The Roles of Renal Oxygen Saturation in Septic Shock Children.

Introduction: Septic shock, the most severe form of sepsis, has high morbidity and mortality rates among children. In patients with septic shock, impaired microcirculatory perfusion is associated with the severity of organ failure and the likelihood of death. Because near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can assess microcirculation status and peripheral tissue oxygenation directly and noninvasively, provides real-time results, and can be performed at the patient's bedside. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of renal oxygen saturation (rRSO2) measured by NIRS in septic shock among children. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled children aged 1 month to 18 years with septic shock who were treated in a pediatric intensive care unit from August 2020 to January 2021. NIRS was used to measure rRSO2 in patients diagnosed with septic shock according to the Third International Consensus Definition of Sepsis and Septic Shock. The baseline rRSO2 value (%) formed a receiver operating characteristic curve and was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio (OR). Results: We enrolled 24 patients, 13 nonsurvivors and 11 survivors, whose mean baseline rRSO2 values were 67.27 ± 12.95 versus 48.69 ± 16.17, respectively (P = 0.006). The optimal cutoff value for baseline rRSO2 was <60.5%, with a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 81.8%, and an area under curve 0.804 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.2%-98.1%, P = 0.012; OR = 15; 95 CI: 2.04-111.74). Conclusion: Measured by NIRS, rRSO2 values are a good predictor of mortality among children with septic shock.

Renal Oxygen Saturation as an Early Indicator of Shock in Children.

Background: Shock is a life-threatening syndrome in which tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery are inadequate. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been suggested as a noninvasive tool for monitoring and detecting the state of inadequate tissue perfusion. Renal and mesenteric oximetry show decreased cardiac output earlier than systemic or global parameters of tissue oxygenation or cerebral oximetry. However, until now there has been no study on the validity of regional renal oxygen saturation (rRSO2) by NIRS for diagnosing shock in children. Purpose: To analyze the validity of rRSO2 by NIRS to diagnose shock in children. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in critically ill children (aged 1 month-18 years) who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from September to November 2020, consecutively. Patients were classified into two groups: shock and non-shock. The diagnosis of shock is based on clinical criteria (tachycardia, sign of hypoperfusion and decrease systolic blood pressure

Inferior Vena Cava/Abdominal Aorta Ratio as a Guide for Fluid Resuscitation.

INTRODUCTION: The fluid therapy is crucial in the treatment of critically ill children. Inadequate or excessive fluid resuscitation leads to increased mortality and morbidity, thus necessitating an accurate parameter for predicting fluid responsiveness when conducting fluid resuscitation. The inferior vena cava/abdominal aorta (IVC/Ao) ratio is suggested as a good guide for fluid resuscitation. However, the cutoff value for predicting fluid responsiveness in children has not been established. Is IVC/Ao ratio can be used to predict fluid responsiveness? METHODS: The objective was to determine the accuracy and a cutoff value of IVC/Ao in predicting fluid responsiveness. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency room and the pediatric intensive care unit of the tertiary hospital from March to August 2017. We consecutively enrolled all critically ill children aged 1 month to 18 years' old who were hemodynamically unstable (shock). Measurements of IVC/Ao with ultrasound and stroke volume with ultrasound cardiac output monitor were obtained before and after fluid challenge. RESULTS: Of 167 subjects enrolled in this study, only 58 subjects were included, most of whom were male (58.6%) and ranging in age from 1 to 11 months (32.8%). The mean IVC/Ao ratio before the fluid challenge in the fluid responsive group was 0.70 ± 0.053. The best cutoff of the IVC/Ao ratio is 0.675 with area under the curve 70.8% (95% confidence interval of 54.6%-87%), 75.7% sensitivity, and 61.9% specificity for predicting significant fluid responsiveness. CONCLUSION: The measurement of IVC/Ao is an accurate, sensitive, and specific parameter to predict fluid responsiveness. The best cut-off for the IVC/Ao ratio is 0.675.