Shoulder Motion Overestimated by Mallet Scores.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) occur in up 0.4 to 4.6 per 1000 live births. Weakness about the shoulder and development of glenohumeral joint contractures are common sequalae of BPBI. Shoulder function in children with BPBI is frequently assessed using the modified Mallet classification to evaluate upper extremity motion deficits. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the abduction, external rotation, and hand-to-mouth Mallet classification scores in children with BPBI using motion capture. METHODS: A retrospective study of 107 children with BPBI who underwent motion capture assessment and Mallet scores on the same date were reviewed. Motion capture measurements were used to calculate humerothoracic elevation and external rotation joint angles in the abduction/hand-to-mouth and external rotation positions, respectively. The humerothoracic joint angles were converted to the corresponding Mallet scores. Discrepancies between the Mallet scores determined by clinicians and those determined by motion capture were assessed. RESULTS: For abduction, 24.3% of Mallet scores were misclassified during clinical examination. Of the misclassified scores, 22 were overestimated by 1 point and 4 were underestimated by 1 point compared with motion capture. For external rotation, 72.9% of Mallet scores were misclassified during clinical examination. Only 5 patients had an HT elevation that was less than 40 degrees, with 4 of them (80%) having a Mallet hand-to-mouth score of 4. There were no differences in proportion of patients with HT elevation less than 40 degrees who had a Mallet score of 4 or a Mallet score less than 4. CONCLUSIONS: There was better agreement in global abduction Mallet scores compared with external rotation and hand-to-mouth Mallet scores. This difference was likely due to the complex compensatory strategies that patients employ while performing external rotation and hand-to-mouth positions. The inaccuracy of the clinically determined Mallet scores is alarming given that they are frequently utilized to assist with surgical indications and are commonly used as outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case series.

Clinical Practice Guidelines to Support Capacity Building in Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach: An International Consensus Building Approach.

BACKGROUND: Surgical outreach to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by organizations from high- income countries is on the rise to help address the growing burden of conditions warranting surgery. However, concerns remain about the impact and sustainability of such outreach. Leading organizations (e.g., the World Health Organization) advocate for a capacity-building approach to ensure the safety, quality, and sustainability of the local health-care system. Despite this, to our knowledge, no guidelines exist to inform such efforts. We aimed to develop clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to support capacity-building in orthopaedic surgical outreach utilizing a multistakeholder and international voting panel. METHODS: We followed a modified American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) CPG development process. We systematically reviewed the existing literature across 7 predefined capacity-building domains (partnership, professional development, governance, community impact, finance, coordination, and culture). A writing panel composed of 6 orthopaedic surgeons with extensive experience in surgical outreach reviewed the existing literature and developed a consensus-based CPG for each domain. We created an international voting panel of orthopaedic surgeons and administrators who have leadership roles in outreach organizations or hospitals with which outreach organizations partner. Members individually reviewed the CPGs and voted to approve or disapprove each guideline. A CPG was considered approved if >80% of panel members voted to approve it. RESULTS: An international voting panel of 14 surgeons and administrators from 6 countries approved all 7 of the CPGs. Each CPG provides recommendations for capacity-building in a specific domain. For example, in the domain of partnership, the CPG recommends the development of a documented plan for ongoing, bidirectional partnership between the outreach organization and the local team. In the domain of professional development, the CPG recommends the development of a needs-based curriculum focused on both surgical and nonsurgical patient care utilizing didactic and hands-on techniques. CONCLUSIONS: As orthopaedic surgical outreach grows, best-practice CPGs to inform capacity-building initiatives can help to ensure that resources and efforts are optimized to support the sustainability of care delivery at local sites. These guidelines can be reviewed and updated in the future as evidence that supports capacity-building in LMICs evolves.The global burden of disease warranting surgery is substantial, and morbidity and mortality from otherwise treatable conditions remain disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)1,2. It is estimated that up to 2 million (about 40%) of injury-related deaths in LMICs could be avoided annually if mortality rates were reduced to the level of those in high-income countries (HICs)3. Despite this, progress toward improved access to safe, timely surgery in resource-poor areas has been slow. Historically, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have tried to address unmet surgical needs through short-term outreach trips; however, growing criticism has highlighted the limitations of short-term trips, including limited follow-up, an increased burden on the local workforce, and further depletion of local resources4-6. In light of ongoing concerns, public health priorities have shifted toward models that emphasize long-term capacity-building rather than short-term care delivery. Capacity-building is an approach to health-care development that builds independence through infrastructure development, sustainability, and enhanced problem-solving while taking context into account7,8.

