Treatment of plaque psoriasis with deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-1 study): a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a paper published in a medical journal that describes the results of a study called POETYK PSO-1, which looked at a new treatment called deucravacitinib for plaque psoriasis. Plaque psoriasis appears on the body as round or oval raised patches (called plaques) typically covered by scales. This can cause the skin to itch, crack or bleed, and the associated itching and pain can make it difficult to perform basic everyday tasks. Living with psoriasis can cause emotional distress. Treatments are available, but some do not always reduce the symptoms of psoriasis, some may need to be injected or taken multiple times a day, and some may have side effects. Researchers are looking for new treatments that are more effective, convenient to take, and have acceptable safety and tolerability. WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STUDY?: Deucravacitinib is a once-daily pill taken by mouth (orally) that was studied as a treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults in two large studies conducted globally, PSO-1 and PSO-2. The POETYK PSO-1 study compared deucravacitinib with placebo (an inactive pill designed to have no effect) and an approved psoriasis treatment called apremilast, which is a pill taken twice a day. These were tested in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, which involved 10% or more of their body (equal to 10 or more handprints). The aim of the study was to compare the ability of deucravacitinib with placebo or apremilast to improve psoriasis for the people in the study, and to compare side effects that people had. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE POETYK PSO-1 STUDY SHOW?: After 4 months of treatment, more people taking deucravacitinib had improvements in psoriasis plaques and skin appearance than those taking placebo or apremilast. The study also showed that people continued to see these improvements after taking deucravacitinib for up to 1 year. Side effects are events that happened during the study treatment phase that may or may not be caused by that treatment. Side effects for people taking deucravacitinib were generally mild and occurred in similar numbers overall to those in people taking placebo. The most common side effects in people taking deucravacitinib were inflammation or infection of the nasal (nose) passages and throat. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03624127 (POETYK PSO-1 study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Treatment of plaque psoriasis with deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-2 study): a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of a paper published in a medical journal that describes the results of a study called POETYK PSO-2, which investigated a new treatment for plaque psoriasis. Plaque psoriasis appears on the body as dry, discolored, patches of skin that can be flaky and covered in scales. This can make the skin itch, crack or bleed and make it difficult for people with psoriasis to perform basic everyday tasks. Treatments are available, but some do not always reduce symptoms or may need to be injected or taken multiple times a day, which can be difficult to do, or can have undesirable side effects. Researchers are looking for new treatments for psoriasis. WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STUDY?: Deucravacitinib is a once-daily pill taken by mouth (orally) that was studied as a treatment for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in two large studies conducted globally, PSO-1 and PSO-2. POETYK PSO-2 was a Phase 3 research study, which is a study that tests a treatment in a large group of participants, that looked at how well deucravacitinib worked in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared to a placebo (an inactive pill that has no effect) and an approved psoriasis treatment called apremilast, which is a pill taken twice a day. These medications were tested in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, which is psoriasis involving 10% or more of their body (equal to 10 or more handprints). The aims of the POETYK PSO-2 study were to find out if treatment with deucravacitinib could improve psoriasis for the participants in the study and to see if there were any side effects. Side effects are events that happened during treatment that may or may not be caused by that treatment. The study also wanted to find out what would happen after stopping treatment with deucravacitinib in participants who had shown major improvements in their psoriasis. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE POETYK PSO-2 STUDY SHOW?: After 4 months of treatment, more participants taking deucravacitinib had significantly greater improvements in psoriasis than those taking placebo or apremilast. The study also showed that participants continued to see these improvements after taking deucravacitinib for up to 1 year. Some participants maintained the improvements in their psoriasis with deucravacitinib after stopping treatment and switching to a placebo. Side effects for participants taking deucravacitinib were generally mild and occurred in similar numbers to those in participants taking placebo. The most common side effects in participants taking deucravacitinib were inflammation of the nose and throat (a common cold) which occurred at a similar rate in participants who took placebo. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03611751 (POETYK PSO-2 study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective, well-tolerated oral psoriasis treatments are needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, versus placebo and apremilast in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Participants were randomized 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg every day (n = 332), placebo (n = 166), or apremilast 30 mg twice a day (n = 168) in the 52-week, double-blinded, phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 trial (NCT03624127). Coprimary end points included response rates for ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1) with deucravacitinib versus placebo at week 16. RESULTS: At week 16, response rates were significantly higher with deucravacitinib versus placebo or apremilast for PASI 75 (194 [58.4%] vs 21 [12.7%] vs 59 [35.1%]; P < .0001) and sPGA 0/1 (178 [53.6%] vs 12 [7.2%] vs 54 [32.1%]; P < .0001). Efficacy improved beyond week 16 and was maintained through week 52. Adverse event rates with deucravacitinib were similar to those with placebo and apremilast. LIMITATIONS: One-year duration, limited racial diversity. CONCLUSION: Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo and apremilast across multiple efficacy end points and was well tolerated in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from the 52-week, randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor psoriasis second trial.

BACKGROUND: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, inhibits cytokine signaling in psoriasis pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate deucravacitinib superiority versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis based on ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and a static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline at week 16. METHODS: POETYK psoriasis second trial (NCT03611751), a 52-week, double-blinded, phase 3 trial, randomized patients 2:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg every day (n = 511), placebo (n = 255), or apremilast 30 mg twice a day (n = 254). RESULTS: At week 16, significantly more deucravacitinib-treated patients versus placebo and apremilast patients achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (53.0% vs 9.4% and 39.8%; P < .0001 vs placebo; P = .0004 vs apremilast) and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (49.5% vs 8.6% and 33.9%; P < .0001 for both). Efficacy was maintained until week 52 with continuous deucravacitinib. The most frequent adverse event with deucravacitinib was nasopharyngitis. Serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events were infrequent. No clinically meaningful changes were observed in laboratory parameters. LIMITATIONS: The study duration was 1 year. CONCLUSION: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superiority versus placebo and apremilast and was well tolerated in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of branebrutinib (BMS-986195), a covalent, irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase: Randomised phase I, placebo-controlled trial in healthy participants.

AIMS: Branebrutinib (BMS-986195) is a potent, highly selective, oral, small-molecule, covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). This study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of branebrutinib in healthy participants. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending dose (SAD; MAD) Phase I study (NCT02705989) enrolled participants into 3 parts: SAD, MAD and JMAD (MAD in first-generation Japanese participants). In each part, participants were randomised 3:1 to receive branebrutinib (SAD: 0.3-30 mg; [J]MAD: 0.3-10 mg) or placebo. Participants in the MAD parts received branebrutinib daily for 14 days and were followed for 14 days postdosing. Safety was assessed by monitoring, laboratory and physical examinations, vital signs, and recording adverse events (AEs). Pharmacodynamics were assessed with a mass spectrometry assay that measured drug-occupied and free BTK. RESULTS: The SAD, MAD and JMAD parts of the study included 40, 32 and 24 participants. Branebrutinib was well tolerated and AEs were mild/moderate, except for 1 serious AE that led to discontinuation. Branebrutinib was rapidly absorbed, with maximum plasma concentration occurring within 1 hour and a half-life of 1.2-1.7 hours, dropping to undetectable levels within 24 hours. BTK occupancy was rapid, with 100% occupancy reached after a single 10-mg dose. BTK occupancy decayed predictably over time (mean half-life in MAD panels: 115-154 hours), such that pharmacodynamic effects were maintained after branebrutinib plasma levels fell below the lower limit of quantification. CONCLUSION: Rapid and high occupancy of BTK and the lack of notable safety findings support further clinical development of branebrutinib.

Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), a PEGylated fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.

BACKGROUND: Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), a PEGylated human fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) analogue, has previously been shown to improve markers of metabolism and liver fibrosis in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. In this phase 2a study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pegbelfermin in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2a study, we recruited adults (aged 21-75 years) with a body-mass index of at least 25 kg/m2, biopsy-confirmed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (fibrosis stage 1-3), and a hepatic fat fraction of at least 10% when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. These patients were enrolled at 17 medical centres in the USA. Eligible patients were stratified by type 2 diabetes status and they were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by a computer-based system to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo once a day, 10 mg pegbelfermin once a day, or 20 mg pegbelfermin once a week, all for 16 weeks. Participants, the study team administering treatment, and investigators analysing outcomes (who were independent of the study team and had no further involvement) were masked to treatment groups. The primary outcomes were safety and the absolute change in hepatic fat fraction after 16 weeks of treatment. All patients who were randomly assigned to groups and received the study drug or placebo were included in the primary analyses. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02413372. FINDINGS: Between May 12, 2015, and Aug 4, 2016, 184 overweight or obese patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis were screened for study inclusion. Of these, 95 (52%) patients were excluded because they no longer met study criteria and 80 (43%) patients entered the placebo lead-in phase. After further exclusions, 75 (94%) patients were randomly assigned to groups, received at least one dose of treatment (25 patients to receive 10 mg pegbelfermin once a day; 24 patients to receive 20 mg pegbelfermin once a week, and 26 patients to receive placebo), and were included in the primary analysis. A prespecified interim analysis at week 8 showed a greater than expected change in the primary outcome and supported early closing of patient enrolment, since this analysis indicated that the full planned sample size was not needed. We observed a significant decrease in absolute hepatic fat fraction in the group receiving 10 mg pegbelfermin daily (-6·8% vs -1·3%; p=0·0004) and in the group receiving 20 mg pegbelfermin weekly (-5·2% vs -1·3%; p=0·008) compared with the placebo group. Most adverse events were mild; the most common events were diarrhoea in eight (16%) of 49 patients treated with pegbelfermin and two (8%) of 26 patients treated with placebo and nausea in seven (14%) patients treated with pegbelfermin and two (8%) patients treated with placebo. There were no deaths, discontinuations due to adverse events, or treatment-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with subcutaneously administered pegbelfermin for 16 weeks was generally well tolerated and significantly reduced hepatic fat fraction in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Further study of pegbelfermin is warranted in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Additional studies that use liver biopsies would allow for the assessment of pegbelfermin's effects on liver histology. Moreover, further studies should allow assessments of the safety and effectiveness of pegbelfermin in a larger number of patients. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), PEGylated FGF21, in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: Results from a Randomized Phase 2 Study.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. This study assessed pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), recombinant PEGylated human fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), in patients with obesity and T2DM predisposed to fatty liver. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with T2DM and BMI of 30 to 50 kg/m2 received subcutaneous pegbelfermin (1, 5, or 20 mg daily or 20 mg weekly; n = 96) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. Primary end points were safety, tolerability, and change in HbA1c. Additional end points included insulin sensitivity, lipids, adiponectin, and disease progression biomarkers. RESULTS: There were no significant effects of pegbelfermin versus placebo on HbA1c. Pegbelfermin 20 mg/d significantly improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.015) and triglycerides (P = 0.037). All pegbelfermin regimens significantly increased adiponectin levels; 20-mg daily and weekly regimens decreased serum PRO-C3. Most adverse events were mild; the most frequent adverse events were injection-site bruising and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week pegbelfermin treatment did not impact HbA1c concentrations, but QW and higher daily doses were associated with improved metabolic parameters and fibrosis biomarkers in patients with obesity and T2DM predisposed to fatty liver. These results support evaluation of pegbelfermin in patients with obesity-related metabolic diseases (e.g., nonalcoholic steatohepatitis).

Phase 2 Trial of Selective Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibition in Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) signaling pathways, which mediate cytokine signaling, are implicated in the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Selective inhibitors of TYK2 may be effective in treating psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2, double-blind trial of a TYK2 inhibitor, BMS-986165, in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, excluding patients with a previous lack of response to agents targeting cytokine signaling through the same tyrosine kinase pathway. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the drug orally at a dose of 3 mg every other day, 3 mg daily, 3 mg twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, or 12 mg daily or to receive placebo. The primary end point was a 75% or greater reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12 (higher scores indicate greater severity of psoriasis). RESULTS: A total of 267 patients received at least one dose in an intervention group of the trial. At week 12, the percentage of patients with a 75% or greater reduction in the PASI score was 7% (3 of 45 patients) with placebo, 9% (4 of 44 patients) with 3 mg of BMS-986165 every other day (P=0.49 vs. placebo), 39% (17 of 44 patients) with 3 mg daily (P<0.001 vs. placebo), 69% (31 of 45 patients) with 3 mg twice daily (P<0.001 vs. placebo), 67% (30 of 45 patients) with 6 mg twice daily (P<0.001 vs. placebo), and 75% (33 of 44 patients) with 12 mg daily (P<0.001 vs. placebo). There were three serious adverse events in patients receiving the active drug, as well as one case of malignant melanoma 96 days after the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Selective inhibition of TYK2 with the oral agent BMS-986165 at doses of 3 mg daily and higher resulted in greater clearing of psoriasis than did placebo over a period of 12 weeks. Larger and longer-duration trials of this drug are required to determine its safety and durability of effect in patients with psoriasis. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02931838 .).

Some practical considerations in three-arm non-inferiority trial design.

Non-inferiority trials aim to demonstrate whether an experimental therapy is not unacceptably worse than an active reference therapy already in use. When applicable, a three-arm non-inferiority trial, including an experiment therapy, an active reference therapy, and a placebo, is often recommended to assess assay sensitivity and internal validity of a trial. In this paper, we share some practical considerations based on our experience from a phase III three-arm non-inferiority trial. First, we discuss the determination of the total sample size and its optimal allocation based on the overall power of the non-inferiority testing procedure and provide ready-to-use R code for implementation. Second, we consider the non-inferiority goal of 'capturing all possibilities' and show that it naturally corresponds to a simple two-step testing procedure. Finally, using this two-step non-inferiority testing procedure as an example, we compare extensively commonly used frequentist p -value methods with the Bayesian posterior probability approach. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Rationale and design of the EXenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial.

Exenatide once-weekly is an extended release formulation of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, which can improve glycemic control, body weight, blood pressure, and lipid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The EXenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) will compare the impact of adding exenatide once-weekly to usual care with usual care alone on major cardiovascular outcomes. EXSCEL is an academically led, phase III/IV, double-blind, pragmatic placebo-controlled, global trial conducted in 35 countries aiming to enrol 14,000 patients with T2DM and a broad range of cardiovascular risk over approximately 5 years. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive exenatide once-weekly 2 mg or matching placebo by subcutaneous injections. The trial will continue until 1,360 confirmed primary composite cardiovascular end points, defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, have occurred. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that exenatide once-weekly is superior to usual care with respect to the primary composite cardiovascular end point. EXSCEL is powered to detect a 15% relative risk reduction in the exenatide once-weekly group, with 85% power and a 2-sided 5% alpha. The primary safety hypothesis is that exenatide once-weekly is noninferior to usual care with respect to the primary cardiovascular composite end point. Noninferiority will be concluded if the upper limit of the CI is <1.30. EXSCEL will assess whether exenatide once-weekly can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM with a broad range of cardiovascular risk. It will also provide long-term safety information on exenatide once-weekly in people with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01144338.

Once-daily ciclesonide improves lung function and is well tolerated by patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: An integrated analysis of 2 identical, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials was conducted. Patients (n = 1015; aged > or =12 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 of 60% to 85% of predicted value) were randomized to ciclesonide 80 microg (CIC80), 160 microg (CIC160), or 320 microg (CIC320), once daily (exactuator doses) in the morning or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: All ciclesonide groups showed significant improvements from baseline to week 12 in FEV1 compared with the placebo group (CIC80, 0.12 L [P = .0007]; CIC160, 0.13 L [P = .0004]; and CIC320, 0.14 L [P < .0001]). Likewise, FEV1 percent predicted, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, 24-hour asthma symptom score, daily albuterol use, and nighttime awakenings were significantly improved in all ciclesonide groups compared with the placebo group. Overall ciclesonide safety profile and rates of oropharyngeal adverse events for all groups were low and similar to those of the placebo group. Fewer ciclesonide-treated patients exhibited asthma-aggravated adverse events, and fewer ciclesonide-treated patients discontinued the study for any reason or because of a lack of efficacy compared with those in the placebo group. No suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function (as assessed by means of 24-hour urinary cortisol levels corrected for creatinine and peak serum cortisol levels after stimulation with low-dose [1 microg] cosyntropin) was observed with any dose of ciclesonide. CONCLUSIONS: In this integrated analysis, ciclesonide once daily administered in the morning is effective and well tolerated.

Ciclesonide, a novel inhaled steroid, does not affect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) reduce local airway inflammation, which is an underlying cause of asthma symptoms. However, potential systemic side effects associated with ICS use are a major concern for asthmatic patients. METHODS: Adult patients (n = 60; > or = 18 years of age) with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomized to receive 4 weeks of treatment with ciclesonide (CIC), 320 microg bid (CIC 640), CIC, 640 microg bid (CIC 1280), fluticasone propionate (FP), 440 microg bid (FP 880), FP 880 microg bid (FP 1760), or placebo (PBO) [all doses expressed as ex-actuator; comparable to ex-valve doses of 800 and 1,600 microg/d for CIC and 1,000 and 2,000 microg/d for FP, respectively]. RESULTS: After 29 days of treatment, CIC 640, CIC 1280, and FP 880 had no significant effect on the mean serum cortisol area under the curve for 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24h). FP 1760 produced a statistically significant suppression in mean serum cortisol AUC0-24h compared to PBO (p = 0.0009; 95% confidence interval [CI] -117.5 [corrected] to -32.1). Results obtained with cosyntropin stimulation revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The CIC 640 group demonstrated a significant increase compared to the PBO group in 24-h urinary cortisol levels from baseline at week 4 (p = 0.0224; 95% CI, 0.0023 to 0.0283), while the other treatment groups revealed no change in this parameter. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in all groups, and all adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Treatment with moderate and high doses of CIC does not result in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis suppression as compared with PBO.

Effect of ciclesonide and fluticasone on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Despite their proven efficacy in the treatment and prevention of asthma exacerbations, current inhaled corticosteroids carry safety concerns, especially adrenal suppression. Ciclesonide (hydrofluoroalkane propellant) is a novel inhaled corticosteroid with few, if any, clinical adverse events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effects of ciclesonide therapy on the dynamic cortisol response to sequential low- and high-dose cosyntropin stimulation in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized and treated; 148 patients completed the study. Fluticasone propionate (chlorofluorocarbon propellant) was used as an active comparator. The doses administered were 320 microg of ciclesonide once daily, 320 microg of ciclesonide twice daily, and 440 microg of fluticasone propionate twice daily, all doses ex-actuator. RESULTS: For both ciclesonide groups, changes in mean low- and high-dose peak serum cortisol levels and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels corrected for creatinine were small vs baseline and comparable with placebo. For the fluticasone propionate group, significant reductions vs placebo in serum cortisol levels in response to high-dose cosyntropin stimulation and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were observed. Oral candidiasis rates were 2.5% for 320-microg/d ciclesonide, 2.4% for 640-microg/d ciclesonide, and 22.0% for 880-microg/d fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the safety of ciclesonide therapy, demonstrating that at doses up to 640 microg/d, the drug does not affect sensitive markers of adrenal function.