Peg-interferon plus nucleotide analogue treatment versus no treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load: a randomised controlled, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Antiviral treatment is currently not recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load. However, they might benefit from acquiring a functional cure (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] loss with or without formation of antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs]). We assessed HBsAg loss during peg-interferon-alfa-2a (peg-IFN) and nucleotide analogue combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load. METHODS: In this randomised controlled, open-label trial, patients were enrolled from the Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands. Eligible patients were HBsAg positive and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative for more than 6 months, could be treatment naive or treatment experienced, and had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations less than 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by a computerised randomisation programme (ALEA Randomisation Service) to receive peg-IFN 180 µg/week plus adefovir 10 mg/day, peg-IFN 180 µg/week plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 245 mg/day, or no treatment for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with serum HBsAg loss among those who received at least one dose of study drug or had at least one study visit (modified intention-to-treat population [mITT]). All patients have finished the initial study of 72 weeks and will be observed for up to 5 years of follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00973219. FINDINGS: Between Aug 4, 2009, and Oct 17, 2013, 167 patients were screened for enrolment, of whom 151 were randomly assigned (52 to peg-IFN plus adefovir, 51 to peg-IFN plus tenofovir, and 48 to no treatment). 46 participants in the peg-IFN plus adefovir group, 45 in the peg-IFN plus tenofovir group, and 43 in the no treatment group began treatment or observation and were included in the mITT population. At week 72, two (4%) patients in the peg-IFN plus adefovir group and two (4%) patients in the peg-IFN plus tenofovir group had achieved HBsAg loss, compared with none of the patients in the no treatment group (p=0·377). The most frequent adverse events (>30%) were fatigue, headache, fever, and myalgia, which were attributed to peg-IFN dosing. Two (4%) serious adverse events were reported in the peg-IFN plus adefovir group (admission to hospital for alcohol-related pancreatitis [week 6; n=1] and pregnancy, which was electively aborted [week 9; n=1]), three (7%) in the peg-IFN plus tenofovir group (admission to hospital after a suicide attempt during a severe depression [week 23; n=1], admission to hospital for abdominal pain [week 2; n=1], and an elective laminectomy [week 40; n=1]), and three (7%) in the no treatment group (admission to hospital for septic arthritis [week 72; n=1], endocarditis [week 5; n=1], and hyperthyroidism [week 20; n=1]). INTERPRETATION: In patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load, combination treatment (peg-IFN plus adefovir and peg-IFN plus tenofovir) did not result in significant HBsAg loss compared with no treatment, which does not support the use of combination treatment in this population of patients. FUNDING: Roche, Fonds NutsOhra.

Evaluation of a hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen assay for routine HCV screening among men who have sex with men infected with HIV.

BACKGROUND: For detection of early HCV infection and reinfection, commercial HCV-RNA tests are available. However, these tests are relatively time-consuming and expensive. A commercially available test that may supplement current screening methods, targets the HCV core protein. METHODS: During five waves of anonymous surveys at the Amsterdam STI clinic between 2009-2012, all HIV-infected MSM (N=439) were tested for HCV-antibodies (AxSYM HCV 3.0, Abbott), and HCV-RNA (TMA Versant, Siemens). To evaluate the potential value of the ARCHITECT HCV antigen (HCV-Ag) assay (Abbott), all HCV-RNA-positive sera (N=31) were tested with this assay, as well as two HIV-infected HCV-RNA-negative controls. In addition, all included samples were tested for alanine aminotransferase (ALT). RESULTS: Among 439 HIV-infected MSM, 31 (7.1%) tested positive for HCV-RNA; the HCV-Ag assay showed concordant positive results for 31/31 (100%). A substantial number of MSM, i.e., 5/31 (16.1%), had detectable HCV-RNA but were HCV-seronegative at the time of screening and were presumed to have been recently infected. Concordant HCV-RNA-negative results were obtained in 57/60 control-samples. Specificity was 95.0% (95% CI: 86.1-99.0). The detection limit was between 3.0 and 3.7 Log10 IU/mL, irrespective of HCV genotype/subtype. ALT concentrations were elevated (i.e.,>40 U/L) in 9/31 (29.0%) HCV-RNA positive MSM, including 1/5 (20.0%) MSM with recent HCV-infection. CONCLUSIONS: The HCV-Ag assay proved a valuable screening tool for detection of active HCV infection among HIV-infected MSM with and without anti-HCV. Adding ALT to current screening methods would improve case finding marginally. We therefore recommend implementation of routine HCV-Ag screening for populations at risk for HCV-(re)infection.

Identifying recently acquired HIV infections among newly diagnosed men who have sex with men attending STI clinics in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: The current surveillance system in The Netherlands cannot differentiate recent HIV infections from established infections, which is crucial for estimating the HIV incidence; this information is needed for assessing trends of the HIV epidemic and the impact of prevention interventions. We determined the proportion of recent HIV infections (RI) and estimated HIV incidence using a recent infection testing algorithm (RITA) among men who have sex with men (MSM) newly diagnosed as having HIV attending sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. METHODS: Plasma samples collected between 2009 and 2011 were tested for RI with the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo immunoassay. Data on viral load, CD4 count and previous HIV testing were incorporated into the RITA. HIV incidence and 95% CIs were estimated. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with RI. RESULTS: Of the 251 samples tested for RI, 78/251 (31%) infections were determined as recent by the RITA. No significant change over time was observed. The estimated HIV incidence in this high-risk MSM population was 3.3 per 100 person-years (95% CI 2.5 to 4.1). The only factor associated with RI in the multivariable model was being tested for HIV ≥ 3 times in the past (aOR=7.4; 95% CI 2.0 to 27.8). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of RIs was comparable to studies in similar settings in Europe. Implementation of the RITA for routine surveillance in The Netherlands to assess trends in RIs over time, to study the infections in other groups and to inform public health actions, is being planned.

Baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as predictor of sustained HBsAg loss in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon-α2a and adefovir.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to identify baseline predictors of response in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with a combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α2a and adefovir. METHODS: We treated 92 chronic hepatitis B patients (44 hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and 48 HBeAg-negative) with HBV DNA > 100,000 copies/ml (> 17,182 IU/ml) with PEG-IFN and adefovir for 48 weeks and followed them up for 2 years. Baseline markers for HBeAg loss, combined response (HBeAg negativity, HBV DNA levels ≤ 2,000 IU/ml and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] normalization) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss were evaluated. RESULTS: Two years after the end of treatment, rates of HBeAg loss and HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive patients were 18/44 (41%) and 5/44 (11%), respectively. In HBeAg-negative patients, rates of combined response and HBsAg loss were 12/48 (25%) and 8/48 (17%), respectively. HBeAg-negative patients with HBsAg loss had lower baseline HBsAg levels than those without HBsAg loss (mean HBsAg 2.35 versus 3.55 log10 IU/ml; P < 0.001). They also had lower HBV DNA levels and were more often (PEG-)IFN experienced. Baseline HBsAg was the only independent predictor of HBsAg loss (OR 0.02; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With combination therapy of PEG-IFN and adefovir for 48 weeks, a high rate of HBsAg loss was observed in both HBeAg-positive (11%) and HBeAg-negative (17%) patients 2 years after treatment ended. In HBeAg-negative patients, a low baseline HBsAg level was a strong predictor for HBsAg loss.