Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a therapeutic dilemma challenging the armamentarium of immunotherapies currently available (case reports).

While survival rates in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) nowadays exceed 90%, systemic ALL relapse, especially after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is associated with a poor outcome. As there is currently no standardized treatment for this situation, individualized treatment is often pursued. Exemplified by two clinical scenarios, the aim of this article is to highlight the challenge for treating physicians to find a customized treatment strategy integrating the role of conventional chemotherapy, immunotherapeutic approaches and second allogeneic HSCT. Case 1 describes a 2-year-old girl with an early isolated bone marrow relapse of an infant KMT2A-rearranged B-cell precursor ALL after allogeneic HSCT. After bridging chemotherapy and lymphodepleting chemotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells (tisagenlecleucel) were administered for remission induction, followed by a second HSCT from the 9/10 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched mother. Case 2 describes a 16-year-old girl with a late, isolated bone marrow relapse of B-cell precursor ALL after allogeneic HSCT who experienced severe treatment toxicities including stage IV renal insufficiency. After dose-reduced bridging chemotherapy, CAR T-cells (tisagenlecleucel) were administered for remission induction despite a CD19- clone without prior lymphodepletion due to enhanced persisting toxicity. This was followed by a second allogeneic HSCT from the haploidentical mother. While patient 2 relapsed around Day + 180 after the second HSCT, patient 1 is still in complete remission >360 days after the second HSCT. Both cases demonstrate the challenges associated with systemic ALL relapse after first allogeneic HSCT, including chemotherapy-resistant disease and persisting organ damage inflicted by previous therapy. Immunotherapeutic approaches, such as CAR T-cells, can induce remission and enable a second allogeneic HSCT. However, optimal therapy for systemic ALL relapse after first HSCT remains to be defined.

Busulfan-fludarabine- or treosulfan-fludarabine-based myeloablative conditioning for children with thalassemia major.

Significant advances in supportive care for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia major (TDT) have improved patients' life expectancy. However, transfusion-associated iron overload remains a significant barrier to long-term survival with good quality of life. Today, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the current curative standard of care. Alongside selection of the best available donor, an optimized conditioning regimen is crucial to maximize outcomes for patients with TDT undergoing HSCT. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the role of busulfan-fludarabine-based and treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning in TDT patients undergoing HSCT. We included 772 patients registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) database who underwent first HSCT between 2010 and 2018. Four hundred ten patients received busulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning (median age 8.6 years) and 362 patients received treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning (median age 5.7 years). Patient outcomes were retrospectively compared by conditioning regimen. Two-year overall survival was 92.7% (95% confidence interval: 89.3-95.1%) after busulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning and 94.7% (95% confidence interval: 91.7-96.6%) after treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning. There was a very low incidence of second HSCT overall. The main causes of death were infections, graft-versus-host disease, and rejection. In conclusion, use of busulfan or treosulfan as the backbone of myeloablative conditioning for patients with TDT undergoing HSCT resulted in comparably high cure rates. Long-term follow-up studies are warranted to address the important issues of organ toxicities and gonadal function.

Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in 21 pediatric hematology and oncology patients at a tertiary care cancer center.

Acute appendicitis is a rare gastrointestinal complication of anti-cancer chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Among a cohort of 2341 hemato-oncologic patients at a pediatric tertiary care cancer center, we identified 21 patients (0.9%) with 23 episodes of acute appendicitis, based on pathological imaging of the appendix and clinical findings. Median age at diagnosis was 10.21 years. Types of underlying disease included acute leukemias (n = 15), solid tumors (n = 4), and aplastic anemia (n = 2). Clinical symptoms seen in > 1 case were recorded for all 23 episodes as follows: abdominal pain, n = 22; abdominal tenderness, n = 4; fever, n = 7; nausea, n = 2; emesis; n = 2; diarrhea, n = 5; and constipation, n = 2. Median leukocyte count at diagnosis was 0.5 × 109/L, with a median of 0.1 × 109/L for the absolute neutrophil count (ANC). All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics and 18/23 (78%) patients underwent uneventful appendectomy after a median of 5 days and with a median ANC of 0.7 × 109/L. Median duration until continuation of chemotherapy was 17 days for the 20 cases of appendicitis occurring during the patients' disease course. Overall, 5/21 (19%) patients died including one related to the appendicitis itself which progressed to a typhlitis and was due to a fungal infection. The other fatalities were transplant- (n = 2) and leukemia-related (n = 2). Acute appendicitis is a rare and usually not life-threatening event in pediatric hemato-oncologic patients, which, if managed by prompt administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics (and antimycotics), can be safely followed by an elective (delayed) appendectomy, even before complete recovery of the neutrophils is achieved.

Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney in Austrian children: Long-term survival after relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) is a rare malignant childhood renal tumour. Recently, the central nervous system (CNS) was found to be the most frequent site of relapse associated with a poor outcome. Optimal treatment strategies are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of all Austrian children with CCSK. They were enrolled in the Austrian-Hungarian Wilms Tumour Study (AHWTS) 1989, the SIOP93-01 or the SIOP2001 study between 1990 and 2019. Demographic, diagnostic, treatment-related variables and survival data were analysed. RESULTS: We identified 12 children with CCSK (M = 7, F = 5; median age 1.6 years). All had localised disease (stage I: 2; stage II: 2; stage III: 8) at diagnosis, and a first complete remission (CR1) was achieved in 12/12. Six patients are in an ongoing CR1 (median follow-up 10 years). Six other patients had a relapse (local 1; brain 5) a median time of 2.4 years from diagnosis. Two patients died of the disease 4 months and 2.8 years after first relapse. Four of five patients with CNS relapse are in CR2 with a median follow-up time of 9.3 years after relapse diagnosis. Relapse treatment included a combination of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Two children received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue, and one child received intrathecal mafosphamide. Long-term side effects after treatment were impaired tubular renal function (n = 4), cardiomyopathy (n = 1) and growth disorders (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the brain was the most common site of relapse. Long-term survival after recurrence was achievable with intensive multimodal therapy.

Management of children and adolescents with gray zone lymphoma: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Data on management of gray zone lymphoma (GZL) in children and adolescents are scarce. PROCEDURE: This retrospective study assessed clinical characteristics and outcome in six Austrian patients with GZL less than 18 years of age (male-to-female ratio: 1:1; median age: 15.8 years). RESULTS: Two patients each had a classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL)-like and composite GZL subtype, and one patient each had a large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LBCL)-like and sequential GZL subtype. All had advanced disease with mediastinal and extranodal involvement. Five patients received an LBCL- and one patient a cHL-directed polychemotherapy ± radiotherapy. Out of the former patients, three survived, including two who relapsed and underwent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. The latter patient survived. CONCLUSIONS: GZL remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, necessitating the development of novel treatment concepts performed in a prospective setting.