Use of Bio-integrative Screws for Fixation of Lisfranc Instability; Pros and Cons from Surgeons' Point of View in a Cadaver Study.

Objectives: Majority of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations require anatomic reduction and rigid internal fixation to prevent debilitating sequelae. Current methods include solid screws and flexible fixations which have been in use for many years. Biointegrative screw is a newer option that has not yet been thoroughly investigated for its effectiveness for Lisfranc injuries. Methods: The ligaments of the Lisfranc complex were resected in eight lower-leg cadaveric specimens. This was done by eight foot and ankle surgeons individually. Distraction forces were applied from opposite sides at the joint to replicate weight bearing conditions. Three methods of fixation - flexible fixation, metal, and biointegrative screws- were evaluated. The diastasis and area at the level of the ligament were measured at four conditions (replicated injury and each type of fixation) in neutral and distraction conditions using fluoroscopy images. The Wilcoxon test and Kruskal Wallis test were used for comparison. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The diastasis value for the transected ligament scenario (2.47 ± 0.51 mm) was greater than those after all three fixation methods without distraction (2.02 ± 0.5 for flexible fixation, 1.72 ± 0.63 mm for metal screw fixation and 1.67 ± 0.77 mm for biointegrative screw fixation). The transected ligament diastasis was also greater than that for metal screw (1.61 ± 1.31mm) and biointegrative screws (1.69 ± 0.64 mm) with distraction (p<0.001). The area at the level of the ligament showed higher values for transected ligament (32.7 ± 13.08 mm2) than the three fixatives (30.75 ± 7.42 mm2 for flexible fixation, 30.75 ± 17.13 mm2 for metal screw fixation and 29.53 ± 9.15 mm2 for biointegrative screw fixation; p<0.05). Conclusion: Metal screws, flexible fixation and biointegrative screws showed comparable effectiveness intra-op, in the correction of diastasis created as a consequence of Lisfranc injury.

The Emerging Role of Automation, Measurement Standardization, and Artificial Intelligence in Foot and Ankle Imaging: An Update.

In the past few years, advances in clinical imaging in the realm of foot and ankle have been consequential and game changing. Improvements in the hardware aspects, together with the development of computer-assisted interpretation and intervention tools, have led to a noticeable improvement in the quality of health care for foot and ankle patients. Focusing on the mainstay imaging tools, including radiographs, computed tomography scans, and ultrasound, in this review study, the authors explored the literature for reports on the new achievements in improving the quality, accuracy, accessibility, and affordability of clinical imaging in foot and ankle.

Does Screw Order Matter? A Technique Tip to Prevent Loss of Fracture Reduction during Surgical Fixation of Lateral Malleolus Fractures.

When obtaining surgical fixation of lateral malleolus fractures, a cortical lag screw is commonly used to obtain anatomic reduction. Subsequently, a neutralization plate is applied. Slight loss of fracture reduction after plate placement occasionally occurs. Although this is frequently attributed to poor bone quality or suboptimal initial lag screw fixation, a frequently overlooked factor is screw order when applying the neutralization plate. The purpose of this technique tip is to highlight the biomechanical rationale behind this loss of reduction and advocate a specific screw order for lateral malleolus fixation.

Lack of Surgeon Standardization on Implant Selection in Ankle Fracture Fixation May Increase Costs and Decrease Contribution Margin.

BACKGROUND: Surgical standardization has been shown to decrease costs without impacting quality; however, there is limited literature on this subject regarding ankle fracture fixation. Methods. Between October 5, 2015 and September 27, 2017, a total of 168 patients with isolated ankle fractures who underwent open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) were analyzed. Financial data were analyzed across ankle fracture classification type, implant characteristics, and surgeons. Bivariate analyses were conducted. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare hardware costs across all 5 surgeons. Linear regression analysis was used to determine if hardware cost differed by surgeon when accounting for fracture type. RESULTS: The mean contribution margin was $4853 (SD $6446). There was a significant difference in implant costs by surgeon (range, lowest-cost surgeon: $471 [SD $283] to $1609 [SD $819]; P < .001). There was no difference in the use of a suture button or locking plate by fracture type (P = .13); however, the cost of the implant was significantly higher if a suture button or locking plate was used ($1014 [SD $666] vs $338 [SD $176]; P < .001). There was an association between surgeon 3 (ß = 200.32 [95% CI 6.18-394.47]; P = .043) and surgeon 4 (ß = 1131.07 [95% CI 906.84-1355.30]; P < .001) and higher hardware costs. CONCLUSIONS: Even for the same ankle fracture type, a wide variation in implant costs exists. The lack of standardization among surgeons accounted for a nearly 3.5-fold difference, on average, between the lowest- and highest-cost surgeons, negatively affecting contribution margin. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Screw-only fibular construct for Weber B ankle fractures: A retrospective clinical and cost comparison to assess feasibility for resource-limited settings.

