Feasibility and patient acceptability of a commercially available wearable and a smart phone application in identification of motor states in parkinson's disease.

In the quantification of symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), healthcare professional assessments, patient reported outcomes (PRO), and medical device grade wearables are currently used. Recently, also commercially available smartphones and wearable devices have been actively researched in the detection of PD symptoms. The continuous, longitudinal, and automated detection of motor and especially non-motor symptoms with these devices is still a challenge that requires more research. The data collected from everyday life can be noisy and frequently contains artefacts, and novel detection methods and algorithms are therefore needed. 42 PD patients and 23 control subjects were monitored with Garmin Vivosmart 4 wearable device and asked to fill a symptom and medication diary with a mobile application, at home, for about four weeks. Subsequent analyses are based on continuous accelerometer data from the device. Accelerometer data from the Levodopa Response Study (MJFFd) were reanalyzed, with symptoms quantified with linear spectral models trained on expert evaluations present in the data. Variational autoencoders (VAE) were trained on both our study accelerometer data and on MJFFd to detect movement states (e.g., walking, standing). A total of 7590 self-reported symptoms were recorded during the study. 88.9% (32/36) of PD patients, 80.0% (4/5) of DBS PD patients and 95.5% (21/22) of control subjects reported that using the wearable device was very easy or easy. Recording a symptom at the time of the event was assessed as very easy or easy by 70.1% (29/41) of subjects with PD. Aggregated spectrograms of the collected accelerometer data show relative attenuation of low (<5Hz) frequencies in patients. Similar spectral patterns also separate symptom periods from immediately adjacent non-symptomatic periods. Discriminative power of linear models to separate symptoms from adjacent periods is weak, but aggregates show partial separability of patients vs. controls. The analysis reveals differential symptom detectability across movement tasks, motivating the third part of the study. VAEs trained on either dataset produced embedding from which movement states in MJFFd could be predicted. A VAE model was able to detect the movement states. Thus, a pre-detection of these states with a VAE from accelerometer data with good S/N ratio, and subsequent quantification of PD symptoms is a feasible strategy. The usability of the data collection method is important to enable the collection of self-reported symptom data by PD patients. Finally, the usability of the data collection method is important to enable the collection of self-reported symptom data by PD patients.

Effect of Carbidopa Dose on Levodopa Pharmacokinetics With and Without Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Inhibition in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is still symptomatic since disease-modifying treatments for PD are not available. Oral levodopa is the gold standard for the treatment of PD motor symptoms. However, incomplete and fluctuating plasma exposure of levodopa leads to suboptimal treatment of the symptoms. The main objective of this study was to investigate to what extent increased carbidopa doses (50 and 100 mg) increase the plasma levels of 100-mg immediate-release (IR) levodopa compared to a 25-mg carbidopa dose with and without co-administration of 200 mg entacapone. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, phase I, pharmacokinetic study with 25 healthy volunteers was conducted. In addition, a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model was built to theoretically evaluate the effect of inhibiting aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) mediated metabolism of levodopa on the exposure of levodopa. RESULTS: The effect of increased carbidopa doses 50 and 100 mg on the total exposure (AUC) of 100 mg IR levodopa was +29% and +36%, respectively, when entacapone was co-administered. Without entacapone, the corresponding increases were +13% and +17%. With entacapone co-administration, the increased carbidopa dose also clearly increased levodopa trough concentration. There was no significant effect on the peak concentrations of levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing carbidopa doses significantly increased the exposure and reduced the fluctuation of IR levodopa in plasma during simultaneous COMT inhibition with entacapone. Theoretical pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that the plasma profile of oral IR levodopa can be even further improved by optimizing AADC and COMT inhibition.

Safety and efficacy of oral levosimendan in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (the REFALS study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent unmet need for new therapies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In a clinical study with healthy volunteers, levosimendan, a calcium sensitiser, was shown to improve neuromechanical efficiency and contractile function of the human diaphragm. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral levosimendan in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, with a focus on respiratory function. METHODS: The REFALS study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial at 99 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis specialist centres in 14 countries worldwide. People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were eligible for participation if they were at least 18 years of age and had a sitting slow vital capacity (SVC) of 60-90% predicted. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) by interactive web-response system to receive either levosimendan or placebo. The capsules for oral administration were identical in appearance to maintain blinding of participants and investigators. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in supine SVC at 12 weeks, assessed as the percentage of predicted normal sitting SVC. The key secondary endpoint was the combined assessment of function and survival (CAFS) up to 48 weeks. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, comprising all participants who were randomly assigned. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03505021) and has been completed. An extension study (REFALS-ES; NCT03948178) has also been completed, but will be reported separately. FINDINGS: Between June 21, 2018, and June 28, 2019, 871 people were screened for the study, of whom 496 were randomly assigned either levosimendan (n=329) or placebo (n=167). Participants were followed up between June 27, 2018 and June 26, 2020, for a median duration of 50·1 (IQR 37·5-51·1) weeks. The median duration of treatment was 47·9 (IQR 26·4-48·1) weeks. Change from baseline in supine SVC at 12 weeks was -6·73% with levosimendan and -6·99% with placebo, with no significant difference between the treatments (estimated treatment difference 0·26%, 95% CI -2·03 to 2·55, p=0·83). Similarly, at week 48, CAFS did not differ between treatment groups (least squares mean change from baseline 10·69, 95% CI -15·74 to 37·12; nominal p value=0·43). The most frequent adverse events were increased heart rate (106 [33%] of 326 receiving levosimendan vs 12 [7%] of 166 receiving placebo), fall (85 [26%] vs 48 [29%]), headache (93 [29%] vs 36 [22%]), and dyspnoea (59 [18%] vs 32 [19%]). 33 (10%) participants allocated levosimendan and 20 (12%) assigned placebo died during the trial, mainly due to respiratory failure or progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. INTERPRETATION: Levosimendan was not superior to placebo in maintaining respiratory function in a broad population with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Although levosimendan was generally well tolerated, increased heart rate and headache occurred more frequently with levosimendan than with placebo. The possibility of a clinically relevant subgroup of responsive individuals requires further evaluation. FUNDING: Orion Corporation.

Oral levosimendan in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase II multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral levosimendan in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, three-period study with 6 months open-label follow-up enrolled adults with ALS and sitting slow vital capacity (SVC) 60%-90 % of predicted from 11 sites in four countries. METHODS: Patients received levosimendan 1 mg daily, 1 mg two times a day or placebo during three 14-day crossover periods and levosimendan 1-2 mg daily during open-label follow-up. Primary endpoint was sitting SVC; secondary endpoints included supine SVC, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), tolerability and safety. RESULTS: Of 66 patients randomised, 59 contributed to the double-blind results and 50 entered open-label follow-up. Sitting SVC was not significantly different between the treatments. In post hoc analysis using period-wise baselines, supine SVC favoured levosimendan over placebo, estimated mean differences from baseline being -3.62% on placebo, +0.77% on levosimendan 1 mg daily (p=0.018) and +2.38% on 1 mg two times a day (p=0.001). Headache occurred in 16.7% of patients during levosimendan 1 mg daily (p=0.030), 28.6% during 1 mg two times a day (p=0.002) and 3.3% during placebo. The respective frequencies for increased heart rate were 5.1% (p=0.337), 18.5% (p=0.018) and 1.7%. No significant differences between the treatments were seen for other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan did not achieve the primary endpoint of improving sitting SVC in ALS. Headache and increased heart rate were increased on levosimendan, although it was otherwise well tolerated. A phase III study to evaluate the longer term effects of oral levosimendan in ALS is ongoing.

Increased dose of carbidopa with levodopa and entacapone improves "off" time in a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether increased fixed carbidopa doses of 65 or 105 mg (ODM-101/65 and ODM-101/105) in combination with 75, 100, 125, or 150 mg of levodopa and 200 mg of entacapone might improve "off" time in fluctuating Parkinson disease (PD) compared to the standard combination of 4:1 levodopa/carbidopa with the usual 200 mg of entacapone (LCE) during a 4-week treatment period. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, crossover, multicenter, phase II, proof-of-concept study in patients with fluctuating PD. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were randomized into the study (mean age 67.0 years; daily "off" time 5.3 hours; mean daily levodopa dose 610 mg). Carryover-adjusted mean changes from baseline "off" times were during ODM-101/65, -1.53 hours (p = 0.02 vs LCE), during ODM-101/105, -1.57 hours (p = 0.01 vs LCE), and during LCE -0.91 hours. Changes in daily "on" time without dyskinesia were 1.54 hours (p = 0.005 vs LCE), 1.38 hours (p = 0.0214 vs LCE), and 0.69 hours, respectively. Changes in "on" time with troublesome dyskinesia were <0.1 hours and not significantly different between treatments. In patients with high-activity COMT genotypes Val/Met or Val/Val, "off" time was reduced more with ODM-101/65 and ODM-101/105 than with LCE (p = 0.015 and p = 0.006). No difference between the treatments was seen in safety and tolerability. The most common treatment-related adverse effects were nausea, dizziness, drug-effect decrease, and dyskinesia, which were in most cases mild or moderate in severity. Treatment-related serious adverse events were diarrhea (ODM-101/105 and LCE), and myocardial ischemia and blood creatine kinase increase (LCE). CONCLUSION: Increasing the dose of carbidopa in combination with levodopa and entacapone should be considered in the treatment of fluctuating PD to improve daily "off" times. Genotyping patients with PD according to COMT activity may improve individual treatment strategies. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01766258. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that an increased dose of carbidopa improves motor fluctuations when administered with levodopa and entacapone.

Efficacy and safety of entacapone in levodopa/carbidopa versus levodopa/benserazide treated Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off.

Entacapone is frequently used together with levodopa/carbidopa (LC) and levodopa/benserazide (LB) in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with wearing-off symptoms. It is generally assumed that the effects of entacapone are independent of the type of decarboxylase inhibitor used, but there is very little published data available on the efficacy of entacapone administered with LB versus LC. We have performed a pooled analysis of three randomized, double-blind, 6-month, phase III studies to compare the treatment effects of entacapone (compared to placebo) in PD patients receiving LC or LB. A total of 551 PD patients experiencing wearing-off were included in the analysis. 300 patients were on LB and 251 on LC at baseline. At 6 months, entacapone (compared to placebo) improved mean daily OFF-time in patients on LB and LC by 0.76 (p = 0.016) and 0.95 (p = 0.011) hours, respectively. The corresponding improvements in ON-time were 0.97 (p = 0.002) and 0.83 h (p = 0.022), respectively. The treatment effects of entacapone both in LB and LC users were statistically significant (p < 0.05) also in UPDRS II and III scores, except in UPDRS II scores in patients receiving LC (p = 0.20). None of the treatment effects of entacapone were statistically significantly different between patients receiving LB or LC. Reported adverse events were comparable between LB and LC users. We conclude that entacapone provided comparable benefits in PD patients with wearing-off symptoms using either LB or LC.

[Parkinson's disease associated with a mutation in the PARK2 gene]. / PARK2-geenin mutaatioon liittyvä Parkinsonin tauti.

The most common cause of monogenic hereditary Parkinson's disease is a mutation in the PARK2 gene. Early onset, slow progression, dystonia, and good response to levodopa are typical of the disease phenotype. Finnish PARK2 patients have not been described previously. We describe two patients, in whom pathogenic mutations in the PARK2 gene were the cause of parkinsonism.

Oral Levosimendan Increases Cerebral Blood Flow Velocities in Patients with a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Pilot Safety Study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous levosimendan is indicated for acute heart failure. The compound has shown promising beneficial effects in ischemic stroke models. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral levosimendan in patients with a history of cerebral ischemia. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 16 patients with a history of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack received oral levosimendan in 5 escalating doses from 0.125 to 2.0 mg daily for 18-day intervals of each dose; 5 patients received placebo. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG and cerebral blood flow velocities using transcranial Doppler ultrasound were recorded at baseline and at the end of each dosing period. Vasomotor reactivity was assessed via the breath holding index. In addition, plasma levels of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and the metabolites of levosimendan were determined. RESULTS: Levosimendan induced an increase in cerebral blood flow velocities and a decrease in NT-pro-BNP compared with placebo. There was no significant effect on breath holding index. Doses ≥0.5 mg increased heart rate by 5 to 9 beats/min. The dose level of 2.0 mg exceeded the preset safety margin of ventricular extrasystoles per hour (ie, upper 90% CI of the ratio of levosimendan to placebo above 2) with an estimate of 3.10 (90% CI, 0.95-10.07). CONCLUSIONS: Oral levosimendan increases cerebral blood flow velocities and diminishes NT-pro-BNP levels in patients with earlier ischemic cerebrovascular event. Daily doses up to 1.0 mg were well tolerated, whereas the 2.0 mg dose level induced an increase in ventricular extrasystoles. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00698763.

