Mixed methods evaluation of handshake antimicrobial stewardship on adult inpatient medicine floors.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of handshake antimicrobial stewardship on medicine floors at a large tertiary care hospital. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: 1,278-bed academic hospital. Patients: Adults admitted to non-ICU medicine services. Interventions: A handshake stewardship team consisting of an infectious diseases (ID) physician and pharmacist reviewed charts of patients receiving antimicrobials on medicine floors without a formal ID consult. Recommendations were communicated in-person to providers and acceptance rates were examined with descriptive statistics. Additional data regarding program perception among providers were obtained via surveys. Antibiotic usage trends were extracted from National Healthcare Safety Network Antimicrobial Use option data and evaluated using an interrupted time-series analysis pre- and post-intervention. Results: The overall acceptance rate of interventions was 80%, the majority being recommendations either to discontinue (37%) or de-escalate therapy (28%). Medical residents and hospitalists rated the intervention favorably with 90% reporting recommendations were helpful all or most of the time. There was a statistically significant decrease in vancomycin (78 vs 70 DOT/1,000 d present (DP), p = 0.002) and meropenem (24 vs 17 DOT/1,000 DP, p = 0.007) usage and a statistically significant increase in amoxicillin-clavulanate usage (11 vs 15 DOT/1,000 DP, p < 0.001). Overall antibiotic usage remained unchanged by the intervention, though pre-intervention there was a nonsignificant overall increasing trend while post-intervention there was a nonsignificant decreasing trend in overall usage. There was no change in in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: The addition of handshake stewardship with adult medicine services was favorably viewed by participants and led to shifts in antibiotic usage.

Safety and efficacy of weight-based ganciclovir dosing strategies in overweight/obese patients.

BACKGROUND: The management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is particularly challenging as both CMV and its usual first-line treatment, ganciclovir, are associated with neutropenia. Ganciclovir dosing is weight-based, most commonly utilizing total body weight (TBW). The subsequent high doses of ganciclovir in overweight/obese patients may increase the risk of toxicity. Utilizing adjusted body weight (AdjBW) dosing may help mitigate this risk. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in toxicity and efficacy between TBW and AdjBW ganciclovir dosing strategies in overweight/obese patients. METHODS: This retrospective study conducted safety and efficacy analyses of ganciclovir courses (≥72 h) used as CMV treatment. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000 cells/µL), and the primary efficacy outcome was a 2-log decrease in CMV polymerase chain reaction within 4 weeks following ganciclovir initiation. In both analyses, courses were excluded in which ganciclovir was dosed outside of specified renal dosing parameters for >20% of the course. RESULTS: Among the 253 courses in the safety cohort, there was no difference in the incidence of neutropenia (17.4% vs. 13.5%, p = .50) in AdjBW compared to TBW dosing. In the 62 courses evaluating efficacy, there was no statistical difference between AdjBW and TBW dosing (60.0% vs. 45.2%, p = .28). No subgroups were identified in which AdjBW dosing was advantageous. CONCLUSION: Utilization of AdjBW ganciclovir dosing did not result in decreased neutropenia or treatment efficacy as compared to TBW dosing. Further studies with larger patient populations would be beneficial to confirm these findings.

Experience with dalbavancin for long-term antimicrobial suppression of left ventricular assist device infections.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a common strategy for management of end-stage heart failure. LVADs carry a risk of infection of the implanted device components, and skin flora are commonly implicated. Long-term antibiotics may be needed for management of deep device infection or recurrent superficial infections. In appropriately selected patients, dalbavancin can be a feasible option given its extended dosing interval. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center review of patients presenting with an LVAD infection between January 2011 and November 2022, where management included the use of dalbavancin. Data regarding LVAD placement, details of index infection, dalbavancin use and outcomes was obtained from chart review, and documented in a RedCap database. RESULTS: The mean time from LVAD placement to index infection was 131.6 weeks (standard deviation 87.2 weeks). The most common targeted organism was Corynebacterium striatum in six of 10 patients. Index infection presented as deep driveline infection in four patients and recurrent superficial driveline infection in three patients. Five patients had a concurrent bloodstream infection. Dalbavancin was discontinued in two patients due to breakthrough infection, with one patient requiring surgical intervention. No drug-related adverse events were noted. CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin is an attractive option in the management of long-term LVAD infection in patients for whom alternative oral or parenteral antibiotics are not a feasible option. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal dosing of dalbavancin in this setting, and to study adverse events and long-term outcomes of dalbavancin.

Spectrum scores: Toward a better definition of de-escalation.

Spectrum scores measure antimicrobial utilization while also quantifying the spectrum of activity. Accordingly, changes in spectrum score can be used to identify antimicrobial de-escalation. We show that spectrum-score-based de-escalation has a 95.7% positive percentage agreement and 81.6% negative percentage agreement versus de-escalation defined as stopping either antistaphylococcal or antipseudomonal agents.

Prospective Nasal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Pneumonia.

We carried out a prospective de-escalation study based on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal cultures in intensive care unit patients with suspected pneumonia. Days of anti-MRSA therapy was significantly reduced in the intervention group (2 [0-3] days vs 1 [0-2] day; P < .01). Time to MRSA de-escalation was also shortened in the intervention group.

Assessment of Antibiotic De-escalation by Spectrum Score in Patients With Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) cause significant mortality. Guidelines recommend empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by de-escalation (DE). This study sought to assess the impact of DE on treatment failure. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study screened all adult patients with a discharge diagnosis code for pneumonia from 2016 to 2019. Patients were enrolled if they met predefined criteria for HAP/VAP ≥48 hours after admission. Date of pneumonia diagnosis was defined as day 0. Spectrum scores were calculated, and DE was defined as a score reduction on day 3 versus day 1. Patients with DE were compared to patients with no de-escalation (NDE). The primary outcome was composite treatment failure, defined as all-cause mortality or readmission for pneumonia within 30 days of diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 11860 admissions screened, 1812 unique patient-admissions were included (1102 HAP, 710 VAP). Fewer patients received DE (876 DE vs 1026 NDE). Groups were well matched at baseline, although more patients receiving DE had respiratory cultures ordered (56.6% vs 50.6%, P = .011). There was no difference in composite treatment failure (35.0% DE vs 33.8% NDE, P = .604). De-escalation was not associated with treatment failure on multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.33). Patients receiving DE had fewer antibiotic days (median 9 vs 11, P < .0001), episodes of Clostridioides difficile infection (2.2% vs 3.8%, P = .046), and hospital days (median 20 vs 22 days, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation and NDE resulted in similar rates of 30-day treatment failure; however, DE was associated with fewer antibiotic days, episodes of C difficile infection, and days of hospitalization.

Evaluation of Total Body Weight versus Adjusted Body Weight Liposomal Amphotericin B Dosing in Obese Patients.

Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is used for various fungal infections, but it is unclear which dosing weight to use in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of adjusted body weight (adjBW) versus total body weight (TBW) dosing of LAmB. This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients who received LAmB for definitive therapy and whose TBW exceeded 120% of their ideal body weight (IBW). Analyses were conducted for 3 mg/kg for adjBW versus TBW and 5 mg/kg for adjBW versus TBW. A total of 238 patients were included. For the 68 patients who received LAmB at 3 mg/kg, there were no differences in safety or efficacy outcomes. For the 170 patients who received LAmB at 5 mg/kg, significantly more patients in the TBW group experienced the primary outcome of nephrotoxicity (57% versus 35% [P value of 0.016]) and had significantly higher rates of early discontinuation of LAmB due to toxicity (33% versus 17% [P = 0.030]). There was a trend toward increased 90-day mortality in the adjBW group (60% versus 45% [P = 0.079]); however, adjBW dosing was not associated with increased mortality in an adjusted model. Given the lower rates of nephrotoxicity but a possible trend toward increased mortality in patients whose TBW exceeds 120% of their IBW, dosing LAmB by adjBW may be reasonable in patients who are not critically ill and who have lower-risk infections. In critically ill patients or those with fungal pathogens or sites of infection associated with higher mortality risk, dosing by TBW can be considered.

