A Systematic Search and Review of Registered Pharmacological Therapies Investigated to Improve Outcomes after a Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Stroke burden is largely due to long-term impairments requiring prolonged care and loss of productivity. We aim to identify and assess studies of different registered pharmacological therapies as treatments for improving post-stroke impairments and/or disabilities. METHODS: In a systematic search and review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022376973), studies of treatments that have been investigated as recovery-enhancing or recovery-promoting treatments in adult patients who had suffered a stroke will be searched for, screened, and reviewed based on the following: participants (P): adult humans, aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with stroke; interventions (I): registered or marketed pharmacological therapies that have been investigated as recovery-enhancing or recovery-promoting treatments in stroke; comparators (C): active or placebo or no comparator; outcomes (O): stroke-related neurological impairments and functional/disability assessments. Data will be extracted from included papers, including patient demographics, study methods, keystroke inclusion criteria, details of intervention and control, and the reported outcomes. RESULT: "The best available studies" based on study design, study size, and/or date of publication for different therapies and stroke subtypes will be selected and graded for level of evidence by consensus. CONCLUSION: There are conflicting study results of pharmacological interventions after an acute stroke to enhance recovery. This systematic search and review will identify the best evidence and knowledge gaps in the pharmacological treatment of post-stroke patients as well as guide clinical decision-making and planning of future studies.

Adjunctive rescue therapy in acute large vessel occlusion secondary to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) secondary to intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is unclear. Adjunctive rescue therapy with balloon angioplasty or stenting may be necessary to ensure vessel patency. We aimed to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of adjunctive rescue therapy vs lone thrombectomy for ICAD-related-LVO. METHODS: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis was performed in acute stroke patients who had endovascular thrombectomy between 2008 and 2021. We included patients with acute ICAD-related-LVO. The location of ICAD and exposure to thrombolysis were used to generate propensity score matching to estimate the likelihood of treatment by adjunctive rescue therapy. The primary clinical outcome (90-day modified rankin scale 0-2) and safety outcomes (symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage) were assessed between the two groups. RESULTS: One-hundred and forty-four patients were included. The median (IQR) age was 68(59-76) and 52(36 %) were females. The baseline NIHSS was 12.5(8-19). Sixty-seven (47 %) patients had ICAD in M1 or M2 segments. Forty-six patients (67 %) had lone thrombectomy and twenty-one (28 %) had adjunctive rescue therapy. Propensity score matching did not demonstrate significant differences in 90-day modified Rankin Score 0-2 between lone thrombectomy (38.8 %) and adjunctive rescue therapy (39.3 %) (p = 0.3). Lone thrombectomy, compared to adjunctive rescue therapy, did not result in significantly more symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages (2.8 % vs 8.3 %, p = 0.6), nor progressive occlusion (17 % vs 19 %, p = 0.8). CONCLUSION: We did not find significant differences in clinical outcomes and safety between lone thrombectomy and adjunctive rescue therapy. Randomized controlled studies are required to resolve the equipoise in treatment of ICAD-related-LVO.

A systematic-search-and-review of registered pharmacological therapies investigated to improve neuro-recovery after a stroke.

Background: Stroke burden is largely due to long-term impairments requiring prolonged care with loss of productivity. We aimed to identify and assess studies of different registered pharmacological therapies as treatments to improve post-stroke impairments and/or disabilities. Methods: We performed a systematic-search-and-review of treatments that have been investigated as recovery-enhancing or recovery-promoting therapies in adult patients with stroke. The treatment must have received registration or market authorization in any country regardless of primary indication. Outcomes included in the review were neurological impairments and functional/disability assessments. "The best available studies" based on study design, study size, and/or date of publication were selected and graded for level of evidence (LOE) by consensus. Results: Our systematic search yielded 7,801 citations, and we reviewed 665 full-text papers. Fifty-eight publications were selected as "the best studies" across 25 pharmacological classes: 31 on ischemic stroke, 21 on ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, 4 on intracerebral hemorrhage, and 2 on subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Twenty-six were systematic reviews/meta-analyses, 29 were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and three were cohort studies. Only nimodipine for SAH had LOE A of benefit (systematic review and network meta-analysis). Many studies, some of which showed treatment effects, were assessed as LOE C-LD, mainly due to small sample sizes or poor quality. Seven interventions had LOE B-R (systematic review/meta-analysis or RCT) of treatment effects. Conclusion: Only one commercially available treatment has LOE A for routine use in stroke. Further studies of putative neuroprotective drugs as adjunctive treatment to revascularization procedures and more confirmatory trials on recovery-promoting therapies will enhance the certainty of their benefit. The decision on their use must be guided by the clinical profile, neurological impairments, and target outcomes based on the available evidence. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=376973, PROSPERO, CRD42022376973.