Evaluation of Upper Extremity Reachable Workspace in Children With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) results in upper extremity (UE) movement limitations. Current assessments of UE function used to inform clinical decision-making only evaluate a limited set of static postures and/or movements and have been criticized for being insensitive to certain meaningful differences in function. Reachable workspace provides a numeric and visual assessment of global UE movement ability by quantifying the regions in space that patients can reach with their hands, and it can be collected using real-time feedback to elicit a best-effort acquisition of function. This study evaluated the ability of a real-time feedback reachable workspace tool to assess UE movement in BPBI. METHODS: Twenty-two children with BPBI participated. Reachable workspace data were collected with three-dimensional motion capture using real-time visual feedback to measure UE reaching ability in all regions surrounding the body. All outer, far-from-body points reached by the hand were recorded and analyzed by region. A two-way, within-subjects analysis of variance was used to assess interlimb differences in percentage workspace reached and median reach distance for each of the six regions. RESULTS: The affected limb had significantly less percentage workspace reached than the unaffected limb for all six regions (mean interlimb differences by region, 5.7%-38.6%). The affected limb had significantly less median reach distance than the unaffected limb for all six regions (mean interlimb differences by region, 3.1%-36.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The workspace approach was capable of detecting UE movement impairments of the BPBI-affected limb. The reported deficits in workspace on the affected limb correspond to common movement impairments in BPBI, such as limitations in shoulder elevation, external rotation, extension, and elbow extension. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The real-time feedback reachable workspace tool is sufficiently robust for assessing UE movement impairments in children with BPBI.

The Development and Validation of Data Elements and Process Steps for an Electronic Health Record for Hand Surgery Outreach Trips.

Background The surgical burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as reported by the number of surgical cases per capita is great. To improve global health and help address this burden, there has been a rise in surgical outreach to LMICs. In high-income countries, an electronic health record (EHR) is used to document and communicate data critical to the quality of care and patient safety. Despite this, there is little guidance or precedence on the data elements or processes for utilizing an EHR on outreach trips. We validated data elements and process steps for utilizing an EHR for hand surgery outreach trips. Methods We conducted a literature review to identify data elements collected during surgical outreach trips. A future-state process map for the collection and documentation of data elements within an EHR was developed through literature review and semistructured interviews with experts in global outreach. An expert consortium completed a modified RAND/University of California at Los Angeles Delphi process to evaluate the importance and feasibility of each data element and process step. Results In total, 65 data elements (e.g., date of birth) and 24 process steps (e.g., surgical site marking) were validated for use in an EHR for hand surgery outreach trips to LMICs. Conclusion This validated portfolio of data elements/process steps can serve as the foundation for pilot testing of an EHR to document and communicate critical patient data on hand surgery outreach trips. Utilization of an EHR during outreach trips to LMICs may serve to improve the safety and quality of care provided. The validated data elements/process steps can serve as a guide for EHR development and implementation of other surgical specialties.

The Philadelphia Shriners Hospital Approach to Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

The care of children with brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) is a complex multidisciplinary endeavor. At the Shriners Hospital for Children in Philadelphia, we have sought to elevate the quality of care delivered to patients through outcomes research and collaboration with colleagues around the world. Our approach to the management of this challenging pathology has evolved time and again. Here, we describe our current approach to patient assessment and operative management in patients with BPBI and its many sequelae.

Capacity Assessment Tool to Promote Capacity Building in Global Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of nongovernmental organizations from high-income countries aim to provide surgical outreach for patients in low- and middle-income countries in a manner that builds capacity. There remains, however, a paucity of measurable steps to benchmark and evaluate capacity-building efforts. Based on a framework for capacity building, the present study aimed to develop a Capacity Assessment Tool for orthopaedic surgery (CAT-os) that could be utilized to evaluate and promote capacity building. METHODS: To develop the CAT-os tool, we utilized methodological triangulation-an approach that incorporates multiple different types of data. We utilized (1) the results of a systematic review of capacity-building best practices in surgical outreach, (2) the HEALTHQUAL National Organizational Assessment Tool, and (3) 20 semistructured interviews to develop a draft of the CAT-os. We subsequently iteratively used a modified nominal group technique with a consortium of 8 globally experienced surgeons to build consensus, which was followed by validation through member-checking. RESULTS: The CAT-os was developed and validated as a formal instrument with actionable steps in each of 7 domains of capacity building. Each domain includes items that are scaled for scoring. For example, in the domain of partnership, items range from no formalized plans for sustainable, bidirectional relationships (no capacity) to local surgeons and other health-care workers independently participating in annual meetings of surgical professional societies and independently creating partnership with third party organizations (optimal capacity). CONCLUSIONS: The CAT-os details steps to assess capacity of a local facility, guide capacity-improvement efforts during surgical outreach, and measure the impact of capacity-building efforts. Capacity building is a frequently cited and commendable approach to surgical outreach, and this tool provides objective measurement to aid in improving the capacity in low and middle-income countries through surgical outreach.

