Digital consults to optimize guideline-directed therapy: design of a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Many heart failure (HF) patients do not receive optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) despite clear benefit on morbidity and mortality outcomes. Digital consults (DCs) have the potential to improve efficiency on GDMT optimization to serve the growing HF population. The investigator-initiated ADMINISTER trial was designed as a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled open-label trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of DC in patients on HF treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 150) diagnosed with HF with a reduced ejection fraction will be randomized to DC or standard care (1:1). The intervention group receives multifaceted DCs including (i) digital data sharing (e.g. exchange of pharmacotherapy use and home-measured vital signs), (ii) patient education via an e-learning, and (iii) digital guideline recommendations to treating clinicians. The consults are performed remotely unless there is an indication to perform the consult physically. The primary outcome is the GDMT prescription rate score, and secondary outcomes include time till full GDMT optimization, patient and clinician satisfaction, time spent on healthcare, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Results will be reported in accordance to the CONSORT statement. CONCLUSIONS: The ADMINISTER trial will offer the first randomized controlled data on GDMT prescription rates, time till full GDMT optimization, time spent on healthcare, quality of life, and patient and clinician satisfaction of the multifaceted patient- and clinician-targeted DC for GDMT optimization.

Advantages of mobile health in the management of adult patients with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) often suffer from deterioration related to cardiac arrhythmias, hypertension (HT) or heart failure (HF), frequently occurring between planned visits. Mobile health (mHealth) could improve management through remote monitoring by enabling swift therapeutic response and detecting new diagnoses. METHODS: We performed a prospective study employing mHealth in ACHD patients, weekly monitoring heart rhythm, weight and blood pressure. In case of consecutive threshold exceeding measurements or in case of new diagnosis, patients were contacted and if needed the treating physician was consulted. Inclusion criteria were: palpitations within the last three years (with or without arrhythmia diagnosis) or HF NYHA class ≥ II. We evaluated the detection of recurrences and new diagnosis of arrhythmias, HT and HF, adherence and patient experience (Net Promotor Score (NPS)). RESULTS: In total, 109 of the 268 invited ACHD patients were enrolled, 80 with palpitations, 13 with HF, 16 experienced both, mean age 45 (±13) years, 33% male. Median follow-up was 12 (Q1-Q3;9-14) months, 91 patients initiated all measurements (heart rhythm, weight and blood pressure). In 25% of the patients with diagnosed arrhythmias (14/56) recurrences of arrhythmias were detected; 13% of the patients with undiagnosed palpitations (4/32) were diagnosed with novel arrhythmias. In 38% of the patients with HT at baseline (6/16), treatment adjustment was necessary, 4% of the patients without HT (4/76) received novel HT diagnosis. Diuretics were adjusted in 7% of the patients with HF (2/29). Adherence was > 70% in 77% of the patients that started weekly measurements (70/91). Patients that were female, older of age and experienced palpitations at inclusion were more likely to acquire an adherence of > 70%. NPS was completed by 68 patients, 57 patients (84%) were promotors or neutral, and 11 patients (16%) were critics. CONCLUSIONS: mHealth offers advantages in the management of selected ACHD patients; it enabled early detection of recurrences and new diagnosis of arrhythmias, hypertension and heart failure, which lead to swift therapeutic response or remote reassurance. Furthermore, mHealth was well accepted with high adherence and positive patient experience.

A successful crowdfunding project for eHealth research on grown-up congenital heart disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data on crowdfunding report a maximal funding of €10.000,-, and state that research is needed to attract attention of larger granting organizations. The aims of this project were 1) to fund an eHealth study in grown-up congenital heart disease (GUCH) patients 2) to contemplate on critical success factors. METHODS: After peer review of the Dutch Heart Foundation a project was published at a donation platform, which was open for donations during a predetermined period of two months. Copywriters were hired to create an easy-to-understand message to donors. A video teaser was created with a motivated patient, and rewards were available. The crowdfunding targeted €25.000 and the Dutch Heart Foundation doubled the donations to €50.000, and return of donations were guaranteed in case this was not met. RESULTS: Initially, donations came from the investigators' private inner circle. In total, 44 potential donors were contacted, but refused to donate originally. Multiple (social) media campaigns were published to promote the project, and an offline mailing was sent to contributors to the Dutch Heart Foundation. During the project support emerged, resulting in extra donations and public awareness. In the lasts three weeks, after sufficient private donations, five major donors decided to support the project. The project became a big success: the predetermined target was exceeded and a total of €74.450,- was raised. CONCLUSION: Innovative crowdfunding gave the opportunity to start eHealth research in GUCH patients. Critical success factors include support of a professional organization, support of stakeholders, and easy-to-understand messages.