[The impact of restaging transurethral resection on recurrence and progression free survival in patients with T1 high grade bladder cancer]. / Résultats et impacts d'une résection de réévaluation dans le traitement des carcinomes urothéliaux de vessie pT1G3 : étude observationnelle.

INTRODUCTION: Restaging transurethral resection (re-TUR) of high grade T1 bladder cancer (HGT1-BC) is recommended but the impact in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) is discussed. The objective of this study was to evaluate our practice of re-TUR for these tumors and its impact on overall survival (OS), RFS and PFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2010 and 2020. The inclusion criteria was the presence of newly diagnosed HGT1-BC. Patients with incomplete resection, suspicion of infiltrating tumor, upper tract urothelial cancer, or metastatic disease were ineligible. Two groups were defined : Group 1 with re-TUR and Group 2 without re-TUR. RFS and PFS were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included, including 50 (64,1%) in group 1. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The mean time to re-TUR was 8 weeks and 60% residual tumor was found. Initial under-staging was found in 12% of cases. RFS and PFS were significantly better in Group 1 (P=0.0019; P=0,02). No significant were found between the groups in OS and specific survival (SS). CONCLUSION: Performing a re-TUR for high grade T1 bladder tumors allows detection of residual tumor and decreases the risk of under-evaluation. It is associated with a significant improvement in RFS and PFS with no impact on OS and SS.

[Botulinium toxin and idiopathic overactive bladder: Multicentric contempory management in Bourgogne]. / Toxine botulique et hyperactivité vésicale idiopathique : évaluation multicentrique des pratiques en Bourgogne.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2014, OnabotulinumtoxinA Botox® (Allergan, Inc., Irvine, USA) represents a new therapeutic option for second-line treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate practices of surgeons using onabotulinium toxin (BoNTA) in this indication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All urogynecology centers of the country were asked in order to list all patients who were treated since marketing autorisation. Patient symptoms, previous treatments, paraclinic evaluations, data of surgery and the characteristics of the follow up were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Six centers used BoNTA and five have accepted to participate. Ninety-seven patients have been identified. Sixty-eight first injections (70 %) were carried out with the strict frameworf of the marketing autorisation (urinary frequency, urinary urgency, urinary incontinence). All patients had at least two symptoms. In 69 %, Botulinum toxin was a second-line treatment after the failure of tibial neuromodulation or sacral neuromodulation. Urodynamic evaluation was carried out for 91 % of patients. The search for a post-void residual volume was observed for 59 % of patients during the follow up. CONCLUSION: In our country, BoNTA injections for idiopathic overactive bladder are mainly effected after tibial neuromodulation or sacral neuromodulation failure. Diagnostic, operating and outcome evaluation practices are still very heterogeneous pleading for a greater standardization of this new therapy in this indication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: A collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended as first-line treatment for cT1 stage kidney tumors because of a better renal function and probably a better overall survival than radical nephrectomy (RN). For larger tumors, PN has a controversial position due to lack of evidence showing good cancer control. The aim of this study was to compare the results of PN and RN in cT2a stage on overall survival and oncological results. METHOD: A retrospective international multicenter study was conducted in the frame of the French kidney cancer research network (UroCCR). We considered all patients aged≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stage cT2a (7.1-10cm) between 2000 and 2014. Cox and Fine-Gray models were performed to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and cancer-free survival (CFS). Comparison between PN and RN was realized after an adjustment by propensity score considering predefined confounding factors: age, sex, tumor size, pT stage of the TNM classification, histological type, ISUP grade, ASA score. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included. OS at 3 and 5 years was 93.6% and 78.7% after PN and 88.0% and 76.2% after RN, respectively. CSS at 3 and 5 years was 95.4% and 80.2% after PN and 91.0% and 85.0% after RN. No significant difference between groups was found after propensity score adjustment for OS (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.05, P=0.75), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18-1.54, P=0.24) and CFS (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.50-2.09, P=0.96). CONCLUSION: PN seems equivalent to RN for OS, CSS and CFS in cT2a stage kidney tumors. The risk of recurrence is probably more related to prognostic factors than the surgical technique. The decision to perform a PN should depend on technical feasibility rather than tumor size, both to imperative and elective situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Prevalence and diversity of management of prostate cancer patients classified as low risk using D'Amico group or Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score: A French multicenter study]. / Prévalence et diversité de la prise en charge des patients atteints de cancer de la prostate classés à faible risque selon la classification de d'Amico ou le score de CAPRA : étude française multicentrique.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, the French High Authority for Health does not recommend mass screening for prostate cancer (PCa), due to the risk of over-treatment, notably of low risk patients. Our study is intended to reflect the therapeutic attitudes for the management of patients classified as low risk of progression in French clinical centers. METHODS: For all positive prostate biopsies performed during 2012 and 2013 in five French departments of urology, clinicopathological characteristics required to calculate the d'Amico risk group and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score were filled. Information on the first treatment of "low risk" patients was collected. RESULTS: A total of 1035 patients were included, with a median age at diagnosis of 66 years old. According to d'Amico and CAPRA classifications, 30.4% and 35.0% of patients were at low, 34.5% and 33.2% at intermediate, 35.1% and 31.8% at high risk. The diagnosis severity increased with age (P<0.0001). The main treatment for low risk patients was radical prostatectomy (41.6% and 42.0% for d'Amico and CAPRA, respectively), but active surveillance was the most frequent treatment if diagnosed after 75 years old. The management of low risk patients varied significantly between centers (P<0.0001), according to the therapeutic platforms available within the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: In absence of strong progression predictor, the management of low risk PCa remains based on center habits and local therapeutic platforms. New predictive markers, such as multiparametric MRI or molecular tests, are needed to guide rational management of low risk PCa. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[High-risk prostate cancer surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy]. / Marges chirurgicales des cancers de prostate à haut risque en prostatectomie totale robot-assistée.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in high risk prostate cancer (HR). The rate of positive surgical margins (PSM) was compared between anticipated HR cancer according to D'Amico risk classification and discovered postoperative HR cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between 2006 and 2013 on patients who underwent RARP. Before surgery, patients were divided according to the D'Amico risk classification. After surgery, HR was defined as pT3a or pT3b, or Gleason score≥8 or positive lymph nodes. The rate of PSM was compared according to the D'Amico risk classification and postoperative HR. RESULTS: During the study, 485 patients were reviewed. Before surgery, 10 % of cancers were classified as D'Amico 3 (49/485). After surgery, 27.6 % (134/485) were classified as HR. There was a significant difference between the rate of PSM in HR/D'Amico 3 and HR/non D'Amico 3 cancer, respectively 22.9 % and 34.3 % (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The RARP is feasible in HR with an average of 30 % of PSM as in open surgery. However, the accurate assessment of preoperative HR will allow a more adapted dissection and a decrease of rate of PSM. So it is necessary to improve the detection of HR and so to select the most suitable cancer for surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

