Deleterious association between proton pump inhibitor and protein kinase inhibitor exposure and survival for patients with lung cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have identified an interaction between protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with lung cancer. This type of interaction may reduce the efficacy of PKIs. However, the effect of PKI-PPI interaction on patient mortality remains controversial. This study set out to determine the impact of PKI-PPI interaction on overall survival for lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using data from the French National Health Care Database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021. We identified patients with: (i) an age equal to or greater than 18 years; (ii) lung cancer; and (iii) at least one reimbursement for one of the following drugs: erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and osimertinib. Patients were followed-up between the first date of PKI reimbursement and either December 31, 2021 or if they died, the date on which death occurred. The cumulative exposure to PPI duration during PKI treatment was calculated as the ratio between the number of concomitant exposure days to PKI and PPI and the number of exposure days to PKI. A survival analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was then performed to assess the risk of death following exposure to a PKI-PPI interaction. RESULTS: 34,048 patients received at least one reimbursement for PKIs of interest in our study: 26,133 (76.8 %) were exposed to erlotinib; 3,142 (9.2 %) to gefitinib; 1,417 (4.2 %) to afatinib; and 3,356 (9.9 %) to osimertinib. Patients with concomitant exposure to PKI-PPI interaction during 20 % or more of the PKI treatment period demonstrated an increased risk of death (HR, 1.60 [95 % CI, 1.57-1.64]) compared to other patients. When this cut-off varied from 10 % to 80 %, the estimated HR ranged from 1.46 [95 % CI, 1.43-1.50] to 2.19 [95 % CI, 2.12-2.25]. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In our study, an elevated risk of death was observed in patients exposed to PKI-PPI interaction. Finally, we were able to identify a dose-dependent effect for this interaction. This deleterious effect of osimertinib and PPI was revealed for the first time in real life conditions.

Teaching pharmacovigilance to French medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Interest of distance learning clinical reasoning sessions.

BACKGROUND: Considering data from the literature in favor of active educational intervention to teach pharmacovigilance, we describe an innovative model of distance learning clinical reasoning sessions (CRS) of pharmacovigilance with 3rd year medical French students. METHODS: The three main objectives were to identify the elements necessary for the diagnosis of an adverse drug reaction, report an adverse drug reaction and perform drug causality assessment. The training was organized in 3 stages. First, students practiced clinical reasoning (CRS) by conducting fictive pharmacovigilance telehealth consultations. Second, students wrote a medical letter summarizing the telehealth consultation and analyzing the drug causality assessment. This letter was sent to the teacher for a graded evaluation. In the third stage was a debriefing course with all the students. RESULTS: Of the 293 third-year medical students enrolled in this course, 274 participated in the distance learning CRS. The evaluation received feedback from 195 students, with an average score of 8.85 out of 10. The qualitative evaluation had only positive feedback. The students appreciated the different format of the teaching, with the possibility to be active. CONCLUSION: Through distance CRS of pharmacovigilance, medical students' competences to identify and report adverse drug reactions were tested. The students experienced the pharmacovigilance skills necessary to detect adverse drug reactions in a manner directly relevant to patient care. The overall evaluation of the students is in favor of this type of method.

Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia: detection of new signals and risk assessment in a nationwide cohort study.

ABSTRACT: More than 130 drugs have been suspected to induce immune hemolytic anemia. Comparative studies measuring the risk of drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) are lacking. We aimed (1) to detect new signals of DIIHA, excluding vaccines, and (2) to assess the association between all suspected drugs and the occurrence of immune hemolytic anemia in a nationwide comparative study. The new signals were identified using a disproportionality study (case/noncase design) in the World Pharmacovigilance Database, Vigibase, among the cases of adverse drug reactions reported up to February 2020 (>20 million). We then conducted a comparative study in the French National health database that links sociodemographic, out-of-hospital, and hospital data for the entire population (67 million individuals). Associations between exposure to drugs (those already reported as DIIHA, plus new signals identified in Vigibase) and incident cases of immune hemolytic anemia (D59.0 and D59.1 diagnosis codes of the International Classification of Diseases, version 10) from 2012 to 2018 were assessed with case-control and case-crossover designs. In Vigibase, 3371 cases of DIIHA were recorded. Fifty-nine new signals were identified resulting in a final list of 112 drugs marketed in France and measurable in the nationwide cohort (n = 4746 patients with incident immune hemolytic anemia included in the case-control analysis matched with 22 447 controls from the general population). We identified an association between immune hemolytic anemia occurrence and some antibiotics, antifungal drugs, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, furosemide, azathioprine, and iomeprol.

Primary autoimmune haemolytic anaemia is associated with increased risk of ischaemic stroke: A binational cohort study from Denmark and France.

