Caracterización del uso de metadona en pacientes paliativos en el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago de Chile / Characterization of methadone use in palliative patients at the National Cancer Institute, Santiago, Chile

OBJETIVOS: realizar un estudio de tipo descriptivo y retrospectivo para caracterizar el uso y efecto de metadona en una población de pacientes de la unidad de cuidados paliativos del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: los datos analizados se obtuvieron desde los registros de la farmacia y las fichas clínicas de los pacientes de la unidad de cuidados paliativos del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer que estaban siendo tratados con metadona durante el mes de agosto de 2013. las variables cuantificadas fueron edad, sexo, diagnóstico oncológico, tipo de dolor, motivo de indicación de metadona, duración del tratamiento, dosis utilizadas, respuesta analgésica y uso concomitante con analgésicos no opioides. RESULTADOS: la población de pacientes bajo control mensual en la unidad de cuidados paliativos al mes de agosto fue de 445 pacientes. en el estudio se incluyeron a 31 pacientes que estaban en ese periodo tratados con metadona, lo que representa un 7% del total de pacientes. la indicación, según tipo de dolor, fue en un 80,6% por dolor de tipo neuropático o mixto. la indicación de metadona se debió, en un 68%, a una rotación de opioides y solo en un 3% fue por indicación primaria. la dosis promedio diaria fluctuó entre 16,7 mg, al inicio del tratamiento; y 26,1 mg, al momento del estudio o periodo de observación. la mediana de uso fue de 211 días. la intensidad del dolor, medida por la escala numérica verbal, fue de 8,3 ± 0,3 mg al inicio del tratamiento y 5,4 ± 0,6 mg durante el control de agosto de 2013, lo que significa una disminución promedio de 34,9%. DISCUSIÓN: el uso de metadona en la unidad de cuidados paliativos del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer está en concordancia con las propuestas internacionales, indicándose principalmente como rotación de opioides y en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático. el análisis de las fichas mostró utilización de dosis bajas de metadona (menores de 30 mg), con pequeños incrementos de dosis durante el período de tratamiento, obteniéndose como resultado una reducción significativa del dolor.

OBJETIVES: to carry out a descriptive and retrospective study to characterize the use and effect of methadone in a group of patients of the Palliative Care Unit of the National Cancer Institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the information was obtained from the patient pharmacy and clinical records at the palliative care unit of the National Cancer Institute who were being treated with methadone during the month of august, 2013. the variables assessed were age, sex, oncology diagnosis, type of pain, reason for methadone prescription, treatment duration, dosage, pain response and associated use of non- opioid analgesics. RESULTS: the patient group under monthly monitoring at the palliative care unit in august was made up of 445 people. the study included 31 patients who at that time were being treated with methadone, 7% of the total. the indication according to the type of pain was in an 80.6% caused by a neuropathic or mixed pain. a 68% of the methadone indication was caused by an opioid rotation and only a 3% by a primary indication. the average daily dose went from 16.7 mg at the beginning to 26.1 mg at the moment the study or observation period was carried out. the use average was of 211 days. The pain intensity, using a numeric scale, was of 8.3 ± 0.3 mg at the beginning of the treatment and a 5.4 ± 0.6 mg during the august 2013 control, which means an average decrease of 34,9 %. DISCUSSION: the use of methadone at the palliative care unit of the National Cancer Institute is in accordance with the international proposals, being indicated mostly as opioid rotation and in the neuropathic pain treatment. the record analysis showed a low dose use of methadone (lower than 30 mg), with small dose increase during the treatment period, getting a significant pain decrease as a result