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures are one of the most common injuries sustained worldwide, with the majority being isolated lateral malleolus fractures. The majority of the world's population live in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC), where implant cost may limit surgical treatment of ankle fractures. We investigate if Weber B ankle fractures could be effectively treated with a lower-cost technique using two screws between the fibula and the tibia to neutralize an interfragmentary lag screw. METHODS: After IRB approval, consecutive patients from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 with Weber-B ankle fractures were treated using AO technique (AOT) with plate osteosynthesis neutralizing an interfragmentary screw. Syndesmotic injuries, as well as injuries to the medial malleolus or foot were treated according to the surgeon's preferences. From January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 these injuries were treated with a screw-only technique (SOT) with two fibula pro tibia screws to neutralize an interfragmentary screw. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, associated rheumatoid arthritis, and associated diabetes mellitus were recorded. The primary outcome variable was a stable radiographic mortise at six weeks post-surgery, secondary outcome variables included clinical union, infection, hardware removal, and implant cost for lateral malleolar fixation charged to the hospital. RESULTS: Seventeen AOT and 10 SOT constructs were included. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. All fractures maintained a stable mortise with clinical union at 6 weeks without infection. There was a statistically significant difference in hardware removal (17.6% AOT, 50% SOT, p = 0.012). The average implant cost to the hospital of the lateral malleolar fixation was significantly less in the SOT group ($592 (SD $229)), compared to the AOT group ($1,949.97 (SD $562)), (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We introduce proof of concept of a novel lower-cost fixation strategy for Weber B ankle fractures that maintained a stable mortise with clinical union at six weeks post-surgery. However, there was a significantly higher rate of hardware removal following fixation with a screw-only construct.

The Lateral Drawer Test: A New Clinical Test to Assess Mortise Instability in Weber B Fibula Fractures.

Background: Assessment of mortise stability is paramount in determining appropriate management of ankle fractures. Although instability is readily apparent in bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures, determination of instability in the isolated Weber B fibula fracture often requires further investigation. Prior authors have demonstrated poor predictive value of physical examination findings such as tenderness, ecchymosis, and swelling with instability. The goal of this study is to test the validity of a new clinical examination maneuver, the lateral drawer test, against the gravity stress view (GSV) in a cohort of patients with Weber B fibula fractures. Secondary goals included assessing pain tolerability of the lateral drawer test, as well as testing interobserver reliability. Methods: Sixty-two patients presenting with isolated fibula fractures were prospectively identified by an orthopaedic nurse practitioner or resident. Three nonweightbearing radiographic views of the ankle as well as a GSV were obtained. Radiographs were not visualized before conducting the lateral drawer test. Two foot and ankle fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons performed and graded the lateral drawer test. Radiographs were then examined and medial clear space (MCS) was measured. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained before and after testing. The results of the lateral drawer test were compared with radiographic measurements of MCS on GSV. A cadaveric experiment was devised to assess interobserver reliability of the lateral drawer test. Results: Thirty (48%) of 62 consecutively enrolled patients demonstrated radiographic instability with widening of the MCS ≥5 mm on GSV. When correlated with MCS measurement, the lateral drawer test demonstrated a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 96%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. There was a strong correlation between the lateral drawer test grade and amount of MCS widening (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.82, P < .005). Patients tolerated the maneuver well with an average increase of 0.7 on the VAS pain scale. Testing of 2 observers utilizing the cadaveric model demonstrated a Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.7 indicating moderate interobserver agreement. Conclusion: The lateral drawer test demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV with moderate interobserver reliability compared with the MCS on GSV in patients presenting with Weber B fibula fractures. Although further external validation is required, the lateral drawer test may offer an adjunct tool via physical examination to help determine mortise stability. Level of Evidence: Level II, Prospective Cohort Study.

