Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 4(4): 623-630, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31673655

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To demonstrate feasibility and toxicity of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation therapy boost (SBRT) for prostate cancer, mimicking a high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A phase 1 sequential dose escalation study of SBRT compared 20 Gy, 22 Gy, and 24 Gy to the prostate and 25 Gy, 27.5 Gy, and 30 Gy to the gross tumor volume in 2 fractions, combined with 46 Gy in 23 fractions of external beam radiation. Feasibility of dose escalation (volume receiving 125% and 150% of the dose) while meeting organ-at-risk dose constraints, grade 2 acute and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity, and freedom from biochemical failure were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-six men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled with a median follow-up of 24 months. Sixty-four percent of patients had high-risk features. Nine men were enrolled to dose level 1, 6 to level 2, and 6 to level 3. Another 15 patients were treated at dose level 3 on the continuation study. Dose level 3 achieved superior 125% (23.75 Gy) and 150% (28.5 Gy) dose compared to dose levels 1 and 2, with minimal differences in organ-at-risk doses. Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from biochemical failure at 3 years was 93.3%. There were no late grade 2 or 3 gastrointestinal events. The late grade 2 genitourinary toxicity at 2 years was 19.3%. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography was performed at 2 years with no local recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that a linear accelerator-based SBRT boost for prostate cancer is feasible and can achieve doses comparable to high-dose-rate boost up to the 150% isodose volumes. Rectal, bladder, and urethral doses remained low, and long-term toxicity was the same as or better than previous reports from high-dose-rate or low-dose-rate boost protocols.

2.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 14(4): 343-346, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29663686

RESUMO

AIM: To explore the utility of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in addition to conventional imaging prior to definitive external beam radiation treatment (EBRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS: All men undergoing PSMA-PET/CT prior to definitive EBRT for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer were included in our ethics approved prospective database. For each patient, clinical and pathological results, in addition to scan results including site of PSMA positive disease and number of lesions, were recorded. Results of conventional imaging (bone scan, CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were reviewed and included. RESULTS: One hundred nine men underwent staging PSMA-PET/CT between May 2015 and June 2017; all patients had national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer and 87% had Gleason score (GS) 4 + 3 or higher. There was positive uptake corresponding to the primary in 108, equivocal in one. All patients with image detected nodal or bony lesions had GS 4 + 3 or more disease. Compared to conventional imaging with bone scan, CT and multiparametric MRI, PSMA-PET/CT upstaged an additional 7 patients (6.4%) from M0 to M1, 16 from N0M0 to N1M0 (14.7%) and downstaged 3 (2.8%) from M1 to M0 disease. CONCLUSION: PSMA-PET/CT identified the primary in 99% of patients, and altered staging in 21% of men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer referred for definitive EBRT compared to CT, bone scan and multiparametric MRI. Following this audit, we recommend the routine use of PSMA-PET/CT prior to EBRT in this patient group.


Assuntos
Ácido Edético/análogos & derivados , Oligopeptídeos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Isótopos de Gálio , Radioisótopos de Gálio , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 126(2): 244-248, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29132644

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify sites of failure with 68Ga-PSMA-PET (PSMA-PET) imaging in patients who have Biochemical Failure (BF) following post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2006 and January 2016, 409 men received post prostatectomy intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) with protocolised planning. 310 patients received radiation treatment (RT) to the Prostate Fossa (PF) alone and 99 patients received RT to PF and pelvic lymphatics (PF + LN) usually in combination with androgen deprivation (AD) therapy. Any failure not detected on conventional imaging was delineated with PSMA-PET scanning. Sites of failure were characterised as in-field (PF ±â€¯LN), or out of field (nodal alone, distant metastatic alone (visceral or bone) or multi-site failure). Nodal failure was further divided into pelvic failure and/or distant failure. RESULTS: 119 men developed BF, defined as a PSA rise of >0.2 or greater, above post-RT nadir. Freedom from BF was 71% in the PF group and 70% in the PF + LN group, with median follow up of 52 and 44 months respectively. AD was used concomitantly in 13% of the PF group and 92% of the PF + LN group. 81 patients with BF (68%) had PSMA-PET imaging performed as per study intent, 67 (80%) of whom had PSMA avid disease identified. PSMA-PET delineated in-field failure occurred in 2/50 (4%) of the PF group and 1/17 (6%) in the PF + LN group. Nodal failure alone was 33/50 (66%) for the PF group vs 7/17 (41%) for the PF + LN group. For the nodal only failure patients, 18/33 (55%) had pelvic-only nodal failure in the PF group compared to 1/7 (14%) in the PF + LN group (p = 0.03). 16 (32%) of the PSMA avid failures in the PF group would have been encompassed by standard pelvic lymphatic radiotherapy volumes. CONCLUSION: Post-prostatectomy radiation treatment resulted in excellent in-field control rates. Isolated pelvic nodal failure was rare in those receiving radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa and pelvic nodes but accounted for one third of failures in those receiving PF alone treatment.


Assuntos
Ácido Edético/análogos & derivados , Oligopeptídeos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isótopos de Gálio , Radioisótopos de Gálio , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Terapia de Salvação/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA