Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 19(8): 757-763, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493378

RESUMO

Blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension is poor. It is unclear how effectively general practitioners assess and treat such patients. T2Target included hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had undergone ambulatory blood pressure monitoring within the past 3 months. Recordings were analyzed by the general practitioner and an independent center and the conclusions were compared. Nighttime hypertension was reported less frequently by the general practitioner in comparison with central assessment (43.9% vs 77.9%, P<.001), as were masked (4.0% vs 13.1%, P<.001) and isolated office (4.4% vs 8.8%, P<.001) hypertension. A total of 13.9% of patients were deemed to have controlled blood pressure (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring). For the 784 patients with uncontrolled blood pressure, 40.7% underwent no change to their antihypertensive treatment. Cardiovascular risk was underestimated, with 11.1% deemed to be at very high risk, in contrast to the 97.0% of patients by central assessment. In conclusion, blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is poor and not accurately assessed by office-based general practitioners, despite the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA