Anti-tumor necrosis factor α: originators versus biosimilars, comparison in clinical response assessment in a multicenter cohort of patients with inflammatory arthropathies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars (SB4 and ABP501) and respective bioriginators in terms of safety and efficacy in a real-life contest. METHODS: We consequently enrolled patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, treated with SB4, and ABP501, or with corresponding originators, belonging to the main biological prescribing centers in the Lazio region (Italy), from 2017 to 2020. Data were collected at recruitment and after 4, 8, 12, and 24 months of therapy. RESULTS: The multicenter cohort was composed by 455 patients treated with biosimilars [SB4/ABP501 276/179; female/male 307/146; biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b-DMARD) naïve 56%, median age/ interquartile range 55/46-65 years] and 436 treated with originators (etanercept/adalimumab 186/259, female/ male 279/157, b-DMARD naïve 67,2%, median age/interquartile range 53/43-62 years). No differences were found about safety, but the biosimilar group presented more discontinuations due to inefficacy (p<0.001). Female gender, being a smoker, and being b-DMARD naïve were predictive factors of reduced drug survival (p=0.05, p=0.046, p=0.001 respectively). The retention rate at 24 months was 81.1% for bioriginators and 76.5% for biosimilars (median retention time of 20.7 and 18.9 months, respectively) (p=0.002). Patients with remission/low disease activity achievement at 4 months showed a cumulative survival of 90% to biosimilar therapy until 24 months (p=0.001); early adverse reactions instead represented a cause of subsequent drug discontinuation (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Real-life data demonstrated a similar safety profile between biosimilars and originators, but a reduced biosimilar retention rate at 24 months. Biosimilars could be considered a valid, safe, and less expensive alternative to originators, allowing access to treatments for a wider patient population.

Imaging B lymphocytes in autoimmune inflammatory diseases.

B cells arise from stem cells precursor and develop through a tightly regulated and selective process that lead to the generation of different B cell populations such as transitional, mature, memory and plasma cells. These B cell subsets can be identified using flow cytometry by the expression of specific surface antigens. The growing knowledge of the pivotal role played by B cells in the development and progression of autoimmune diseases combined with the advances in monoclonal antibody technology, led in the last years to the generation of different biological agents targeting B cells. In this context, nuclear medicine can offer the possibility to use a panel of biologic radiopharmaceuticals for molecular imaging of inflammatory diseases. Radiopharmaceuticals bind to their targets with high affinity and specificity and have an excellent imaging diagnostic potential for the evaluation of disease activity, selection and monitoring of immune therapies. Several molecules have been radiolabelled for the imaging of T lymphocytes whereas, by now, the anti CD20 rituximab is the only biological therapy targeting B cells that demonstrated to be efficiently radiolabelled and used to detect inflammation in autoimmune patients.

Imaging B lymphocytes in autoimmune inflammatory diseases.

B cells arise from stem cells precursor and develop through a tightly regulated and selective process that lead to the generation of different B cell populations such as transitional, mature, memory and plasmacells. These B cell subsets can be identified using flow cytometry by the expression of specific surface antigens. The growing knowledge of the pivotal role played by B cells in the development and progression of autoimmune diseases combined with the advances in monoclonal antibody technology, led in the last years to the generation of different biological agents targeting B cells. In this context, nuclear medicine can offer the possibility to use a panel of biologic radiopharmaceuticals for molecular imaging of inflammatory diseases. Radiopharmaceuticals bind to their targets with high affinity and specificity and have an excellent imaging diagnostic potential for the evaluation of disease activity, selection and monitoring of immune therapies. Several molecules have been radiolabelled for the imaging of T lymphocytes whereas, by now, the anti CD20 Rituximab is the only biological therapy targeting B cells that demonstrated to be efficiently radiolabelled and used to detect inflammation in autoimmune patients.

Abatacept (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4-immunoglobulin) improves B cell function and regulatory T cell inhibitory capacity in rheumatoid arthritis patients non-responding to anti-tumour necrosis factor-α agents.

