Multiple breath-hold segmented volumetric modulated arc therapy under real-time fluoroscopic image guidance with implanted fiducial markers: preliminary clinical experience.

A technique for multiple breath-hold segmented volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been proposed under real-time fluoroscopic image guidance with implanted fiducial markers. Fiducial markers were embedded as close as possible to a tumour and the patient was asked to breathe in slowly under fluoroscopy. Immediately after the marker positions on the fluoroscopic image moved inside the planned marker contours transferred from a digitally reconstructed radiographic image at each gantry start angle, the patient was asked to hold their breath and a segmented VMAT beam was delivered. During beam delivery, the breath-hold status was continuously monitored by viewing a pointer in a breath monitoring system, Abches (Apex Medical, Tokyo, Japan), with the aid of a video camera installed in the treatment room. As long as the pointer stayed still, the segmented VMAT delivery continued for a preset period of 15-30 s, depending on the breath-hold capability of each patient. As soon as each segmented delivery was completed, the beam interrupt button was pushed; subsequently, the patient was asked to breathe freely. Because the preset breath-hold period was determined in order for each patient to hold their breath without fail, an intermediate beam interrupt due to breath-hold failure during the segmented beam delivery was not observed. This procedure was repeated until all the segmented VMAT beams were delivered. A case of pancreatic cancer is reported here as a preliminary study. The proposed technique may be clinically advantageous for treating tumours that move with respiration, including pancreatic cancer, lung tumour and other abdominal cancers.

Reproducibility of diaphragm position assessed with a voluntary breath-holding device.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of diaphragm position in our new breath-holding radiotherapy for abdominal tumors using image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and a voluntary breath-holding device, Abches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with abdominal tumors using IGRT with Abches were enrolled. Twenty patients without dementia or severe lung disease were analyzed. Each fraction of all patients was set up with kV cone-beam CT with reference to the vertebral bodies. Before daily treatment, electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images of the diaphragm at breath-holding exhale phase were acquired. The difference in the diaphragm position relative to the vertebral body was analyzed by comparing EPID images and the digitally reconstructed radiograph of the planning CT. We evaluated the reproducibility of two axes: superior-inferior (S-I) and right-left (R-L) with the EPID measurements. RESULTS: The 443 irradiation data sets were analyzed. The interfractional reproducibility of the diaphragm relative to vertebral bodies was 1.7 ± 1.4 mm in the S-I and 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in the R-L direction. CONCLUSION: This technique has good interfractional reproducibility and visibility of the diaphragm during irradiation. Its use is feasible in the routine clinical setting and irradiation.

[Method for evaluating the positional accuracy of a six-degrees-of-freedom radiotherapy couch using high definition digital cameras].

PURPOSE: In this study, we proposed and evaluated a positional accuracy assessment method with two high-resolution digital cameras for add-on six-degrees-of-freedom radiotherapy (6D) couches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two high resolution digital cameras (D5000, Nikon Co.) were used in this accuracy assessment method. These cameras were placed on two orthogonal axes of a linear accelerator (LINAC) coordinate system and focused on the isocenter of the LINAC. Pictures of a needle that was fixed on the 6D couch were taken by the cameras during couch motions of translation and rotation of each axis. The coordinates of the needle in the pictures were obtained using manual measurement, and the coordinate error of the needle was calculated. The accuracy of a HexaPOD evo (Elekta AB, Sweden) was evaluated using this method. RESULTS: All of the mean values of the X, Y, and Z coordinate errors in the translation tests were within ±0.1 mm. However, the standard deviation of the Z coordinate errors in the Z translation test was 0.24 mm, which is higher than the others. In the X rotation test, we found that the X coordinate of the rotational origin of the 6D couch was shifted. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed an accuracy assessment method for a 6D couch. The method was able to evaluate the accuracy of the motion of only the 6D couch and revealed the deviation of the origin of the couch rotation. This accuracy assessment method is effective for evaluating add-on 6D couch positioning.

Effect of daily setup errors on individual dose distribution in conventional radiotherapy: an initial study.

Recent linear accelerators can perform cone-beam computed tomography to correct setup errors immediately before dose delivery. We calculated the dose distribution with setup errors acquired from cone-beam computed tomography to determine a more realistic and individual effect of setup errors. The differences in dose distribution were analyzed. The setup errors of three patients who were irradiated in the neck, esophagus, and pelvic area were obtained retrospectively. We found that the maximum dose variances for the three cases were 19.9-35.9%. The maximum dose variance points were relatively far from the isocenter. The volume of the 10% dose difference had widths of 1.3-1.85 cm around the beam edges. The V95 and mean doses at the clinical target volume were mostly unchanged. Doses around the beam edges were more varied than those around the isocenter for every case. The dose on the spinal cord located near the beam edges varied by 5-10% compared with the dose of the radiotherapy plan in two of the cases. We demonstrated the individual dose distributions of the cases affected by daily setup errors for all fractions.