Impact of a Patient Support Program on time to discontinuation of adalimumab in Australian adult patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-an observational study.

This observational study evaluated the impact of a sponsor company-provided Patient Support Program (PSP) on discontinuation of adalimumab in adult Australian patients eligible for Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS)-reimbursed adalimumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Crohn's Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC), or Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS). Patients initiating adalimumab between May 2018 and September 2019 were enrolled into two prospective cohorts based on their decision to opt for or decline the PSP (PSP or non-PSP cohorts). In addition, a historical, retrospective Non-PSP cohort was established from the Services Australia 10% PBS dataset by extracting data of patients initiating adalimumab prior to the introduction of adalimumab PSPs and based on adalimumab PBS listing dates (AS: April 2007 to March 2009; PsA/RA: January 2007 to December 2008; CD: January 2009 to December 2010; HS and UC indications not included). Follow-up for all cohorts was 12 months. The primary endpoint was the time to discontinuation, compared between the prospective PSP cohort and the prospective or retrospective Non-PSP cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the cohorts. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated no difference in time to discontinuation between the prospective PSP (n = 162) and non-PSP (n = 65) cohorts (HR [95% CI] = 1.256 [0.616-2.563], p = 0.5304). The 12-month adalimumab persistence rates (95% CI) were 78% (69%, 84%) and 82% (67%, 90%), respectively. In contrast, discontinuation was less likely in the prospective PSP (n = 151) compared with the retrospective non-PSP (n = 297) cohort (HR [95% CI] = 0.44 [0.28-0.68], p<0.001). The 12-month persistence rates (95% CI) were 81% (76%, 90%) and 61% (56%, 67%), respectively. Overall, this study suggests that optimal adalimumab persistence can be achieved with either a structured PSP or healthcare support from other sources, but this was not the case more than a decade ago.

Comparative adherence of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan in Australian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective real-world database study.

AIM: Bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan are endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), currently available in Australia for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study assessed the comparative adherence of these ERAs for PAH in Australian patients. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study used data for adults with PAH from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (01/2006-10/2020). The primary outcome was treatment adherence (i.e. receiving ≥80% of ERA doses over 12 months). Secondary outcomes were time to treatment change (add-on or switch) and overall survival. RESULTS: The study included 436 patients who took bosentan (n = 200), ambrisentan (n = 69), or macitentan (n = 167). Treatment adherence was significantly greater in patients who received macitentan (65.3%) versus ambrisentan (56.5%) and bosentan (58.0%), with odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI) of 0.51 (0.30-0.88; p = 0.016) for bosentan versus macitentan and 0.48 (0.24-0.96; p = 0.037) for ambrisentan versus macitentan. The median time to treatment change was 47.2 and 43.4 months for bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively (not calculated for macitentan because of insufficient duration of data). LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data for Australian patients with PAH showed that treatment adherence for ERAs was suboptimal. Adherence was higher for macitentan compared with ambrisentan and bosentan.

Comparative Treatment Persistence and Adherence to Endothelin Receptor Antagonists Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Japan: A Real-World Administrative Claims Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world data on the comparative effectiveness of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs; macitentan, bosentan, ambrisentan) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), particularly in Asian countries, are scarce. We evaluated the persistence of these ERAs before and after macitentan approval in Japan (2015). METHODS: We used real-world data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision administrative claims database between April 2008 and November 2020. Patients with PAH were identified from the dataset. Persistence to ERA treatment before and after approval of macitentan in Japan was defined as the time between start of the index ERA and treatment discontinuation or death. Propensity score adjustment was applied to minimize confounding effects among treatment groups. RESULTS: In the pre-macitentan approval cohort, 153 and 51 patients received bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively. In the post-macitentan approval cohort, 331, 284, and 91 patients received macitentan, bosentan, and ambrisentan, respectively. Unadjusted median persistence for ambrisentan- and bosentan-treated patients was 19 and 10 months, respectively (adjusted HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.61-1.24]; P = 0.434 [bosentan as reference]). In the post-macitentan approval cohort, unadjusted median persistence was 18 months for macitentan-treated patients versus 6 and 8 months for ambrisentan- and bosentan-treated patients, respectively. Adjusted HRs for ambrisentan and bosentan were 1.48 (95% CI 1.12-1.95; P = 0.006) and 1.63 (95% CI 1.30-2.04; P < 0.001 [macitentan as reference]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data for Japanese patients with PAH showed that persistence was significantly higher for macitentan, versus ambrisentan and bosentan, since its approval.

