Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Blood ; 2024 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728380

RESUMO

In MDS patients higher IPSS-R at transplant is associated with worse transplant outcome. Thus, it may seem beneficial to improve IPSS-R by therapeutic intervention prior to transplantation in order to "down-stage" the disease risk. However, there is no evidence to date to support this approach. A retrospective analysis of the EBMT transplant registry was performed to investigate the role of therapeutic interventions prior to transplantation with regard to changes in IPSS-R and transplant outcomes. A total of 1482 MDS patients with sufficient data to calculate IPSS-R at diagnosis and at time of transplantation were selected and analysed for transplant outcome in a multivariable Cox model including IPSS-R at diagnosis, treatment intervention, change in IPSS-R before transplant and several patient and transplant variables. Transplant outcome was unaffected by IPSS-R change in untreated patients and moderately superior in chemotherapy-treated patients with improved IPSS-R at transplant. Improved IPSS-R after hypomethylating agents (HMA) or other therapies showed no beneficial effect. However, when IPSS-R progressed after chemotherapy, (HMA) or other therapies, transplant outcome was worse than without any prior treatment. Similar results were found when reduction or increase in bone marrow (BM) blasts between diagnosis and transplantation was considered. The results show a limited benefit of IPSS-R down staging or reduction of BM blasts after chemotherapy and no benefit for HMA or other treatments and thus question the role of prior therapy in MDS patients scheduled for transplantation. The model-based survival estimates should help inform decision making for both doctors and patients.

2.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 29(12): 750-756, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37709204

RESUMO

The outcome of patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) who relapse or progress after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) administered as salvage therapy beyond the second treatment line is poor. However, a minority of patients become long-term survivors despite CAR-T failure. The German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) has proposed a hierarchical management algorithm for CAR-T failure in LBCL, aimed at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as definite therapy in eligible patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate characteristics, relapse patterns, and management strategies in long-term survivors after CAR-T failure, with a particular focus on the feasibility and outcome of alloHCT. This was a retrospective analysis of all evaluable patients with a relapse/progression event (REL) observed in a previously reported GLA sample between November 2018 and May 2021. REL occurred in 214 of 356 patients (60%) who underwent CAR-T for LBCL in the previous GLA study. An evaluable dataset was available for 143 of these 214 patients (67%). Twenty-six of 143 patients (18%) survived 12 months or longer from REL, 109 (76%) died within the first year after REL, and 8 (6%) were alive but had not reached the 12-month landmark. Long-term survivors had more favorable pre-CAR-T features, had a longer interval between CAR-T and REL, and had more often received a tumor biopsy after CAR-T failure, whereas the choice of the first salvage regimen had no impact. AlloHCT was feasible in 40 of 53 patients (75%) intended and resulted in a 12-month post-transplantation overall survival of 36% in those patients who underwent transplantation with sensitive or untreated REL. AlloHCT after CAR-T failure in LBCL is feasible and may be an important contributor to long-term survival, although selection bias must be taken into account. Thus, alloHCT should be considered as a reasonable treatment option for eligible patients in this setting. However, because the overall outlook after CAR-T failure remains poor, novel effective therapeutic approaches are needed, either to allow long-term disease control per se or to improve the preconditions for successful alloHCT.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Recidiva , Sobreviventes
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 58(5): 558-566, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36849806

RESUMO

Risk factors for severe SARS-Cov-2 infection course are poorly described in children following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this international study, we analyzed factors associated with a severe course (intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or mortality) in post-HCT children. Eighty-nine children (58% male; median age 9 years (min-max 1-18)) who received an allogeneic (85; 96%) or an autologous (4; 4%) HCT were reported from 28 centers (18 countries). Median time from HCT to SARS-Cov-2 infection was 7 months (min-max 0-181). The most common clinical manifestations included fever (37; 42%) and cough (26; 29%); 37 (42%) were asymptomatic. Nine (10%) children following allo-HCT required ICU care. Seven children (8%) following allo-HCT, died at a median of 22 days after SARS-Cov-2 diagnosis. In a univariate analysis, the probability of a severe disease course was higher in allo-HCT children with chronic GVHD, non-malignant disease, immune suppressive treatment (specifically, mycophenolate), moderate immunodeficiency score, low Lansky score, fever, cough, coinfection, pulmonary radiological findings, and high C-reactive protein. In conclusion, SARS-Cov-2 infection in children following HCT was frequently asymptomatic. Despite this, 10% needed ICU admission and 8% died in our cohort. Certain HCT, underlying disease, and SARS-Cov-2 related factors were associated with a severe disease course.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Transmissíveis , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Feminino , Transplante Homólogo , Estudos Prospectivos , Medula Óssea , Teste para COVID-19 , Tosse/etiologia , COVID-19/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Progressão da Doença , Doenças Transmissíveis/etiologia
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 57(10): 1556-1563, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35835997