Primary autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) causes the destruction of red blood cells and a subsequent pro-thrombotic state, potentially increasing the risk of ischaemic stroke. We investigated the risk of ischaemic stroke in patients with AIHA in a binational study. We used prospectively collected data from nationwide registers in Denmark and France to identify cohorts of patients with primary AIHA and age- and sex-matched general population comparators. We followed the patient and comparison cohorts for up to 5 years, with the first hospitalization of a stroke during follow-up as the main outcome. We estimated cumulative incidence, cause-specific hazard ratios (csHR) and adjusted for comorbidity and exposure to selected medications. The combined AIHA cohorts from both countries comprised 5994 patients and the 81 525 comparators. There were 130 ischaemic strokes in the AIHA cohort and 1821 among the comparators. Country-specific estimates were comparable, and the overall adjusted csHR was 1.36 [95% CI: 1.13-1.65], p = 0.001; the higher rate was limited to the first year after AIHA diagnosis (csHR 2.29 [95% CI: 1.77-2.97], p < 10-9 ) and decreased thereafter (csHR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.66-1.20], p = 0.45) (p-interaction < 10-5 ). The findings indicate that patients diagnosed with primary AIHA are at higher risk of ischaemic stroke in the first year after diagnosis.

Infectious risk when prescribing rituximab in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia acquired in the setting of autoimmune diseases.

We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study in a French University Hospital between 2010 and 2018 to describe the risk of severe infectious event (SIE) within 2 years after the date of first rituximab infusion (T0) prescribed after the evidence of acquired hypogammaglobulinemia (gamma globulins [GG] ≤ 6 g/L) in the setting of autoimmune diseases (AID) other than rheumatoid arthritis. SIE occurred in 26 out of 121 included patients. Two years cumulative incidence rates were 12.7 % (95 % CI 5.1-23.9) in the multiple sclerosis/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder group (n = 48), 27.6 % (95 % CI 15.7-40.9) in the ANCA-associated vasculitis group (n = 48) and 30.6 % (95 % CI 13.1-50.3) in the 'other AID' group (n = 25). Median GG level at T0 was 5.3 g/l (IQR 4.1-5.6) in the 'SIE' group and 5.6 g/l (IQR 4.7-5.8) in the 'no SIE' group (p = 0.04). In regression analysis, risk of SIE increased with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (OR 2.77; 95 % CI 1.01-7.57), lung disease (OR 3.20; 95 % CI 1.27-7.99), GG < 4 g/L (OR 3.39; 95 % CI 1.02-11.19), concomitant corticosteroid therapy (OR 4.13; 95 % CI 1.63-10.44), previous cyclophosphamide exposure (OR 2.69; 95 % CI 1.10-6.61), a lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/µL (OR 2.86; 95 % CI 1.12-7.21) and absence of pneumococcal vaccination (OR 3.50; 95 % CI 1.41-8.70). These results may help to inform clinical decision when considering a treatment by rituximab in immunosuppressed AID patients with hypogammaglobulinemia.

[Performing pharmacoepidemiological studies using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS): How to translate guidelines into practice]. / Réalisation d'études pharmacoépidémiologiques à partir du système national des données de santé (SNDS) : application des recommandations dans la pratique.

The French health insurance data warehouse named SNDS is one of the largest medico-administrative in the world allowing for powerful pharmacoepidemiological studies, based on real-life data collected prospectively. In addition to the absolute necessity of a strong pharmacological rationale, recommendations have been thought to improve the quality of pharmacoepidemiological studies. These guidelines emphasize the importance of an accurate definition of the study population, outcome and exposure, especially for studies performed on medico-administrative databases. Compliance with certain guidelines, particularly those concerning the identification of a specific population or an outcome and the definition of risk periods or exposure periods, may be difficult when performing studies on the SNDS because of its structure and the nature of the data recorded. The objective of this article is to provide advice for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies according to the recommendationswhen using the SNDS, given its specificities. The performing of reliable studies from this rich but complex data warehouse requires the expertise of researchers with deep knowledge both in the SNDS and in pharmacological reasoning.

Performing pharmacoepidemiological studies using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS): How to translate guidelines into practice.

The French health insurance data warehouse named SNDS is one of the largest medico-administrative in the world allowing for powerful pharmacoepidemiological studies, based on real-life data collected prospectively. In addition to the absolute necessity of a strong pharmacological rationale, recommendations have been thought to improve the quality of pharmacoepidemiological studies. These guidelines emphasize the importance of an accurate definition of the study population, outcome and exposure, especially for studies performed on medico-administrative databases. Compliance with certain guidelines, particularly those concerning the identification of a specific population or an outcome and the definition of risk periods or exposure periods, may be difficult when performing studies on the SNDS because of its structure and the nature of the data recorded. The objective of this article is to provide advice for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies according to the recommendations when using the SNDS, given its specificities. The performing of reliable studies from this rich but complex data warehouse requires the expertise of researchers with deep knowledge both in the SNDS and in pharmacological reasoning.

