A Scoping Review on Learning Health Networks Available in Pediatric Surgical Specialties.

BACKGROUND: Learning health networks (LHN) are consortia of institutions that collaborate and embrace the elements of the learning health system (LHS), including quality improvement, education, research, and stakeholder involvement. Their ultimate goal is rapid information dissemination in clinical care. Pediatric surgical specialties perform unique yet high-impact procedures that could benefit from LHN, thereby improving surgical outcomes and care through LHS approaches. Consequently, health system leaders should be aware of LHN and their importance in enhancing surgical care and improving outcomes. This scoping review aims to map and characterize the existing LHN applied in pediatric surgical specialties. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus up to June 2022, with an update search conducted in May 2023. Additionally, Google Scholar, ProQuest and inquiry from topic experts were used for cross-referencing relevant review articles to identify grey literature. This scoping review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA-scoping review extension. RESULTS: A total of 56 publications for 19 LHN were identified and included in this scoping review. Out of 19 identified LHN in pediatric surgical specialties, 18 were organized in North America. Eight of the networks are related to pediatric general surgery and another eight were related to pediatric transplantation. The 16 out of 19 LHN were initiated after 2001. To date, only eight of the LHNs generated reports of comparative improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: This scoping review provides an overview of the available LHNs in pediatric surgical specialties. Over the past decade, several pediatric surgical specialties have embraced the principles of learning health systems, forming inter-institutional collaborations that utilize information technology to generate big data on patient-level clinical information, engage in quality improvement cycles, adopt evidence-based practices, and actively involve patients and stakeholders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Utilization of individual components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves post-operative outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a blueprint for progressive adoption of ERAS.

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS] is an approach for standardization of perioperative care aimed at improving patient outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to determine if length of stay (LOS) differed by protocol type (ERAS vs. non-ERAS [N-ERAS]) in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patient characteristics were collected and compared between groups. Differences in LOS were assessed using regression adjusting for age, sex, BMI, pre-surgical Cobb angle, levels fused and year of surgery. RESULTS: Fifty nine ERAS patients were compared to 81 N-ERAS patients. Patients were comparable in their baseline characteristics. Median LOS was 3 days (IQR = 3-4) for the ERAS group, compared to 5 days (IQR = 4-5) for the N-ERAS group (p < 0.001). The ERAS group had a significantly lower adjusted rate of stay (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.62-0.92). The ERAS group had significantly lower average pain on post-operative days 0 (least-squares-mean [LSM] 2.66 vs. 4.41, p < 0.001), POD1 (LSM 3.12 vs. 4.48, p < 0.001) and POD5 (LSM 2.84 vs. 4.42, p = 0.035). The ERAS group had lower opioid consumption (p < 0.001). LOS was predicted by the number of protocol elements received; those receiving two (RR = 1.54 95% CI = 1.05-2.24), one (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.09-2.03) or none (RR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.21-2.13) had significantly longer rates of stay than those receiving all four. CONCLUSION: Adoption of modified ERAS-based protocol for patients undergoing PSF for AIS led to significant reduction in LOS, average pain scores, and opioid consumption.

A Comparison of Short Versus Long Course Intravenous Antibiotics When Treating Urinary Tract Infection in Infants <60 Days of Age.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common reason for hospitalization in infants younger than 60 days, and the optimal approach to intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy upon UTI diagnosis in this cohort is unknown. We determined whether there was an association between IV antibiotic therapy duration (long [>3 days] vs short [≤3 days]) and treatment failure via a retrospective review of infants with confirmed UTIs receiving IV antibiotics at a tertiary referral center. A total of 403 infants were included; 39% were treated with ampicillin and cefotaxime, and 34% with ampicillin and gentamycin or tobramycin. The median IV antibiotic duration was 5 (interquartile range: 3-10) days, and 5% of patients experienced treatment failure. The treatment failure rate was similar in both short- and long-course IV antibiotic groups (P > .05), and there was no significant association between treatment duration and failure. We conclude that treatment failure for infants hospitalized with UTI is uncommon and not associated with IV antibiotic duration.

