The role of the female gender on mid-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study.

Background: Data on female gender differences on clinical prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are still controversial. We evaluated retrospectively the impact of women patients in comparison with men undergoing CABG on mid-term outcome. Methods: Between December 2014 and March 2022, 1,044 consecutive patients (162 females, 15.5%, 882 males, 84.5%) underwent isolated CABG. The mean follow-up was 40±27 (median 38) months. Logistic and Cox model analysis regressions were used to assess the risk of female gender and other variables, Kaplan-Meier estimates to assess survival rates. Results: Women did not have a significant higher operative mortality than men (3.09% vs. 1.93%; P=0.37). There was no difference in the use of left internal mammary artery (97.5% vs. 94.9%; P=0.85). Independent predictors of early mortality were emergency CABG (P<0.0001), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 30 days (P=0.0026), and higher EuroSCORE II (P=0.0155). At 7.5 years, actuarial survival was 87%±3.6% for female gender vs. 88%±1.9% in male gender (P=0.41), freedom from cardiac death 97%±1.8% vs. 96.6%±1.0% (P=0.6), freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) 87%±6.2% vs. 89.7%±2.5% (P=0.96). Independent predictor of all-causes death and cardiac death was the advanced age (74 years in dead patients vs. 67 years in survivors) (P<0.0001). Female gender was not a predictor of either operative mortality (P=0.34) or worse mid-term outcome (P=0.41). Conclusions: Women undergoing CABG with the same surgical techniques currently adopted for men, do not appear to be associated with worse early prognosis. Freedom from late all-causes mortality, cardiac death and adverse cardiac events are comparable and equally satisfactory, highlighting the positive protective effect of CABG over time also in women.

A case of haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) revealed an outbreak of Shiga toxin-2-producing Escherichia coli O26:H11 infection in a nursery, with long-lasting shedders and person-to-person transmission, Italy 2015.

Purpose. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) represents a major issue for public health because of the severity of the associated illnesses, including haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). In 2015, investigation of a case of HUS revealed an outbreak of Shiga toxin-2-producing E. coli O26 : H11 infection in a nursery in Italy. The investigation showed that the infection was transmitted to cases' contacts via person to person.Methods. The case finding was performed by testing for STEC stool samples of the HUS case's contacts within the family and the nursery. STEC O26 isolates were characterized by whole genome sequencing. Confirmed cases were repeatedly tested to monitor the duration of STEC shedding.Results. Eleven STEC O26 cases were identified, including adults and asymptomatic patients. Clinical illness was only observed in children. Strain characterization revealed that a single clone harbouring the stx2a and eae genes and the complete array of STEC-associated virulence genes, belonging to ST(21), was implicated in the outbreak. To reduce bacterial shedding, patients were treated with cefixime following clinical recovery. This antibiotic was well tolerated and did not induce any apparent consequences on patients' health.Conclusions. This study confirms that Stx2-producing E. coli O26 represents an emerging public health problem. The occurrence of outbreaks of infection by Stx2-producing E. coli O26 in nurseries is of particular concern, given the high probability of infection progressing in severity and resulting in secondary cases.