Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability in the Radiologic Assessment of Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing intraobserver and interobserver reliability of 3 different radiologic fusion classifications following uninstrumented single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The objective of the study was to compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of 3 different radiologic spinal fusion scoring systems. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Knowledge regarding radiologic spinal fusion is crucial when studying patients that were treated with lumbar interbody fusion. The scoring system should be reliable and reproducible. Various radiologic classification systems coexist, but the reliability of these systems has thus far not been compared in a single consecutive group of patients. The aim of the present study was the identification of the most valid scoring system in the assessment of interbody fusion. METHODS: We studied a retrospective consecutive cohort of 50 patients who underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure by a single surgeon using a stand-alone cage performed between 1993 and 2002. Plain anterior-posterior, lateral radiographs, and flexion-extension radiographs were made during follow-up visits and were used for analysis. The interbody fusion was scored on these radiographic images using the 3 classification systems (Brantigan, Burkus, and the Radiographic Score) by 2 experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and 2 senior orthopedic spinal surgeons all of whom were blinded to clinical data and outcome. RESULTS: Of the 3 classifications included in the current study, the Burkus classification had a moderate interobserver agreement and a substantial to perfect intraobserver agreement. The other classifications (Bratingan and the Radiographic Score) showed only fair interobserver agreement and moderate to substantial agreement among all observers. No significant differences in reliability between orthopedic surgeons and radiologists were found for all 3 classifications. CONCLUSIONS: The Burkus classification system was classified as most reliable in this, but showed only moderate interobserver agreement. Therefore, the need for a more reliable classification system for the radiographic assessment of lumbar interbody fusion still exists to date.

Spinal fusion using adipose stem cells seeded on a radiolucent cage filler: a feasibility study of a single surgical procedure in goats.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a one-step surgical concept, employing adipose stem cells (ASCs) and a novel degradable radiolucent cage filler (poly-L-lactide-co-caprolactone; PLCL), within polyetheretherketone cages in a stand-alone caprine spinal fusion model. METHODS: A double-level fusion study was performed in 36 goats. Four cage filler groups were defined: (i) acellular PLCL, (ii) PLCL + SVF (freshly harvested stromal vascular fraction highly enriched in ASCs); (iii) PLCL + ASCs (cultured to homogeneity); and (iv) autologous iliac crest bone graft (ABG). Fusion was assessed after 3 and 6 months by radiography, micro-CT, biomechanics, and biochemical analysis of tissue formed inside the cage after 6 months. RESULTS: No adverse effects were observed in all groups. After 3 months, similar and low fusion rates were found. Segmental stability did not differ between groups in all tested directions. Micro-CT imaging revealed significantly higher amounts of mineralized tissue in the ABG group compared to all others. After 6 months, interbody fusion rates were: PLCL 53%, SVF 30%, ASC 43% and ABG 63%. A trend towards higher mineralized tissue content was found for the ABG group. Biochemical and biomechanical analyses revealed equal maturity of collagen cross-links and similar segmental stability between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of the one-step surgical procedure for spinal fusion for the first time. The radiolucent PLCL scaffold allowed in vivo monitoring of bone formation using plain radiography. Addition of stem cells to the PLCL scaffolds did not result in adverse effects, but did not enhance the rate and number of interbody fusions under the current conditions. A trend towards superior results with ABG was found. Further research is warranted to optimize the spinal fusion model for proper evaluation of both PLCL and stem cell therapy.