A phase I trial of vaccination with lethally irradiated lymphoma cells admixed with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor secreting K562 cells for the treatment of follicular lymphoma.

Several vaccine strategies have been tested for the treatment of follicular lymphoma; however, none have proven successful. In a phase I dose-escalation protocol, we developed a vaccine consisting of lethally irradiated whole lymphoma cells admixed with K562 cells that constitutively secreted granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-K562)(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00487305). Patients with grade 1, 2, or 3 A follicular lymphoma were divided into 2 study tiers based on prior treatment and received a maximum of 6 vaccines. Vaccines contained dose levels of 5 × 106 or 1 × 107 GM-K562 cells admixed with autologous tumor cells at doses ranging from 1 × 105 to 5 × 107.Correlative studies did not demonstrate a significant immune response as assessed by delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, B and T cell subsets, and natural killer cell subsets. Future vaccine studies should focus on identifying lymphoma-specific immunogenic proteins and modifying the vaccine immune adjuvant.

Case Report: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder as a serious complication of vascularized composite allotransplantation.

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is an emerging field in transplant surgery. Despite overall positive outcomes, VCA confers risk for multiple complications related to the procedure and subsequent immunosuppression. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders occurring after solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. A patient with PTLD after bilateral upper extremity transplantation is presented as well as a review of all known cases of PTLD after VCA, with a focus on the unique epidemiology, presentation, and treatment in this population.

Real-World Multicenter Study of PD-1 Blockade in HIV-Associated Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Across the United States.

BACKGROUND: Despite a higher risk of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in people with HIV and the demonstrated safety and efficacy of PD-1 blockade in cHL, there are limited data on the use of these agents in HIV-associated cHL (HIV-cHL). PATIENTS/METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with HIV-cHL from the "Cancer Therapy using Checkpoint inhibitors in People with HIV-International (CATCH-IT)" database who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab, alone or in combination with other agents, and reviewed records for demographics, disease characteristics, immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs), and treatment outcomes. Changes in CD4+ T-cell counts with treatment were measured via Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients with partial or complete response (PR/CR) per 2014 Lugano classification. RESULTS: We identified 23 patients with HIV-cHL who received a median of 6 cycles of PD-1 blockade: 1 as 1st-line, 6 as 2nd-line, and 16 as ≥3rd-line therapy. Seventeen (74%) patients received monotherapy, 5 (22%) received nivolumab plus brentuximab vedotin, and 1 received nivolumab plus ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide. The median baseline CD4+ T-cell count was 155 cells/µL, which increased to 310 cells/µL at end-of-treatment (P = .009). Three patients had grade 3 imAEs; none required treatment discontinuation. The ORR was 83% with median duration of response of 19.7 months. The median progression-free survival was 21.2 months and did not differ between patients with <200 versus ≥200 CD4+ cells/µL (P = .95). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of PD-1 blockade in HIV-cHL for the same indications as the general population with cHL.

Advancements in the Management of Follicular Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Review

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Western countries. While FL is generally incurable, standard initial therapies are associated with high response rates and durable remissions for most patients. In addition, novel targeted agents and immunotherapies are changing the treatment algorithm for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. This review discusses the initial staging, prognosis, and treatment options for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory FL. Initial treatment options for FL include active surveillance, radiotherapy, rituximab monotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy. Staging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone marrow biopsy is crucial for identifying early-stage patients. Most patients with FL will receive chemoimmunotherapy as the initial treatment with options including rituximab or obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone; cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; bendamustine; or lenalidomide. No significant differences in overall survival have been observed in randomized studies comparing these regimens. Maintenance therapy with rituximab or obinutuzumab in responders to initial chemoimmunotherapy improves progression-free survival. For relapsed/refractory FL, treatment options include chemoimmunotherapy, lenalidomide-based regimens, tazemetostat, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel), and CD3/CD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). Given the encouraging outcomes obtained with CAR-T cell therapy and BsAbs, multiple trials are testing these highly active agents in earlier lines of therapy and among high-risk patients with early relapse after frontline chemoimmunotherapy. Additional studies and follow-up are needed to understand how these novel agents may further change treatment algorithms for FL.

Frontline Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Despite many recent therapeutic advances, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a largely incurable disease. Treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease are limited in number and in response durability. Therefore, improving the efficacy of frontline (1L) treatment, and specifically maximizing the duration of first remission, remains of critical importance to obtain favorable long-term outcomes. As 1L treatments become more effective, improving tolerability is also becoming an increasingly realistic goal. Targeted agents, which are now mainstays of treatment in R/R MCL, are establishing new, paradigm-changing roles in frontline treatment. Here, we review data supporting current standard-of-care (SOC) approaches and explore six main areas of possible focus for advancement of 1L management: optimizing the chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) backbone, adding targeted agents to CIT, redefining the role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), improving maintenance therapy, using targeted agent combinations with omission of CIT, and employing MRD-guided therapy. We highlight several ongoing phase 3 trials that may soon impact frontline MCL management and outline some areas of necessary investigation as the field continues to strive towards a cure for this disease.