Evaluation of Total Body Weight versus Adjusted Body Weight Voriconazole Dosing in Obese Patients.

This retrospective single-center study of a cohort of adult patients who received voriconazole with a steady-state trough concentration measured during therapy evaluated the rate of therapeutic trough attainment using adjusted body weight (AdjBW)-based and total body weight (TBW)-based dosing in overweight and obese patients. Of the 130 patients included, 45 patients received TBW-based dosing and 85 patients received AdjBW-based dosing. Therapeutic trough attainment was significantly improved with AdjBW-based dosing compared to TBW-based dosing (64.7% versus 46.7%; P = 0.047).

Evaluation of a hybrid antimicrobial restriction process at a large academic medical center.

We conducted a retrospective review of a hybrid antimicrobial restriction process demonstrating adherence to appropriate use criteria in 72% of provisional-only orders, in 100% of provisional orders followed by ID orders, and in 97% of ID-initiated orders. Therapy interruptions occurred in 24% of provisional orders followed by ID orders.

A Cluster of Cefepime-induced Neutropenia During Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.

A cluster of cefepime-induced neutropenia (CIN) was identified from June 2017 to May 2018 in a regional outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy population. Our data suggest prolonged courses of cefepime (≥2 weeks), administered by rapid intravenous push, were associated with a higher risk of CIN.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of tedizolid for the treatment of skin infections.

INTRODUCTION: Tedizolid is indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Although tedizolid shares many similar properties with linezolid, another oxazolidinone used to treat ABSSSI, the two antibiotics have several key differences. Areas covered: This review provides a detailed summary of the overall pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of tedizolid for the treatment of ABSSSI. Expert opinion: Compared to other antibiotics used for ABSSSI, tedizolid has several advantages. Tedizolid has a long half-life, allowing for once daily dosing. Tedizolid also has broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and Enterococci - including isolates demonstrating resistance to linezolid. It is available in both oral and intravenous formulations, and, has outstanding oral bioavailability, allowing for oral-step down therapy. There is also some evidence that, tedizolid has fewer significant interactions with serotonin reuptake inhibitors or monoamine oxidase inhibitors than linezolid. Finally, thrombocytopenia may occur less often with tedizolid than linezolid. However, these benefits must be weighed against the financial cost of tedizolid and the availability of alternative antibiotic choices.

Effective Antibiotic Conservation by Emergency Antimicrobial Stewardship During a Drug Shortage.

We present the first description of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) used to successfully manage a multi-antimicrobial drug shortage. Without resorting to formulary restriction, meropenem utilization decreased by 69% and piperacillin-tazobactam by 73%. During the shortage period, hospital mortality decreased (P=.03), while hospital length of stay remained unchanged. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:356-359.

Ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) is increasingly challenging due to increased resistance of Gram-negative organisms. These multidrug resistant organisms lead to an increase in morbidity and mortality. This has led to renewed interest in use of older ß-lactam antibiotics in combination with newer ß-lactamase inhibitors. Ceftazidime-avibactam is one of the newest such combination antibiotics, which has been released for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in combination with metronidazole. Areas covered: In this drug evaluation manuscript cIAI along with the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and clinical study results of ceftazidime-avibactam are reviewed. Expert opinion: The role of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with metronidazole in the treatment of cIAI is still to be defined. Patients with cIAI known to be infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae would be clear candidates for treatment with this agent, as would patients infected with more common types of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Gram-negative pathogens if a carbapenem alternative were desired. At present, it is difficult to establish a clear group of patients with cIAI for whom initial empiric therapy with this agent would be warranted.

New Gram-Positive Agents: the Next Generation of Oxazolidinones and Lipoglycopeptides.

The growing problem of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), has reached a critical state. Tedizolid phosphate, dalbavancin, and oritavancin have recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and represent the next generation of oxazolidinones and lipoglycopeptides. All three agents exhibit in vitro activity and clinical efficacy against MRSA. Tedizolid phosphate and oritavancin demonstrate in vitro activity against VRE. These new Gram-positive agents are reviewed here.