RESUMO
Background: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) can lead to functional decline in geriatric and polytraumatized patients. Treatment of PHFs is an area of much debate and much variability between practitioners. Objectives: We surveyed orthopedic trauma (OT) and shoulder and elbow (SE) surgeons to evaluate differences in postoperative protocols when treating acute PHFs with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), or hemi or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Materials and methods: We distributed a web-based survey to three OT and SE associations between August 2018-April 2019. Questions included practice characteristics, standard postoperative protocols for weight-bearing, lifting, and range of motion (ROM) by treatment modality, and factors affecting modality and postoperative protocol decisions. We compared the subspecialties. Results: 239 surgeons [100 (42.2 %) OT, 118 (49.8 %) SE] completed the survey. OT were more likely to allow immediate ROM, lifting, and weight bearing following intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction internal fixation with a locking plate (ORIF), or arthroplasty (all p < 0.025), and to allow earlier unrestricted use of the extremity following IMN and arthroplasty (p = 0.001, p = 0.021 respectively). OT were more likely to consider operating on a PHF if there was contralateral upper extremity injury or need of the injured arm for work or activities of daily living (all p < 0.026). The subspecialties did not differ significantly on factors affecting their postoperative protocols. OT preferred IMN and SE surgeons preferred rTSA for allowing immediate unrestricted postoperative weight bearing, ROM, or lifting (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: There are significant differences in postoperative protocols between trauma and SE surgeons when treating PHFs. Postoperative protocols should be further studied to balance surgical outcomes and the risks of functional decline when treating patients with PHFs.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The 2 main forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and intramedullary nailing in 64 cases. INTERVENTION: Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, bother index, EQ Health, and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, and number and type of adverse events. RESULTS: Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months after injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability, and ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired 1 year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas Femorais Distais , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas , Humanos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Placas Ósseas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fraturas do Fêmur/etiologia , Consolidação da FraturaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Fracture nonunion remains a devastating complication and may occur for several reasons, though the microbial contribution remains poorly estimated. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, including 16S rRNA gene profiling, are capable of rapid bacterial detection within clinical specimens. Nonunion cases may harbor microbes that escape detection by conventional culture methods that contribute to persistence. Our aim was to investigate the application of NGS pathogen detection to nonunion diagnosis. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, samples were collected from 54 patients undergoing open surgical intervention for preexisting long-bone nonunion (n = 37) and control patients undergoing fixation of an acute fracture (n = 17). Intraoperative specimens were sent for dual culture and 16S rRNA gene-based microbial profiling. Patients were followed for evidence of fracture healing, whereas patients not healed at follow-up were considered persistent nonunion. Comparative analyses aimed to determine whether microbial NGS diagnostics could discriminate between nounions that healed during follow-up versus persistent nonunion. RESULTS: Positive NGS detection was significantly correlated with persistent nonunion, positive in 77% more cases than traditional culture. Nonunion cases were observed to have significantly increased diversity and altered bacterial profiles from control cases. DISCUSSION: NGS seems to be a useful adjunct in identification of organisms that may contribute to nonunion. Our findings suggest that the fracture-associated microbiome may be a significant risk factor for persistent nonunion. Ongoing work aims to determine the clinical implications of isolated organisms detected by sequencing and to identify robust microbial predictors of nonunion outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas não Consolidadas , Microbiota , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Microbiota/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To (1) demonstrate that the AO Spine Sacral Classification System can be reliably applied by general orthopaedic surgeons and subspecialists universally around the world and (2) delineate those injury subtypes that are most difficult to classify reliably to refine the classification before evaluating clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Agreement study. SETTING: All-level trauma centers, worldwide. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-two members of the AO Trauma and AO Spine community. INTERVENTION: The AO Sacral Classification System was applied by each surgeon to 26 cases in 2 independent assessments performed 3 weeks apart. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. RESULTS: A total of 8097 case assessments were performed. The kappa coefficient for interobserver agreement for all cases was 0.72/0.75 (assessment 1/assessment 2), representing substantial reliability. When comparing classification grading (A/B/C) regardless of subtype, the kappa coefficient was 0.84/0.85, corresponding to excellent reliability. The kappa coefficients for interobserver reliability were 0.95/0.93 for type A fractures, 0.78/0.79 for type B fractures, and 0.80/0.83 for type C fractures. The overall kappa statistic for intraobserver reliability was 0.82 (range 0.18-1.00), representing excellent reproducibility. When only evaluating morphology type (A/B/C), the average kappa value was 0.87 (range 0.18-1.00), representing excellent reproducibility. CONCLUSION: The AO Spine Sacral Classification System is universally reliable among general orthopaedic surgeons and subspecialists worldwide, with substantial interobserver and excellent intraobserver reliability.
Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , SacroRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: With no current "gold standard" fixation strategy for syndesmotic injuries and differences in preferred preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic techniques and criteria, methods of reduction, fixation constructs, and postoperative management, the goals of this study were to determine how orthopaedic surgeons currently manage ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmotic disruption, as well as to identify surgeon demographics predictive of syndesmotic management techniques. METHODS: This study was conducted as a web-based survey of foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeons, Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) members, and Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) members. The survey, sent and completed via the HIPAA-compliant Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system, consisted of 18 questions: 6 surgeon demographic questions and 12 specific syndesmotic management questions regarding perioperative protocols and syndesmotic fixation construct techniques. RESULTS: One hundred and ten orthopaedic surgeons completed our survey. Years of practice and type of fellowship were found to be the variables that influenced perioperative syndesmotic management strategies the most, while a number of fractures operated on per year, country of practice, and practice setting also influenced management decisions. Additionally, 59% (65/110) surgeons indicated that the way they have managed syndesmotic injuries has changed at some point in their career, while 33% (36/110) specified that they could foresee themselves changing their management of these injuries in the future. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant variability among responders in preoperative and intraoperative assessment technique, fixation construct, screw removal protocol, and postoperative weightbearing protocol. This study raises awareness of differences in and factors predictive of management strategies and should be used for further discussion when determining a potential gold standard for the management of these complex injuries.
RESUMO
We present the case of an 86-year-old woman who suffered full-thickness soft tissue loss secondary to degloving injury to the lower left limb, resulting in an exposed tibia. This patient underwent drilling to create artificial fenestrations in the cortical bone followed by placement of Integra dermal regeneration template. The technique of drilling fenestrations to expose underlying vasculature of cortical bone has not previously been described in its relationship with Integra dermal regeneration templates in large degloving injuries of the lower limb. This technique enabled us to perform earlier skin grafting and ultimately resulted in complete and timely wound closure. We present this case as a comparable alternative treatment in cases of reconstructive surgery secondary to severe burns or trauma to reduce the time required for successful wound closure over exposed bone in full-thickness tissue loss injuries of the lower limb.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We studied the safety of immediate weight-bearing as tolerated (IWBAT) and immediate range of motion (IROM) after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of selected malleolar ankle fractures (defined as involving bony or ligamentous disruption of 2 or more of the malleoli or syndesmosis without articular comminution) and attempted to identify risk factors for complications. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Level 1 Urban Trauma Center and multiple community hospitals, orthopedic specialty hospitals, and outpatient surgicenters within one metropolitan area. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Of 268 patients at our level 1 trauma center who underwent primary ORIF of a selected malleolar fracture from 2013 to 2018, we identified 133 (49.6%) who were selected for IWBAT and IROM. We used propensity score matching to identify 172 controls who were non-weight-bearing (NWB) and no range of motion for 6 weeks postoperatively. The groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, Charleston Comorbidity Index, smoking status, diabetes status, malleoli involved, percentages undergoing medial malleolus (60.9% IWBAT vs. 51.7% NWB), posterior malleolus (24.1% IWBAT, 26.7% NWB), or syndesmosis fixation (41.4% IWBAT, 42.4% NWB, P = 0.85). INTERVENTION: IWBAT and IROM after ankle ORIF versus NWB for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative complications, including delayed wound healing, superficial or deep infection, and loss of reduction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in total complications (P = 0.41), nonoperative complications (P = 0.53), or operative complications, including a loss of reduction (P = 0.89). We did not identify any factors associated with an increased complication risk, including posterior malleolus or syndesmosis fixation, diabetes, age, or preinjury-assisted ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to demonstrate a difference in complications in general and loss of reduction in particular when allowing immediate weight-bearing/ROM in selected cases of operatively treated malleolar fractures, suggesting this may be safe. Future prospective randomized studies are necessary to determine if immediate weight-bearing/ROM is safe and whether it offers any benefits to patients with operatively treated malleolar fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Suporte de CargaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3). RESULTS: Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment.