RESUMO

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may help physicians to identify a subgroup of patients at high risk of relapse for de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but its relevance among patients affected by secondary AML (sAML) is still unknown. We assessed the impact of MRD among 318 adult patients with sAML who received an allogeneic HCT in first complete remission. At the time of HCT, a total of 208 (65%) patients achieved MRD negativity, while 110 (35%) had positive MRD. 2-year overall survival (OS) was 58.8 % (95% CI 52.2-64.9) with leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 50.0 % (95% CI 43.7-56.1), relapse incidence of 34.2% (95% CI 28.4-40.1) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 23.3 % (95% CI 19-27.7) for the entire cohort. In multivariate analysis, HCT recipients with KPS ≥ 90 experienced less disease recurrence (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) with better LFS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.86). There were no differences in major clinical endpoints between patients with MRD-positive and MRD-negative status at the time of HCT. Pre-transplantation assessment of MRD was not informative on post-HCT outcomes in this retrospective registry-based analysis among patients affected by sAML.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Medula Óssea , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Neoplasia Residual , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante
5.
Blood ; 140(4): 349-358, 2022 07 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316325

RESUMO

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have evolved as a new standard-of-care (SOC) treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Here, we report the first German real-world data on SOC CAR T-cell therapies with the aim to explore risk factors associated with outcomes. Patients who received SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for LBCL and were registered with the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST) were eligible. The main outcomes analyzed were toxicities, response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We report 356 patients who received axi-cel (n = 173) or tisa-cel (n = 183) between November 2018 and April 2021 at 21 German centers. Whereas the axi-cel and tisa-cel cohorts were comparable for age, sex, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), international prognostic index (IPI), and pretreatment, the tisa-cel group comprised significantly more patients with poor performance status, ineligibility for ZUMA-1, and the need for bridging, respectively. With a median follow-up of 11 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, PFS, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) 12 months after dosing were 52%, 30%, and 6%, respectively. While NRM was largely driven by infections subsequent to prolonged neutropenia and/or severe neurotoxicity and significantly higher with axi-cel, significant risk factors for PFS on the multivariate analysis included bridging failure, elevated LDH, age, and tisa-cel use. In conclusion, this study suggests that important outcome determinants of CD19-directed CAR T-cell treatment of LBCL in the real-world setting are bridging success, CAR-T product selection, LDH, and the absence of prolonged neutropenia and/or severe neurotoxicity. These findings may have implications for designing risk-adapted CAR T-cell therapy strategies.


Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Neutropenia , Antígenos CD19 , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 57(1): 23-30, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599284

RESUMO

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains a treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who fail to respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). While imatinib seems to have no adverse impact on outcomes after transplant, little is known on the effects of prior use of second-generation TKI (2GTKI). We present the results of a prospective non-interventional study performed by the EBMT on 383 consecutive CML patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib undergoing allo-HCT from 2009 to 2013. The median age was 45 years (18-68). Disease status at transplant was CP1 in 139 patients (38%), AP or >CP1 in 163 (45%), and BC in 59 (16%). The choice of 2GTKI was: 40% dasatinib, 17% nilotinib, and 43% a sequential treatment of dasatinib and nilotinib with or without bosutinib/ponatinib. With a median follow-up of 37 months (1-77), 8% of patients developed either primary or secondary graft failure, 34% acute and 60% chronic GvHD. There were no differences in post-transplant complications between the three different 2GTKI subgroups. Non-relapse mortality was 18% and 24% at 12 months and at 5 years, respectively. Relapse incidence was 36%, overall survival 56% and relapse-free survival 40% at 5 years. No differences in post-transplant outcomes were found between the three different 2GTKI subgroups. This prospective study demonstrates the feasibility of allo-HCT in patients previously treated with 2GTKI with a post-transplant complications rate comparable to that of TKI-naive or imatinib-treated patients.


Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Dasatinibe/efeitos adversos , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/efeitos adversos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos
7.
Am J Hematol ; 96(1): 40-50, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32944990

RESUMO

Karyotypic analysis at time of diagnosis has an important value in determining initial response to treatment, remission duration and overall survival (OS) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Less is known about its value before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients transplanted with active disease, either relapsed or primary refractory (Rel-Ref) AML. We explored the impact of cytogenetic risk (stratification according to MRC-UK) in 2089 patients with either Ref (n = 972) or Rel AML (n = 1117) transplanted during the period 2000-2017. Overall, 154 patients had a favorable risk, 1283 had an intermediate risk and 652 had an adverse cytogenetic risk. Median follow-up was 49 months. Compared to the favorable risk group, intermediate and adverse risk patients were associated with worse leukemia-free survival and OS and also with a higher incidence of relapse. In a subgroup analysis of patients in the intermediate risk group harboring Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD), this remained an important prognostic factor, being associated with worse outcomes. When analyzing patients according to the intensity of the conditioning regimen, no differences were observed for the main transplant outcomes. In conclusion, in patients diagnosed with AML and transplanted with active disease, karyotype remains an important prognostic factor, allowing splitting patients into different risk groups according to their cytogenetics. Similarly, FLT3-ITD mutation also remains a negative prognostic factor in this population.


Assuntos
Aberrações Cromossômicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Sistema de Registros , Tirosina Quinase 3 Semelhante a fms/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aloenxertos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/genética , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(12): 2372-2377, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32846200

RESUMO

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm characterized by destructive bony lesions, anemia, and renal impairment. Access to effective therapy is limited globally. We report the rates and utilization of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) globally from 2006-2015 to better characterize access to HCT for patients with MM. This was an analysis of a retrospective survey of Worldwide Network of Blood and Marrow Transplant sites, conducted annually between 2006-2015. Incidence estimates were from the Global Burden of Disease study. Outcome measures included total number of autologous and allogeneic HCTs by world regions, and percentage of newly diagnosed MM patients who underwent HCT, calculated by the number of transplants per region in calendar year/gross annual incidence of MM per region. From 2006 to 2015, the number of autologous HCT performed worldwide for MM increased by 107%. Utilization of autologous HCT was highest in Northern America and European regions, increasing from 13% to 24% in Northern America, and an increase from 15% to 22% in Europe. In contrast, the utilization of autologous HCT was lower in the Africa/Mediterranean region, with utilization only changing from 1.8% in 2006 to 4% in 2015. The number of first allogeneic HCT performed globally for MM declined after a peak in 2012 by -3% since 2006. Autologous HCT utilization for MM has increased worldwide in high-income regions but remains poorly utilized in Africa and the East Mediterranean. More work is needed to improve access to HCT for MM patients, especially in low to middle income countries. © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Mieloma Múltiplo , Medula Óssea , Europa (Continente) , Carga Global da Doença , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , América do Norte , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo , Transplante Homólogo
9.
Blood ; 136(12): 1442-1455, 2020 09 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32542357

RESUMO

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although currently used GVHD treatment regimens target the donor immune system, we explored here an approach that aims at protecting and regenerating Paneth cells (PCs) and intestinal stem cells (ISCs). Glucagon-like-peptide-2 (GLP-2) is an enteroendocrine tissue hormone produced by intestinal L cells. We observed that acute GVHD reduced intestinal GLP-2 levels in mice and patients developing GVHD. Treatment with the GLP-2 agonist, teduglutide, reduced de novo acute GVHD and steroid-refractory GVHD, without compromising graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects in multiple mouse models. Mechanistically GLP-2 substitution promoted regeneration of PCs and ISCs, which enhanced production of antimicrobial peptides and caused microbiome changes. GLP-2 expanded intestinal organoids and reduced expression of apoptosis-related genes. Low numbers of L cells in intestinal biopsies and high serum levels of GLP-2 were associated with a higher incidence of nonrelapse mortality in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Our findings indicate that L cells are a target of GVHD and that GLP-2-based treatment of acute GVHD restores intestinal homeostasis via an increase of ISCs and PCs without impairing GVL effects. Teduglutide could become a novel combination partner for immunosuppressive GVHD therapy to be tested in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Peptídeo 2 Semelhante ao Glucagon/uso terapêutico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Intestinos/efeitos dos fármacos , Celulas de Paneth/efeitos dos fármacos , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Células-Tronco/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Feminino , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/patologia , Humanos , Intestinos/citologia , Intestinos/patologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Celulas de Paneth/patologia , Células-Tronco/patologia , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos
10.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 55(4): 698-707, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31484992

RESUMO

Health care costs attributed to biologics have increased exponentially in the recent years, thus biosimilars offer a possible solution to limit costs while maintaining safety and efficacy. Reducing expenditure is vital to health care especially in developing countries where affordability and access to health care is a major challenge. We discuss the opportunities and the challenges of biosimilars in the field of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in low- and lower-middle income countries. Developing countries can potentially invest in the forecasted costs reduction by utilizing biosimilars. This can be used to decrease the costs of procedures such as HCT, which is a rapidly growing field in many developing regions. The introduction of biosimilars in the developing regions faces many challenges which include, but are not limited to: legal and regulatory issues, lack of research infrastructure, and the presence of educational barriers. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed to ensure an effective and safe introduction of biosimilars into low- and lower-middle income countries.


Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Medula Óssea , Países em Desenvolvimento , Renda
12.
EClinicalMedicine ; 15: 33-41, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31709412

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The role of conditioning intensity and stem cell source on modifying pre-transplantation risk in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a matter of debate, but crucial when benchmarking centres. METHODS: This Retrospective, multicenter exploratory-validation analysis of 9103 patients, (55.5% male, median age 50 years; 1-75 years range) with an allogeneic HSCT between 2010 and 2016 from a matched sibling (N = 8641; 95%) or matched unrelated donor (N = 462; 5%) for acute myeloid (N = 6432; 71%) or acute lymphoblastic (N = 2671; 29%) leukaemia in first complete remission, and reported by 240 centres in 30 countries to the benchmark database of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) searched for factors associated with use of transplant techniques (standard N = 6375;70% or reduced intensity conditioning N = 2728;30%, respectively bone marrow N = 1945;21% or peripheral blood N = 7158;79% as stem cell source), and their impact on outcome. FINDINGS: Treatment groups differed significantly from baseline population (p < 0.001), and within groups regarding patient-, disease-, donor-, and centre-related pre-transplantation risk factors (p < 0.001); choice of technique did depend on pre-transplantation risk factors and centre (p < 0.001). Probability of overall survival at 5 years decreased systematically and significantly with increasing pre-transplantation risk score (score 2 vs 0/1 HR: 1·2, 95% c.i. [1·1-1·.3], p = 0.002; score 3 vs 0/1 HR: 1·5, 95% c.i. [1·3-1·7], p < 0.001; score 4/5/6 vs 0/1 HR: 1·9, 95% c.i. [1·6-2·2], p < 0.001) with no significant differences between treatment groups (likelihood ratio test on interaction: p = 0.40). Overall survival was significantly associated with selection steps and completeness of information (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Patients' pre-transplantation risk factors determine survival, independent of transplant techniques. Transplant techniques should be regarded as centre policy, not stratification factor in benchmarking. Selection criteria and completeness of data bias outcome. Outcomes may be improved more effectively through better identifying pre-transplantation factors as opposed to refinement of transplant techniques. FUNDING: The study was funded by EBMT.

13.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(5): 375-385, 2019 02 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403573

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) occurs in the blood of approximately 20% of older persons. CHIP is linked to an increased risk of hematologic malignancies and of all-cause mortality; thus, the eligibility of stem-cell donors with CHIP is questionable. We comprehensively investigated how donor CHIP affects outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We collected blood samples from 500 healthy, related HSCT donors (age ≥ 55 years) at the time of stem-cell donation for targeted sequencing with a 66-gene panel. The effect of donor CHIP was assessed on recipient outcomes, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (CIR/P), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 92 clonal mutations with a median variant allele frequency of 5.9% were identified in 80 (16.0%) of 500 donors. CHIP prevalence was higher in donors related to patients with myeloid compared with lymphoid malignancies (19.2% v 6.3%; P ≤ .001). In recipients allografted with donor CHIP, we found a high cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD; hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.49; P = .003) and lower CIR/P (univariate: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.97; P = .027; multivariate: HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.98; P = .042) but no effect on nonrelapse mortality. Serial quantification of 25 mutations showed engraftment of 24 of 25 clones and disproportionate expansion in half of them. Donor-cell leukemia was observed in two recipients. OS was not affected by donor CHIP status (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.321; P = .434). CONCLUSION: Allogeneic HSCT from donors with CHIP seems safe and results in similar survival in the setting of older, related donors. Future studies in younger and unrelated donors are warranted to extend these results. Confirmatory studies and mechanistic experiments are warranted to challenge the hypothesis that donor CHIP might foster cGVHD development and reduce relapse/progression risk.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/genética , Hematopoese/genética , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/fisiologia , Doadores não Relacionados , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/genética , Neoplasias Hematológicas/patologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Leukemia ; 32(5): 1057-1069, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29515238

