[Deployment of the nurse practitioner and physician assistant in The Netherlands]. / De inzet van de verpleegkundig specialist en physician assistant.

The Physician Assistant and the Nurse Practitioner have been successfully implemented in the Dutch health care system. The professionals provide good quality care, contribute to reducing the workload of physicians, and in most cases are cost-effective. The changing labor market, the increased demand for care and the way health care is organized will further increase demand. Within the labor market, we see several developments affecting the demand for PAs and USs; the need for physicians to have more work-life balance and the shortage of residents not in training ('anioses'). The increased and changing demand for care also requires additional staff, in this case PAs and VSs. In addition, it appears to be quite possible to have care performed by a PA or VS supported by the use of technology and guidelines.

Advanced Practice Providers as Leaders of a Rapid Response Team: A Prospective Cohort Study.

In view of the shortage of medical staff, the quality and continuity of care may be improved by employing advanced practice providers (APPs). This study aims to assess the quality of these APPs in critical care. In a large teaching hospital, rapid response team (RRT) interventions led by APPs were assessed by independent observers and intensivists and compared to those led by medical residents MRs. In addition to mortality, the MAELOR tool (assessment of RRT intervention), time from RRT call until arrival at the scene and time until completion of clinical investigations were assessed. Process outcomes were assessed with the crisis management skills checklist, the Ottawa global rating scale and the Mayo high-performance teamwork scale. The intensivists assessed performance with the handoff CEX recipient scale. Mortality, MAELOR tool, time until arrival and clinical investigation in both groups were the same. Process outcomes and performance observer scores were also equal. The CEX recipient scores, however, showed differences between MRs and APPs that increased with experience. Experienced APPs had significantly better situational awareness, better organization, better evaluations and better judgment than MRs with equal experience (p < 0.05). This study shows that APPs perform well in leading an RRT and may provide added quality over a resident. RRTs should seriously consider the deployment of APPs instead of junior clinicians.

Advanced practice providers versus medical residents as leaders of rapid response teams: A 12-month retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: In a time of worldwide physician shortages, the advanced practice providers (APPs) might be a good alternative for physicians as the leaders of a rapid response team. This retrospective analysis aimed to establish whether the performance of APP-led rapid response teams is comparable to the performance of rapid response teams led by a medical resident of the ICU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective single-center cohort study, the electronic medical record of a tertiary hospital was queried during a 12-months period to identify patients who had been visited by our rapid response team. Patient- and process-related outcomes of interventions of rapid response teams led by an APP were compared with those of teams led by a medical resident using various parameters, including the MAELOR tool, which measures the performance of a rapid response team. RESULTS: In total, 179 responses of the APP-led teams were analyzed, versus 275 responses of the teams led by a resident. Per APP, twice as many calls were handled than per resident. Interventions of teams led by APPs, and residents did not differ in number of admissions (p = 0.87), mortality (p = 0.8), early warning scores (p = 0.2) or MAELOR tool triggering (p = 0.19). Both groups scored equally on time to admission (p = 0.67) or time until any performed intervention. CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis showed that the quality of APP-led rapid response teams was similar to the quality of teams led by a resident. These findings need to be confirmed by prospective studies with balanced outcome parameters.

Procedures Performed by Advanced Practice Providers Compared With Medical Residents in the ICU: A Prospective Observational Study.

To assess the frequency and safety of procedures performed by advanced practice providers and medical residents in a mixed-bed ICU. DESIGN: A prospective observational study where consecutive invasive procedures were studied over a period of 1 year and 8 months. The interventions were registered anonymously in an online database. Endpoints were success rate at first attempt, number of attempts, complications, level of supervision, and teamwork. SETTING: A 33-bedded mixed ICU. SUBJECTS: Advanced practice providers and medical residents. INTERVENTIONS: Registration of the performance of tracheal intubation, central venous and arterial access, tube thoracostomies, interhospital transportation, and electrical cardioversion. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: A full-time advanced practice provider performed an average of 168 procedures and a medical resident an average of 68. The advanced practice provider inserted significant more radial, brachial, and femoral artery catheters (66% vs 74%, p = 0.17; 15% vs 12%, p = 0.14; 18% vs 14%, p = 0.14, respectively). The median number of attempts needed to successfully insert an arterial catheter was lower, and the success rate at first attempt was higher in the group treated by advanced practice providers (1.30 [interquartile range, 1-1.82] vs 1.53 [interquartile range, 1-2.27], p < 0.0001; and 71% vs 54%, p < 0.0001). The advanced practice providers inserted more central venous catheters (247 vs 177) with a lower median number of attempts (1.20 [interquartile range, 1-1.71] vs 1.33 [interquartile range, 1-1.86]) and a higher success rate at first attempt (81% vs 70%; p < 0.005). The number of intubations by advanced practice providers was 143 and by medical residents was 115 with more supervision by the advanced practice provider (10% vs 0%; p = 0.01). Team performance, as reported by nursing staff, was higher during advanced practice provider procedures compared with medical resident procedures (median, 4.85 [interquartile range, 4.85-5] vs 4.73 [interquartile range, 4.22-5]). Other procedures were also more often performed by advanced practice providers. The complication rate in the advanced practice provider-treated patient group was lower than that in the medical resident group. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced practice providers in critical care performed procedures safe and effectively when compared with medical residents. Advanced practice providers appear to be a valuable addition to the professional staff in critical care when it comes to invasive procedures.