[Evaluation the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Predictive score for cardiovascular diseases]. / Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) proposed a new cardiovascular risk (CV) score. AIM: To evaluate the new risk score (ACC/AHA 2013) in a Chilean population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2014, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile and fasting blood glucose levels were measured and a survey about CV risk factors was responded by 3,284 subjects aged 40 to 79 years (38% females), living in urban Santiago. ACC/AHA 2013, FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores were calculated. All-cause mortality was determined in July 2014 by consulting the Death Registry of the Chilean Identification Service, with an average follow up of 7 ± 3 years. RESULTS: The prevalence of risk factors were 78% for dyslipidemia, 37% for hypertension, 20% for smoking, 7% for diabetes, 20% for obesity and 54% for physical inactivity. The mean FRAM, Chilean FRAM and ACC/AHA scores were 8, 3 and 9%, respectively. During follow-up, 94 participants died and 34 deaths were of cardiovascular cause. Participants who died had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0. 01) and tended to be older (p = 0.06). The FRAM score for 10 years for deceased and surviving patients was 12 and 8%, respectively (p = NS). The figures for the Chilean FRAM were 5 and 2%, respectively (p = 0.09). The figures for the ACC/AHA 2013 score were 33 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.04). According to receiver operating characteristic curves, ACC/AHA 2013 had a higher area under de curve for CV mortality than FRAM and Chilean FRAM. CONCLUSIONS: The new ACC/AHA 2013 score, is better than traditional FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores in predicting cardiovascular mortality in a low risk population.

Does Good Aerobic Capacity Attenuate the Effects of Aging on Cardiovascular Risk Factors? Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in a Latino Population.

Background. High aerobic capacity is associated with low cardiovascular (CV) risk. The aim of this study was to determine the CV RF burden in subjects with aerobic capacity ≥10 METs and compare it with those having <10 METs. Methods. Cross-sectional study in 2646 subjects (mean age 48 ± 12 years). Demographics, medical history, physical activity, cardiovascular RFs, fasting lipids and blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and anthropometric measurements were collected. Aerobic capacity was determined by exercise stress test. The ACC/AHA 2013 pooled cohort equation was used to calculate CV risk. Logistic models were built to determine the probability of having ≥2 RFs versus 0-1 RF, by age and sex, according to aerobic capacity. Results. 15% of subjects had aerobic capacity < 10 METs. The ACC/AHA scores were 15% in men and 6% in women with <10 METs and 5% and 2%, respectively, in those with ≥10 METs. The probability of having ≥2 RFs increased with age in both groups; however, it was significantly higher in subjects with <10 METs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.92-3.35). Conclusions. Aerobic capacity ≥ 10 METs is associated with a better CV RF profile and lower CV risk score in all age groups, regardless of gender.

Superioridad del nuevo puntaje de riesgo ACC/AHA 2013 por sobre el puntaje de Framingham, en la predicción de riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular en Santiago / Evaluation the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Predictive score for cardiovascular diseases

Background: Recently, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) proposed a new cardiovascular risk (CV) score. Aim: To evaluate the new risk score (ACC/AHA 2013) in a Chilean population. Material and Methods: Between 2002 and 2014, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profile and fasting blood glucose levels were measured and a survey about CV risk factors was responded by 3,284 subjects aged 40 to 79 years (38% females), living in urban Santiago. ACC/AHA 2013, FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores were calculated. All-cause mortality was determined in July 2014 by consulting the Death Registry of the Chilean Identification Service, with an average follow up of 7 ± 3 years. Results: The prevalence of risk factors were 78% for dyslipidemia, 37% for hypertension, 20% for smoking, 7% for diabetes, 20% for obesity and 54% for physical inactivity. The mean FRAM, Chilean FRAM and ACC/AHA scores were 8, 3 and 9%, respectively. During follow-up, 94 participants died and 34 deaths were of cardiovascular cause. Participants who died had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0. 01) and tended to be older (p = 0.06). The FRAM score for 10 years for deceased and surviving patients was 12 and 8%, respectively (p = NS). The figures for the Chilean FRAM were 5 and 2%, respectively (p = 0.09). The figures for the ACC/AHA 2013 score were 33 and 9%, respectively (p = 0.04). According to receiver operating characteristic curves, ACC/AHA 2013 had a higher area under de curve for CV mortality than FRAM and Chilean FRAM. Conclusions: The new ACC/AHA 2013 score, is better than traditional FRAM and Chilean FRAM scores in predicting cardiovascular mortality in a low risk population.

