Targeted Lung Health Check: breast related incidental findings-imaging appearances and lessons learned.

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of Targeted Lung Health Checks (TLHC) to screen for lung cancer has highlighted that incidental findings are common and require management strategies. This study analyses retrospectively, incidentally detected breast lesions reported as part of the TLHC referred to the Breast Cancer clinicians. METHODS: All participants with incidental breast nodules referred to the Breast Cancer team in the first year of screening were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-two participants (48 female; 92.3%) were referred to the Breast Multidisciplinary Team Meeting for assessment of 43 breast nodules, 8 breast asymmetry/dense breasts, and 2 likely breast related metastatic disease. One participant declined breast team referral. For the 42 breast nodules investigated, the final diagnoses were 5 breast carcinomas, 10 normal breast tissue, and 27 benign nodules. One male patient was diagnosed with breast carcinoma. The 29 breast nodules classified as smooth and well defined were all benign. No malignancy was demonstrated in the group with asymmetric or dense breast tissue. Metastatic breast carcinoma was confirmed in two participants. Twenty-six out of thirty-seven (54%) females had prior breast screening mammograms precluding further investigation. CONCLUSION: Incidental breast nodules are common on THLC scans. Smooth, sharply defined breast nodules are likely to be benign but low-dose CT is poor at accurately assessing breast nodules. Agreed breast referral pathways prior to starting the Lung Cancer Screening programme are recommended. Access to screening mammograms can reduce referrals to the Breast clinic. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Lessons learned from TLHC pilot studies can be useful to sites commencing national TLHC programme.

Effect of Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage vs Talc Slurry via Chest Tube on Pleurodesis Failure Rate Among Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is challenging to manage. Talc pleurodesis is a common and effective treatment. There are no reliable data, however, regarding the optimal method for talc delivery, leading to differences in practice and recommendations. Objective: To test the hypothesis that administration of talc poudrage during thoracoscopy with local anesthesia is more effective than talc slurry delivered via chest tube in successfully inducing pleurodesis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 17 UK hospitals. A total of 330 participants were enrolled from August 2012 to April 2018 and followed up until October 2018. Patients were eligible if they were older than 18 years, had a confirmed diagnosis of MPE, and could undergo thoracoscopy with local anesthesia. Patients were excluded if they required a thoracoscopy for diagnostic purposes or had evidence of nonexpandable lung. Interventions: Patients randomized to the talc poudrage group (n = 166) received 4 g of talc poudrage during thoracoscopy while under moderate sedation, while patients randomized to the control group (n = 164) underwent bedside chest tube insertion with local anesthesia followed by administration of 4 g of sterile talc slurry. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pleurodesis failure up to 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included pleurodesis failure at 30 and 180 days; time to pleurodesis failure; number of nights spent in the hospital over 90 days; patient-reported thoracic pain and dyspnea at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days; health-related quality of life at 30, 90, and 180 days; all-cause mortality; and percentage of opacification on chest radiograph at drain removal and at 30, 90, and 180 days. Results: Among 330 patients who were randomized (mean age, 68 years; 181 [55%] women), 320 (97%) were included in the primary outcome analysis. At 90 days, the pleurodesis failure rate was 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the talc poudrage group and 38 of 159 (24%) in the talc slurry group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.54-1.55]; P = .74; difference, -1.8% [95% CI, -10.7% to 7.2%]). No statistically significant differences were noted in any of the 24 prespecified secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with malignant pleural effusion, thoracoscopic talc poudrage, compared with talc slurry delivered via chest tube, resulted in no significant difference in the rate of pleurodesis failure at 90 days. However, the study may have been underpowered to detect small but potentially important differences. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Identifier: ISRCTN47845793.