Surgical results of Hartmann procedure in emergency cases with left-sided colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define indication of Hartmann procedure (HP) under emergency conditions, analyze, and present in which cases this procedure should be used. METHODS: The patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal cancer were analyzed. Rates of mortality, overall, and disease-free survival of the patients were evaluated. The colostomy closure rate, operative mortality, and surgical complications of the secondary operation performed after the HP were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients who underwent HP were included in the study. The indications were obstruction (n = 37) or perforation (n = 20). The post-operative mortality and morbidity rates were 21.1% and 63.2%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 54%, 49%, and 45%. CONCLUSION: HP can be a life-saving procedure in cases of high risk, emergency colorectal disease. Surgeons create a temporary stoma as a part of this procedure that is generally closed with a second operation. However, it is not possible to close the stoma in some cases, and the potential physical and emotional issues related to the stoma should be a part of the surgeon's considerations.

OBJETIVO: Definir la indicación del procedimiento de Hartmann en condiciones de emergencia y en qué casos debe utilizarse. MÉTODO: Se analizaron los pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal de emergencia. Se evaluaron las tasas de mortalidad y de supervivencia global y libre de enfermedad. También se evaluaron la tasa de cierre de la colostomía, la mortalidad operatoria y las complicaciones quirúrgicas de la operación secundaria. RESULTADOS: Fueron incluidos en el estudio 57 pacientes sometidos a un procedimiento de Hartmann. Las indicaciones fueron obstrucción (n = 37) o perforación (n = 20). Las tasas de mortalidad y de morbilidad posoperatorias fueron del 21,1% y el 63,2%, respectivamente. Las tasas de supervivencia a 1, 3 y 5 años para todos los pacientes fueron del 54%, el 49% y el 45%. CONCLUSIÓN: El procedimiento de Hartmann puede salvar vidas en casos de enfermedad colorrectal de emergencia de alto riesgo. Los cirujanos crean un estoma temporal como parte de este procedimiento, que generalmente se cierra con una segunda operación. Sin embargo, en algunos casos no es posible cerrar la estoma, y los posibles problemas físicos y emocionales relacionados con este deberían ser parte de las consideraciones del cirujano.

Comparison of Topical, Systemic, and Combined Therapy with Steroids on Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a benign disorder of the breast, for which the optimal treatment modality remains missing. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with a histopathologically proven diagnosis of IGM were enrolled in a prospective, randomized parallel arm study. Patients were treated with topical steroids in Group T (n: 42), systemic steroids (0.8 mg/kg/day peroral) in Group S (n: 42), and combined steroids (0.4 mg/kg/day peroral + topical) in Group C (n: 40). Compliance with the therapy, response to the therapy, the duration of therapy, side effects and the recurrence rates were compared. RESULTS: Sixteen patients did not comply with the treatment, and the highest ratio of compliance with therapy was seen in Group T (p < 0.05). Complete clinical regression (CCR) was observed in 90 (83.3%) patients. Response to the treatment (RT) was evaluated radiologically and observed in 89.8% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding CCR, RT and the recurrence rate. The longest duration of therapy was observed in Group T (22 ± 9.1-week), whereas the shortest was observed in Group S (11.7 ± 5.5-week) (p < 0.001). The systemic side effects were significantly lower in Group T in comparison with Groups S and C (2.4% vs. 38.2% and 30.3%, respectively) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of the treatment was similar for all groups, both clinically and radiologically. Although the duration of therapy was longer in Group T, the lack of systemic side effects increased the compliance of the patients with the therapy. Therefore, topical steroids would be among first-line treatment options of IGM.

Does Primary Hyperparathyroidism Have an Association with Thyroid Papillary Cancer? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship between primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) and papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). METHODS: The perioperative findings of 275 patients with pHPT who underwent surgery between January 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with pHPT and PTC concurrently. Pathology results and demographic findings of these patients were compared with 186 patients who underwent thyroidectomy and diagnosed with PTC at the same time interval. RESULTS: The co-occurrence of pHPT and PTC was 11.3% (31/275). The median ages of the pHPT, pHPT + PTC, and PTC groups were 55, 57, and 50 years old, respectively (p < 0.001). The diameter of tumor was smaller in the pHPT + PTC group [median 7 mm (range 0.5-25 mm) vs. 15 mm (range 1-100 mm)], with higher rates of microcarcinomas (p < 0.001), than the patients in the PTC group. Examination of tumor morphology showed higher rates of tumor capsule invasion and multicentricity in the pHPT + PTC group than those in the isolated PTC group (p = 0.02, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: The pHPT + PTC group had significantly smaller tumor diameter than the PTC group. This result may support the idea that pHPT leads to overdiagnosis of PTC. However, observation of high rates of tumor capsule invasion and multicentricity in the pHPT + PTC group may suggest an associative etiology with more aggressive PTC.

The effect of tegafur and uracil combination on colonic anastomotic strength: an experimental study on rats.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Some patients are candidates for neo-adjuvant use of Tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, and Uracil combination (UFT). The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of preoperative UFT use on the strength of colonic anastomosis. METHODOLOGY: Forty Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into a control (group 1, n=10) and three study (Group 2, 3 and 4, 10 animals in each group) groups. Animals in control and study groups were given saline or UFT which included 50 mg/kg of Tegafur via an oral-gastric tube for 28 days. A segmental colonic resection and end-to-end anastomosis was performed on all animals 1, 1, 7 and 14 days after the treatments had ended in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. On postoperative day 7 the animals were killed and bursting pressure and breaking strength were measured. RESULTS: Three animals in the treatment groups died during the preoperative period, and one in the control group died after surgery. The animals in groups 2 and 3 had lesser bursting pressures than the control group (p<0.001), but no statistical difference was observed in bursting pressures of the control group and group 4 (p>0.05). The breaking strengths of each group were statistically different from the other groups (p<0.001 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: UFT use during the preoperative period affected the anastomosis strength in this animal experiment. Current study suggests that an operation should not be performed during the 14 days after UFT use has ended.