[Khorama score as a predictive tool for thromboembolic events in high risk patients]. / Caracterización de pacientes hospitalizados con neoplasia activa y diagnóstico de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa mediante la puntuación de Khorana en el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer.

BACKGROUND: There is an established relation between cancer and the development of thromboembolic venous disease. Khorana et al developed a predictive score using clinical characteristics and laboratory values to stratify patients according to their risk. AIM: To characterize using Khorana score, patients with active cancer and a diagnosis of thromboembolic disease during hospitalization in an oncology hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of records of the pharmacy of the hospital, selecting patients who received heparin in therapeutic doses during their hospitalization. Using laboratory values available in the medical records, the Khorama score was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients with thromboembolic events, aged 60 ± 2 years (56% males) were selected for the study. Eighty percent of them were catalogued in the intermediate and high risk group according to Khorana score. CONCLUSIONS: Khorana score is a simple scale that might be useful to establish early prophylactic measures in patients with high risk for thromboembolic events, especially those with cancer.

Uso de opioides en pacientes paliativos oncológicos al momento de fallecer: "el mito de la morfina" / Use of opioids in palliative cancer patients at the time of his death: the myth of morphine

Objetivos: determinar cuáles fueron los opioides usados al momento de morir, tiempo de uso e incremento de dosis. Materiales y Métodos: Pacientes paliativos ingresados el año 2008 al Instituto Nacional del Cáncer. Los datos fueron obtenidos del libro de ingresos y registro informático de recetas. Resultados: Ingresaron 456 pacientes, de éstos fallecieron 170 (37 por ciento), con mediana de edad de 66 años (16-97) y 53 por ciento mujeres. Al momento del fallecimiento, un 14 por ciento no estaba recibiendo opioides. Los opioides utilizados fueron codeína, 11,7 por ciento; tramadol, 32,4 por ciento; oxicodona, 0,7 por ciento; morfina, 37,2 por ciento; metadona, 4,8 por ciento; buprenorfina TTS, 10,3 por ciento; y fentanilo TTS, 2,8 por ciento. En todos, las dosis promedio fueron bajas (morfina, 26,9 mg/día; metadona, 17,9 mg/ día; tramadol, 142,8 mg/día; buprenorfina, 19 ug/h; y fentanilo, 19,5 ug/h). No se evidenció un incrementosignificativo en las dosis. El tiempo promedio de uso desde el último cambio de opioide fue 41,3 DE+63,5 días con una mediana de 26 días (1 a 366). No se encontró diferencia entre los opioides. Discusión: La mitad de los pacientes fallecidos estaban en OMSIII. De los usuarios de opioides potentes, solo un 37 por ciento estaba con morfina. Las dosis promedio de todosfueron bajas. El tiempo transcurrido entre el inicio del opioide y la muerte no difirió entre opioides. En suma, no todos los pacientes paliativos en nuestra población falleció recibiendo morfina, no se evidenciaron diferencias en el tiempo de uso del opioide ni un aumento de la dosis, lo cual desmitifica dos creencias: “si uso morfina me voy a morir antes” y “si uso morfina deberé aumentar las dosis y me haré dependiente”.

Objectives: to determine which were the opioids used at the time of death, time usage and increasing doses. Materials and Methods: Palliative patients admitted to the National Cancer Institute in 2008. Data were obtained from the book income and prescription computer records. Results: 456 patients were treated, 170 died (37 percent), with median age of 66 (16-97) and 53 percent women. At death time, 14 percent was not receiving opioids. Used opioids were 11.7 percent codeine; 32.4 percent tramadol; 0.7 percent oxycodone; 37.2 percent morphine; 4.8 percent methadone; 10.3 percent TTS buprenorphine and 2.8 percent TTS fentanyl. All average doses were low (morphine 26,9 mg/day, methadone 17,9 mg/ day, tramadol, 142,8 mg/ day, buprenorphina 19 ug/h and fentanyl 19,5 ug/h). A significant increase in dose was not observed. Average time since the last change of opiode was 41.3 DE+63.5 days with a median of 26 days (1-366), no difference was found between different opioids. Discussion: Half of the patients who died were in OMSIII. Only 37 percent of strong opioids users was using morphine. The average doses of all were low. Time between start opioid use and death was no different for different opioids. So not all palliative patients died using morphine, and no differences were observed in opioids time of use, or increasing doses which demystifies two beliefs: “If I use morphine I will die prematurely” and “If I use morphine, I will increase dose and I will be dependent ”.