Neurological Improvement by One-Thirds Is Associated With Early Recanalization in Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of large vessel occlusion strokes demonstrate early recanalization, obviating the initial intention to proceed to endovascular thrombectomy. Neurological improvement is a possible surrogate marker for reperfusion. We aimed to determine the optimal threshold of neurological improvement, as defined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), which best associates with early recanalization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion transferred from primary stroke centers to a tertiary comprehensive stroke center in Melbourne, Australia, for possible endovascular thrombectomy from January 2018 to December 2022. Absolute and percentage changes in NIHSS between transfer, as well as other definitions of neurological improvement, were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for association with recanalization as defined by the absence of occlusion in the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2 segments), or basilar artery on repeat vascular imaging. RESULTS: Six hundred and fifty-four transferred patients with large vessel occlusion were included in the analysis: mean age was 68.8±14.0 years, 301 (46.0%) were women, and 338 (52%) received intravenous thrombolytics. The proportion of extracranial internal carotid artery, intracranial internal carotid artery, M1, proximal M2, and basilar artery occlusion was 18.8%, 13.6%, 48.3%, 15.0%, and 4.3%, respectively, on initial computed tomography angiogram. Median NIHSSprimary stroke center and NIHSScomprehensive stroke center scores were 15 (interquartile range, 9-18) and 13 (interquartile range, 8-19), respectively. Early recanalization occurred in 82 (13%) patients. NIHSS reduction of ≥33% was the best tradeoff between sensitivity (64%) and specificity (83%) for identifying recanalization. NIHSS reduction of ≥33% had the highest discriminative ability to predict recanalization (area under the curve, 0.735) in comparison with other definitions of neurological improvement. CONCLUSIONS: One-third neurological improvement between the primary hospital and tertiary center was the best predictor of early recanalization.

Atrial fibrillation is associated with higher first pass effect following thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion.

BACKGROUND: First pass effect (FPE), defined as single-pass complete or near complete reperfusion during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes, is a critical performance metric. Atrial fibrillation (AF)-related strokes have different clot composition compared with non-AF strokes, which may impact thrombectomy reperfusion results. We compared FPE rates in AF and non-AF stroke patients to evaluate if AF-related strokes had higher FPE rates. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the DIRECT-SAFE trial data, including patients with retrievable clots on the initial angiographic run. Patients were categorized into AF and non-AF groups. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of FPE (single-pass, single-device resulting in complete/near complete reperfusion) in AF and non-AF groups. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between FPE and AF, adjusting for thrombolysis pre-thrombectomy and clot location. RESULTS: We included 253 patients (67 with AF, 186 without AF). AF patients were older (mean age: 74 years vs 67.5 years, p=0.001), had a higher proportion of females (55% vs 40%, p=0.044), and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score: 17 vs 14, p=0.009) than non-AF patients. No differences were observed in thrombolytic agent usage, time metrics, or clot location. AF patients achieved a higher proportion of FPE compared with non-AF patients (55.22% vs 37.3%, adjusted odds ratio 2.00 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.55), p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: AF-related strokes in LVO patients treated with EVT were associated with FPE. This highlights the need for preparedness for multiple passes and potential adjuvant/rescue therapy in non-AF-related strokes.

Possible Influence of Ethnicity on CT Perfusion Parameter Thresholds in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Introduction Tissue at risk, as estimated by CT perfusion utilizing Tmax+6, correlates with final infarct volume (FIV) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) without reperfusion. Tmax thresholds are derived from Western ethnic populations but not from ethnic Asian populations. We aimed to investigate the influence of ethnicity on Tmax thresholds. Methods From a clinical-imaging registry of Australian and Indonesian stroke patients, we selected a participant subgroup with the following inclusion criteria: AIS under 24 hours and absence of reperfusion therapy. Clinical data included demographics, time metrics, stroke severity, premorbid, and 3-month Modified Rankin Score. Baseline CTP and MRI <72 hours were performed. Volumes of Tmax utilizing different thresholds and final infarct volumes (FIV) were calculated. Spearman correlation was used to evaluate relationship involving ordinal variables and calculate the optimal Tmax threshold against FIV in both populations. Results Two hundred patients were included in the study sample 100 in Jakarta and 100 in Geelong. The median National Institutes Health Stroke Scale (IQR) were 6(3-11) and 3(1-5), respectively. The median Tmax+6(IQR) was 0 (0-46.5) in Jakarta group and 0(0-7.5) in Geelong group. The median FIV(IQR) was 0 (0-30.5) and 0 (0-5.5). Tmax +8s in Jakarta population against FIV showed Spearman's coefficient =0.72, representing the optimal Tmax threshold. Tmax+6s showed Spearman's coefficient =0.51 against FIV in the Geelong population. Conclusions Tmax thresholds approximating FIV were possibly different in the Asian when compared with the non-Asian populations. Future studies are required to extend and confirm the validity of our findings.

Usefulness of transcranial Doppler-derived cerebral hemodynamic parameters in the noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography is a noninvasive bedside tool that can evaluate cerebral blood flow hemodynamics in major intracranial arteries. TCD-derived pulsatility index (PI) is believed to be influenced by intracranial pressure (ICP). OBJECTIVE: To correlate TCD-PI with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure (representing ICP), measured by standard lumbar puncture (LP) manometry. METHODS: CSF pressures (CSF-P) were measured in 78 patients by LP manometry. Stable TCD spectra were obtained 5 minutes before LP from either middle cerebral arteries using Spencer's head frame and 2-MHz transducer. PI values were calculated from the TCD spectra by an independent neurosonologist. RESULTS: Factors displaying a significant relationship with CSF-P included age (R = -.426, P < .0005); EDV (R = -.328, P = .002;) and PI (R = .650, P < .0005). On analyzing dichotomized data (CSF-P < 20 vs. ≥ 20 cm H2 0) TCD-PI was an independent determinant (OR per .1 increase in PI = 2.437; 95% CI, 1.573-3.777; P < .0005). PI ≥ 1.26 could reliably predict CSF-P ≥ 20 cm H2 0 (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 81.1%, 96.3%, 93.8%, 88.1%, and 90.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: TCD-derived PI could be used to identify patients with CSF-P ≥ 20 cm H2 0 and may play an important role as a monitoring tool.