RESUMO
Achromobacter xylosoxidans (A. xylosoxidans) is an opportunistic pathogen that is responsible for various nosocomial and community-acquired infections. It is often found in patients with cystic fibrosis or chronic lung diseases. Here, a 70-year-old female patient presented to an emergency department with complaints of diffuse abdominal pain and distension, on and off giddiness, and generalized body pain for one month with a known case of diabetes and hypertension. The patient had no history of nausea, vomiting, constipation/loose stools, or fever at the time of arrival. Then, the patient was admitted with a provisional diagnosis of incisional hernia. However, the patient developed a fever after she had undergone surgery for an incisional hernia. The blood culture reveals the growth of A. xylosoxidans. The patient responded well to treatment with intravenous antibiotics piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem for five days. The literature on bacteremia caused by A. xylosoxidans in incisional hernia patients is reviewed in this study, along with the distinct antimicrobial susceptibility pattern.
RESUMO
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly those that produce carbapenemases, pose a significant public health concern due to very limited treatment options. The timely identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is essential for putting in place efficient infection control measures and selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapies, thereby improving the clinical outcome of the patient. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the diagnostic accuracy and practicality between two phenotypic tests, namely the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and carbapenemase Nordmann-Poirel (Carba NP) test, in detecting carbapenemase production by Enterobacterales and thereby aiding the clinician in making a decision to choose an appropriate test for their phenotypic detection. This systematic review involved combining sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CIs), Forest plot for sensitivity and specificity, and plotting suitable summary receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under the curve. Of the 20 studies included in this review, the overall effect sizes of Carba NP and mCIM with 95% CIs were as follows: sensitivity, 91% (86-96%) and 97% (95-99%); specificity, 93% (88-97%) and 97% (93-100%); PPV, 97% and 98%; NPV, 79% and 90%; accuracy, 93% and 97%; diagnostic odds ratio, 1487.8879 and 8527.5541; and AUC, 0.85 and 1, respectively. In conclusion, the mCIM method showed superior sensitivity (97%), specificity (97%), and accuracy compared to the Carba NP test in detecting carbapenemase production, even though both these methods had a few technical limitations. The Carba NP test is rapid, affordable, and dependable, whereas mCIM is more accurate and cost-effective but time-consuming. We propose that both tests can be reliably used for screening of carbapenemase production in Enterobacterales, as endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute even in resource-limited clinical laboratories, in the order of prioritizing the mCIM method first and then followed by the Carba NP test when situation demands expedited results.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There are comparatively fewer surgical site infections after craniofacial trauma than after trauma to the extremities, and the etiology is complex. Gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacteria Veillonella is a common commensal in the oral cavity and has been linked to osteomyelitis and surgical site infections in prosthetic joint infections. They serve as early biological indicators. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the presence of Veillonella in patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma, to document the difference in colony count in patients requiring surgical intervention at different time intervals as against patients with surgical site infections, and to provide better hospital care and management so as to improve the standard of care with an attempt to prevent the possibility of postoperative surgical site infections. METHODOLOGY: In this study, individuals with trauma/fractures of the maxillofacial region requiring surgical intervention at varied time spans, early, intermediate, and late, were included. After obtaining informed consent, the examination was done; the fracture type and site were noted, and a swab was taken on the day of admission, on the day of surgery, and on the day of discharge and given for microbiological evaluation. Findings were recorded. RESULTS: The primary and secondary objectives of the study were established. The mean colony count in colony-forming units/milliliter for patients undergoing early surgical intervention, on the day of admission, was 2.01E+0.6. On the day of discharge, the mean colony count was 1.51E+0.6. In contrast, for patients with surgical site infection, on the day of admission, the mean was 6.5E+0.7, and on the day of discharge, the mean colony count reduced to 4.01E+0.6. The time-colony-forming unit graph showed a difference in the colony count of Veillonella in patients operated at different time intervals as against patients with surgical site infection and modified relation with a number of other oral commensals. The colony count in patients with osteomyelitis was found and compared. CONCLUSION: There is a change in the colony count of Veillonella species and its relation to their commensals when intervened at different time intervals. Our study indicates that the estimation of Veillonella species and the colony count could aid in determining the possibility of a surgical site infection. This study also stresses on the appropriate reporting of maxillofacial trauma in cases of a poly-trauma for appropriate management.