Control of nuclear envelope dynamics during acute ER stress by LINC complexes disassembly and selective, asymmetric autophagy of the outer nuclear membrane.

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) extends to the outer (ONM) and the inner (INM) nuclear membrane forming the nuclear envelope (NE) that delimits the nucleoplasm containing the cell genome. Unfolded protein responses (UPRs) and reticulophagy responses increase or reduce ER size and activities, respectively. If dynamic changes of the ER are transmitted to the contiguous NE was not known. In our recent publication, we report on the transmission of stress-induced ER expansion to the NE, which requires disassembly of the Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes deputed to ensure a physical connection between the cytoplasmic cytoskeleton and the nuclear lamina and to maintain the width between INM and ONM within 50 nm. LINC complexes disassembly relies on reduction of the disulfide bond that covalently links SUN proteins in the INM and KASH proteins (SYNE/NESPRIN proteins in mammals) in the ONM by the ONM-resident reductase TMX4. Upon stress resolution, the physiological shape of the NE is reestablished by SEC62-driven ONM-phagy, where ONM-derived vesicles are directly captured by RAB7- and LAMP1-positive endolysosomes in processes that proceed via asymmetric microautophagy of the NE.

TMX4-driven LINC complex disassembly and asymmetric autophagy of the nuclear envelope upon acute ER stress.

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an organelle of nucleated cells that produces proteins, lipids and oligosaccharides. ER volume and activity are increased upon induction of unfolded protein responses (UPR) and are reduced upon activation of ER-phagy programs. A specialized domain of the ER, the nuclear envelope (NE), protects the cell genome with two juxtaposed lipid bilayers, the inner and outer nuclear membranes (INM and ONM) separated by the perinuclear space (PNS). Here we report that expansion of the mammalian ER upon homeostatic perturbations results in TMX4 reductase-driven disassembly of the LINC complexes connecting INM and ONM and in ONM swelling. The physiologic distance between ONM and INM is restored, upon resolution of the ER stress, by asymmetric autophagy of the NE, which involves the LC3 lipidation machinery, the autophagy receptor SEC62 and the direct capture of ONM-derived vesicles by degradative LAMP1/RAB7-positive endolysosomes in a catabolic pathway mechanistically defined as micro-ONM-phagy.

Modular self-assembly system for development of oligomeric, highly internalizing and potent cytotoxic conjugates targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of FGFR1 is observed in numerous tumors and therefore this receptor constitutes an attractive molecular target for selective cancer treatment with cytotoxic conjugates. The success of cancer therapy with cytotoxic conjugates largely relies on the precise recognition of a cancer-specific marker by a targeting molecule within the conjugate and its subsequent cellular internalization by receptor mediated endocytosis. We have recently demonstrated that efficiency and mechanism of FGFR1 internalization are governed by spatial distribution of the receptor in the plasma membrane, where clustering of FGFR1 into larger oligomers stimulated fast and highly efficient uptake of the receptor by simultaneous engagement of multiple endocytic routes. Based on these findings we aimed to develop a modular, self-assembly system for generation of oligomeric cytotoxic conjugates, capable of FGFR1 clustering, for targeting FGFR1-overproducing cancer cells. METHODS: Engineered FGF1 was used as FGFR1-recognition molecule and tailored for enhanced stability and site-specific attachment of the cytotoxic drug. Modified streptavidin, allowing for controlled oligomerization of FGF1 variant was used for self-assembly of well-defined FGF1 oligomers of different valency and oligomeric cytotoxic conjugate. Protein biochemistry methods were applied to obtain highly pure FGF1 oligomers and the oligomeric cytotoxic conjugate. Diverse biophysical, biochemical and cell biology tests were used to evaluate FGFR1 binding, internalization and the cytotoxicity of obtained oligomers. RESULTS: Developed multivalent FGF1 complexes are characterized by well-defined architecture, enhanced FGFR1 binding and improved cellular uptake. This successful strategy was applied to construct tetrameric cytotoxic conjugate targeting FGFR1-producing cancer cells. We have shown that enhanced affinity for the receptor and improved internalization result in a superior cytotoxicity of the tetrameric conjugate compared to the monomeric one. CONCLUSIONS: Our data implicate that oligomerization of the targeting molecules constitutes an attractive strategy for improvement of the cytotoxicity of conjugates recognizing cancer-specific biomarkers. Importantly, the presented approach can be easily adapted for other tumor markers.

Dissecting biological activities of fibroblast growth factor receptors by the coiled-coil-mediated oligomerization of FGF1.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are integral membrane proteins involved in various biological processes including proliferation, migration and apoptosis. There are a number of regulatory mechanisms of FGFR signaling, which tightly control the specificity and duration of transmitted signals. The effect of the FGFRs spatial distribution in the plasma membrane on receptor-dependent functions is still largely unknown. We have demonstrated that oligomerization of FGF1 with coiled-coil motifs largely improves FGF1 affinity for FGFRs and heparin. Set of developed FGF1 oligomers evoked prolonged activation of FGFR1 and receptor-downstream signaling pathways, as compared to the wild type FGF1. The majority of obtained oligomeric FGF1 variants showed increased stability, enhanced mitogenic activity and largely improved internalization via FGFR1-dependent endocytosis. Importantly, FGF1 oligomers with the highest oligomeric state exhibited reduced ability to stimulate FGFR-dependent glucose uptake, while at the same time remained hyperactive in the induction of cell proliferation. Our data implicate that oligomerization of FGF1 alters the biological activity of the FGF/GFR1 signaling system. Furthermore, developed FGF1 oligomers, due to improved stability and proliferative potential, can be applied in the regenerative medicine or as drug delivery vehicles in the ADC approach against FGFR1-overproducing cancers.

