Provider Knowledge and Cardiovascular Screening Practices: A Call for Heightened Screening.

Cardiac risk factors are known to compound the development of cardiotoxicities (CTx) in patients exposed to anthracycline (ANT) chemotherapy agents. National oncology and cardiology organizations have published recommendations for cardiovascular risk stratification and screening cancer patients following exposure to ANTs. The frequency with which oncology providers are integrating these principles into practice is unknown. This knowledge-based quality improvement (QI) project was designed to heighten oncology provider competencies such that screening frequency of cancer patients for CTx in the post-ANT setting aligns more closely with national guidelines for care. A web-based educational intervention, cardiac screening tool, and evidence-based literature were shared with 20 oncology providers over the course of 5 months. Retrospective chart reviews and pre- and post-project surveys were performed to assess competencies and practice trends. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed to illustrate whether the interventions improved knowledge and changed practice. Findings revealed an increase in the number of provider-perceived percentage of high cardiac risk patients and the number of patients screened, knowledge did not improve, and the frequency by which oncology providers ordered echocardiograms increased minimally. Factors such as organizational system changes, time constraints, and change fatigue limited effective and consistent implementation of the project interventions. The trajectory of cancer survivorship is affected by cardiovascular disease. Cardiac screening of cancer patients is a critical component of cancer care that has the potential to positively impact economic and health outcomes of this susceptible population.

Practical cardiovascular imaging approach to diagnose immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis.

Immuno-oncology employs various therapeutic strategies that harness a patient's own immune system to fight disease and has been a promising new strategy for cancer therapy over the last decade. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are monoclonal antibodies, that increase antitumor immunity by blocking intrinsic down-regulators of immunity, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Seven ICIs are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration and have increased the overall survival for patients with various cancer subtypes. These are used either as single agents or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors, small molecular kinase inhibitors or cytotoxic chemotherapies. There are also many other immune modifying agents including other checkpoint inhibitor antibodies that are under investigation in clinical trials.

Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey.

BACKGROUND: Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers' opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners. METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies. CONCLUSIONS: These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.