Patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: an expert consensus.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to reach a consensus on the most relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the corresponding measures (PROMs), and measurement frequency during severe asthma patient follow-up. METHODS: Two Delphi rounds were conducted. The questionnaire was developed based on a systematic literature review, a focus group with patients, and a nominal group with experts. It assessed PROs' relevance and the appropriateness (A) and feasibility (F) of PROMs using a Likert scale (1=totally agree; 9=totally disagree). The consensus was established when ≥75% of participants agreed (1-3) or disagreed (7-9). RESULTS: Sixty-three professionals (25 hospital pharmacists, 14 allergists, 13 pulmonologists, and 11 nurses) and 5 patients answered the Delphi questionnaire. A consensus was reached on all PROs regarding their relevance. Experts agreed on the use of ACT (A:95.24%; F:95.24%), mini AQLQ (A:93.65; F:79.37%), mMRC dyspnea scale (A:85.71%; F:85.71%), TAI (A:92.06%; F:85.71%), MMAS (A:75.40%; F:82%), and the dispensing register (A:96.83%; F:92.06%). Also considered suitable were: SNOT-22 (A:90.48%; F:73.80%), PSQI (A:82.54; F:63.90%), HADS (A:82.54; F:64%), WPAI (A:77.78%; F:49.20%), TSQM-9 (A:79.37; F:70.50%) and knowledge of asthma questionnaire (A:77%; F:68.80%); however, their use in clinical practice was considered unfeasible. Panelists also agreed on the appropriateness of EQ-5D, which was finally included despite being considered unfeasible (A: 84.13%; F:67.20%) in clinical practice. Agreement was reached on using ACT, TAI, mMRC, and a dispensing register every three months; mini-AQLQ and MMAS every six months; and EQ-5D every twelve months. CONCLUSION: This consensus paves the way toward patient-centered care, promoting the development of strategies supporting routine assessment of PROs in severe asthma management.

[Telemedicine and severe asthma in our environment: Views on the experience of professionals and suggestions to make it a reality]. / Telemedicina y asma grave en nuestro entorno: reflexiones sobre la experiencia de los profesionales y propuestas para hacerla realidad.

This paper aims to examine the recent experience in telemedicine (TM) management of patients with severe asthma (SA). A committee of health professionals involved in asthma management (pulmonology, allergology, respiratory nursing, and hospital pharmacy) held discussion meetings on the practical experience of TM for the management of SA and the means available complemented with a bibliographic search to know the current status of TM in SA. The main barriers detected for the implementation of TM in SA have been the lack of technological training, the lack of registration of TM in the clinical history, the care overload, or the connectivity problems at the administration level. The practical solutions are provided such as the selection of the patient suitable for TM, the registration of TM in the medical record, its inclusion in the care objectives or the increase of funding for systems. Moreover, the main App and Webapp for use by patients are provided, and the portable equipment for remote functional respiratory tests. In conclusion, it is necessary that the teleconsultation has the same entity as the face-to-face visit with a schedule in the appointment's agenda and a structure of both the medical interview and the tests to be performed in each consultation. Additionally, should be promoted the implementation of a video call system, tools that allow the monitoring of both therapeutic adherence and inhalation technique, as well as the patient's lung function.

[Referral Criteria for Asthma: An Updated Consensus]. / Criterios de derivación en asma: Actualización documento de consenso.

Asthma is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in Spain. In 2019, the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), the Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN), the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (semFYC), the Spanish Society of General and Family Physicians (SEMG) and the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) drafted a document laying down the criteria for referral and action guidelines in the diagnosis, control and monitoring of the asthmatic patient to facilitate ongoing care and improved attention in every setting. The new circumstances derived from the Covid-19 pandemic have demanded that some of the recommendations of the previous edition be updated and adapted to the new healthcare situation.

Relationship between upper airway diseases, exhaled nitric oxide, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine.