Current Concepts in Elbow Extension Reconstruction for the Tetraplegic Patient.

Individuals with C5 or C6 spinal cord injury (SCI) have paralysis of the triceps brachii, and the subsequent loss of elbow extension makes it impossible to reliably use their hands above shoulder level because of the inability to hold the elbow extended against gravity. For persons with cervical SCI, elbow extension can be restored with both tendon and nerve transfers. Elbow extension is necessary for dressing, eating, wheelchair locomotion, pressure relief maneuvers, independent transfers, and reaching objects above shoulder level. Deltoid-to-triceps and biceps-to-triceps tendon transfers have established efficacy and a longer history of use. Transfer of motor branches from the axillary nerve to triceps motor branches is new with no current published prospective studies but shows early promise. This review aims to highlight the amazing potential these procedures can have on the independence and quality of life for people with quadriplegia. Despite the immense benefit possible, fewer than 14% of eligible people with cervical SCI in the United States receive upper limb reconstructive surgery. Surgical timing is critical. A broader understanding and raised awareness of reconstructive options for elbow extension in people with quadriplegia will increase recognition of eligible patients and speed referral time to the appropriate practitioner.

Early Results of 3-Dimensional Planning and Customized Cutting Guides for the Treatment of Severe Madelung Defofrmity.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of Madelung deformity can present challenges due to a need for multiplanar correction. Developing customized cutting guides for osteotomies may improve surgical outcomes by enhancing the surgeon's understanding and surgical correction. METHODS: All patients who underwent forearm osteotomies for Madelung deformity using computed tomography planning with 3-dimensional-printed customized cutting guides were retrospectively reviewed (n = 8). Seven patients underwent a double osteotomy of the radius, and 1 underwent a single osteotomy. RESULTS: Ulnar tilt was improved in all cases. Correction of deformity was significant on anteroposterior but not on lateral views. The mean preoperative and postoperative radial bow was measured in 2 planes, with an average preoperative bow of 32° (± 21°) on anteroposterior radiographs and 36° (± 17°) on lateral radiographs, and an average bow of 10° (± 6°) on anteroposterior radiographs and 7° (± 6°) on lateral films after surgery. The predicted radial bow was calculated to be 9.1° (± 8°). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional planning allows predictable deformity correction across multiple but not all parameters. Future studies comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes of guided versus nonguided osteotomies are required to justify the additional expense and preoperative planning efforts. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

A Framework and Blueprint for Building Capacity in Global Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach.

BACKGROUND: Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) from high-income countries provide surgical outreach for patients in low and middle-income countries (LMICs); however, these efforts lack a coordinated measurement of their ability to build capacity. While the World Health Organization and others recommend outreach trips that aim to build the capacity of the local health-care system, no guidance exists on how to accomplish this. The objective of this paper is to establish a framework and a blueprint to guide the operations of NGOs that provide outreach to build orthopaedic surgical capacity in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with 16 orthopaedic surgeons and administrators located in 7 countries (6 LMICs) on the necessary domains for capacity-building; the analysis was guided by a literature review of capacity-building frameworks. We subsequently conducted a modified nominal group technique with a consortium of 10 U.S.-based surgeons with expertise in global surgical outreach, which was member-checked with 8 new stakeholders from 4 LMICs. RESULTS: A framework with 7 domains for capacity-building in global surgical outreach was identified. The domains included professional development, finance, partnerships, governance, community impact, culture, and coordination. These domains were tiered in a hierarchical system to stratify the level of capacity for each domain. A blueprint was developed to guide the operations of an organization seeking to build capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The developed framework identified 7 domains to address when building capacity during global orthopaedic surgical outreach. The framework and its tiered system can be used to assess capacity and guide capacity-building efforts in LMICs. The developed blueprint can inform the operations of NGOs toward activities that focus on building capacity in order to ensure a measured and sustained impact.