Increased reporting of venous and arterial thromboembolic events reported with tixagevimab-cilgavimab for coronavirus disease 2019.

OBJECTIVES: As two phase three clinical trials indicated a disproportion in the number of thromboembolic events in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group than in the placebo group, there has been a cardiovascular safety concern with the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Whether tixagevimab/cilgavimab use in real life increases the risk of thromboembolic events is unclear. METHODS: We used VigiBase, WHO's individual case safety reports database, to assess the risk of reporting arterial or venous thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 (aged ≥12 years) exposed to tixagevimab/cilgavimab compared with patients with COVID-19 exposed to other anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, including casirivimab/imdevimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab and sotrovimab. RESULTS: Among the 8952 reports of patients with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAb, 31 reports of thromboembolic events were associated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab, mainly deep vein thrombosis (10), pulmonary embolism (8) and myocardial infarction (7). Compared with other anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was associated with an increased risk of reporting arterial thromboembolic events (reporting OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.73, 6.10). Concerning venous thromboembolic events, a significant increase in the risk of reporting was observed with the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (reporting OR 3.59; 95% CI 2.16, 5.96). DISCUSSION: This observational study corroborates in a real-world setting in which the cardiovascular safety signal has already been found for tixagevimab/cilgavimab in two clinical trials. Owing to these thromboembolic safety concerns and considering the lack of clinical trials supporting protection against the omicron variant, there is an urgent need to improve knowledge on the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab with new COVID-19 variants.

IgA Vasculitis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A French Multicenter Case Series Including 12 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign triggered several autoimmune diseases. We hereby aimed to describe IgA vasculitis (IgAV) following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: We conducted a national, multicenter, retrospective study in France of new-onset adult IgAV diagnosis following COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In total, 12 patients with new-onset IgAV were included. Of these, 5 (41.7%) were women, and the median age was 52.5 (IQR 30.75-60.5) years. Of the 12 patients, 10 had received an mRNA vaccine and 2 had received a viral vector vaccine. The median time from vaccination to onset of symptoms was 11.5 (IQR 4.25-21.25) days. Vasculitis occurred after the first vaccine dose in most patients (n = 8). All patients had skin involvement, with skin necrosis in 4 patients. In total, 7 patients had joint involvement and 2 had arthritis. A total of 4 patients had nonsevere gastrointestinal involvement and 2 had nonsevere renal involvement. The median C-reactive protein level was 26 (IQR 10-66.75) mg/L, the median creatininemia level was 72 (IQR 65-81) µmol/L, and 1 patient had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min at management. All patients received treatment, including 9 patients (75%) who received glucocorticoids. In total, 5 patients received a vaccine dose after developing IgAV, 1 of whom experienced a minor cutaneous relapse. CONCLUSION: The baseline presentation of IgAV following COVID-19 vaccination was mild to moderate, and outcomes were favorable. Thus, a complete COVID-19 vaccination regimen should be completed in this population. Of note, a fortuitous link cannot be ruled out, requiring a worldwide pharmacovigilance search to confirm these findings.

Incidence of heart failure following exposure to a protein kinase inhibitor, a French population-based study.

AIMS: Pharmacovigilance signals of heart failure (HF) following exposure to protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) have been detected in recent years. Our aim was to identify the PKIs most frequently associated with the development of HF. METHODS: Using the French National Healthcare Database, all patients newly exposed to a PKI between January 2011 and June 2014 were followed up for 18 months. Specific hospitalization diagnosis and long-term HF-related disease codes were used to identify HF patients. HF incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were measured and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using a Cox model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to limit the potential indication and competitive risk bias. RESULTS: Thirteen PKIs were studied. Among the 49 714 new PKI users registered during the study period, the mean IRR of HF was 3.38 per 100 person-years, with a median time to onset of 155 days. We found a significant increase in the incidence of HF for six medicinal products: pazopanib (aHR = 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-3.52), dasatinib (aHR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.42-3.44), ruxolitinib (aHR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.69-2.64), crizotinib (aHR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.07-2.72), everolimus (aHR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.67) and vemurafenib (aHR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.01-1.86). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with our primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides knowledge on HF following exposure to a PKI. Additional studies could confirm these results for dasatinib, everolimus, pazopanib and ruxolitinib, and particularly for the two medicinal products with results slightly above the significance threshold, namely, crizotinib and vemurafenib, in our sensitivity analyses.

Risk of vaso-occlusive episodes in patients with sickle cell disease exposed to systemic corticosteroids: a comprehensive review.

INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most frequent inherited disorder in the world. It is caused by a single amino acid mutation on the beta-globin chain, which lead to red blood cell deformation, haemolysis, and chronic inflammation. Clinical consequences are vaso-occlusives crisis, acute chest syndrome, thrombosis, infection, and chronic endothelial injury. AREAS COVERED: Corticosteroids are an old therapeutic class, that are inexpensive and widely available, which can be administered in different forms. Their adverse effects are numerous and well-known. This class could appear to be useful in SCD treatment due to its anti-inflammatory effect. Moreover, corticosteroids remain an essential therapeutic class for many indications, besides SCD. Although specific adverse effects of corticosteroids have been suspected in SCD patients for decades, recent papers has reported strong evidence of specific and severe adverse effects in this population. Based on a literature review, we will discuss pathophysiological considerations, consequences, and practical use of corticosteroids in SCD. EXPERT OPINION: High corticosteroid doses, for any indication , induce vaso-occlusive crises, acute chest syndrome, and re-hospitalization in patients with SCD. There is no evidence of any benefits of corticosteroid use in the SCD acute events. Prevention by hydroxyurea and/or red blood cell transfusion or exchange should be discussed when corticosteroid use is indispensable.

Risk of vaso-occlusive episode after exposure to corticosteroids in patients with sickle cell disease.

Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) are a major concern in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Exposure to systemic corticosteroids has been suspected to increase the occurrence of VOEs in case reports or series. No comparative study has been conducted to investigate this risk, which is still debated. Several clinical trials demonstrated the effectiveness of corticosteroids for the treatment of VOEs, but with increased rates of readmission. The aim of the study was to assess the risk of hospitalization for VOE associated with exposure to systemic corticosteroids in patients with SCD. We used a case-case-time-control design in a nationwide population-based cohort built in the French national health insurance database between 2010 and 2018. The population included all patients with SCD with at least 1 hospitalization for VOE. Corticosteroids were identified using out-of-hospital dispensing data. The outcome was the first hospitalization for VOE. The case-case-time-control design induces self-adjustment for time-invariant confounders, including genotype. Analyses were adjusted for time-dependent confounders (infections, red blood transfusions) and stratified by exposure to hydroxyurea. Overall, 5151 patients were included in the main analysis. Corticosteroid exposure was significantly associated with the occurrence of hospitalizations for VOEs: adjusted odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.6). In patients exposed to hydroxyurea, the adjusted odds ratio was 2.6 (95% CI, 1.1-6.4); it was 4.0 (95% CI, 2.5-6.3) in unexposed patients. These results were consistent in children and adults. In conclusion, systemic corticosteroids were associated to an increased risk of hospitalization for VOEs and should be limited in patients with SCD.

Risk factors of hospitalisation for thrombosis in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia, including disease-specific treatments: a French nationwide cohort study.

We aimed to assess the risk factors of venous thrombosis (VT) and arterial thrombosis (AT) in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), particularly in relation to treatments. The population comprised all incident primary ITP adults in France between 2009 and 2017 (FAITH cohort; NCT03429660) built in the national health database. Outcomes were the first hospitalisation for VT and AT. Multivariable Cox regression models included baseline risk factors, time-varying exposure to ITP drugs, splenectomy and to cardiovascular drugs. The cohort included 10 039 patients. A higher risk of hospitalisation for VT was observed with older age, history of VT, history of cancer, splenectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 3·23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2·26-4·61], exposure to corticosteroids (HR 3·55, 95% CI 2·74-4·58), thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs; HR 2·28, 95% CI 1·59-3·26) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg; HR 2·10, 95% CI 1·43-3·06). A higher risk of hospitalisation for AT was observed with older age, male sex, a history of cardiovascular disease, splenectomy (HR 1·50, 95% CI 1·12-2·03), exposure to IVIg (HR 1·85, 95% CI 1·36-2·52) and TPO-RAs (HR 1·64, 95% CI 1·26-2·13). Rituximab was not associated with an increased risk. These findings help to estimate the risk of thrombosis in adult patients with ITP and to select treatment.

COVID-19 vaccines: A perspective from social pharmacology.

Social pharmacology is a branch of clinical pharmacology, which depicts relationships between society and drugs and in particular factors, reasons, social consequences of drug use as well as representations of drugs in the society. Recent development and marketing of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines raises a number of questions of social pharmacology: are vaccines drugs like any other? What is their perception at the individual, population and societal levels? How do individuals perceive the risks and benefits of these vaccines? What is the perception at the societal level? What is the individual and societal acceptability of these vaccines during a pandemic? All these questions are discussed in the light of recent data. A number of proposals, both at the individual and at the collective or population level, are formulated to help solve these problems of social pharmacology.