Differential regulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 trafficking and function by extracellular galectins.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are integral membrane proteins that transmit signals through the plasma membrane. FGFRs signaling needs to be precisely adjusted as aberrant FGFRs function is associated with development of human cancers or severe metabolic diseases. The subcellular localization, trafficking and function of FGFRs rely on the formation of multiprotein complexes. In this study we revealed galectins, lectin family members implicated in cancer development and progression, as novel FGFR1 binding proteins. We demonstrated that galectin-1 and galectin-3 directly bind to the sugar chains of the glycosylated extracellular part of FGFR1. Although both galectins compete for the same binding sites on FGFR1, these proteins elicit different impact on FGFR1 function and cellular trafficking. Galectin-1 mimics fibroblast growth factor as it efficiently activates FGFR1 and receptor-downstream signaling pathways that result in cell proliferation and apoptotic evasion. In contrast, galectin-3 induces extensive clustering of FGFR1 on the cell surface that inhibits constitutive internalization of FGFR1. Our data point on the interplay between extracellular galectins and FGFRs in the regulation of cell fate.

Cross-Talk between Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors and Other Cell Surface Proteins.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) constitute signaling circuits that transmit signals across the plasma membrane, regulating pivotal cellular processes like differentiation, migration, proliferation, and apoptosis. The malfunction of FGFs/FGFRs signaling axis is observed in numerous developmental and metabolic disorders, and in various tumors. The large diversity of FGFs/FGFRs functions is attributed to a great complexity in the regulation of FGFs/FGFRs-dependent signaling cascades. The function of FGFRs is modulated at several levels, including gene expression, alternative splicing, posttranslational modifications, and protein trafficking. One of the emerging ways to adjust FGFRs activity is through formation of complexes with other integral proteins of the cell membrane. These proteins may act as coreceptors, modulating binding of FGFs to FGFRs and defining specificity of elicited cellular response. FGFRs may interact with other cell surface receptors, like G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) or receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The cross-talk between various receptors modulates the strength and specificity of intracellular signaling and cell fate. At the cell surface FGFRs can assemble into large complexes involving various cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). The interplay between FGFRs and CAMs affects cell-cell interaction and motility and is especially important for development of the central nervous system. This review summarizes current stage of knowledge about the regulation of FGFRs by the plasma membrane-embedded partner proteins and highlights the importance of FGFRs-containing membrane complexes in pathological conditions, including cancer.

Targeting Cellular Trafficking of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors as a Strategy for Selective Cancer Treatment.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) in response to fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) transmit signals across the cell membrane, regulating important cellular processes, like differentiation, division, motility, and death. The aberrant activity of FGFRs is often observed in various diseases, especially in cancer. The uncontrolled FGFRs' function may result from their overproduction, activating mutations, or generation of FGFRs' fusion proteins. Besides their typical subcellular localization on the cell surface, FGFRs are often found inside the cells, in the nucleus and mitochondria. The intracellular pool of FGFRs utilizes different mechanisms to facilitate cancer cell survival and expansion. In this review, we summarize the current stage of knowledge about the role of FGFRs in oncogenic processes. We focused on the mechanisms of FGFRs' cellular trafficking-internalization, nuclear translocation, and mitochondrial targeting, as well as their role in carcinogenesis. The subcellular sorting of FGFRs constitutes an attractive target for anti-cancer therapies. The blocking of FGFRs' nuclear and mitochondrial translocation can lead to the inhibition of cancer invasion. Moreover, the endocytosis of FGFRs can serve as a tool for the efficient and highly selective delivery of drugs into cancer cells overproducing these receptors. Here, we provide up to date examples how the cellular sorting of FGFRs can be hijacked for selective cancer treatment.

High Affinity Promotes Internalization of Engineered Antibodies Targeting FGFR1.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is a plasma membrane protein that transmits signals from the extracellular environment, regulating cell homeostasis and function. Dysregulation of FGFR1 leads to the development of human cancers and noncancerous diseases. Numerous tumors overproduce FGFR1, making this receptor a perspective target for cancer therapies. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are highly potent and selective anticancer agents. ADCs are composed of antibodies (targeting factors) fused to highly cytotoxic drugs (warheads). The efficiency of ADC strategy largely depends on the internalization of cytotoxic conjugate into cancer cells. Here, we have studied an interplay between affinity of anti-FGFR1 antibodies and efficiency of their cellular uptake. We have developed a unique set of engineered anti-FGFR1 antibodies that bind the same epitope in the extracellular part of FGFR1, but with different affinities. We have demonstrated that these antibodies are effectively taken up by cancer cells in the FGFR1-dependent manner. Interestingly, we have found that efficiency, defined as rate and level of antibody internalization, largely depends on the affinity of engineered antibodies towards FGFR1, as high affinity antibody displays fastest internalization kinetics. Our data may facilitate design of therapeutically relevant targeting molecules for selective treatment of FGFR1 overproducing cancers.