The use of biological agents combined with methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has strongly improved disease outcome. In this study, the effects of abatacept on the size and function of circulating B and T cells in RA patients not responding to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α have been analysed, with the aim of identifying immunological parameters helpful to choosing suitable tailored therapies. We analysed the frequency of peripheral B and T cell subsets, B cell function and T regulatory cell (Treg ) inhibitory function in 20 moderate/severe RA patients, according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, primary non-responders to one TNF-α blocking agent, who received abatacept + MTX. Patients were studied before and 6 months after therapy. We found that abatacept therapy significantly reduced disease activity score on 44 joints (DAS)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values without causing severe side effects. The size of the circulating B and T cell compartments in RA patients was not significantly different from healthy donors, but B cell proliferation and plasma cell differentiation was impaired before therapy and restored by abatacept. While Treg cell frequency was normal, its inhibitory function was absent before therapy and was partially recovered 6 months after abatacept. B and Treg cell function is impaired in RA patients not responding to the first anti-TNF-α agent. Abatacept therapy was able to rescue immune function and led to an effective and safe clinical outcome, suggesting that RA patients, in whom anti-TNF-α failed, are immunologically prone to benefit from an agent targeting a different pathway.

Pemphigus vulgaris in a patient with arthritis and uveitis: successful treatment with immunosuppressive therapy and acyclovir.

A case of pemphigus vulgaris in a 41-year-old man with undifferentiated arthritis and uveitis is described. Histology of labial mucosa showed acantholytic, necrotic, and multinucleated giant keratinocytes having some nuclear inclusions suggestive of a virus infection. Specific serological tests revealed IgG positivity for HSV-1, CMV, and EBV, while real-time polymerase chain reaction assay from a biopsy of the mucosal lesion showed the presence of HSV-1/2 DNA. Treatment with prednisone, methotrexate, and acyclovir induced the complete remission of mucosal and joint symptoms, which then relapsed after interruption of antiviral therapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, a combined treatment with low doses of prednisone, methotrexate, and acyclovir was restarted and during 18 months of follow-up no recurrence was registered. Correlations between pemphigus and the herpes virus infection and also between autoimmune arthritis and herpetic agents have been well documented, but the exact role of the herpes virus in these disorders still needs further discussion. Our case strongly suggests that when autoimmune disorders do not respond to immunosuppressive agents, a viral infection should be suspected, researched, and treated.

Radiological outcomes in randomized controlled trials on biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review.

Several scores are currently used to estimate the radiologic progression of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Modified Sharp score, Genant-modified Sharp score and van der Heijde-modified Sharp score are actually the most commonly used scores in randomized controlled trials on biologic drugs actually available in scientific literature. An intensive literature search (EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE) was performed in order to identify randomized controlled studies reporting on the efficacy of biologic drugs on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis by means of approved scoring methods such as Sharp score variants. All studies were evaluated for their approach to radiologic outcome, and a global evaluation of trends towards radiologic evaluation was performed. Eighteen studies were identified and analyzed, and data from such randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reported and described regarding their approach to radiologic outcomes. The use of three different scoring methodologies generated similar but non-comparable data; although a big part of the studies reported good efficacy profiles of several biologic drugs on radiologic progression, data from such studies are not comparable as the three different scoring methods are not convertible from one to another. At present, there is no standardization for the evaluation of radiologic outcomes, thus preventing comparison of results obtained by different drugs. The use of a single, standardized and widely approved scoring method would grant the possibility of comparing such data.

Safety of intra-articular hip injection of hyaluronic acid products by ultrasound guidance: an open study from ANTIAGE register.

OBJECTIVE: We developed a standardized technique for ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of the hip joint with the purpose of extending routine intra-articular injection of hyaluronans and steroids to the hip, as commonly used in the knee. In this article we report the safety of this technique in an extended series of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were injected supine with an anterosuperior approach under ultrasound guidance. The Us probe is applied with a target device for biopsy. RESULTS: The standardised technique was used to inject 1906 patients with 4002 injections of hyaluronan products over a four-year period. The treatment was well tolerated with few, and exclusively local, side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of hyaluronans under ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection is a safe technique for treatment of rheumatic diseases of the hip.

