RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids causes less pain than excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but many patients still experience significant postprocedure discomfort. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether topical lidocaine, with or without diltiazem, is more effective than placebo for analgesia after hemorrhoid banding. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 2% lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with 2% diltiazem, or a placebo ointment. SETTINGS: This study was performed at 2 university public teaching hospitals and 2 private hospitals in Australia. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years undergoing hemorrhoid banding were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Topical ointments were applied postprocedure 3× daily for 5 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analog pain score, opiate analgesia usage, and patient satisfaction were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Of 159 eligible patients, 99 were randomly assigned (33 in each group). Pain scores were reduced at 1 hour for the lidocaine (OR 4.15 [1.12-15.41]; p = 0.03) and lidocaine/diltiazem groups (OR 3.85 [1.05-14.11]; p = 0.04) compared with placebo. Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group had improved satisfaction (OR 3.82 [1.28-11.44]; p = 0.02) and were more likely to recommend the procedure to others (OR 9.33 [1.07-81.72]; p = 0.04). Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group required approximately 45% less total and in-hospital analgesia compared with the placebo. There was no difference in complications between any of the groups. LIMITATIONS: A cost/benefit analysis was not performed. Analgesic efficacy appeared to be short term and the procedures were performed only in the hospital/nonambulatory setting. CONCLUSIONS: Topical lidocaine reduced short-term analgesia use, whereas combination lidocaine/diltiazem was associated with both improved analgesia and patient satisfaction after hemorrhoid banding. LIDOCANA TPICA O UNGENTO DE LIDOCANA/DILTIAZEM DESPUS DE LA LIGADURA HEMORROIDAL CON BANDA ELSTICA UN ENSAYO PROSPECTIVO CONTROLADO Y ALEATORIZADO DE TRES BRAZOS: ANTECEDENTES:La ligadura de hemorroides con banda elástica causa menos dolor que la hemorroidectomía escisional, pero muchos pacientes siguen experimentando molestias significativas tras el procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar si la lidocaína tópica, con o sin diltiazem, es más eficaz que el placebo para la analgesia tras la ligadura hemorroidal.DISEÑO:Este es un ensayo prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir lidocaína al 2 %, lidocaína al 2 % con diltiazem al 2 % o ungüento de placebo.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en dos hospitales públicos con docencia universitaria y dos hospitales privados en Australia.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes consecutivos de ≥18 años sometidos a ligadura para hemorroides.INTERVENCIONES:Se aplicaron ungüentos tópicos tras el procedimiento tres veces al día durante 5 días.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La puntuación analógica visual del dolor, el uso de analgésicos opiáceos y la satisfacción del paciente fueron las principales medidas de resultado.RESULTADOS:De 159 pacientes elegibles, 99 fueron aleatorizados (33 en cada grupo). Las puntuaciones de dolor se redujeron a la hora para los grupos de lidocaína (OR 4,15 (1,12-15,41); p = 0,03) y lidocaína/diltiazem (OR 3,85 (1,05-14,11), p = 0,04) en comparación con el placebo.Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem mejoraron su satisfacción (OR 3,82 (1,28-11,44), p = 0,02) y eran más propensos de recomendar el procedimiento a otros (OR 9,33 (1,07-81,72), p = 0,04). Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem requirieron aproximadamente un 45 % menos de analgesia total e intrahospitalaria en comparación con el grupo de placebo. No hubo diferencia en las complicaciones entre ninguno de los grupos.LIMITACIONES:No se realizó un análisis de costo/beneficio. La eficacia analgésica pareció ser a corto plazo y los procedimientos solo se realizaron en el hospital/entorno no ambulatorio.CONCLUSIÓN:La lidocaína tópica mejora la analgesia a corto plazo, mientras que la combinación de lidocaína/diltiazem se asocia tanto con una mejor analgesia como con la satisfacción del paciente tras la colocación de bandas para hemorroides. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).
Assuntos
Diltiazem , Hemorroidas , Lidocaína , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Diltiazem/uso terapêutico , Hemorroidas/cirurgia , Hospitais Universitários , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Pomadas , Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose , Abdome/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/patologia , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed for better local control of colon cancer and to improve cancer-specific survival (CSS). However, CME may be associated with increased morbidity from bleeding during central vascular ligation. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of conventional right hemicolectomy, a traditional anatomical dissection along anatomical planes with radical excision of the central lymph nodes at the level of the origin of colic artery but without exposure of superior mesenteric vein and artery (SMV/SMA). METHOD: This was a retrospective review of a cohort of all elective right hemicolectomies performed at a specialist tertiary unit during a five-year period (2011-2015). RESULTS: Five-hundred-nineteen patients (271 female, a median age of 73.0 years (interquartile range (IQR) 65.0-80.0)) were included (Stage I disease: 2.7%, stage II: 53.2%, stage III: 33.3%, stage IV: 10.8%). At the latest follow-up (a median 47 months (IQR 29-67)), local recurrence occurred in 34 patients (6.6%). Three-year overall survival was 74.4% and 3-year CSS was 85.9%. Subgroup analysis for stage I-III showed local recurrence in 6.0%, sole distant recurrence in 7.6% while 19 patients (4.1%) suffered concomitant local and distant recurrence. The anastomotic leak rate was 1.0% and perioperative bleeding occurred in 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Oncological outcomes comparable to those of CME can be achieved by conventional surgery but with low rates of bleeding complications and anastomotic leakage. The proposed advantages of CME should be carefully considered and balanced against patients' co-morbidities and potential complications.