RESUMO

This document updates the recommendations on the management of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-neg MPNs) published in 2011 by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consortium. Recommendations were produced by multiple-step formalized procedures of group discussion. A critical appraisal of evidence by using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was performed in the areas where at least one randomized clinical trial was published. Seven randomized controlled trials provided the evidence base; earlier phase trials also informed recommendation development. Key differences from the 2011 diagnostic recommendations included: lower threshold values for hemoglobin and hematocrit and bone marrow examination for diagnosis of polycythemia vera (PV), according to the revised WHO criteria; the search for complementary clonal markers, such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/IDH2, and SRSF2 for the diagnosis of myelofibrosis (MF) in patients who test negative for JAK2V617, CALR or MPL driver mutations. Regarding key differences of therapy recommendations, both recombinant interferon alpha and the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib are recommended as second-line therapies for PV patients who are intolerant or have inadequate response to hydroxyurea. Ruxolitinib is recommended as first-line approach for MF-associated splenomegaly in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk disease; in case of intermediate-1 disease, ruxolitinib is recommended in highly symptomatic splenomegaly. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is recommended for transplant-eligible MF patients with high or intermediate-2 risk score. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is also recommended for transplant-eligible MF patients with intermediate-1 risk score who present with either refractory, transfusion-dependent anemia, blasts in peripheral blood > 2%, adverse cytogenetics, or high-risk mutations. In these situations, the transplant procedure should be performed in a controlled setting.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Nitrilas , Cromossomo Filadélfia , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Esplenomegalia/tratamento farmacológico
15.
J Hematol Oncol ; 11(1): 40, 2018 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29544522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Experience using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched sibling donors (MSD) or unrelated donors (UD) is limited and with controversial results. The study aim was to evaluate PT-Cy as GVHD prophylaxis post-HSCT from MSD and UD transplants. We analyzed 423 patients with acute leukemia who received PT-Cy alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive (IS) drugs as GVHD prophylaxis. Seventy-eight patients received PT-Cy alone (group 1); 204 received PT-Cy in combination with one IS drug-cyclosporine-A (CSA) or methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) (group 2), while 141 patients received PT-Cy in combination with two IS drugs-CSA + MTX or CSA + MMF (group 3). Transplants were performed from 2007 to 2015 and median follow-up was 20 months. RESULTS: Probability of overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 50, 52.2, and 62.4%, for the three groups, respectively, p = 0.06. In multivariate analysis, in comparison to PT-Cy alone, the addition of two IS drugs was associated with reduced risk of extensive cGVHD (HR 0.25, p = 0.02). Use of bone marrow (BM) and anti-thymocyte globulin were independently associated with reduced risk of extensive cGVHD. Prognostic factors for non-relapse mortality (NRM) were the addition of two IS drugs to PT-Cy (HR 0.35, p = 0.04), diagnosis of AML, disease status at transplant, and patient CMV serology. Factors associated with increased OS were the use of PT-Cy with two IS drugs (HR 0.49, p = 0.02), AML, and disease status at transplant. CONCLUSION: For GVHD prophylaxis in MSD and UD HSCT, the addition of IS drugs to PT-Cy enhances its effect and reduces the risk of severe cGVHD, reducing mortality and improving survival.


Assuntos
Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ciclofosfamida/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Irmãos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Doadores não Relacionados , Adulto Jovem
16.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 23(7): 1193-1202, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28285082

RESUMO

The understanding and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have dramatically improved in recent years. However, accurate assessment of the response of myeloma to therapy and its subsequent relapse remains a difficult task. Criteria have changed over time and new parameters have recently been incorporated to evaluate minimal residual disease status. We present a practical approach to assess response and relapse/progression in myeloma in the context of its treatment. A robust reporting schema is crucial to correctly evaluate any treatment protocol and compare results across trials. MM is a highly heterogeneous disease with multifarious manifestations. To assess the tumor load decline after treatment and its increase during relapse/progression, numerous parameters need to be taken into account. As our ability and the tools to measure low levels of disease have improved over time, so have the accepted definitions of response, most recently in August 2016. The goal of this article is to define, describe, and clarify the practical methodological aspects of disease evaluation in response to therapy and in progression or relapse. We expect this practical manual will help myeloma professionals and research workers in data collection for registries and databases and clinical trial reporting.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Haematologica ; 101(9): 1120-7, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27229716