Prevalence, patient characteristics and treatment patterns among SLE-PAH patients in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective analysis of Medical Data Vision Database in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Real-world evidence regarding prevalence, patient characteristics and treatment patterns for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Japan is limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study analysing Japan's Medical Data Vision (MDV) database from April-2008 to September-2020. Prevalence, incidence, patient characteristics, treatment patterns and use of vasodilators by treatment line were evaluated. RESULTS: Prevalence of PAH was 0.392% in SLE patients (n=114/29,077). Cumulative incidence was 0.53% (3-years (y)) and 0.77% (5y). Of 114 SLE-PAH patients, 49% developed PAH <1 year from SLE diagnosis. SLE-PAH patients were more female (88% vs. 72%), had lower mean age at SLE diagnosis (53y vs. 56y) and more severe SLE (61% vs 25%), versus non-PAH SLE patients. Glucocorticoids (58%) and vasodilators (27%) were preferred first-line monotherapy for SLE-PAH. Glucocorticoids+immunosuppressants (19%) was predominant first-line combination therapy. Endothelin receptor antagonists (40% and 44%) and nitric oxide analogues (31% and 40%) were dominant first- and second-line vasodilators. CONCLUSION: SLE-PAH patients were more females, younger at diagnosis, had more severe SLE than non-PAH SLE patients. Most were diagnosed <1 year of SLE diagnosis. In Japan's real-world practice, initial treatment goal is SLE management, while vasodilators are preferred in advanced disease, as per MDV database.

Persistence with urate-lowering therapy in Australia: A longitudinal analysis of allopurinol prescriptions.

AIM: Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis in men. Despite the availability of effective urate-lowering therapies (ULT), the management of gout is suboptimal due to poor persistence with ULT. This study examined national prescribing patterns of ULT to determine persistence with allopurinol in Australia. METHODS: A 10% sample of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing claims database was used to identify individuals initiated on allopurinol between April 2014 and December 2019. The number of allopurinol scripts dispensed was used to estimate persistence with allopurinol. Persistence was defined as the number of months from initiation until discontinuation (last prescription with no further scripts acquired for a period thereafter). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine persistence, while Cox regression analysis was used to examine the influence of gender, concomitant colchicine and age. RESULTS: The largest drop in persistence occurred immediately after initiation, with 34% of patients discontinuing allopurinol 300-mg therapy in the first month. Median persistence with allopurinol 300 mg was 5 months (95% confidence interval 4.76-5.24), with around 63% of individuals not persisting with this therapy for more than 12 months. Concomitant prescription of colchicine on the day of allopurinol initiation only occurred in 7% of allopurinol initiations. No increase in persistence was observed for those co-prescribed colchicine. CONCLUSION: Persistence with allopurinol was poor. More effective methods targeting prescribers, patients and systems are required to promote persistence with allopurinol. Improving persistence to allopurinol is an important public health goal given the proven potential of this medication to eliminate gout.

Antidepressant prescribing patterns in Australia.

BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders (MDcpg2015 and MDcpg2020) provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for managing mood disorders. AIMS: We examined Australian real-world prescribing habits to determine whether management in clinical practice aligned with MDcpg2015 recommendations. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients ≥16 years old who had been dispensed a Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-listed antidepressant between July 2013 and June 2019 was conducted using Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services PBS 10% sample data. RESULTS: Between July 2013 and June 2019, 239 944 patients in Australia commenced antidepressant treatment. Of these, 22% (52 694 patients) received a second treatment (a new class of treatment after a period of discontinuation or additional antipsychotic therapy) and 6% (15 741 patients) received a third treatment. Patients were initially prescribed primarily selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; 52% of prescriptions) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; 25%), even though TCAs are not recommended for first-line treatment. Fewer than one-quarter of patients were prescribed serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (13%) or other agents (10%). General practitioners (GPs) were more likely to initiate TCAs than psychiatrists (22% v. 7%).Once initiated, the overall median time patients remained on treatment was 4.5 months; this was highest with SSRIs (5.8 months) and lowest with TCAs (0.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: First-line prescribing broadly follows guidelines. GP and psychiatrist prescribing patterns differ, perhaps reflecting different patient groups and the need to tailor treatment to individuals. Future guidelines should aim to capture the different presentations and complexity of depression.

Antipsychotic prescribing patterns in Australia: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: To examine real-world patterns of antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia Australia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample data. Included data were for patients aged 16-years or older who initiated treatment for the first time with a PBS-reimbursed antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia between July 2013 and September 2017. Patterns of treatment usage were summarised descriptively. Differences in prescribing patterns by age and prescribing year were reported. Treatment persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with differences explored using log-rank tests. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 6,740 patients, representing 8,249 non-unique patients, received prescriptions for antipsychotic medications. Patients were aged 16 years to over 85 years (54.5% were < 55 years) and two-thirds of patients were male (61%). The majority of treatment episodes (62%, n = 5,139/8,249) were prescribed an atypical oral antipsychotic. Typical long-acting antipsychotic therapies (LATs) were prescribed 19% of the treatment episodes (n = 1,608/8,249. There was a small increase in prescribing of atypical LAT and typical LAT and a small decrease in atypical oral and clozapine prescribing over the study period. Treatment persistence was greatest in patients treated with clozapine, than in those treated with atypical LATs. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of patients receive atypical antipsychotic medications, one in five continue to use older typical LAT therapies. Patient age and time on therapy may be associated with choice of therapy. Persistence to atypical LAT therapy is better than for other treatment modalities in this real-world cohort.

An Australian Real-World Study of Treatment Persistence of Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world treatment persistence to ustekinumab for Crohn's disease (CD) was studied using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. Demographic and treatment pattern characteristics were also investigated. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort analysis included PBS 10% sample data for ustekinumab from September 2017 to March 2020, and for other biologics from October 2007 to capture earlier line(s) of therapy. Included patients received ustekinumab for CD prescribed by a gastroenterologist. Treatment persistence overall and by prior biologic experience, mono- or combination therapy, sex and age were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of age, sex and line of therapy on persistence. RESULTS: Data were available for 301 patients. Of these, 58.8% were female and 76.7% were aged 26-65 years. Median follow-up from first ustekinumab dispense was 16 months. Median persistence to ustekinumab had not been reached. Twelve-month persistence to ustekinumab was 82.6% (95% CI 78.1-87.5%). Patients receiving ustekinumab as their first biologic therapy had 12-month persistence of 88.0% (80.8-95.9%) compared to 80.6% (75.0-86.6%) for patients who had previously received other biologic therapies (p=0.059). The adjusted analysis showed a trend to longer persistence for patients receiving ustekinumab as their first biologic therapy compared to biologic experienced patients (HR 1.86 (95% CI 0.95-3.63), p=0.070). Males had higher persistence to ustekinumab than females (HR 0.36 (0.20-0.66), p<0.001). Receiving ustekinumab as a monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine, mercaptopurine, 5ASAs, methotrexate, or corticosteroids had no effect on persistence (p=0.22). CONCLUSION: In an Australian real-world setting, persistence to ustekinumab was demonstrated to be over 80% at 12 months. Use as monotherapy or in combination with other therapy for CD did not affect persistence. Differences in treatment persistence by gender and previous biologic use warrant further investigation as further long-term data becomes available.