Assessment of approaches to estimate scapular orientation in children with brachial plexus birth injury.

BACKGROUND: Challenges in measuring dynamic scapular orientation limit assessment of scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to shoulder function in children with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Double calibration acromion marker cluster (D-AMC) and linear model approaches have been validated to estimate scapular motion in healthy adults, but neither has been evaluated in BPBI. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the linear model and D-AMC approaches able to accurately estimate scapular orientation in children with BPBI at functional arm postures? METHODS: Seventeen children with BPBI positioned their affected limbs in 11 static positions while their segment orientations were measured with motion capture. Linear model and D-AMC estimates of scapular orientation were compared against palpation at six of the static positions with functional relevance to BPBI using a three-way repeat measures ANOVA and a comparison of root mean square errors (RMSE) against literature AMC values for healthy adults. RESULTS: The D-AMC was similar to palpation across all positions and scapular axes while the linear model differed from palpation in a few instances. RMSEs of the D-AMC (3.7-14.8°) and particularly the linear model (4.6-24.8°) were generally at or beyond the upper range of past AMC analyses on healthy adults (1.6-14.2°), especially for more complex, multiplanar arm postures. Despite the D-AMC outperforming the linear model, this approach still produced clinically meaningful (>10°) errors for roughly (12.7-22.5%) of subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Current methods for estimating dynamic scapular orientation remain less than ideal for BPBI. Use of the D-AMC may be appropriate to gain broad insights into general dynamic scapulothoracic and glenohumeral function; however, given their potential for producing clinically meaningful errors, the D-AMC and linear model are not recommended for diagnostic purposes or outcomes assessment on an individual patient basis unless their patient-specific accuracy has been evaluated and confirmed prior to use.

Comparison of Shoulder Motion Measurements by Visual Estimate, Goniometer and Motion Capture.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus birth injuries (BPBI) can result in lasting impairments of external rotation and cross-body adduction (CBA) that disrupt functional activities such as dressing, grooming, or throwing a ball. The purpose of this study was to compare the quantification of shoulder humerothoracic (HT) external rotation (ER), and glenohumeral (GH) CBA by 3 methods - physician visual estimate, goniometer measurement by an occupational therapist, and motion capture. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with BPBI (average age of 9.9±3.2 y) participated in this study. Mallet scores and visual estimates of passive HT ER and GH CBA were recorded by a physician. The passive measures were repeated by an occupational therapist using a goniometer while motion capture measures were simultaneously collected. Active HT ER was also measured by motion capture. The passive measures were compared with analyses of variance with repeated measures, intraclass correlations, and Bland-Altman plots. External rotation Mallet scores determined by motion capture and by the physician were compared. RESULTS: The measures of GH CBA were not statistically different and demonstrated good agreement, but substantial variation. For HT ER, all measures were significantly different and demonstrated poor agreement and substantial variation. When the joint angles measured by motion capture were used to determine the Mallet score, 79% of external rotation Mallet scores assigned by the physician were incorrectly categorized, with the physician always scoring the participant higher than predicted motion capture Mallet score. CONCLUSIONS: Both GH CBA and HT ER measures demonstrated substantial variability between measurement types, but only HT ER joint angles were significantly different. In addition, more than three-quarters of external rotation Mallet scores were misclassified by the physician. Motion capture measurements offer the benefit of less susceptibility to patients' compensatory and/or out-of-plane movements and should be considered for clinical assessment of shoulder range of motion in children with BPBI. If motion capture is unavailable, the use of a goniometer provides more accurate clinical measures of shoulder motion than visual estimates and care should be taken to minimize and account for compensatory movement strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case series.

Reachable workspace with real-time motion capture feedback to quantify upper extremity function: A study on children with brachial plexus birth injury.

