CoaguChek and Coag-Sense PT2 Meter Point of Care INR Device Validation.

OBJECTIVE: To standardize international normalized ratio (INR) measurements and improve data integrity by enabling electronic result transmission for warfarin monitoring, two point-of-care (POC) devices were evaluated against an internal plasma INR reference method. METHODS: A multicenter study was pursued (January 24, 2022, through October 19, 2022) to compare concordance of two commercially available POC devices, Coag-Sense PT2 Meter (Coag-Sense) and CoaguChek XS Pro and Plus devices (CoaguChek), against an internal plasma INR method among patients treated with warfarin. Bias and linear regression analysis were assessed for these devices including dosing decision accuracy compared with plasma INR reference. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients treated with warfarin across three Mayo Clinic sites agreed to participate. Atrial fibrillation (n=191, 63.9%), venous thromboembolism (n=65; 21.7%), and heart valve prosthesis (n=46; 15.4%) were common anticoagulant indications with a 2.5 INR target for 280 (93.6%) of patients. For the CoaguChek devices, 243 (81.3%) of values fell within 0.2 INR units with plasma INR referent and 285 (95.3%) within 0.4 units (R2=0.93). For the Coag-Sense device, 102 (34.1%) of values fell within 0.2 INR units and 180 (60.2%) within 0.4 INR units of plasma INR values, (R2=0.83; P<.0001). Using the plasma INR as the gold standard, appropriate dosing recommendations would have occurred for 292 (97.7%) of the CoaguChek and 244 (81.6%) of the Coag-Sense results. CONCLUSION: Compared with a plasma referent, INR values obtained from the CoaguChek devices exhibited less systematic bias compared with Coag-Sense measures. This translates to a greater percentage of concordant management decisions between POC and laboratory INR methods.

Efficacy and toxicity of photon, proton, and carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma.

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) of the central nervous system are rare and treatment options are not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) and re-radiotherapy (re-RT) for de novo intracranial SFT and recurrent intracranial SFT. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed efficacy and toxicity of different RT modalities in patients who received radiotherapy (RT) for intracranial SFT at Heidelberg University Hospital between 2000 and 2020 following initial surgery after de novo diagnosis ("primary group"). We further analyzed the patients of this cohort who suffered from tumor recurrence and received re-RT at our institution ("re-irradiation (re-RT) group"). Median follow-up period was 54.0 months (0-282) in the primary group and 20.5 months (0-72) in the re-RT group. RT modalities included 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), proton RT, and carbon-ion RT (C12-RT). Response rates were analyzed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: While the primary group consisted of 34 patients (f: 16; m:18), the re-RT group included 12 patients (f: 9; m: 3). Overall response rate (ORR) for the primary group was 38.3% (N = 11), with 32.4% (N = 11) complete remissions (CR) and 5.9% (N = 2) partial remissions (PR). Stable disease (SD) was confirmed in 5.9% (N = 2), while 41.2% (N = 14) experienced progressive disease (PD). 14% (N = 5) were lost to follow up. The re-RT group had 25.0% CR and 17.0% PR with 58.0% PD. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 100%, 96%, and 86%, respectively, in the primary group, and 81%, 14%, and 14%, respectively, in the re-RT group. Particle irradiation (N = 11) was associated with a lower likelihood of developing a recurrence in the primary setting than photon therapy (N = 18) (OR = 0.038; p = 0.002), as well as doses ≥ 60.0 Gy (N = 15) versus < 60.0 Gy (N = 14) (OR = 0.145; p = 0.027). Risk for tumor recurrence was higher for women than for men (OR = 8.07; p = 0.014) with men having a median PFS of 136.3 months, compared to women with 66.2 months. CONCLUSION: The data suggests RT as an effective treatment option for intracranial SFT, with high LPFS and PFS rates. Radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy could be associated with lower tumor recurrence. Particle therapy may be associated with a lower risk of recurrence in the primary setting, likely due to the feasibility of higher RT-dose application.