Psoriasiform dermatitis in a non-psoriatic patient treated with adalimumab.

Anti-TNF drugs may be associated with various adverse reactions including cutaneous ones. We describe the case of a 45-year-old woman affected by undifferentiated spondyloarthritis who presented a localized psoriasiformis dermatitis during treatment with adalimumab, without any medical history of psoriasis.

May etanercept and PTH (1-34) association heal erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the formation in the joints of an inflammatory tissue, which causes the appearance of localized erosions on the margins of the joints. The molecular mechanism that causes the bone erosion is multifactorial. Inflammatory cytokines imbalance and OPG-RANK-L system are involved. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study is to evaluate the possibility of inducing healing or reduction in the number of erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha adding Teriparatide (PTH1-34) to standard treatment with anti-TNF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty adult patients with active RA diagnosed according to American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria at least 6 months before study begin were enrolled. Only patients affected by established RA (6 to 18 months from symptoms beginning) were recruited. Eligible patients were randomized to receive a standard dosage of etanercept (50 mg/week) or etanercept at same dosage with an addition of teriparatide (20 mg). Evaluation of eventual healing of arthritic erosions by magnetic resonance imaging was performed at time zero and then at twelve months. The following evaluation was assessed at baseline and after 12 months according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) definitions: number of erosion and presence or absence of synovitis, effusion and bone oedema. A comparative examination of quantitative and qualitative assessment of each parameter was applied. Plain radiographs of the hands were obtained at baseline and 52 weeks. Radiographs were scored blindly using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method. Safety of each treatment was evaluated by means of the adverse events (AES) evaluation and report. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The study did not achieve its primary endpoint of healing erosions. In the active arm no healing of erosions was found. At 52 weeks, there were no new MRI erosions in two arms. Bone oedema scores were significantly improved at 52 weeks in favour of both treatments versus baseline scores, without inter-groups differences. X-ray patterns were unchanged in all patients of both groups. No new erosions or previous erosions' healing were observed. No AEs were reported. Patients from both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the DAS 28 scores at 52 weeks (p < 0.005) if compared with baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm rapid control of inflammation and MRI damage benefits after Etanercept administration without a significant improvement in MRI findings after concomitant addition of teriparatide. Even though these results could seem to suggest to avoid the simultaneous use of these two drugs to treat RA erosions, further studies might be suggested to asses if sequential adminstration of an anabolic agent such as Teriparatide, after achieving clinical remission, may be able to improve bone damage.

Can the association of Ciclosporine A and Methotrexate maintain remission/low disease activity induced by etanercept in early Rheumatoid Arthritis patients? Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The opportunity to induce remission/low disease activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients has been achieved in recent years by the adoption of more sensitive diagnostic methods [Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasonography] and early aggressive treatments (combination of biologics and synthetic DMARDs). On the other hand, data are still scarce and contrasting about the management of long-term remission. The aim of this preliminary study is to evaluate whether the association of Methotrexate + Ciclosporine A (MTX + CSA) therapy in early RA (eRA) patients is able to maintain remission/low disease activity and avoid structural progression, evaluated by MRI. Etanercept was suspended in patients who reached remission/low disease activity and CSA+MTX therapy was introduced (T0), all patients continued to receive MTX; at this time MRI showed mild/moderate synovitis and erosions in all the patients; 1-year after (T1), a slight reduction in mean synovitis, bone edema and total score was observed, whereas the erosion score was unchanged. The mean DAS44 remained stable from T0 to T1 and 6/7 patients maintained a low disease activity score. No side effects were reported. These results confirm the good clinical efficacy and safety of the combination therapy CSA+MTX in eRA patients and demonstrate a parallel arrest of structural damage evaluated by MRI 1-year after etanercept suspension.