Levosimendan alone and in combination with valsartan prevents stroke in Dahl salt-sensitive rats.

The effects of levosimendan on cerebrovascular lesions and mortality were investigated in models of primary and secondary stroke. We aimed to determine whether the effects of levosimendan are comparable to and/or cumulative with those of valsartan, and to investigate whether levosimendan-induced vasodilation has a role in its effects on stroke. In a primary stroke Dahl/Rapp rat model, mortality rates were 70% and 5% for vehicle and levosimendan, respectively. Both stroke incidence (85% vs. 10%, P<0.001) and stroke-associated behavioral deficits (7-point neuroscore: 4.59 vs. 5.96, P<0.001) were worse for vehicle compared to levosimendan. In a secondary stroke model in which levosimendan treatment was started after cerebrovascular incidences were already detected, mean survival times were 15 days with vehicle, 20 days with levosimendan (P=0.025, vs. vehicle), 22 days with valsartan (P=0.001, vs. vehicle), and 31 days with levosimendan plus valsartan (P<0.001, vs. vehicle). The respective survivals were 0%, 16%, 20% and 59%, and the respective incidences of severe lesions were 50%, 67%, 50% and 11%. In this rat model, levosimendan increased blood volume of the cerebral vessels, with significant effects in the microvessels of the cortex (∆R=3.5±0.15 vs. 2.7±0.17ml for vehicle; P=0.001) and hemisphere (∆R=3.2±0.23 vs. 2.6±0.14ml for vehicle; P=0.018). Overall, levosimendan significantly reduced stroke-induced mortality and morbidity, both alone and with valsartan, with apparent cumulative effects, an activity in which the vasodilatory effects of levosimendan have a role.

Entacapone and prostate cancer risk in patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: The association between Parkinson's disease (PD) and prostate cancer, both common in elderly men, is disputable. In the STRIDE-PD study, prostate cancer developed in 9 patients (3.7%) receiving levodopa/carbidopa with entacapone, a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, versus 2 cases (0.9%) without entacapone. The current pharmacoepidemiological study aimed to determine whether entacapone increases prostate cancer incidence or mortality in PD patients and whether cumulative exposure affects these rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using population-wide health care registers with patient-level linkage. Prostate cancer incidence and mortality were modeled by Cox's proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Use of entacapone with l-dopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor caused no increased risk of prostate cancer incidence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.44) or mortality (0.93; 0.43-1.98). The HR for cumulative entacapone use of >360 days versus never-use was 0.82 (0.56-1.18) for prostate cancer incidence and 1.27 (0.60-2.72) for prostate cancer mortality.

The effect of different dosing regimens of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone on plasma levodopa concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Repeated dosing of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) has shown a favourable pharmacokinetic (PK) profile compared with levodopa/carbidopa (LC), but increases maximum plasma levodopa concentrations (C(max)) during the day. High levodopa concentrations are associated with peak-dose dyskinesias. PURPOSE: To determine whether administering LCE 75/18.5/200 and 125/31.5/200 mg (LCE 75 and LCE 125) following a morning dose of LCE 100/25/200 and 150/37.5/200 mg (LCE 100 and LCE 150), respectively, would avoid the increase in levodopa C(max) values observed during multiple dosing of LCE 100 and LCE 150. METHODS: This was an open, randomized, three-period, crossover PK trial in healthy volunteers (n = 19). Subjects were randomized to Group 1 or 2. Group 1 received in random sequence: LCE 150 followed by LCE 125 three times daily (tid); LCE 150 four times daily (qid); LC 150 qid. Group 2 received in random sequence: LCE 100 followed by LCE 75 tid; LCE 100 qid; LC 100 qid. Levodopa C(max), minimum plasma concentration (C(min)), area under the curve (AUC(0-14)) and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF) were calculated up to 14 h after the first dose. RESULTS: Levodopa C(max) was not increased when the LCE dose was decreased by 25 mg after the morning dose. In comparison to LC, levodopa C(min) levels and AUC(0-14) values for LCE were significantly higher, while the levodopa PTF was significantly smaller. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the dose of LCE by 25 mg following the first morning dose results in a more consistent levodopa C(max) profile, avoiding levodopa accumulation while maintaining significantly higher C(min) levels and AUC(0-14) values compared with LC.

Direct switch from levodopa/benserazide or levodopa/carbidopa to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone in Parkinson's disease patients with wearing-off: efficacy, safety and feasibility--an open-label, 6-week study.

The study objective was to assess the efficacy, safety and feasibility of switching from levodopa/benserazide (LB) or levodopa/carbidopa (LC) to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with wearing-off. This was a multicenter, open-label, 6-week study; the primary outcome was success rate based on the patient-assessed Clinical Global Impression of Change (P-CGI-C). Secondary outcomes included investigator-assessed CGI-C (I-CGI-C), change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), motor/non-motor wearing-off symptoms and quality of life-visual analog scale (QoL-VAS). After switching to LCE, 77% of patients reported an 'improvement' (p < 0.0001 vs. patients reporting 'no change or worsening'). Significant improvements were seen in I-CGI-C, UPDRS and QoL-VAS, regardless of prior therapy. Oral levodopa dosing was increased in 28% of patients; the primary outcome remained significant when these patients were excluded. The data suggest that switching from LB/LC to LCE provided a significant benefit in PD patients with wearing-off.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic profile of levodopa throughout the day between levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone and levodopa/carbidopa when administered four or five times daily.

OBJECTIVES: To compare plasma levodopa concentrations after repeated doses of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) and levodopa/carbidopa (LC). METHODS: Open-label, randomized, two-period, active-controlled, cross-over study with four dosing regimens: groups I and II (healthy volunteers and Parkinson's disease patients) received levodopa 100 mg or 150 mg four times daily, respectively, and groups III and IV (healthy volunteers) received the same strengths of levodopa five times daily. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters determined for levodopa included Cmin, Cmax, Cmax - Cmin, AUC, t(1/2), and tmax. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers and PD patients, mean trough levels (Cmin), Cmax, and AUC of levodopa were, in general, significantly higher during LCE compared to LC administration. Compared to Cmin, Cmax, and AUC, differences between the treatments in variability of levodopa concentrations (Cmax - Cmin) were less consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The present results on the differences in levodopa PK between LCE and LC provide a basis to evaluate the relationship of levodopa PK and the induction of motor complications in an on-going study in early Parkinson's disease using similar dosing regimens.

Five-year efficacy and safety of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease.

This was a retrospective pooled analysis of data from four comparably designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies and their long-term open-label extensions. Patients on levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) were randomized to entacapone or to placebo in the 6-month, double-blind phase, with all patients subsequently receiving entacapone in the extension phase. UPDRS III motor scores improved by -2.1 points during the first 6 months of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy, and remained below baseline for up to 2 years. Increased daily 'ON' time, together with response duration to a single morning dose of levodopa and clinical global evaluation, also supported the long-term efficacy of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone. The mean daily dose of levodopa did not increase over the 5-year follow-up period. Long-term therapy with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone was well-tolerated.

Switching from levodopa to the long-acting dopamine D2/D3 agonist piribedil reduces the expression of dyskinesia while maintaining effective motor activity in MPTP-treated primates.

BACKGROUND: The control of motor complications following dopaminergic medication in late-stage Parkinson disease remains problematic. OBJECTIVE: We now investigate the potential of oral administration of the long-acting dopamine D2/D3 agonist piribedil to decrease the expression of dyskinesia induced by prior exposure to levodopa in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine hydrochloride (MPTP)-treated primates. METHODS: MPTP-treated common marmosets were treated with equieffective doses of levodopa (10.0-12.5 mg/kg PO, twice daily) or piribedil (3.0-4.0 mg/kg PO, once daily) for 30 days and then switched to the alternative treatment for a further 35 days. RESULTS: Levodopa administration markedly improved motor function, but dyskinesia rapidly appeared and intensified as treatment progressed. Administration of piribedil produced a similar reversal of MPTP-induced motor deficits but with comparatively mild dyskinesia. On switching from levodopa to piribedil, the intensity of dyskinesia decreased without altering the improvement in motor deficits. However, on switching from piribedil to levodopa, the rapid increase in dyskinesia despite the improvement in motor function being maintained suggests that piribedil also primes for but does not markedly express dyskinesia. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the low dyskinesia expression resulting from piribedil treatment compared with an equieffective dose of levodopa. Importantly, the results show that switching from levodopa to piribedil rapidly results in a sustained decrease in dyskinesia intensity.