Caracterización de pacientes hospitalizados con neoplasia activa y diagnóstico de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa mediante la puntuación de Khorana en el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer / Khorama score as a predictive tool for thromboembolic events in high risk patients

Background: There is an established relation between cancer and the development of thromboembolic venous disease. Khorana et al developed a predictive score using clinical characteristics and laboratory values to stratify patients according to their risk. Aim: To characterize using Khorana score, patients with active cancer and a diagnosis of thromboembolic disease during hospitalization in an oncology hospital. Material and Methods: Review of records of the pharmacy of the hospital, selecting patients who received heparin in therapeutic doses during their hospitalization. Using laboratory values available in the medical records, the Khorama score was calculated. Results: Twenty seven patients with thromboembolic events, aged 60 ± 2 years (56% males) were selected for the study. Eighty percent of them were catalogued in the intermediate and high risk group according to Khorana score. Conclusions: Khorana score is a simple scale that might be useful to establish early prophylactic measures in patients with high risk for thromboembolic events, especially those with cancer.

Impaired Fasting Glucose in Nondiabetic Range: Is It a Marker of Cardiovascular Risk Factor Clustering?

BACKGROUND: Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) through the nondiabetic range (100-125 mg/dL) is not considered in the cardiovascular (CV) risk profile. AIM: To compare the clustering of CV risk factors (RFs) in nondiabetic subjects with normal fasting glucose (NFG) and IFG. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 3739 nondiabetic subjects. Demographics, medical history, and CV risk factors were collected and lipid profile, fasting glucose levels (FBG), C-reactive protein (hsCRP), blood pressure (BP), anthropometric measurements, and aerobic capacity were determined. RESULTS: 559 (15%) subjects had IFG: they had a higher mean age, BMI, waist circumference, non-HDL cholesterol, BP, and hsCRP (p < 0.0001) and lower HDL (p < 0.001) and aerobic capacity (p < 0.001). They also had a higher prevalence of hypertension (34% versus 25%; p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (79% versus 74%; p < 0.001), and obesity (29% versus 16%; p < 0.001) and a higher Framingham risk score (8% versus 6%; p < 0.001). The probability of presenting 3 or more CV RFs adjusted by age and gender was significantly higher in the top quintile of fasting glucose (≥98 mg/dL; OR = 2.02; 1.62-2.51). CONCLUSIONS: IFG in the nondiabetic range is associated with increased cardiovascular RF clustering.

Comparison of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 and High Sensitive C-Reactive Protein as Determinants of Metabolic Syndrome in Subjects without Coronary Heart Disease: In Search of the Best Predictor.

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is a marker of metabolic syndrome (MS) and cardiovascular (CV) disease. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) also predicts CV disease. There are no reports comparing these markers as predictors of MS. Methods. Cross-sectional study comparing Lp-PLA2 and hsCRP as predictors of MS in asymptomatic subjects was carried out; 152 subjects without known atherosclerosis participated. Data were collected on demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, anthropometric and biochemical measurements, and hsCRP and Lp-PLA2 activity levels. A logistic regression analysis was performed with each biomarker and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for MS. Results. Mean age was 46 ± 11 years, and 38% of the subjects had MS. Mean Lp-PLA2 activity was 185 ± 48 nmol/mL/min, and mean hsCRP was 2.1 ± 2.2 mg/L. Subjects with MS had significantly higher levels of Lp-PLA2 (P = 0.03) and hsCRP (P < 0.0001) than those without MS. ROC curves showed that both markers predicted MS. Conclusion. Lp-PLA2 and hsCRP are elevated in subjects with MS. Both biomarkers were independent and significant predictors for MS, emphasizing the role of inflammation in MS. Further research is necessary to determine if inflammation predicts a higher risk for CV events in MS subjects.