Scrotal flap phalloplasty as temporary neophallus in infants and children with penile agenesis: Multi-institutional experience and long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Aphallia is a rare congenital disorder pertaining to genotypic males. Early surgical creation of a neophallus is recommended to reinforce the child's male gender-identity, favoring proper psychosexual development. Modern microsurgical techniques used to create a neophallus in adults are not recommended in children due to the invasiveness and complexity of the procedures, along with high complication rates. Scrotal flap phalloplasty is a simple and reproducible technique to create a temporary neophallus in prepubertal boys with aphallia. OBJECTIVE: We present a multi-institutional experience, ten years after the initial description of the scrotal flap phalloplasty (SFP) technique, in which a flap from the well-developed scrotum is used to build a temporary neophallus, without obvious scars in patients with aphallia. STUDY DESIGN: The records of surgical neophalloplasty for aphallia patients from 4 centers between 2011 and 2021 were reviewed. All patients had at least one year follow-up to assess for short and long-term complications. Age at initial operation, associated anomalies, and other related surgical procedures were analyzed. RESULTS: The post-operative aesthetic result in all patients was satisfactory and has been maintained in the long-term follow-up, with all patients presenting a cylindrical structure resembling an uncircumcised penis, without evidence of significant contraction or loss of length. (Summary Figure) DISCUSSION: Non-microsurgical neophalloplasty techniques in patients with penile agenesis are temporary procedures that help to establish the body image and preserve the psychosexual development of the patient with aphallia. These techniques do not involve tissue transplant from a distant region, and are simpler to perform, with less scarring at the donor sites. Due to significant donor scars and considerable morbidity and complexity associated with the definitive phalloplasty techniques, we created a simple, reproducible and straightforward procedure to serve as a temporary neophallus in young boys with aphallia. As affected patients usually have a well-formed scrotum with normal and orthotopic testicles, it is the ideal donor site for a temporary neo-phallus in childhood. Furthermore, other donor sites are preserved for a definitive phalloplasty. There are limitations to this study, as quality of life could not be assessed and psychological or gender-identity investigations have not been carried out. None of these children have reached puberty, and hence decision and outcomes of definitive neophallus reconstruction has not been considered to date. CONCLUSION: Scrotal flap phalloplasty is a minimally invasive, simple and reproducible technique used to create a temporary neophallus in boys with aphallia, while waiting for definitive reconstructive surgery after puberty.

Ultrasonographical features of perinatal testicular torsion: an assessment of interobserver variability among radiologists and pediatric urologists.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare interpretations of Doppler ultrasound (US) in newborns with confirmed perinatal testicular torsion (PTT) by an experienced faculty (staff) pediatric radiologist (SPR), pediatric radiology fellow (PRF), pediatric urology fellow (PUF) and staff pediatric urologist (SPU). METHODS: US images of 27 consecutive males with PTT between May 2000 and July 2020 were retrieved. The testicles were classified as affected or non-affected by PTT. We performed a blinded comparison of interpretation by four assessors (SPR, PRF, PUF, SPU), with respect to the US features of PTT. Paired inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen's Kappa (κ) and overall agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. RESULTS: Overall comparison using Fleiss' kappa found fair agreement for most features except testicular echogenicity and echogenic foci at interface for which there was poor agreement. Paired comparisons revealed better agreement between the SPR and PRF compared to the remaining two pairs, suggesting a need for the pediatric urologists (PUF and SPU) to acquaint themselves with testicular ultrasonography as this may have an impact on patient risk stratification and the quality of information given to parents. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the need for focused training program for pediatric urologists to attain similar agreement as the radiologists, suggesting a need for the pediatric urologists (PUF and SPU) to acquaint themselves with testicular ultrasonography as this may have an impact on patient risk stratification and the quality of information given to parents.

Recurrent UPJ obstruction following paediatric pyeloplasty is associated with an initial <2.5cm incision open surgical approach.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk factors that affect surgical outcomes for pediatric pyeloplasty, and whether this may be related to the choice of operative approach. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate clinicodemographic and operative characteristics of children undergoing dismemberment pyeloplasty by 2 senior pediatric urologists in our tertiary institution between Jan 2008 - Dec 2017. Outcomes included overall complications, re-stenosis, and revision pyeloplasty based on clinic-radiological parameters. Bivariate analysis with Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test followed by multivariate logistic regression with backward likelihood analysis determined an adjusted effect estimate of the identified significant indicators for inferior peri-operative outcomes related to management. RESULTS: A total of 185 (93 open, 92 Laparoscopic) cases with an average follow-up of 31.3±27.4 months were analyzed. Complications occurred in 21 (11.4%) patients. 12 (6.5%) experienced recurrent UPJ obstruction with 10 (5.4%) undergoing redo-pyeloplasty. Of these, 9 were performed open and 1 laparoscopically. Multivariate logistic regression identified open pyeloplasty as an independent predictor for overall complications (HR 3.29, 95%CI 1.14, 9.51), recurrent UPJ obstruction (HR 49.8, 95%CI 3.09, 803.2) and redo-pyeloplasty (HR 9.75, 95%CI 1.21, 78.6) compared to a laparoscopic approach. Missed crossing vessels were identified in seven redo-cases, which all were from prior open pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: An initial open approach was identified as an independent predictor of future complications due to a higher incidence missed crossing vessels at initial repair. Surgeons need to remain especially mindful of this phenomenon when working in a confined open field.