Assuntos
Sacro/lesões , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/classificação , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnósticoRESUMO
The optimal surgical approach for acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the lower leg remains debatable. Although a majority of surgeons tend to use a 2-incision approach to 4-compartment fasciotomies, the authors have used a single-incision technique followed by protocolized, staged skin closure. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and complication rate of this strategy. This retrospective study included all patients treated for ACS by a single surgeon during a 3-year period. A protocol was used including a single-incision technique followed by vacuum-assisted wound-closure dressing, periodic return to the operating room at 48- to 72-hour intervals, and sequential wound closure with vertical mattress sutures. Complications associated with this protocol were analyzed. Eleven patients were included in the study. Average length of follow-up was 12 months (range, 2-35 months). There were no instances of malunion, deep or superficial infection, intraoperative neurovascular injury, or progressive neurologic deficits-indicating adequate release of all 4 compartments through a single incision. All patients were closed primarily without need for skin grafting. Average time to primary closure was 4.5 days. One patient had a tibial fracture nonunion and 1 had distal wound breakdown, which healed by secondary intention. A single-incision approach to 4-compartment fasciotomies followed by protocolized skin closure is safe and effective and may reduce the need for skin grafting. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e225-e230.].
Assuntos
Síndromes Compartimentais/cirurgia , Fasciotomia/métodos , Adulto , Fasciotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Pele , Suturas/efeitos adversos , Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , CicatrizaçãoRESUMO
Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities following orthopaedic surgery is well-documented. Though less common than its lower extremity counterpart, upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) has been documented in the literature as well, largely in the context of arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, there is a paucity of literature documenting UEDVT following surgical fixation of upper extremity fractures, specifically fractures involving the proximal humerus. We present a case of UEDVT following a fracture to the proximal humerus and subsequent surgery. Though UEDVT is considered a rare complication following this type of surgery based on a lack of documentation within the literature, we believe a high-index of suspicion is required to prevent potentially life-threatening sequelae, such as pulmonary embolism (PE) and post-thrombotic syndrome.
RESUMO
Yablon originally described that late posttraumatic degenerative ankle arthritis was due to ongoing tibio-talar joint incongruity, and more importantly that anatomic reduction of the lateral malleolus was key to anatomic reduction of the ankle joint, as the talus "faithfully followed that of the lateral malleolus." Ankle fractures involving the lateral malleolus, left unreduced, can lead to malunion and posttraumatic degenerative arthritis. Treatment of this often includes a fibular osteotomy to restore length and rotation. We revisit Yablon's original principles and present a review of the literature pertaining to techniques and outcomes of lateral malleolus malunions treated with distal fibular osteotomies as well as a case report highlighting the challenges and considerations when facing this problem.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Artroscopia/métodos , Fíbula/lesões , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Mal-Unidas/cirurgia , Osteotomia/métodos , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fíbula/cirurgia , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Mal-Unidas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Treatment of oblique and spiral fractures remains challenging. The aim of this study was to introduce and investigate the new LagLoc technique for locked plating with generation of interfragmentary compression, combining the advantages of lag screw and locking-head-screw techniques. Oblique fracture was simulated in artificial diaphyseal bones, assigned to three groups for plating with a seven-hole locking compression plate. Group I was plated with three locking screws in holes one, four, and seven. The central screw crossed the fracture line. In group II the central hole was occupied with a lag screw perpendicular to fracture line, whereas holes one and seven were occupied with locking screws. Group III was instrumented applying the LagLoc technique as follows. Hole four was predrilled perpendicularly to the plate, followed by overdrilling of the near cortex and insertion of a locking screw-crossing the fracture line-whose head was covered by a holding sleeve to prevent temporarily the locking in the plate hole and generate interfragmentary compression. Subsequently, the screw head was released and locked in the plate hole. Holes one and seven were occupied with locking screws. Interfragmentary compression in the fracture gap was measured using pressure sensors. All screws in the three groups were tightened with 4 Nm torque. Interfragmentary compression in group I (167 ± 25 N) was significantly lower in comparison to groups II (431 ± 21 N) and III (379 ± 59 N), p ≤ 0.005. The difference in compression between groups II and III remained not significant (p = 0.999). The new LagLoc technique offers an alternative tool to generate interfragmentary compression with the application of locking plates by combining the biomechanical advantages of lag screw and locking screw fixations. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2886-2891, 2018.