[Investigation and management of genito-urinary tuberculosis]. / Prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique de la tuberculose urogénitale.

Genito-urinary tuberculosis is the fourth most common manifestation of the disease, but it is often underestimated by clinicians because of few and non-specific symptoms and insidious disease course. The most common urinary findings are multiple ureteral stenosis. The most common genital involvement is an epididymal nodule for men and a chronic salpingitis for women. The definite diagnosis of genito-urinary tuberculosis is obtained on the basis of culture studies. Due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease, especially of genital location in woman, a probable or presumptive diagnosis is frequently considered with several parameters including radiological imaging (abdominal CT-scan, pelvic ultrasound, pelvic MRI). Endoscopic and surgical procedures are frequently required to obtain specimens for histopathologic and bacteriological studies. Medical treatment is the method of choice, with a combination of four drugs, namely isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide, followed by a two-drug regimen, for a total of six month duration. Surgery might be indicated in complicated genito-urinary tuberculosis (decreased renal function, infertility, urologic complaints).

Current role of transcatheter arterial embolization for bladder and prostate hemorrhage.

Intractable hematuria from the bladder or the prostate can be life-threatening and its management remains a difficult clinical problem. Severe bleeding can arise as a result of radiation cystitis, bladder carcinoma, cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis, severe infection, transurethral resection of the prostate and prostate cancer. When irrigation of the bladder through a three-way catheter and fulguration of the bleeding lesions fail to stop the hematuria, a life-threatening situation can develop, when blood transfusion fails to keep pace with the rate of blood loss. Patients with massive uncontrollable hematuria are often elderly and unfit for cystectomy as a treatment. Many urologists have had to manage this difficult problem, and several different treatments have been attempted and described, with varying degrees of success. Transcatheter arterial embolization of the vesical or prostatic arteries is occasionally indicated in these patients when all other measures have failed. There is limited published experience with this procedure, but success in 90% of patients is reported when the vesical or prostatic arteries can be identified. The aim of this review is to describe the current place of transcatheter arterial embolization in the management of severe bladder or prostate bleeding after failed conservative therapy, and to review its efficacy and morbidity.

[A majority of useless call of an on-call urology resident: a study of the AFUF]. / Une majorité d'appels évitables au cours des astreintes d'urologie en CHU : l'étude de l'AFUF.