A Canadian national survey: Perspectives on routine pathological examination of hernia sacs after inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair among pediatric urologists, surgeons, and pathologists.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand perspectives on routine pathological examination of hernia sacs following pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair among Canadian pediatric urologists, surgeons, and pathologists. STUDY DESIGN: All active members of Pediatric Urologists of Canada (PUC), Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (CAPS), and the divisional heads of anatomical pathology at the Canadian children's hospitals (AP) were invited to participate between June 2019 and January 2021 in an anonymous multiple-choice-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rates were 71% from PUC (24/34), 20% from CAPS (25/130), and 64% from AP (7/11). The majority of the surgeons (PUC:54%, CAPS:68%) did not routinely send hernia sacs for pathological examination after inguinal hernia repair. Most felt there was a little value in such examination (PUC:96%, CAPS:72%). Among those who submit hernia sacs, the majority did not receive reports that were clinically significant impacting patient management (PUC:82%, CAPS:50%). On the other hand, the pathologists had mixed opinion on the value of examining hernia sacs. Most of them only did gross examination (86%), unless requested by surgeons or concerning features were noted on gross examination. The majority have found clinically meaningful abnormal findings (71%), including vas deferens and portions of the spermatic cord. DISCUSSION: Currently, there are no evidence-based clinical guidelines on pathological assessment of hernia sacs after pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair. Instead of making it mandatory, future guidelines should highlight specimens that should be submitted for further investigations (e.g., challenging cases where inadvertent surgical injuries might have occurred). Future studies should also address whether patients who may be at higher risk of having clinically significant pathology can be identified pre- or perioperatively to more efficiently triage specimens that would benefit from pathological examination. Limitation of the study includes low response rate from the CAPS members during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: While most of the pediatric urologists and surgeons felt there is a little value of pathological examination of hernia sacs following inguinal hernia and hydrocele repair, half of the anatomical pathologists felt there is value. Future studies should aim to establish evidence-based clinical guidelines taking stakeholders perspectives into consideration.

Optimizing the surgical instrument tray to immediately increase efficiency and lower costs in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: Surgical trays are often poorly configured and can be ongoing sources of frustration and excess costs. We conducted an observational study to determine if the use of a customized mathematical inventory optimization model would result in a greater reduction in the number of instruments on a surgical tray than a clinician review of the tray. METHODS: Utilization of instruments on the major orthopedic tray at a large academic hospital was documented over 80 procedures. Processes in the medical device reprocessing department and operating room were observed to comprehensively quantify all associated costs. Results of the observations were applied to a customized mathematical model to determine the ideal tray configuration. For comparison, a clinician review was also performed. RESULTS: The mathematical model alone produced an ideal tray size of 47 instruments, a reduction of 41 instruments from the original size of 88 instruments (47% reduction). This represented $34 440 in annual savings. In contrast, the clinician review alone suggested an ideal tray size of 67 instruments (23% reduction), representing $17 640 in annual savings. When clinicians were provided with the additional information from the model, they reduced the tray size to 51 instruments (42% reduction), producing $31 870 in savings. The mathematical model yielded an additional 22% instrument reduction and $14 230 in savings compared with clinician review alone. CONCLUSION: Our mathematical model is generalizable and can be applied to all specialties and hospitals to determine optimal tray configuration. As such, the financial implications are broad; at our institution, application to all surgical trays would result in $205 000 of savings annually. Surgeons and managers looking to streamline surgical trays should consider this evidence-based approach.

Hospitalization following pediatric kidney transplantation: An international comparison among a Canadian pediatric transplant center, North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies, and Cooperative European Pediatric Renal Transplant Initiative registry data.