Clinical upper extremity (UE) functional assessments and motion capture measures are limited to a set of postures and/or motions that may provide an incomplete evaluation of UE functionality. Reachable workspace analysis offers a more global assessment of UE function, but is reliant on patient compliance with instructions and may result in underestimates of a patient's true UE function. This study evaluated a clinical tool that incorporates real-time visual feedback with motion capture to provide an innovative means of engaging patients to ensure a 'best effort' quantification of their available UE workspace. Reachable workspace for 10 children with brachial plexus birth injury was collected with and without real-time feedback on the affected and unaffected limbs. Real-time feedback consisted of subjects reaching for virtual targets surrounding their physical space using a virtual cursor controlled by the real-time location of their hand. Real-time feedback resulted in significantly greater workspace in multiple regions on both the affected (3/6 octants; mean differences 10.8%-20.0%) and unaffected (6/6 octants; mean differences 24.3%-40.0%) limbs. Use of real-time feedback also yielded significant interlimb differences in workspace across more regions (4/6 octants; mean differences 29.0%-39.9% vs. 1/6 octants; mean difference 17%). Finally, real-time feedback resulted in significant interlimb differences in median reach distance across more regions (4/6 octants; mean differences 7.5%-44.8% vs. 1/6 octants; mean difference 11.2%). A reachable workspace tool with real-time feedback results in more workspace and UE function recorded and offers a highly visual and intuitive depiction of a patient's UE abilities.

Scapulothoracic and Glenohumeral Contributions to Humerothoracic Kinematics in Single Versus Double Tendon Transfers in Patients With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests that patients with brachial plexus birth injury are more likely to retain midline function following a teres major tendon transfer without a concomitant latissimus dorsi transfer. Both procedures increase shoulder external rotation and abduction, but whether increased loss of midline frequency following double transfer is due to glenohumeral (GH) joint motion or scapulothoracic (ST) compensation is unknown. We hypothesized that double tendon transfers would exhibit greater GH external rotation than single tendon transfers, thus requiring greater ST rotation to internally rotate the shoulder, while GH and ST contributions to elevation remained equivalent between both groups. METHODS: Twenty-six postsurgical children with C5/C6 brachial plexus birth injuries participated in this study. Thirteen patients with single tendon transfers were matched with 13 with double tendon transfer. Coordinate systems of the thorax, scapula, and humerus were measured utilizing motion capture in 6 arm positions. Joint angles were calculated by the helical (ST) and modified globe method (GH and humerothoracic [HT]). Differences between groups were compared with repeated measures of multivariate analyses of variance for each position. Pending significant multivariate analyses of variance, univariate analyses of variance determined joint differences between transfer groups. RESULTS: Joint rotations from neutral were similar between groups in 5 of 6 tested positions, with double tendon transfers consistently demonstrating 15°-20˚ more internal rotation at the GH and HT joints. Still, only the internal rotation position showed statistically significant differences in GH and HT joint angles. The ST joint angles were similar in this position (45.2˚ and 48.5˚). CONCLUSIONS: The arc of motion for patients with double tendon transfer was more internally rotated than in patients with single tendon transfer at the GH and HT joints for all positions. However, both groups demonstrated little active rotation from neutral. Based on this data, teres major-only tendon transfers may not reduce the risk of loss of midline function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Single Versus Double Tendon Transfer to Improve Shoulder External Rotation During the Treatment of Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy.

Background: Tendon transfers are commonly performed in patients with brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) to improve function. Transferring 2 tendons in patients with C5-7 injury has the potential complication of loss of midline function. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a single tendon transfer (1TT) as opposed to the traditional double tendon transfer (2TT) resulted in any differences in functional outcomes in patients with C5-7 BPBP. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with C5-7 BPBP who underwent tendon transfers to improve shoulder external rotation over a 5-year period was performed at 2 institutions. Outcomes were assessed using the modified Mallet (MM) classification scores. Results: Twenty-two C5-7 patients had complete records of preoperative and postoperative MM scores, including 11 sex-matched patients in both the 1TT and 2TT groups. When comparing preoperative and postoperative MM categories, there were significant improvements in both the 1TT and 2TT groups for global abduction (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively) and external rotation (P < .00001 for both). Modified Mallet (MM) hand to neck scores were significantly improved in the 2TT group (P < .05) but not in the 1TT group (P = .053). Internal rotation scores significantly decreased in both groups (P < .001). Both groups demonstrated significant increases in total scores from the preoperative MM scores (P < .01). Conclusion: The 1TT and 2TT procedures result in substantial gains in upper extremity functions for patients with C5-7 BPBP as measured by the MM score, specifically within the global abduction and external rotation subcategories. However, a significant loss occurs in internal rotation for both groups.