GOAL: To assess the workload of an on-call urology resident at a French University Hospital. MATERIAL: A prospective study was performed during 15 days in February 2012. The data recorded in our database regarded the resident (sex, age, time to go to work), the call (emergency, type and reason) and the person who called (grade, department). RESULTS: Seven centres including 18 residents participated. On average five calls were received per day [0-17]. After midnight, the resident was called less than twice (1.6). There was an actual emergency in 64% of cases [0-13]. The urology-related call motives (73%) mainly consisted in acute urine retention (AUR) and catheter problems (73), renal colic (RC) (49), acute pyelonephritis (23), and hematuria (22). Residents had to go to the hospital in 55% of AUR and catheter problems, 30% of acute pyelonephritis, 17% of RC and 14% of hematuria. The emergency department (ED) called the urology resident in 39% of cases but only 18% required the presence of the resident. A call made by a senior was more likely to be an emergency (67%) than by a resident or a nurse (51%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: The urology resident when on-call is mainly asked for an advice by the ED. Among urology-related advice, bladder catheterization problems were the most frequent. RC was the second call motive but most of the time was not an actual emergency.

[Erectile function and sexuality of partners after radical prostatectomy with robotics versus manual laparoscopy: long-term assessment]. / Fonction érectile et sexualité des partenaires après prostatectomie totale robot-assistée versus laparoscopique manuelle : évaluation à long terme.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term sexual outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) vs robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the 412 patients treated by the same surgeon by LRP or RALP from March 2004 to July 2009. Ninety-six patients were evaluated preoperatively with a good erectile function before surgery and a follow-up more than 24 months. Erectile function was evaluated by the IIEF-5, the QLQ-C30 PR25 questionnaires. Partner's sexuality was evaluated with a FSFI's based questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no significant difference before surgery between two groups LRP and RALP. After surgery, the IIEF-5 without any treatment was better in RALP group than in LRP group (P=0.025). When a bilateral nerve sparing was performed, the IIEF-5 maximum was better in RALP group (P=0.002). For the partners, there was no difference between the two techniques and it appeared that communication about sexuality is the less altered, long time after a radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In case of bilateral nerve sparing prostatectomy, an experimented operator in laparoscopic surgery should have better long-term erectile function results with RALP than LRP. Partner's sexuality modifications need more prospective studies to know its influence on erectile rehabilitation.

[Does the urologist in formation have a burnout syndrome? Evaluation by Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)]. / Les urologues en formation ont-ils un syndrome d'épuisement professionnel ? Évaluation par le Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the burn-out syndrome in the population of urologists in training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A trans-sectional study was carried out among the French urologists in training association (AFUF) members. A questionnaire including the Maslach Burnout Inventory and questions on the age, gender, professional and familial status, working time and hobbies was emailed. RESULTS: The response rate was 65.5 %. Mean burn-out, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores were 15.57 ± 8.55 (low burn-out), 8.56 ± 5.52 (moderate burn-out) and 37.19 ± 6.21 (moderate burn-out), respectively. Forty-five (24 %) had a severe burn-out syndrome, 11 an emotional exhaustion and 41 a depersonalization. Urologists in couple had a significant lower emotional exhaustion level than single. Depersonalization and low personal accomplishment scores were related to the age and working time. Having at least one hobby prevented emotional exhaustion and improved personal accomplishment levels. Gender had no impact on burn-out syndrome. CONCLUSION: Quarter of French urologists in training had a burn-out syndrome. Factors preventing it were working time reduction, being in couple and having at least one hobby. burn-out syndrome severity decreased with age and senior status.

[Alert on the predictable accessibility of the fellowship of urology until 2013: a study of the AFUF]. / Alerte sur l'accessibilité prévisible du postinternat d'urologie jusqu'en 2013: une étude de l'AFUF.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accessibility of the fellowship for the residents of Urology expecting to accomplish their residentship between November 2010 and 2013. PATIENTS: Between November 2010 and January 2011, all the residents ongoing for the residentship of Urology in France were reached by an electronic mailing using the AFUF register. A questionnaire reported all the residents expecting to accomplish their residentship between November 2010 and 2013, and the number and the expected availability of fellow and specialist assistant posts during the same period. RESULTS: Our study counted 306 urologists on training (190 residents, 76 fellows, 30 assistants, 10 on other posts). On November 2010, 56 residents accomplished their residentship, while 68 and 79 residents expected to accomplish their residentship on November 2011 and 2012, respectively. One hundred and six posts validated the fellowship of Urology on November 2010 (76 fellows, 30 assistants), among 54 posts were available. Over the residents expecting to accomplish their residentship on November 2011 and 2012, 22 and 54 residents may not find a fellow post available. CONCLUSION: The number of residents expecting to accomplish the residentship of Urology between November 2010 and 2013 was increasing, showing a greater interest for this speciality and a lack of regulation for its accessibility. By reason of a discrepancy of fellow and specialist assistant posts, only 67.6 and 31.6% of the residents expecting to accomplish their residentship on November 2011 and 2012 may be able to find a post available.