BACKGROUND: There are several databases across the world that collect pediatric KT data. We compare the hospitalization outcomes for pediatric KT recipients from a large Canadian transplant center (SickKids database; The Hospital for Sick Children Kidney Transplantation Institutional Database), United States (NAPRTCS), and Europe (CERTAIN registry). METHODS: An institutional retrospective review of KT was performed between 2000 and 2015. Baseline characteristics, duration of initial hospitalization/readmission at 1-5 and 6- to 11-month posttransplant, and 1-year graft survival data were collected. Corresponding data from the NAPRTCS 2014 Annual Transplant Report and CERTAIN registry were compared. RESULTS: Posttransplant, patients from NAPRTCS had the shortest duration of hospitalization within the first month (10.4 days, SE 0.2), followed by SickKids (20.3 days, SE 0.7) and CERTAIN (25.5 days, SE 0.7). For both living and deceased donor populations, patients from SickKids were most likely to be hospitalized at 1- to 5-month posttransplant (82.4% [89/108]; 72.1% [98/136]), followed by Europe (52.1% [198/380]; 61.6% [501/813]) and United States (45.4% [2379/5241]; 51.4% [2517/4896]). Patients from Europe were most likely to be hospitalized at 6- to 12-month posttransplant (42.1% [160/380]; 51.7% [420/813]), followed by SickKids (35.2% [38/108]; 37.5% [51/136]) and United States (28.3% [1387/4901]; 31.6% [1411/4465]). Across all databases, the most commonly addressed issues during readmissions were infectious complications. CONCLUSION: The differences observed in this investigation may reflect the local reimbursement models, resources for outpatient management, and practice variations across a large Canadian transplant center, United States, and European countries.

Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics vs. placebo after midshaft-to-distal hypospadias repair: the PROPHY Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of prophylactic antibiotics after stented hypospadias repair is very common, but most research has not identified any clinical benefits of this practice. Only one study has found that postoperative prophylaxis reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Data from the same trial suggested that prophylaxis may also reduce urethroplasty complications. No studies on this subject have been placebo-controlled. OBJECTIVE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the incidence of infection or urethroplasty complications after stented repair of midshaft-to-distal hypospadias. STUDY DESIGN: Boys were eligible for this multicenter trial if they had a primary, single-stage repair of mid-to-distal hypospadias with placement of an open-drainage urethral stent for an intended duration of 5-10 days. Participants were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo twice daily for 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic UTI, surgical site infection (SSI), and urethroplasty complications, including urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and C. difficile colitis. RESULTS: Infection or urethroplasty complications occurred in 10 of 45 boys (22%) assigned to receive antibiotic prophylaxis as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) who received placebo (relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.8; p = 0.16). There were no significant differences between groups in symptomatic UTIs, SSIs, or any urethroplasty complications. Mild ADRs occurred in 3 of 45 boys (7%) assigned to antibiotics as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) given placebo (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5; p = 0.72). There were no moderate-to-severe ADRs, and no patients developed C. difficile colitis. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial of 93 patients, prophylactic antibiotics were not found to reduce infection or urethroplasty complications after stented mid-to-distal hypospadias repair. The study did not reach its desired sample size and was therefore underpowered to independently support a conclusion that prophylaxis is not beneficial. However, the result is consistent with most prior research on this subject. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02096159.

Impact of native nephrectomy on hypertension outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: a 10-year institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role native nephrectomy (NN) in hypertension-related outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing renal transplantation (RT). METHODS: Renal transplants (RT) performed at our institution between 2006 and 2015 were reviewed. RT recipients who underwent NN were compared to those who did not. Primary outcomes were hypertension-related: use/number of medications pre-/post-transplant and hypertension-related readmissions. Secondary outcomes were 1-year outcomes of: readmissions, eGFR, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3 complications, and graft loss. RESULTS: 135 patients were evaluated. 24 underwent NN (Group 1) and 111 did not (Group 2). Baseline characteristics were similar between Groups 1 and 2. The majority of NN indications were hypertension (10/39 kidneys) and proteinuria (12/39 kidneys). There were no differences in use/number of anti-hypertensive medications pre- or post-transplant. However, between Group 2 and subgroup of patients who underwent NN for hypertension, a significant difference was seen in medication use/numbers but not post-transplant. Number of readmissions due to hypertension was similar (7.2% vs. 12.5%). The only difference in secondary outcomes was higher readmission rates with bacterial infections for group 1 (45.8% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: NN, when offered to patients at higher risk of post-RT hypertension, may allow high-risk patients to achieve similar hypertension outcomes as those at lower risk.