Assessment of the relationship between Brachial Plexus Profile activity short form scores and modified Mallet scores.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the relationship between the modified Mallet classification and the Brachial Plexus Profile activity short form (BP-PRO activity SF). The therapist or surgeon classifies upper extremity movement for the modified Mallet classification, while the BP-PRO assesses parents' perceptions of difficulty performing activities. PURPOSE: To provide a deeper understanding of the relationship of functional and perceived outcome measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, correlational design. METHODS: Eighty children with brachial plexus birth injuries were evaluated using the modified Mallet classification, while parents simultaneously answered the BP-PRO activity SF questions. All patients had undergone one of three surgical interventions to improve shoulder function. The relationship between the two measures, patient injury levels, and surgical histories were assessed. RESULTS: The average modified Mallet scores and BP-PRO activity SF scores weakly correlated (r = 0.312, P = .005) and both measures differentiated between C5-6 and C5-7 injury levels (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). Conversely, the modified Mallet scores could differentiate between the three surgical groups (F = 8.2, P < .001), while the BP-PRO activity SF could not (P = .54). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that these tools measure different aspects of patient outcomes. The Mallet classification may be more focused on shoulder motion than the BP-PRO activity SF. Additional questions that specifically require shoulder function could be incorporated into the BP-PRO activity SF to improve understanding of patient/parent perceptions of shoulder function for children with brachial plexus injuries. Clinicians should be aware of the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of each outcome assessment tool for appropriate use and interpretation of results.

Nerve Transfers for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Patients With Acute Flaccid Myelitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate short- to midterm outcomes of patients with acute flaccid myelitis who underwent nerve transfers for restoration of elbow flexion. METHODS: Patients with a minimum of 10 months of follow up after undergoing nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were clinically assessed using the Active Movement Scale (AMS). They were evaluated for any postoperative complications, particularly weakness in the distribution of the donor nerve(s). Fifteen of 25 consecutive patients who were treated using this surgical technique were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: All patients exhibited poor elbow flexion preoperatively (AMS 0 to 3). At a mean follow up of 17.3 months, 80% (15/25) of patients achieved excellent elbow flexion (AMS 6 or 7); 9 of these 15 had full active range of motion. Two patients achieved good elbow flexion (AMS 5) with antigravity movement to less than 50% of the passive range of motion. No cases of superficial or deep infection were reported, and all patients maintained identical motor function, relative to preoperative status, of the muscles innervated by the donor nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve transfer surgery has shown promising short- to midterm results for recovery of nerve and muscle function, particularly for the restoration of elbow flexion. We recommend this treatment option for patients not demonstrating clinical improvement after 6 to 9 months of incomplete recovery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The One-Bone Forearm in Children: Surgical Technique and a Retrospective Review of Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe a technique of end-to-end rigid fixation of the distal radius to the proximal ulna. The shortening and radioulnar overlap in this technique yield a high union rate, large corrections, and few complications. METHODS: This retrospective chart review from 2 centers was undertaken in 39 patients (40 forearms) who underwent one-bone forearm operations between 2005 and 2019. There were 25 male and 14 female patients, with a mean age at surgery of 9.7 years (range 3 to 19 years; SD, 4.5 years). The diagnoses included brachial plexus birth injury, spinal cord injury, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, cerebral palsy, ulnar deficiency with focal indentation, multiple hereditary exostosis, acute flaccid myelitis, and tumor. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 33.5 months (1.2-110.1 months; SD, 27.1 months). The 36 forearms in supination had an average supination contracture of 93° (range, 15° to 120°; SD, 15.4°). The 4 pronated arms had an average pronation contracture of 80° (range, 50° to 120°; SD, 29.2°). The average postoperative position was 22.8° of pronation (range, -15° to 45°; SD, 12.9°). The average correction obtained with our technique was 113° (range, 20° to 145°; SD, 22.9°). Radiographic union was demonstrated in 32 (80%) of the one-bone forearms by 10 weeks, 39 (97.5%) by 16 weeks, and 40 (100%) by 24 weeks. One patient had peri-implant fractures prior to union. No forearms required reoperation for nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: One-bone forearm performed with this technique allows reliable healing and a large degree of correction. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Fixation of Displaced Medial Epicondylar Fractures in Adolescents.