RESUMO

Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation is not a standard therapy for multiple myeloma, some patients can benefit from this intense therapy. There are few reports on outcomes after umbilical cord blood transplantation in multiple myeloma, and investigation of this procedure is warranted. We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients, 85 with multiple myeloma and 10 with plasma cell leukemia, receiving single or double umbilical cord blood transplantation from 2001 to 2013. Median follow up was 41 months. The majority of patients received a reduced intensity conditioning. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 97%±3% at 60 days, and that of 100-day acute graft-versus-host disease grade II-IV was 41%±5%. Chronic graft-versus-host disease at two years was 22%±4%. Relapse and non-relapse mortality was 47%±5% and 29%±5% at three years, respectively. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 24%±5% and 40%±5%, respectively. Anti-thymocyte globulin was associated with decreased incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease, higher non-relapse mortality, decreased overall and progression-free survival. Patients with high cytogenetic risk had higher relapse, and worse overall and progression-free survival. In conclusion, umbilical cord blood transplantation is feasible for multiple myeloma patients.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue do Cordão Umbilical , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Doadores não Relacionados , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue do Cordão Umbilical/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue do Cordão Umbilical/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
18.
Leuk Res ; 39(9): 933-7, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26003666

RESUMO

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potentially curative treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Recent advances in the field of hematopoietic cell allografting have resulted in a practice shift, favoring less intense preparative regimens. We present results of a retrospective comparative analysis of two preparative regimens, namely FB2 (IV fludarabine plus IV busulfan 6.4mg/kg±10%) and FB4 (IV fludarabine plus IV busulfan 12.8mg/kg ±10%), in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic cell allografting in second complete remission at EBMT participating centers. Between 2003 and 2010, 128 AML patients in second complete remission were allografted following a preparative regimen of FB2 (n=88) or FB4 (n=40). The median time-to-neutrophil engraftment was similar whether patients received FB2 (16 (5-38) days) or FB4 (16 (9-29) days), p=0.45. A multivariate analysis showed that use of FB4 resulted in improved 2-year leukemia-free (HR=0.44 (95%CI=0.21, 0.94), p=0.03) and overall survival (HR=0.38 (95%CI=0.16, 0.86), p=0.02). Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (2-year) for all patients was 21% (95%CI=14-28%). Our analysis suggests that FB4 improves 2-year leukemia-free and overall survival in AML allografted in second complete remission. A confirmatory randomized controlled trial that compares these two preparative regimens (FB2 vs. FB4) in AML in CR2 is definitely warranted.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Bussulfano/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/imunologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/patologia , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/imunologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/mortalidade , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indução de Remissão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Homólogo , Vidarabina/uso terapêutico
19.
Blood ; 117(23): 6063-73, 2011 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21447828

RESUMO

The role of high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to evolve in the novel agent era. The choice of induction therapy has moved from conventional chemotherapy to newer regimens incorporating the immunomodulatory derivatives thalidomide or lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. These drugs combine well with traditional therapies and with one another to form various doublet, triplet, and quadruplet regimens. Up-front use of these induction treatments, in particular 3-drug combinations, has affected unprecedented rates of complete response that rival those previously seen with conventional chemotherapy and subsequent ASCT. Autotransplantation applied after novel-agent-based induction regimens provides further improvement in the depth of response, a gain that translates into extended progression-free survival and, potentially, overall survival. High activity shown by immunomodulatory derivatives and bortezomib before ASCT has recently led to their use as consolidation and maintenance therapies after autotransplantation. Novel agents and ASCT are complementary treatment strategies for MM. This article reviews the current literature and provides important perspectives and guidance on the major issues surrounding the optimal current management of younger, transplantation-eligible MM patients.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Fatores Etários , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo
20.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 16(11): 1467-503, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20699125

RESUMO

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/terapia , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Transfusão de Linfócitos , Linfoma não Hodgkin , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Recidiva , Transplante Homólogo , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA