Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 19(1): 61, 2021 Apr 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827596

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A group of clinician-scientists and managers working within a Dutch academic network, experienced difficulties in clearly defining the knowledge broker role of the clinician-scientists. They found no role clarity in literature, nor did they find tools or methods suitable for clinician-scientists. Clarifying role expectations and providing accountability for funding these knowledge broker positions was difficult. The aim of this research was to design a theory-informed tool that allowed clinician-scientists to make their knowledge broker role visible. METHODS: A participatory design research was conducted in three phases, over a 21-month period, with a design group consisting of an external independent researcher, clinician-scientists and their managers from within the academic network. Phase 1 constituted a literature review, a context analysis and a needs analysis. Phase 2 constituted the design and development of a suitable tool and phase 3 was an evaluation of the tool's perceived usefulness. Throughout the research process, the researcher logged the theoretic basis for all design decisions. RESULTS: The clinician-scientist's knowledge broker role is a knowledge-intensive role and work-tasks associated with this role are not automatically visible (phase 1). A tool (the SP-tool) was developed in Microsoft Excel. This allowed clinician-scientists to log their knowledge broker activities as distinct from their clinical work and research related activities (phase 2). The SP-tool contributed to the clinician-scientists' ability to make their knowledge broker role visible to themselves and their stakeholders (phase 3). The theoretic contribution of the design research is a conceptual model of professionalisation of the clinician-scientist's knowledge broker role. This model presents the relationship between work visibility and the clarification of functions of the knowledge broker role. In the professionalisation of knowledge-intensive work, visibility contributes to the definition of clinician-scientists broker functions, which is an element necessary for the professionalisation of an occupation. CONCLUSIONS: The SP-tool that was developed in this research, contributes to creating work visibility of the clinician-scientists' knowledge broker role. Further research using the SP-tool could establish a clearer description of the knowledge broker role at the day-to-day professional level and improved ability to support this role within organisations.


Assuntos
Conhecimento , Médicos , Humanos , Pesquisadores
2.
PLoS One ; 13(1): e0191332, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29364935

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this exploratory study was to obtain greater insight into the effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on the mental health of employees. METHODS: Using PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINAHL, we performed a systematic review in October 2015 of studies investigating the effects of MBSR and MBCT on various aspects of employees' mental health. Studies with a pre-post design (i.e. without a control group) were excluded. RESULTS: 24 articles were identified, describing 23 studies: 22 on the effects of MBSR and 1 on the effects of MBSR in combination with some aspects of MBCT. Since no study focused exclusively on MBCT, its effects are not described in this systematic review. Of the 23 studies, 2 were of high methodological quality, 15 were of medium quality and 6 were of low quality. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the emergent and relatively uncharted nature of the topic of investigation, the exploratory character of this study, and the diversity of outcomes in the studies reviewed. Based on our analysis, the strongest outcomes were reduced levels of emotional exhaustion (a dimension of burnout), stress, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and occupational stress. Improvements were found in terms of mindfulness, personal accomplishment (a dimension of burnout), (occupational) self-compassion, quality of sleep, and relaxation. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review suggest that MBSR may help to improve psychological functioning in employees.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Atenção Plena/métodos , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Humanos
3.
Muscle Nerve ; 41(4): 533-9, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19941334

RESUMO

In this investigation we study the impact of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) on psychological distress, depressive symptoms, and health status of patients during the first year after GBS. At 3, 6, and 12 months, patients were given the General Health Questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Eighty-five patients participated. Psychological distress and depressive symptoms were present but improved between 3 and 6 months. At 12 months the psychosocial health status was still impaired. Patients who perceived their physical residua to be moderately to seriously disruptive and patients with muscle ache and cramps had worse scores on all scales. It can be concluded that most of the improvement occurred in the first 6 months. Psychosocial health status, however, was still impaired at 1 year, but depressive symptoms played no role. Treatment of muscle ache and cramps, and the disruptive effect of physical residua should be seriously considered.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/psicologia , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Ajustamento Social , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/complicações , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/terapia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Estresse Psicológico/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Occup Rehabil ; 16(3): 439-67, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16783530