Revision Strategies for the Aseptic, Malaligned, Surgically Treated Ankle Fracture.

Although surgical fixation can take many forms depending on ankle fracture morphology, the goals of open reduction internal fixation are to restore fracture alignment, re-establish ankle stability, and achieve an anatomic mortise. A subset of patients may present postoperatively with evidence of suboptimal open reduction internal fixation. Increased contact pressures across the tibiotalar joint, increased talar shift, and pathologic joint loading leading to the development of post-traumatic arthritis are common sequela of the malaligned mortise. Treatment necessitates a comprehensive approach. This article describes our preferred systematic approach for diagnosis and treatment of the aseptic, malaligned, surgically treated ankle fracture.

The Lateral Fibular Stress Test: High Variability of Force Applied by Orthopaedic Surgeons in a Biomechanical Model.

Background: The lateral fibular stress test (LFST), also known as the hook or Cotton test, is commonly performed to assess syndesmotic instability intraoperatively. Several studies have used 100 N as the force applied when performing the LFST to detect syndesmotic instability, though no evidence-based requisite force has been described for the test. We hypothesize that surgeons do not apply force uniformly or consistently when performing the LFST and that substantial variation exists. Fundamentally, this could lead to inconsistent diagnosis of syndesmotic instability as surgeons may not be applying the force in a consistent manner. Methods: A biomechanical ankle model consisting of an industrial force gauge attached through a SawBones model was fashioned. Orthopaedic attending surgeons and trainees were asked to perform a series of LFSTs and to simulate the force they typically apply intraoperatively. Basic demographic data were collected on each participant. Results: Thirty-three surgeons participated in the study, including 18 trainees. The median (IQR) force applied during the LFST was 96.42 (71.42-126.33), 87.49 (69.19-117.40), 99.99 (79.91-137.49), for the pooled group, attendings, and trainees respectively. More than half (54.5%) of all trials were less than 100 N (57.8% of surgeons, 51.8% trainees). Intraobserver correlation was excellent within the overall cohort (0.92, P < .001), trainees (0.90, P < .001), and attendings (0.94, P < .001), respectively. Interobserver reliability was fair among the overall cohort (κ =0.28, P = .49), and poor between the attendings (κ = 0.11, P = .69) and the trainees (κ = 0.05, P = .82), respectively. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the amount of force applied by typical surgeons when performing the LFST test is highly variable. Variable force application when performing the LFST may lead to inconsistent detection of syndesmotic instability, which may portend a poorer outcome. Clinical Relevance: In this study, we demonstrate the wide variability in the amount of force used during a lateral fibular stress test. High variability of force application when performing the LFST may lead to inconsistent diagnosis of syndesmotic instability, which may portend a poorer outcome. Our findings suggest the need for further investigation into the technical aspects of syndesmotic testing that will permit more reproducible and valid interrogation of the syndesmosis.

Reliability of Fifth Metatarsal Base Fracture Classifications and Current Management.

