Facilitators, barriers and acceptability of implementing a communication board in Sri Lankan intensive care units: A qualitative descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' and nurses' views of potential facilitators, barriers, and prospective acceptability of implementing a communication board in Sri Lankan intensive care units. DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive study. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Eight patients who received mechanical ventilation and nine nurses who worked in adult medical and surgical intensive care units were purposively selected. Data were collected via audio-taped, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews in January/February 2023. Interview guide questions were informed by the knowledge-to-action framework and the theoretical framework of acceptability. Data were analysed using inductive and deductive content analysis. The 32-item checklist of the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was used to ensure the quality of reporting. SETTING: A 3,000 bed Sri Lankan teaching hospital with 18 intensive care units. FINDINGS: Four categories reflecting patients' and nurses' anticipated use of the board were found. The first category described patients' and nurses' 'readiness to use the communication board' and their positive attitudes towards it. The second category focused on the 'potential benefits of the communication board', while the third category emphasised the 'individual patient characteristics' that should be taken into consideration when implementing communication boards. The final category described practical aspects related to 'integrating communication boards into routine practice'. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates communication boards may improve communication between ventilated patients and nurses, and they are acceptable to end users. Adopting these tools may be a pivotal step to enhancing patient-centred care in demanding intensive care settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: An inability to communicate effectively with ventilated intensive care patients creates negative experiences for both patients and nurses. Communication boards may act as a medium to better understand patients' needs during mechanical ventilation.Understanding patients' and nurses' views is beneficial when designing patient-centred communication interventions in intensive care units.

Augmentative and alternative communication tools for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to understand the extent and type of evidence on augmentative and alternative communication tools used with mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. REVIEW METHOD USED: This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, followed by PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations) framework to provide a structured approach to analysis of reviews. DATA SOURCES: In December 2021, six electronic databases-CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, Medline (Ebscohost), PyscINFO, and Web of Science-were searched. Searches were supplemented with hand searching of reference lists of included studies. REVIEW METHODS: Studies were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full-text review was completed by two independent authors, with any disagreement resolved by consensus or with consultation with a third reviewer. A table was developed to extract key information from the eligible studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and Supporting the Use of Research Evidence checklist were used to quality appraise the selected primary research and reviews, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (19 primary studies and four reviews) were included in the review. Findings highlighted five main patterns: (i) Co-designing of the augmentative and alternative communication tools; (ii) Patients' and healthcare professionals' training needs on augmentative and alternative communication tools; (iii) Implementation of validated communication assessment algorithms; (iv) Amalgamate several communication methods/approaches; (v) Technical competency required for high-technology augmentative and alternative communication tools. CONCLUSION: Both low- and high-technology augmentative and alternative communication tools are widely used for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units, but there is a need for systematically assessing the communication needs and implementing communication interventions to promote meaningful patient-centred clinical outcomes.