Validation and comparison of the stroke prognosis instrument (SPI-II) and the essen stroke risk score (ESRS) in predicting stroke recurrence in Asian population.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are limited data on the accuracy of available risk scores to predict stroke recurrence in the Asian population. METHOD: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients with acute ischemic stroke during January 2014 - December 2018. Longitudinal data with three years of follow-up among these patients were collected and validated through both electronic and manual chart review. The area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) method or C-statistic and calibration plot were used to evaluate and compare the Stroke Prognosis Instrument II (SPI-II) and the Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) in predicting the long-term risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. The predictive performances of the two scores were compared using DeLong's method. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 543 patients, including 181 and 362 patients with and without recurrent events. There were no significant differences in mean age and gender between the two groups. Recurrence cases tended to have significant more risk factors compared to those without events. Among cases with recurrent events, 134 (74.03%) and 65.74% (119) cases were classified as high-risk based on SPI-II and ESRS, respectively. The AUROC curve of the SPI-II and ESRS score was 0.646 (95% CI, 0.594-0.697) and 0.614 (95%CI, 0.563-0.665), respectively (p = 0.394). Based on the calibration plot, the SPI-II and ESRS scores showed similar moderate predictive performance on recurrence stroke with a C statistic (95% CI) of 0.655 (95% CI: 0.603-0.707) and 0.631 (95% CI 0.579-0.684), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both ESRS and SPI-II scores had moderate predictive performance in Thai population.

Prescriber compliance to direct oral anticoagulant labels and impact on outcomes in Thailand.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the prescriber compliance to the approved labels of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and impact of appropriateness of dosing on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using simple-stratified random sampling of adult patients receiving ≥6 months of DOACs for various indications during 2013-2017 in 10 tertiary care hospitals. Patients were classified into 3 dosing groups including approved dose, underdosing and overdosing based on the Thai Food and Drug Administration-approved labels. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the impact of different dosings on thromboembolic and bleeding events. RESULTS: From 1200 patients included in the data analysis, prescribing of DOACs was consistent with the approved indications in 1130 cases (94.2%) while 70 patients (5.8%) received DOACs despite having contraindications or with off-label usage. Among 1026 cases of dosing evaluation cohort, 688 patients (67.1%) received approved doses. There were 227 (21.9%) and 110 (10.7%) cases of underdosing and overdosing, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that underdosing was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism 3.023 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.291-7.080; P = .011) while overdosing was associated with an increased risk of bleeding requiring hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.045; 95% CI, 1.501-6.178; P = .002) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or more (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.196; 95% CI, 1.083-4.452; P = .029). CONCLUSION: Prescribers' compliance to approved indications were high. However, 1/3 of DOAC prescriptions were inconsistent with approved dosing. Dosing deviation was associated with an increase in adverse clinical outcomes.

Quality assessment and cost saving of renal dosing recommendation by clinical pharmacists at medical wards in Thailand.

Background Renal dosage adjustment for patients with reduced kidney function is a common function of clinical pharmacy service. Assessment of pharmacist's intervention in the aspect of quality and economic impact should be conducted to evaluate the benefit of this service. Objective This study aimed to assess the quality and cost saving of clinical pharmacists' recommendation on renal dosage adjustment among patients with reduced kidney function. Setting Eight medical wards of the Siriraj Hospital, a tertiary-care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Method A retrospective study was conducted using medical records and clinical pharmacist's intervention database. All patients admitted to the study wards whose estimated creatinine clearance were less than 60 mL/min or presented with acute kidney injury on admission during October 2016-December 2017 were included. The targeted medications were antimicrobial agents. Main outcome measure Percentage of the concordance between pharmacists' recommendation compared to standard dosing references and related cost saving. Results Among 158 patients, pharmacists provided 190 recommendations, including 151 (79.1%) dose reduction, 17 (8.9%) dose increase and 22 (11.5%) recommendations to provide supplemental dose after dialysis. These recommendations were 90.5% consistent with standard references. Physician accepted and complied with 89.5% of pharmacists' recommendations. Average direct cost saving was €5,114.11 while cost avoidance was €863.47. Conclusion Trained clinical pharmacists were able to provide high-quality recommendation on dosage adjustment in these patients in accordance to standard dosing guidelines. In addition, dosage adjustment also led to a significant direct cost saving and cost avoidance from prevention of adverse drug reactions.