BACKGROUND: Classification of fifth metatarsal base fractures has been a source of confusion since originally described by Jones in 1902. Zone classifications have been described but never evaluated for reliability. The most recent classification, metaphyseal vs meta-diaphyseal, may be unknown to many surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate reliability of American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) members classifying fifth metatarsal base fractures and current management of these fractures. METHODS: A survey was emailed to AOFAS members including radiographs of 18 fifth metatarsal base fractures. Demographic information was collected in addition to evaluation of the radiographs. Interrater reliability was assessed for each measurement: presence of Jones fracture, zone classification, and metaphyseal vs metaphyseal-diaphyseal, using Fleiss kappa. After 3 weeks, a second email was sent to the members asking to retake the survey to evaluate intrarater reliability. Respondents were asked which region is a Jones fracture, which classification is used, if symptomatic zone 2 and 3 fractures are treated similarly, and what fractures are operative in healthy symptomatic acute fractures. RESULTS: A total of 223 AOFAS members, with a median time in practice of 12 years (range 0-50), completed the initial survey. Eighty members (36%) repeated the survey for intrarater comparison. Interrater reliability was moderate for Jones and zone classification but substantial for the 2-zone metaphyseal/meta-diaphyseal classification. The median intrarater kappa was 0.78, 0.75, and 0.78 for Jones, zone, and metaphyseal/meta-diaphyseal respectively. Seventy percent of respondents treat zones 2 and 3 similarly, and approximately 60% consider an acute symptomatic fracture identified as Jones, zone 2 or zone 3 operative. CONCLUSION: A 2-zone system may be the best available classification for fifth metatarsal base fractures given high interrater reliability and 70% of AOFAS members treat zones 2 and 3 in similar fashion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Are SER-II Ankle Fractures Anatomic? Computed Tomography Demonstrates Mortise Malalignment in the Setting of Apparently Normal Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fracture treatment is predicated on minimal displacement, leading to abnormal joint contact area. The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether computed tomography (CT) detects subtle mortise malalignment undetectable by x-ray in supination-external rotation-II (SER-II) injuries. METHODS: A total of 24 patients with SER-II injuries, as demonstrated by negative gravity stress radiography, were included. Medial clear space (MCS) measurements were performed on bilateral ankle x-rays (injured and contralateral, uninjured side) at several time points as well as bilateral non-weight-bearing CT performed once clinical and radiographic healing was demonstrated (mean = 66 days post injury, range = 61-105 days). Statistical analyses examined differences in measurements between both sides. RESULTS: Final x-rays demonstrated no differences between normal and injured ankle MCS (P = .441). However, CT coronal/axial MCS measurements were different (P < .05). CT coronal MCS measured wider by a mean difference of 0.67 mm (P < .001). CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of subtle mortise malalignment in SER-II ankle fractures, as demonstrated by CT, which is undetectable when assessed by plain radiographs. Although clinical outcomes are yet unknown, there are important implications of the finding of confirmed, subtle mortise malalignment in SER-II injuries and the limitations of x-ray to detect it. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Stepwise-edited, human melanoma models reveal mutations' effect on tumor and microenvironment.

Establishing causal relationships between genetic alterations of human cancers and specific phenotypes of malignancy remains a challenge. We sequentially introduced mutations into healthy human melanocytes in up to five genes spanning six commonly disrupted melanoma pathways, forming nine genetically distinct cellular models of melanoma. We connected mutant melanocyte genotypes to malignant cell expression programs in vitro and in vivo, replicative immortality, malignancy, rapid tumor growth, pigmentation, metastasis, and histopathology. Mutations in malignant cells also affected tumor microenvironment composition and cell states. Our melanoma models shared genotype-associated expression programs with patient melanomas, and a deep learning model showed that these models partially recapitulated genotype-associated histopathological features as well. Thus, a progressive series of genome-edited human cancer models can causally connect genotypes carrying multiple mutations to phenotype.

Anatomic Structures at Risk During Posterior to Anterior Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.

Background. There are no established guidelines for fixation of posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs). However, fixation of PMFs appears to be increasing with growing evidence demonstrating benefits for stability, alignment, and early functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk to anatomic structures utilizing a percutaneous technique for posterior to anterior (PA) screw fixation of PMFs. Methods. Percutaneous PA screw placement was carried out on 10 fresh frozen cadaveric ankles followed by dissection to identify soft tissue and neurovascular structures at risk. The distance from the guidewire to each anatomic structure of interest was measured. The correlation between the mean distances from the guidewire to each structure was calculated. Results. The sural nerve was directly transected in 1/10 specimens (10%) and in contact with the wire in a second specimen (10%). There was a significant correlation between the proximity of the guidewire to the apex of Volkmann's tubercle and its proximity to the sural nerve. The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle belly was perforated by the guidewire 40% of the time but was not tethered or entrapped by the screw. Conclusions. Percutaneous PA screw placement is a safe technique which can be improved with several modifications. A mini-open technique is recommended to protect the sural nerve. There may be potential for tethering of the FHL with use of a washer or large screw head. Risk to the anterior and posterior neurovascular bundles is minimal.Levels of Evidence: Level V.

Syndesmotic Screw Breakage May Be More Problematic Than Previously Reported: Increased Rates of Hardware Removal Secondary to Pain With Intraosseous Screw Breakage.