OBJECTIVE: The "united airway disease" concept is based on the bidirectional interaction between asthma and rhinitis. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between upper airway diseases and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), as well as their association with the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and atopy in patients with persistent symptoms suggestive of asthma requiring methacholine challenge testing (MCT) to confirm asthma diagnosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective study was carried out in adult patients with persistent asthma-like symptoms and negative bronchodilator testing. FeNO and MCT were performed in all patients. Asthma was confirmed based on the presence of suggestive symptoms and MCT results. Associated upper airway diseases included allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). RESULTS: The study included 575 patients; asthma was confirmed in 32.3%, and FeNO values ≥ 50 ppb were found in 27% of the patients. Elevated FeNO was significantly associated to AERD. The prevalence of atopy in asthma patients was 86.6%. Atopy was present in 90.4% of patients with asthma and FeNO levels ≥ 50 ppb. A significant association was found between AERD, asthma, and FeNO ≥ 50 ppb. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma but negative bronchodilator testing are commonly seen in usual practice. In this population, the association of high FeNO levels and BHR to atopy, as well as to AERD, suggests the presence eosinophilic inflammation in both the upper and lower airways and supports the "one airway" hypothesis.

Changes in exhaled nitric oxide levels after bronchial allergen challenge.

BACKGROUND: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a marker of inflammation of the airways accompanying changes in the clinical condition of asthma. Allergen exposure has been associated with a delayed elevation of FeNO. The aim of this study was to assess airway inflammation with FeNO measurements during bronchial allergen challenge (BAC), and to determine the diagnostic performance of FeNO changes. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with asthma and sensitization to inhalant allergens were studied. BAC with common or high-molecular-weight occupational aeroallergens was performed. FeNO was measured before and 24 h after BAC. Receiver operating characteristics curve was built to assess the sensitivity and specificity of increase in FeNO levels associated with BAC outcome. RESULTS: In 21 patients (61.76%) a positive asthmatic reaction (responders) was observed. A significant increase in postchallenge FeNO was observed in this group of patients compared to the group of nonresponders. A median increase (FeNO postchallenge-FeNO prechallenge) of 14.0 ppb was observed in the group of responders, whereas a -1.0 ppb change was attained in the nonresponder group (P < 0.001). The cutoff point providing maximal sensitivity and specificity for %ΔFeNO after BAC was 12%. This change in FeNO levels has a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.92 for predicting a positive outcome in the BAC. CONCLUSION: FeNO measurements can be used as a surrogate of airway inflammation accompanying the asthmatic reaction induced by BAC. FeNO measurements may be a useful and reliable tool in the monitoring and interpreting specific bronchial challenge test with allergens.

Usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide for diagnosing asthma.

RATIONALE: A standard asthma diagnosis is made based on clinical history, reversibility of airway obstruction, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive airway inflammatory marker that has been suggested as a diagnostic tool for asthma. The aim of this study was to establish a FeNO cut-off value for asthma diagnosis. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen consecutive adult patients (mean age 34 ± 13 years) reporting symptoms consistent with asthma, with normal spirometric parameters and a negative bronchodilator test, were included in the study. All underwent a methacholine challenge test following the five-breath dosimeter protocol. FeNO was measured with a portable device (NioxMino, Aerocrine AB, Sweden) just before the methacholine challenge. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance of FeNO measurement were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five out of the 114 patients (30.7%) were diagnosed with asthma. A positive methacholine challenge was associated with higher FeNO levels and with lower forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) at baseline. No correlation was found between methacholine provocative concentration causing a decrease of 20% in FEV(1) (PC(20)) and FeNO levels. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was constructed for FeNO levels (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.667-0.857; p < .001). The FeNO cut-off point with maximal specificity and sensitivity for asthma diagnosis was 40 ppb. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with confirmed asthma showed higher FeNO levels. A cut-off value of 40 ppb was calculated as the most efficient for asthma diagnosis in our population. The use of FeNO measurement may be a helpful tool to rule out a diagnosis of asthma, especially in patients in whom a methacholine challenge is not feasible or available.