Assuntos
Placas Ósseas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Parafusos ÓsseosAssuntos
Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/normas , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Governo , Humanos , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controleRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Dislocations of the proximal tibiofibular joint are an uncommon injury but have been reported in a variety of different athletes. Treatment and rehabilitation ofthese cases have ranged significantly across the reported cases. CASE REPORT: The present case describes a 23-year-old male professional hockey player who suffered an isolated anterior dislocation of the proximal tibiofibular joint. Spontaneous reduction occurred several days following the injury; however, instability and subluxation continued and screw fixation was required. Ultimately the patient returned to competition at a professional level 3 months following the injury. CONCLUSION: The case illustrates the possibility ofpersistent instability of an isolated proximal tibiofibular joint injury, and also the successful treatment of this by fixation with a single screw. This fixation proved to alleviate pain and allow for a return to weight-bearing activities and professional athletic competition.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to describe the injuries associated with sacral fractures and to analyze their impact on patient outcome. METHODS: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature was performed to identify the injuries associated with sacral fractures. RESULTS: Sacral fractures are uncommon injuries that result from high-energy trauma, and that, due to their rarity, are frequently underdiagnosed and mistreated. Only 5% of sacral fractures occur in isolation. Injuries most often associated with sacral fractures include neurologic injuries (present in up to 50% of sacral fractures), pelvic ring disruptions, hip and lumbar spine fractures, active pelvic/ abdominal bleeding and the presence of an open fracture or significant soft tissue injury. Diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures and fractures extending to the lumbar spine are key factors for the appropriate management of sacral fractures. Importantly, associated systemic (cranial, thoracic, and abdominopelvic) or musculoskeletal injuries should be promptly assessed and addressed. These associated injuries often dictate the management and eventual outcome of sacral fractures and, therefore, any treatment algorithm should take them into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral fractures are complex in nature and often associated with other often-missed injuries. This review summarizes the most relevant associated injuries in sacral fractures and discusses on their appropriate management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Management of acetabular fractures in the senior population can be one of the most challenging injuries to manage. Furthermore, treating surgeons have a paucity of information to guide the treatment in this patient population. THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE: (1) demographic and epidemiologic data, (2) mortality rates for nonoperative compared to operative management at different time points, (3) common fracture configurations, and (4) fracture fixation strategies in senior patients treated with acetabular fractures. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively gathered data at a Level I trauma center over a five-year period. 1123 acetabular fractures were identified. 156 of them were for patients over the age of 65 (average age of 78). RESULTS: Falls and motor vehicle accidents accounted for the two most common mechanisms of injury. 82% of patients had significant medical comorbidities. 51 patients (33%) died within one year, in which 75% of them died within 90 days of their acetabular fracture. 84% of the deceased patients, i.e. from the group of 51 patients, had non-operative treatment. For patients treated with traction alone, there was a 79% one-year mortality and 50% mortality rate within 90 days. Within the entire cohort, 70% had either an associated both-column (ABC) or anterior column/posterior hemitransverse (AC/PHT) fracture pattern. Fifty-seven patients (36.5%) underwent open reduction and internal fixation using standard reduction techniques and surgical implants via two main surgical exposures of ilioinguinal (69%) and Kocher-Langenbeck (29%). CONCLUSION: Geriatric patients with acetabular fractures are uncommon accounting for only 14% of all acetabular fractures. Patients who undergo surgery show lower mortality rates. ABC and AC/PHT fracture patterns are the two most common fracture patterns. Routine fixation constructs and implants can be used to manage these challenging fractures. Most patients are unable to return to their homes and instead require skilled nursing facility during their convalescence.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews the history and structure of Medicare reimbursement with a focus on aspects relevant to the field of orthopedic surgery. Namely, this includes Parts A and B, with particular attention paid to the origins of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) and the physician fee schedule, respectively. We then review newer policies affecting orthopedic surgeons. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent Medicare reforms relevant to our field include readmission penalties, the evolution of bundled payments including the mandatory Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) and Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment (SHFFT) programs, and the new mandatory Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) pay-for-performance program. Providers are facing an increasingly complex payment system and are required to assume growing levels of financial risk. Physicians and practices who prepare for these changes will likely fare best and may even benefit.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Femoral head fractures are uncommon injuries. Small series constitute the majority of the available literature. Surgical approach and fracture management is variable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, method of treatment, and outcomes of consecutive femoral head fractures at a regional academic Level I trauma center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed over a 13-year period. All AO/OTA 31C femoral head fractures were identified. A surgical approach and fixation method was recorded. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed for patients with 6 months or greater follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated for fixation failure, heterotopic ossification (HO), avascular necrosis (AVN) and post-traumatic arthritis. RESULTS: We identified 164 fractures in 163 patients; 147 fractures were available for review. Treatment was operative reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 78 (53.1%), fragment excision in 37 (25.1%) and non-operative in 28 (19%). An anterior approach and mini-fragment screws were used in the majority of patients treated with fixation. Sixty-nine fractures had follow-up greater than 6 months. Sixty-two fractures (89.9%) proceeded to uneventful union. All Pipkin III fractures failed operative fixation. Six patients developed AVN, seven patients had a known conversion to hip arthroplasty; HO developed in 28 (40.6%) patients and rarely required excision. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the femoral head are rare. An anterior approach can be used for fragment excision or fixation using mini-fragment screws. Pipkin III fractures represent catastrophic injuries. Non-bridging, asymptomatic HO is common. AVN and posttraumatic degenerative disease of the hip occur but are uncommon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-prognostic.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/terapia , Cabeça do Fêmur/lesões , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite/etiologia , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/classificação , Fraturas do Fêmur/complicações , Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Cabeça do Fêmur/cirurgia , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Necrose da Cabeça do Fêmur/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ossificação Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossificação Heterotópica/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Study Design Survey study. Objective To determine the global perspective on controversial aspects of sacral fracture classifications. Methods While developing the AOSpine Sacral Injury Classification System, a survey was sent to all members of AOSpine and AOTrauma. The survey asked four yes-or-no questions to help determine the best way to handle controversial aspects of sacral fractures in future classifications. Chi-square tests were initially used to compare surgeons' answers to the four key questions of the survey, and then the data was modeled through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 474 surgeons answered all questions in the survey. Overall 86.9% of respondents felt that the proposed hierarchical nature of injuries was appropriate, and 77.8% of respondents agreed that that the risk of neurologic injury is highest in a vertical fracture through the foramen. Almost 80% of respondents felt that the separation of injuries based on the integrity of L5-S1 facet was appropriate, and 83.8% of surgeons agreed that a nondisplaced sacral U fracture is a clinically relevant entity. Conclusion This study determines the global perspective on controversial areas in the injury patterns of sacral fractures and demonstrates that the development of a comprehensive and universally accepted sacral classification is possible.