BACKGROUND: The majority of retained syndesmotic screws will either loosen or break once the patient resumes weight-bearing. While evidence is limited, anecdotal experience suggests that intraosseous screw breakage may be problematic for some patients due to painful bony erosion. This study seeks to identify the incidence of intraosseous screw breakage, variables that may predict intraosseous screw breakage, and whether intraosseous screw breakage is associated with higher rates of implant removal secondary to pain. METHODS: Five hundred thirty-one patients undergoing syndesmotic stabilization were screened, of which 43 patients (with 58 screws) experiencing postoperative screw breakage met inclusion criteria. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, time to screw breakage, location of screw breakage, and implant removal. Several radiographic parameters were evaluated for their potential to influence the site of screw breakage. RESULTS: Intraosseous screw breakage occurred in 32 patients (74.4%). Screw breakage occurred exclusively in the tibiofibular clear space in the remaining 11 instances (25.6%). Intraosseous screw breakage was significantly associated with eventual implant removal after breakage (P = .034). Screws placed further from the tibiotalar joint were at less risk for intraosseous breakage (odds ratio 0.818, P = .002). Screws placed at a threshold height of 20 mm or greater were more likely to break in the clear space (odds ratio 12.1, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Syndesmotic screw breakage may be more problematic than previously described. Intraosseous breakage was associated with higher rates of implant removal secondary to pain in this study. Placement of screws 20 mm or higher from the tibiotalar joint may decrease risk of intraosseous breakage.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective study.

Risk Factors for Aseptic Revision of Operatively Treated Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Early revision rates within 12 months after ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation (AF-ORIF) are fairly low; however, they remain relevant given the volume of ankle fractures occurring annually. Understanding these rates is complex because reoperation due to technical or mechanical complications is typically reported alongside soft tissue-related problems such as symptomatic hardware, wound dehiscence, or infection. There are limited data identifying risk factors specifically for revision of ankle fracture fixation in the absence of soft tissue complications. Understanding variables that predispose to aseptic technical and mechanical failure without this confounder may provide insight and improve patient care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at 2 large academic medical centers. Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR) data available from 2002 to 2019 were used to identify patients who underwent aseptic revision of AF-ORIF within 12 months (n = 33). A control group (n = 100) was selected by identifying sequential patients who underwent AF-ORIF not requiring revision within 12 months. Multiple factors were recorded for all patients in both cohorts. Each fracture was also evaluated according to the Ankle Reduction Classification System (ARCS) of Chien et al,8 which categorizes biplanar talar displacement in relation to a central tibial plumb line into 1 of 3 grades: A (0-2 mm), B (3-10 mm), and C (>10 mm). Adapted from its original purpose of grading reduction quality, we applied ARCS to pre-reduction radiographs to assess initial fracture displacement. All variables collected were compared in univariate analysis. Variables that achieved significance in univariate comparisons were included as candidates for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Final multivariable logistic regression modeling demonstrated the following factors to independently predict the need for aseptic revision surgery: documented falls in the early postoperative period (aOR, 298; 95% CI, 15.4, 5759; P < .001), movement-altering disorders (aOR, 81.7; 95% CI, 4.12, 1620; P = .004), a nonanatomic mortise (medial clear space [MCS] > superior clear space [SCS]) on immediate postoperative imaging (aOR, 38.4; 95% CI, 5.53, 267; P < .001), initial coronal plane tibiotalar displacement >10 mm and sagittal plane tibiotalar dislocation (ARCS-C) (aOR vs ARCS-A, 25.8; 95% CI, 2.81, 237; P = .004), substance abuse (aOR, 15.7; 95% CI, 2.66, 92.8; P = .002), and polytrauma (aOR, 12.3; 95% CI, 2.02, 74.8; P = .006). CONCLUSION: In this investigation we found a notable increase in risk for revision surgery after AF-ORIF for patients who had one of the following: (1) falls in the early postoperative period, (2) movement-altering disorders, (3) a nonanatomic mortise (MCS > SCS) on immediate postoperative imaging, (4) more severe initial fracture displacement, (5) substance abuse, or (6) polytrauma. Identifying these factors may allow surgeons to better understand risk and counsel patients, and may serve as future targets for intervention aimed at improving patient safety and outcomes after ankle fracture ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.