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To provide evidence of predictors for sickness absence in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP), distinguishing predictors aimed at the decision to report sick (absence threshold) and decision to return to work (return to work threshold). METHODS: Medical and psychological databases were searched, as well as citations from relevant reviews. In- and exclusion criteria were applied. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the papers independently. RESULTS: Many different predictors were studied, and few factors were studied more than once. Consistent evidence was found for own expectations of recovery only as predictor for the decision to return to work. Patients with higher expectations had less sickness absence at the moment of follow-up measurement. As expected, different predictors were found aiming at the absence threshold or the return to work threshold. Furthermore, predictors varied also with the measurement instruments used, timing of follow-up measurements, and definition of outcomes. Until now, too few studies are available to overcome several potential sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: No core set of predictors exists for sickness absence in general. The characteristics of the study including the decision to report sick or to return to work determined the influence of several predictors on sickness absence in patients with CLBP. Further research and use of a core set of measurements and uniform definitions are needed to predict sickness absence and return to work in patients with CLBP.


Assuntos
Absenteísmo , Emprego/tendências , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Humanos , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Doenças Profissionais/reabilitação , Prognóstico
5.
J Occup Rehabil ; 16(4): 579-89, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16649007

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Both the floor-to-waist lifting task of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) and recommended weight limit (RWL) of the NIOSH produce safe lifting weights and are used world-wide nowadays. It is unknown whether they produce similar safe lifting weights. Aim of this study was to compare FCE performance on the floor-to-waist lifting task and RWL of the NIOSH lifting guideline for this task, in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: Ninety-two patients performed the FCE lifting task. RWL was calculated for this task. Performance was compared with RWL. A lifting index was calculated by dividing performance by RWL. Differences between groups with a lifting index < or =1, 1-3, and >3 were calculated for pain intensity, scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and work status. RESULTS: Men lifted on average 32.5 kg (SD 15.4) and women 18.8 kg (SD 7.8). RWL for this task was 12.8 kg. Mean difference between performance and RWL was 15.0 kg (SD 14.7; range -8.8 to 59.2). The Roland Morris Disability score of patients with a lifting index < or =1 was significantly lower than patients with a lifting index 1-3 and >3. No difference in pain intensity and work status was found between groups. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that performance on the FCE floor-to-waist lifting task and RWL of the NIOSH for this task produce different safe lifting weights in individual patients with CLBP, which may result in contradictory recommendations about need for rehabilitation and return to work.


Assuntos
Remoção , Dor Lombar/reabilitação , Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Análise de Variância , Doença Crônica , Emprego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
J Occup Rehabil ; 16(2): 197-205, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16708276

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to study intensity and duration of symptom increase following an FCE and to explore safety of an FCE. METHODS: Included were 92 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), mean age 38.5 years, mean self-reported disability 12.5 (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). All patients underwent an FCE. Symptom increase was measured with a 2-item questionnaire. Operational definition for safety: no formal complaint filed and symptom increase to occur only temporarily. RESULTS: No formal complaints were filed (n=92). In total, 54 patients returned the questionnaire (59%; 'responders'). Of the responders, 76% reported increased symptom intensity after an FCE, ranging from 'little increase' to 'severe increase'. Symptoms of all responders returned to pre-FCE level. Duration of symptom increase of the responders ranged from 1 day to 3 weeks. Symptom increase resided to pre-FCE level within 1 week in 93% of the responders. Symptom increase was weakly related to self-reported disability (r=0.38, p<0.05). Except for gender, differences between responders and non-responders were non-significant. CONCLUSION: A temporary increase in symptom intensity following an FCE is common. Within the operational definitions of safety used in this study, assessment of functional capacity of patients with CLBP appears safe.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Segurança , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA