Management and Characteristics of Embolism and Thrombosis After COVID-19 Vaccination: Scoping Review.

This scoping review aims to 1) identify characteristics of participants who developed embolism and/or thrombotic event(s) after COVID-19 vaccination and 2) review the management during the new vaccine development of the unexpected event(s). This review was conducted following PRISMA for scoping review guidelines. Peer-reviewed articles were searched for studies involving participants with embolism and/or thrombotic event(s) after COVID-19 vaccination with the management described during the early phase after the approval of vaccines. The 12 studies involving 63 participants were included in this review. The majority of participants' ages ranged from 22 to 49 years. The embolism and/or thrombotic event(s) often occur within 30 days post-vaccination. Five of the included studies reported the event after receiving viral vector vaccines and suggested a vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia as a plausible mechanism. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was the most frequently reported post-vaccination thrombosis complication. In summary, the most frequently reported characteristics and management from this review were consistent with international guidelines. Future studies are recommended to further investigate the incidence and additional potential complications to warrant the benefit and safety after receiving COVID-19 vaccine and other newly developed vaccines.

Racial Disparities in Shared Decision-Making and the Use of mHealth Technology Among Adults With Hypertension in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technology has the potential to support shared decision-making (SDM) and improve hypertension control. However, our understanding of the variations in individuals' involvement in SDM and mHealth usage across different racial and ethnic groups in the United States is still limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the extent of involvement in SDM and the usage of mHealth technology in health-related activities among US adults with hypertension from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and to examine whether the mHealth usage differed by individuals' level of engagement in SDM. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional data from the 2017 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey, which was conducted on US adults with self-reported hypertension, and race and ethnicity data were included. The exposure of interest was race and ethnicity. The outcomes were SDM and mHealth usage. SDM was assessed using an item: "In the past 12 months, how often did your health professional: involve you in decisions about your healthcare as much as you wanted?" mHealth usage was defined as using a smartphone or tablet to engage in (1) making health decisions, (2) discussing health decisions with health providers, (3) tracking health progress, and (4) sharing health information. Weighted multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between race and ethnicity and SDM or mHealth usage adjusted for covariates and stratified by the level of engagement in SDM. RESULTS: This study included 4893 adults with hypertension, and the mean age was 61 (SD 13) years. The sample was 53% female, 61% (n=3006) non-Hispanic White, 19% (n=907) non-Hispanic Black or African American, 12% (n=605) Hispanic, 4% (n=193) non-Hispanic Asian, and 4% (n=182) non-Hispanic other. Compared to the non-Hispanic White adults, non-Hispanic Black adults were more likely to use mHealth to make health decisions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.70, 95% CI 1.23-2.34), share health information (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.08), and discuss health decisions with health providers (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.02-1.87). Significant associations were observed specifically among those who were always involved in SDM. Asian adults were less likely to be involved in SDM (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99) and were more likely to use mHealth to track progress on a health-related goal (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.28-3.34) than non-Hispanic White adults. Hispanic adults were less likely to use mHealth to share health information (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67) and discuss health decisions with health providers (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.94) compared to non-Hispanic White adults. CONCLUSIONS: This study observed racial and ethnic disparities in SDM and mHealth usage among US adults with hypertension. These findings emphasize the significance of comprehending the involvement of SDM and the usage of mHealth technology within racially and ethnically diverse populations.

'Snapshot' cohort study design across multi-site research settings: challenges, strategies, and solutions.

Multi-site research studies redefine cohort studies by simultaneously providing a cross-sectional snapshot of patients and monitoring them over time, to evaluate outcomes. However, careful design is crucial to minimize potential biases, such as seasonal variations, that may arise during the study period. Addressing snapshot study challenges requires strategic solutions: implementing multi-stage sampling for representativeness, providing rigorous data collection training, using translation techniques and content validation for cultural and linguistic appropriateness, streamlining ethical approval processes, and applying comprehensive data management for follow-up and missing data. These strategies can optimize the efficacy and ethicality of snapshot studies.

Community empowerment: A concept analysis.

AIM: To report an analysis of the concept of community empowerment. DESIGN: Concept analysis. DATA SOURCES: Literature published in the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Medline electronic databases from 2016 to 2022 were systematically searched from 30 July to 1 October 2022. METHOD: The amended guideline from Walker and Avant's approach (2011) to concept analysis was performed in nine stages: choosing a concept, determining the purpose of analysis, identifying definitions of the concept, defining attributes, identifying a model case, identifying antecedents, identifying consequences, defining empirical referents and applying the concept to nursing practice. RESULTS: Community empowerment is a fundamental idea in health promotion that may assist communities in defining priorities, making choices, developing strategies and executing them to improve health and minimize inequalities in health. Community empowerment is an effective tool that advanced practice nurses (APNs) may employ to eliminate health inequities and promote community health. CONCLUSION: This concept analysis is one step towards broadening nurses' understanding of one of the ideas of health promotion. Additionally, the concept of community empowerment represents an opportunity for additional research in nursing that is applicable to communities. IMPACT: Community empowerment has served as a guiding paradigm for both theory and practice in health promotion. Also, it is recognized that social, economic and environmental elements have a direct effect on health status. However, community empowerment research in advanced nursing practices is limited. This paper will guide future nursing research on community empowerment that goes beyond involvement and engagement, for this is an effective strategy APNs can use to address health disparities and improve community health.