RESUMO
We describe a method to identify candidate cancer biomarkers by analyzing numeric approximations of tissue specificity of human genes. These approximations were calculated by analyzing predicted tissue expression distributions of genes derived from mapping expressed sequence tags (ESTs) to the human genome sequence using a binary indexing algorithm. Tissue-specificity values facilitated high-throughput analysis of the human genes and enabled the identification of genes highly specific to different tissues. Tissue expression distributions for several genes were compared to estimates obtained from other public gene expression datasets and experimentally validated using quantitative RT-PCR on RNA isolated from several human tissues. Our results demonstrate that most human genes ( approximately 98%) are expressed in many tissues (low specificity), and only a small number of genes possess very specific tissue expression profiles. These genes comprise a rich dataset from which novel therapeutic targets and novel diagnostic serum biomarkers may be selected.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Mapeamento Cromossômico/métodos , Genoma Humano/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos , Etiquetas de Sequências Expressas , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Especificidade de Órgãos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To discover prostate cancer biomarkers, we profiled gene expression in benign and malignant cells laser capture microdissected (LCM) from prostate tissues and metastatic prostatic adenocarcinomas. Here we present methods developed, optimized, and validated to obtain high quality gene expression data. RESULTS: RNase inhibitor was included in solutions used to stain frozen tissue sections for LCM, which improved RNA quality significantly. Quantitative PCR assays, requiring minimal amounts of LCM RNA, were developed to determine RNA quality and concentration. SuperScript II reverse transcriptase was replaced with SuperScript III, and SpeedVac concentration was eliminated to optimize linear amplification. The GeneChip(R) IVT labeling kit was used rather than the Enzo BioArray HighYield RNA transcript labeling kit since side-by-side comparisons indicated high-end signal saturation with the latter. We obtained 72 mug of labeled complementary RNA on average after linear amplification of about 2 ng of total RNA. CONCLUSION: Unsupervised clustering placed 5/5 normal and 2/2 benign prostatic hyperplasia cases in one group, 5/7 Gleason pattern 3 cases in another group, and the remaining 2/7 pattern 3 cases in a third group with 8/8 Gleason pattern 5 cases and 3/3 metastatic prostatic adenocarcinomas. Differential expression of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) and hepsin was confirmed using quantitative PCR.