Brentuximab vedotin and chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

ABSTRACT: Several single-arm studies have explored the inclusion of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, no head-to-head comparisons with standard salvage chemotherapy have been performed. This study presents a propensity score-matched analysis encompassing individual patient data from 10 clinical trials to evaluate the impact of BV in transplant-eligible patients with R/R cHL. We included 768 patients, of whom 386 were treated with BV with or without chemotherapy (BV cohort), whereas 382 received chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy cohort). Propensity score matching resulted in balanced cohorts of 240 patients each. No significant differences were observed in pre-ASCT complete metabolic response (CMR) rates (P = .69) or progression free survival (PFS; P = .14) between the BV and chemotherapy cohorts. However, in the BV vs chemotherapy cohort, patients with relapsed disease had a significantly better 3-year PFS of 80% vs 70%, respectively (P = .02), whereas there was no difference for patients with primary refractory disease (56% vs 62%, respectively; P = .67). Patients with stage IV disease achieved a significantly better 3-year PFS in the BV cohort (P = .015). Post-ASCT PFS was comparable for patients achieving a CMR after BV monotherapy and those receiving BV followed by sequential chemotherapy (P = .24). Although 3-year overall survival was higher in the BV cohort (92% vs 80%, respectively; P < .001), this is likely attributed to the use of other novel therapies in later lines for patients experiencing progression, given that studies in the BV cohort were conducted more recently. In conclusion, BV with or without salvage chemotherapy appears to enhance PFS in patients with relapsed disease but not in those with primary refractory cHL.

Effect of atorvastatin versus placebo on efficacy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP.

STOP-CA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing atorvastatin to placebo in treatment-naïve lymphoma patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. We performed a preplanned subgroup to analyze the impact of atorvastatin on efficacy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) at standard doses for six 21-day cycles and were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin 40 mg daily (n = 55) or placebo (n = 47) for 12 months. The complete response (CR) rate was numerically higher in the atorvastatin arm (95% [52/55] vs. 85% [40/47], p = .18), but this was not statistically significant. Adverse event rates were similar between the atorvastatin and placebo arms. In summary, atorvastatin did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the CR rate or progression-free survival, but both were numerically improved in the atorvastatin arm. These data warrant further investigation into the potential therapeutic role of atorvastatin added to anthracycline-based chemotherapies.

Five-year follow-up of a phase 2 study of ibrutinib plus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as initial therapy in CLL.

ABSTRACT: We previously reported high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease <10-4 (uMRD4) with ibrutinib plus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (iFCR) followed by 2-year ibrutinib maintenance (I-M) in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here, we report updated data from this phase 2 study with a median follow-up of 63 months. Of 85 patients enrolled, including 5 (6%) with deletion 17p or TP53 mutation, 91% completed iFCR and 2-year I-M. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-100%) and 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%), respectively. No additional deaths have occurred with this extended follow-up. No difference in PFS was observed by immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene status or duration of I-M. High rates of peripheral blood (PB) uMRD4 were maintained (72% at the end of iFCR, 66% at the end of 2-year I-M, and 44% at 4.5 years from treatment initiation). Thirteen patients developed MRD conversion without clinical progression, mostly (77%) after stopping ibrutinib. None had Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) mutations. One patient had PLCG2 mutation. Six of these patients underwent ibrutinib retreatment per protocol. Median time on ibrutinib retreatment was 34 months. The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation was 8%. Second malignancy or nonmalignant hematologic disease occurred in 13%, mostly nonmelanoma skin cancer. Overall, iFCR with 2-year I-M achieved durably deep responses in patients with diverse CLL genetic markers. Re-emergent clones lacked BTK mutation and retained sensitivity to ibrutinib upon retreatment. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02251548.

Evaluation of mediastinal lymph node segmentation of heterogeneous CT data with full and weak supervision.

Accurate lymph node size estimation is critical for staging cancer patients, initial therapeutic management, and assessing response to therapy. Current standard practice for quantifying lymph node size is based on a variety of criteria that use uni-directional or bi-directional measurements. Segmentation in 3D can provide more accurate evaluations of the lymph node size. Fully convolutional neural networks (FCNs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in segmentation for numerous medical imaging applications, including lymph node segmentation. Adoption of deep learning segmentation models in clinical trials often faces numerous challenges. These include lack of pixel-level ground truth annotations for training, generalizability of the models on unseen test domains due to the heterogeneity of test cases and variation of imaging parameters. In this paper, we studied and evaluated the performance of lymph node segmentation models on a dataset that was completely independent of the one used to create the models. We analyzed the generalizability of the models in the face of a heterogeneous dataset and assessed the potential effects of different disease conditions and imaging parameters. Furthermore, we systematically compared fully-supervised and weakly-supervised methods in this context. We evaluated the proposed methods using an independent dataset comprising 806 mediastinal lymph nodes from 540 unique patients. The results show that performance achieved on the independent test set is comparable to that on the training set. Furthermore, neither the underlying disease nor the heterogeneous imaging parameters impacted the performance of the models. Finally, the results indicate that our weakly-supervised method attains 90%- 91% of the performance achieved by the fully supervised training.