Unilateral pallidotomy in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated common marmosets exhibiting levodopa-induced dyskinesia.

Pallidotomy paradoxically reduces the intensity of levodopa-induced dyskinesia without worsening motor symptoms. The reasons for this are not clear and no experimental study has investigated this phenomenon. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of unilateral pallidotomy on locomotor activity, motor disability and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated levodopa-primed common marmosets. Animals were primed to exhibit dyskinesia by daily administration of levodopa until stable dyskinesia was evoked by each dose. Locomotor activity, motor disability and dyskinesia were assessed weekly at baseline and following an acute levodopa challenge. Prior to pallidotomies, two distinct groups of animals emerged: poor responders to levodopa with mild dyskinesia (Group 1) and those exhibiting a marked increase in motor activity and pronounced dyskinesia (Group 2). Electrolytic lesions were placed in the left internal segment of the globus pallidus. Pallidotomy had no effect on basal or levodopa-induced motor activity in either group but significantly improved basal motor disability in Group 2. Following pallidotomy, the ability of levodopa to reduce motor disability was significantly increased in both groups. Pallidotomy improved dyskinesia in both Groups 1 and 2 but it was more effective in reducing dystonia compared with chorea. The effect of pallidotomy on dyskinesia in Group 2 was transient, with the intensity of involuntary movements reverting to presurgery levels 4 weeks later. This study shows that in levodopa-primed, parkinsonian marmosets, placement of discrete globus pallidus lesions can ameliorate levodopa-induced dyskinesia but not akinesia. This model allows the evaluation of pallidotomy-induced biochemical changes in dyskinetic primates.

Multiple small doses of levodopa plus entacapone produce continuous dopaminergic stimulation and reduce dyskinesia induction in MPTP-treated drug-naive primates.

Long-acting dopamine agonist drugs induce a lower incidence of dyskinesia in MPTP-treated primates and patients with Parkinson's disease compared to pulsatile treatment with levodopa, supporting the concept of continuous dopaminergic stimulation as a means of dyskinesia avoidance. We examined the effects of L-dopa administered with or without the COMT inhibitor entacapone on dyskinesia induction in previously untreated MPTP-treated common marmosets. Administration of L-dopa (12.5 mg/kg p.o.) plus carbidopa twice daily produced fluctuating improvement in motor behavior coupled with dyskinesia. Coadministration with entacapone produced similar patterns of motor improvement and dyskinesia that were not different from that produced by L-dopa alone. Treatment with L-dopa (6.25 mg/kg p.o.) plus carbidopa four times daily reversed motor disability and induced dyskinesia in a manner that was not different from the twice-daily treatment regimens. However, coadministration with entacapone produced more continuous improvement in locomotor activity with less dyskinesia than animals treated with L-dopa four times daily alone. These data support the notion that pulsatile stimulation contributes to the development of dyskinesia and suggests that more frequent dosing of L-dopa plus entacapone may be a useful treatment strategy for patients in the early stages of Parkinson's disease.

3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) inhibits dyskinesia expression and normalizes motor activity in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated primates.

Ecstasy [3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)] was shown to prolong the action of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) while suppressing dyskinesia in a single patient with Parkinson's disease (PD). The clinical basis of this effect of MDMA is unknown but may relate to its actions on either dopaminergic or serotoninergic systems in brain. In normal, drug-naive common marmosets, MDMA administration suppressed motor activity and exploratory behavior. In 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated, L-DOPA-primed common marmosets, MDMA transiently relieved motor disability but over a period of 60 min worsened motor symptoms. When given in conjunction with L-DOPA, however, MDMA markedly decreased dyskinesia by reducing chorea and to a lesser extent dystonia and decreased locomotor activity to the level observed in normal animals. MDMA similarly alleviated dyskinesia induced by the selective dopamine D2/3 agonist pramipexole. The actions of MDMA appeared to be mediated through 5-HT mechanisms because its effects were fully blocked by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. Furthermore, the effect of MDMA on L-DOPA-induced motor activity and dyskinesia was partially inhibited by 5-HT1a/b antagonists. The ability of MDMA to inhibit dyskinesia results from its broad spectrum of action on 5-HT systems. Serotoninergic receptors appear to play an important modulatory role in l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia, and this study may provide a framework for the use of serotoninergic agents in the treatment of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.