Utility of the cold pressor test to predict future cardiovascular events.

INTRODUCTION: The cold pressor test (CPT) is a common and extensively validated test, which induces systemic stress involving immersion of an individual's hand in ice water (normally temperature between 0 and 5 degrees Celsius) for a period of time. CPT has been used in various fields, like examining effects of stress on memory, decision-making, pain and cardiovascular health. Areas covered: In terms of cardiovascular health, current research is mainly interested in predicting the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events. The objective of this review is to give an overview of the history and methodology of the CPT, and clinical utility in possibly predicting CV events in CAD and other atherosclerotic diseases. Secondly, we will discuss possible future applications of the CPT in clinical care. Expert opinion: An important issue to address is the fact that the physiology of the CPT is not fully understood at this moment. As pointed out multiple mechanisms might be responsible for contributing to either coronary vasodilatation or coronary vasoconstriction. Regarding the physiological mechanism of the CPT and its effect on the measurements of the carotid artery reactivity even less is known.

Impact of the Advanced Practice Provider in Adult Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects on quality and efficiency of implementation of the advanced practice provider in critical care. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were used to extract articles regarding advanced practice providers in critical care. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were selected when reporting a comparison between advanced practice providers and physician resident/fellows regarding the outcome measures of mortality, length of stay, or specific tasks. Descriptive studies without comparison were excluded. The methodological quality of the included studies was rated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The agreement between the reviewers was assessed with Cohen's kappa. A meta-analysis was constructed on mortality and length of stay. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One-hundred fifty-six studies were assessed by full text. Thirty comparative cohort studies were selected and analyzed. These compared advanced practice providers with physician resident/fellows. All studies comprised adult intensive care. Most of the included studies showed a moderate to good quality. Over time, the study designs advanced from retrospective designs to include prospective and comparative designs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four random effects meta-analyses on length of stay and mortality were constructed from the available studies. These meta-analyses showed no significant difference between performance of advanced practice providers on the ICU and physician residents/fellows on the ICU, suggesting the quality of care of both groups was equal. Mean difference for length of stay on the ICU was 0.34 (95% CI, -0.31 to 1.00; I = 99%) and for in hospital length of stay 0.02 (95% CI, -0.85 to 0.89; I = 91%); whereas the odds ratio for ICU mortality was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.81-1.19; I = 37.3%) and for hospital mortality 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79-1.07; I = 28%). CONCLUSIONS: This review and meta-analysis shows no differences between acute care given by advanced practice providers compared with physician resident/fellows measured as length of stay or mortality. However, advanced practice providers might add value to care in several other ways, but this needs further study.

Use of Postoperative Peak Arterial Lactate Level to Predict Outcome After Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: In the present study, the authors investigated the predictive value of postoperative peak arterial lactate levels for early and late mortality after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Single-center study in an academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2004 and 2014 (n = 16,376). INTERVENTIONS: Different cardiac surgical procedures. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were classified according to the peak arterial lactate level (PALL) within 3 days postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to identify postoperative peak arterial lactate level as a predictor for early and late mortality respectively. In 8460 patients (51.7%), lactate was not measured postoperatively because these patients were managed according to the fast-track protocol. These patients constituted group 1 in our population but were excluded from the regression analysis. The remaining patients (n = 7,916; 48.3%) were divided according to the postoperative peak arterial lactate level (PALL): PALL<5 mmol/L (group 2), PALL 5 to 10 mmol/L (group 3), and PALL of>10 mmol/L (group 4). Early mortality was 3.7%, 20.4%, and 62.9% in groups 2, 3, and 4 respectively (p<0.0001). This mortality rate was significantly higher than that of group 1 (1.6%); p<0.0001. Multivariate regression analyses revealed postoperative peak arterial lactate as a significant predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 1.44 [1.39-1.48], p<0.001) as well as for late mortality (hazard ratio = 1.05 [1.01-1.10], p<0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative peak arterial lactate level in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is an independent predictor for both early and late mortality.