Fractures of the medial epicondyle are often a marker of injury of the medial collateral ligament complex of the elbow, regardless of displacement. The medial epicondyle serves as the origin for the flexor/pronator mass superficially and the medial collateral ligament near the base. These fractures occur most commonly through the apophysis at the base of the epicondyle, making differentiation of muscular versus ligamentous avulsion difficult. Fractures associated with elbow dislocation and fractures with an intra-articular incarcerated medial epicondyle are ligamentous injuries, requiring at least intraoperative examination and most likely fixation of the fracture. Degree of displacement has traditionally been considered the deciding factor for fracture fixation, but this concept has been proven unreliable both in the literature and in our experience. Regardless of the degree of displacement, we recommend examination under anesthesia for all displaced fractures, with fixation of any fractures that render the elbow unstable to valgus stress. DESCRIPTION: The patient is placed in the supine position, and an examination under anesthesia is performed. If the elbow is stable to valgus load, the patient is placed into a long arm cast and awakened from anesthesia. If the elbow is unstable, the patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position, and the arm is prepared and draped. The fingers and wrist are wrapped with a self-adhesive bandage in flexion to relax the flexor/pronator mass. Under tourniquet control, a curvilinear medial incision is made just dorsal to the medial epicondyle. The ulnar nerve is identified and transposed if necessary. A guidewire is placed through the fracture fragment and used as a joystick. The hand is then positioned on the posterior aspect of the hip to provide varus load to the elbow and assist with reduction. The medial epicondyle is reduced, and the guidewire is advanced unicortically. A 3.0-mm, partially threaded cannulated screw is then advanced over the guidewire. A long arm cast is applied after closure of the wound with buried absorbable sutures. ALTERNATIVES: Nonoperative treatment in a cast has been suggested. Surgical variations include supine positioning, bicortical screws, and use of washers. RATIONALE: Lateral decubitus positioning and wrapping of the hand and wrist in flexion facilitate reduction by both applying a varus load and relaxing the flexor/pronator mass. Unicortical fixation is sufficient and does not risk injury to anterolateral structures. Washers have a higher complication rate than screws alone and may not be necessary in most cases1.

Long Thoracic Nerve Transfer for Children With Brachial Plexus Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: The transfer of intraplexal and extraplexal nerves for restoration of function in children with traumatic and birth brachial plexus palsies has become well accepted. Little has been written about using the long thoracic nerve (LTN) as a donor in reanimation of the upper extremity. The authors present a case series of nerve transfers using the LTN as a donor in brachial plexus injury. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed over a 10-year period at a single institution. The primary outcome measure was the active movement scale. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the study: 10 birth injury patients and 4 blunt trauma patients. Average follow-up time was 21.3 and 10.75 months, respectively. The best outcomes were seen when the LTN was used for reinnervation of the obturator nerve in free functioning muscle transfers. The next most successful recipients were the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves. Outcomes were poor in transfers to the posterior interosseous fascicles of the radial nerve and the radial nerve branches to the triceps. DISCUSSION: The LTN may be a potential nerve donor for musculocutaneous or axillary nerve reinnervation in patients with brachial plexus injuries when other donors are not available during a primary plexus reconstruction. However, the best use may be for delayed neurotization of a free functioning muscle transfer after the initial plexus reconstruction has failed and no other donors are available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic study.

Outcomes of Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation in Pediatric Patients With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of osteochondral autograft transplantations in the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in the pediatric population. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016, 15 patients who had undergone osteochondral autograft transplantation at a mean age of 13.7 years at surgery were identified. The donor site was from the superolateral, non-weight-bearing surface of the lateral femoral condyle of the ipsilateral knee. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 29.5 months, with no patients lost to follow-up. Mean arc of motion increased significantly from 121.9° preoperatively to 139.1° postoperatively. All 9 elite athletes returned to sports at an elite level: 7 returned to the same level of competition in the same sport, 1 retired from gymnastics due to multiple injuries but began diving at an elite level, and 1 retired from baseball unrelated to elbow symptoms but continued hockey at the same level. Of the 4 recreational athletes, all returned to sport. There were no intraoperative complications. The symptoms resolved completely in all but 2 patients, who improved over their preoperative condition. The donor site knee pain resolved in all patients at an average of 2.3 months. Postoperative imaging demonstrated the healing and incorporation of the plug in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum, osteochondral autograft transplantation demonstrates excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes, with minimal short-term donor site morbidity and a high level of return to the sport. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.