[Does robotics improve laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in complex surgical cases?]. / Le robot améliore-t-il la prostatectomie totale laparoscopique dans les cas complexes?

UNLABELLED: The radical prostatectomy is the main treatment prostate cancer in young men. However in difficult cases, another therapeutic option is often suggested. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the quality of the anastomosis in complex surgical cases by comparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RLRP). MATERIAL: From March 2004 to August 2009, 397 patients underwent radical prostatectomy: 176 LRP and 221 RLRP consecutively by the same surgeon. Antecedents that might have complicated dissection were analyzed: prostatic volume over 80 cc, previous inguinal hernia repair with mesh, previous pelvic surgery, body mass index over 30 and previous trans-urethral resection of prostate. RESULTS: In a preoperative mode, there was no significant difference between the two groups. A multivariable analysis of the quality of the anastomosis turned to the advantage of the robot (OR=2.56 [95 %CI: 1.28-5.25]), specifically for difficult cases (Odd Ratio=7.736 [95 %CI: 2.689-22.254]). CONCLUSION: The use of the robot improved the quality of the anastomosis for patients that might have raised technical issues.

[Results of an investigation by questionnaire into interest in neuro-urology of urology residents]. / Résultat d'une enquête par questionnaire sur l'intérêt porté à la neuro-urologie par les urologues en formation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the interest borne towards neuro-urology within the community of the urology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January and May 2009, all urology residents received an anonymous questionnaire by e-mail estimating their interest for neuro-urology. The analyzed data were: epidemiologic data; participation in theoretical learning and training courses practices; interest and investment in the speciality; opinion on the current formation. The qualitative variables were compared by the chi-2 test. P values <0,05 were considered significant. RESULTS: The rate of answer was 45,3 %. The middle age was 28,7+/-2,3 years. Ninety-two (70,7 %) of the 130 urologist residents questioned wished to exert full-time or divided in a hospital structure. They were 40 % to have a multidisciplinary neuro-urology staff, and 80 % were in a service which dealt with suffering patients of neurological bladder. The percentage of urologist residents interested by neuro-urology was 69,2 %, and 61,5 % of them wished to practice this activity in their future exercise. This wish was significantly higher for those resulting from the ENC (p<0,05), for those wishing to exert at the hospital (p<0,01) and for those who practice urology at a level of expertise in neuro-urology (p<0,01). The theoretical and practical teaching of neuro-urology were considered as being insufficient for respectively 73,9 % and 64,2 % of the urologist residents. In contrast, the average note allotted to the neuro-urology module of the ECU was of 7,47 out of 10. CONCLUSION: Neuro-urology seems to be particularly attractive for the urologist residents, and many wished to integrate it in their future exercise. The motivation was more important for those who wished to carry out a career in hospital. Even if the quality of the teaching was very noted, their modalities were considered to be insufficient by most of them.

[Teaching and perception of urology by medical students at the end of the second cycle: an appraisal]. / Enseignement et perception de l'urologie à la fin du deuxième cycle des études médicales: état des lieux.

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine how the medical students from the second cycle perceived urology and what their learning methods were. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An e-questionnaire was sent to 1600 students in 16 teaching faculties during the last year of their second cycle. RESULTS: Overall, we obtained 590 answers (36.8%). In our population, 70.2% of the students were women. Of them, 24.1% had been already enrolled in an academic urology unit. Urology was defined as a medical, surgical and medico-surgical discipline by 3.7%, 37.8% and 58% of the students, respectively. Urology was considered as very important, important, not very important and not important at all by 5.1%, 54.4%, 37.5% and 2.4% of the students. The teaching methods used to learn urology were duplicated-notes for ENC preparation (45.3%), conferences for ENC (French national ranking exam) preparation (43.7%), courses of the national urology college (38.6%) and courses of the faculty (32%). The best mastered items were lithiasis disease (86.3%), voiding dysfunction (76.3%) and urological cancers (56.7%). On the contrary, only 34.7% and 28% considered their knowledge sufficient on the erectile dysfunctions and on renal transplantation. Lastly, 7.3% intended to become urologists. Having a work experience in a urology unit was significantly associated to the feeling of being prepared to become an intern (p<0.001) and to the project of becoming a urologist (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Urology was considered like an important discipline by half of the students at the end of the second cycle even though it is under-represented in the national teaching programme for ENC. A third of the students used courses from the faculty to learn urology and a quarter of them had a work experience in a urology unit during their second cycle.