Characteristic of drug-related problems and pharmacists' interventions in a stroke unit in Thailand.

Background Little information is available regarding pharmacist's intervention to solve drug-related problems (DRPs) in a stroke unit. Objective To investigate the nature and frequency of DRPs along with the role of pharmacists in a stroke unit. Setting The study was conducted at the stroke unit of Siriraj hospital, a university affiliated tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Method A retrospective descriptive study of DRPs and pharmacists' interventions for stroke patients was performed during July 2015 to December 2016. Data were collected from patient's medical records and pharmacist's intervention record forms. DRPs were categorized using the Hepler-Strand classification. The stroke pharmacist team, consisting of a board-certified pharmacotherapy specialist, neurology pharmacy residents and stroke unit pharmacists, participated in the multidisciplinary ward round in the stroke unit 5 days a week. All patients were visited by a member of the stroke pharmacist team within the first two days of their admission to conduct a thorough review of drug therapy for every patient and provided appropriate recommendation to the multidisciplinary team either verbally during the ward round or with written information in the patients' medical charts, as appropriate. Main Outcome Measure (a) incidence and characteristics of DRPs (b) types and the acceptance of pharmacists' interventions. Results A total of 859 patients were admitted, of those, 768 patients had ≥ 1 DRPs and a total of 796 DRPs were identified. Clinical pharmacists provided 659 interventions to the multidisciplinary team. The most common DRPs identified were "untreated indications" (22.6%) and "non-compliance" (21.0%). Of all DRPs, 74.6% were stroke related issues. The most implicated drugs were antihypertensive drugs, followed by antithrombotic therapies. The multidisciplinary team accepted 84.7% of pharmacists' interventions. Conclusion DRP in a stroke unit is common. Clinical pharmacists in a stroke unit can effectively reduce and prevent DRPs with the focus on performing medication reconciliation, providing recommendation on dosage adjustment and proper drug selection for stroke patients.

Comparative efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy with fibrinolytic agents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinolytic therapy offers an alternative to mechanical reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in settings where health-care resources are scarce. Comprehensive evidence comparing different agents is still unavailable. In this study, we examined the effects of various fibrinolytic drugs on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We did a network meta-analysis based on a systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing fibrinolytic drugs in patients with STEMI. Several databases were searched from inception up to Feb 28, 2017. We included only randomised controlled trials that compared fibrinolytic agents as a reperfusion therapy in adult patients with STEMI, whether given alone or in combination with adjunctive antithrombotic therapy, against other fibrinolytic agents, a placebo, or no treatment. Only trials investigating agents with an approved indication of reperfusion therapy in STEMI (streptokinase, tenecteplase, alteplase, and reteplase) were included. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality within 30-35 days and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042131). FINDINGS: A total of 40 eligible studies involving 128 071 patients treated with 12 different fibrinolytic regimens were assessed. Compared with accelerated infusion of alteplase with parenteral anticoagulants as background therapy, streptokinase and non-accelerated infusion of alteplase were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1·14 [95% CI 1·05-1·24] for streptokinase plus parenteral anticoagulants; RR 1·26 [1·10-1·45] for non-accelerated alteplase plus parenteral anticoagulants). No significant difference in mortality risk was recorded between accelerated infusion of alteplase, tenecteplase, and reteplase with parenteral anticoagulants as background therapy. For major bleeding, a tenecteplase-based regimen tended to be associated with lower risk of bleeding compared with other regimens (RR 0·79 [95% CI 0·63-1·00]). The addition of glycoprotein IIb or IIIa inhibitors to fibrinolytic therapy increased the risk of major bleeding by 1·27-8·82-times compared with accelerated infusion alteplase plus parenteral anticoagulants (RR 1·47 [95% CI 1·10-1·98] for tenecteplase plus parenteral anticoagulants plus glycoprotein inhibitors; RR 1·88 [1·24-2·86] for reteplase plus parenteral anticoagulants plus glycoprotein inhibitors). INTERPRETATION: Significant differences exist among various fibrinolytic regimens as reperfusion therapy in STEMI and alteplase (accelerated infusion), tenecteplase, and reteplase should be considered over streptokinase and non-accelerated infusion of alteplase. The addition of glycoprotein IIb or IIIa inhibitors to fibrinolytic therapy should be discouraged. FUNDING: None.