Vertebral fracture assessment in supine position: comparison by using conventional semiquantitative radiography and visual radiography.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed with the patient in the supine position and conventional semiquantitative radiography of the spine by using conventional visual radiography of the spine as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethics review board; informed consent was obtained from the patients. A total of 250 consecutive patients (mean age, 62.0 years; range, 25-89 years) consisting of 190 women (mean age, 64 years; range, 25-89 years) and 60 men (mean age, 57.0 years; range, 27-83 years) who were suspected of having osteoporosis and who underwent VFA in the supine position and radiography of the spine were evaluated. VFA and semiquantitative radiography were analyzed by using a six-marker point method to describe the shape and deformity of each vertebra. Visual radiography of the lateral spine was performed by an experienced radiologist. The agreement between VFA, visual radiography, and semiquantitative radiography of semiquantitative graded fractures was assessed by using weighted kappa statistics. RESULTS: Visual radiography helped identify 92 (36.8%) patients with at least one vertebral fracture (mean, 1.8 per patient). Most fractures were present in T7, T12, and L1. Excellent agreement was found between VFA and visual radiography, with 97.5% concordance and kappa = 0.82; VFA and semiquantitative radiography were in agreement in 97.4% of patients, with kappa = 0.83; and visual radiography and semiquantitative radiography were in agreement in 98.1%, with kappa = 0.87. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values calculated by lesion level for VFA compared with visual assessment were 83.6%, 99.1%, 84.1%, and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: VFA performed with patients in the supine position is an accurate method to help detect vertebral fractures when compared with conventional spine radiography. VFA permits combination of fracture assessment with bone mineral density measurement in a single session.

Severity of iron overload of proband determines serum ferritin levels in families with HFE-related hemochromatosis: the HEmochromatosis FAmily Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In families of patients with clinically detected hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) early screening has been suggested to prevent morbidity and mortality. Here, we aim to identify determinants for iron overload in first-degree family members of C282Y homozygous probands with clinically detected HH. METHODS: Data on HFE-genotype, iron parameters, demographics, lifestyle factors and health, were collected from 224 Dutch C282Y homozygous patients with clinically diagnosed HH and 735 of their first-degree family members (FDFM), all participating in the HEmochromatosis FAmily Study (HEFAS). RESULTS: The best predictive multivariable model forecasted 45% of variation of the serum ferritin levels. In this model severity of iron overload in the proband significantly predicted serum ferritin levels in FDFM. Other significant determinants in this model consisted of C282Y homozygosity, compound heterozygosity, age at testing for serum ferritin and supplemental iron intake, whereas a low body mass index showed a protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a model to assess the risk of development of iron overload for relatives of probands with HH. These results might be instrumental in the development of an optimal strategy for future family screening programs.

Non-invasive liver iron concentration measurement by MRI: comparison of two validated protocols.

In the non-invasive determination of the liver iron concentration several validated MRI methods are available, two of which are compared in this study. Twenty-eight patients were examined by MRI and evaluated by the methods of Kreeftenberg et al. [Kreeftenberg Jr HG, Mooyaart EL, Huizenga JR, Sluiter WJ, Kreeftenberg Sr HG. Quantification of liver iron concentration with magnetic resonance imaging by combining T1-, T2-weighted spin echo sequences and a gradient echo sequence. Neth J Med 2000;56:133-7] and Gandon et al. [Gandon Y, Olivie D, Guyader D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet 2004;363:357-62]. It is concluded that the latter shows a better inter- and intra-observer correlation and is more accurate because of the automated preselection of one of five sequences most sensitive in the estimated liver iron concentration range. In the Kreeftenberg method combining the results of three suboptimal sequences, leads to underestimation of the liver iron concentration.

Correlation between serum ferritin levels and liver iron concentration determined by MR imaging: impact of hematologic disease and inflammation.

Liver iron concentration was determined in 28 patients by magnetic resonance imaging using the method of Gandon et al. (Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet 2004;363:357-362). The result showed a significant correlation with blood plasma ferritin content (Spearman's r=.66; P<.001) and a slightly improving correlation coefficient when limited to those patients not known to have inflammation (r=.82; n=17; P<.001). Zooming in on patients with hematologic disease also had a beneficial effect on the correlation between liver iron content and plasma ferritin level (r=.79; n=13; P=.001). It is concluded that in patients without inflammation and in patients with hematologic disease, the content of ferritin in blood is a better predictor of liver iron content than in other patient categories.

The availability of diseases for medical students in a university hospital.

The Dutch national objectives for the education of medical doctors (in terms of diseases), expressed in the form of a student compiled logbook, must be attained at the time of graduation. The diseases that are required are divided into the categories 'essential' and 'compulsory choice'. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the inpatient department of internal nedicine offers medical students sufficient diseases during two four-week periods in the clerkship, such that the required diseases related to Internal Medicine as described in our logbook can be met. At five subdivisions, medical doctors recorded the diseases available for students. Of the 37 'essential' diseases students may be expected to encounter during one four-week stay in the department: 57% in internal medicine-I; 55% in internal medicine-II; 47% in nephrology; 41% in respiratory medicine; 13% in oncology. Of the 65 'compulsory choice' diseases the number of diseases encountered is respectively: 78%; 57%; 41%; 34%; 33%. We conclude that a considerable number of the diseases required by the Blueprint and therefore by the government is available in two four-week periods in the inpatient clerkship, when this comprises a stay at a general subdivision and a specialist-oriented subdivision. To be more precise about the fulfilment of the logbook requirements, further research is necessary.