Indirect comparison of the effects of anti-TNF biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by means of a mixed treatment comparison performed on efficacy data from published randomised, controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To compare ASAS (Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis Response Criteria), 20 response patterns between anti-TNF biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by means of a mixed treatment comparison of different randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of biological therapies. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was performed to identify a number of similarly designed double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of the TNF-α inhibitors etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis patients, conducted over an 18-year period. The end-point of interest was ASAS20 response criteria at 24 weeks. Results were analyzed simultaneously using Bayesian mixed treatment comparison techniques. Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) of ASAS20 response and associated 95% credible intervals (CrIs). The probability of being the best treatment was also reported. RESULTS: Three RCTs were selected for data extraction and further analysis. By mean of MTC, all anti-TNF agents demonstrated to be more efficacious in inducing an ASAS20 response than placebo. Infliximab shows a 72% probability of being the best treatment of all. Adalimumab and etanercept show probabilities of 13% and 15%, respectively. No differences were observed when comparing directly an anti-TNF-α agent against another. When compared with placebo, Infliximab increases the probability of response by ∼7-times (OR = 6.8), Adalimumab by ∼4-times (OR = 4.4), and Etanercept by 5-times (OR = 4.9). Differences in trials procedures, the use of a fixed-effect model, and the small number of trials included represent limitations of this study CONCLUSIONS: Even if the mixed treatment comparisons between infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept did not show a statistically significant difference, this analysis suggests that infliximab, compared to placebo, is expected to provide the highest rate of ASAS20 response in SA patients naive to biologic treatments.

The impact of treatment with hylan G-F 20 on progression to total hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic hip OA: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: There is scarce data available on intra-articular hyaluronan's ability to modify the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective pilot study was to assess the impact of treatment with hylan G-F 20 on progression to total hip replacement (THR) in patients with symptomatic hip OA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The records of patients presenting with symptomatic hip OA and treated with hylan G-F 20 were analysed. Endpoints were the number of THRs performed and the survival time (in months) between commencement of treatment and THR, if performed. Endpoints were evaluated for the entire study population and for those sub-groups of patients which were, or were not, defined as candidates for THR prior to intra-articular treatment. Predictive factors of progression to THR were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 850 patients' records were evaluated and 224 patients' data were included in the study and evaluated. Eighty-four patients (37.5%) progressed to THR, 206 patients (92.0%) achieved 12 months survival, 170 patients (75.9%) achieved 24 months survival, and 69 patients (30.8%) achieved 5 years survival. Mean survival time was 36 months. Classification as a THR candidate, Lequesne score, ultrasound pattern and the presence of diabetes were predictive factors for progression to THR. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that hylan G-F 20 could be included in the management of symptomatic hip OA before recommendation for THR, particularly in patients presenting with milder symptoms, or in patients where, due to comorbidities or personal choice, THR is not a feasible option. Limitations of this study include the retrospective study design and the lack of a control group to determine any placebo effect of hylan G-F 20. Further prospective studies are therefore needed to corroborate these results.

(99m)Tc-labeled rituximab for imaging B lymphocyte infiltration in inflammatory autoimmune disease patients.

PURPOSE: The rationale of the present study was to radiolabel rituximab with 99m-technetium and to image B lymphocytes infiltration in the affected tissues of patients with chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, in particular, the candidates to be treated with unlabelled rituximab, in order to provide a rationale for 'evidence-based' therapy. PROCEDURES: Rituximab was labelled with (99m)Tc via 2-ME reduction method. In vitro quality controls of (99m)Tc-rituximab included stability assay, cysteine challenge, SDS-PAGE, immunoreactive fraction assay and competitive binding assay on CD20+ve Burkitt lymphoma-derived cells. For the human pilot study, 350-370 MBq (100 µg) of (99m)Tc-rituximab were injected in 20 patients with different chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases. Whole body anteroposterior planar scintigraphic images were acquired 6 and 20 h p.i. RESULTS: Rituximab was labelled to a high labelling efficiency (>98%) and specific activity (3515-3700 MBq/mg) with retained biochemical integrity, stability and biological activity. Scintigraphy with (99m)Tc-rituximab in patients showed a rapid and persistent spleen uptake, and the kidney appeared to be a prominent source for the excretion of radioactivity. Inflamed joints showed a variable degree of uptake at 6 h p.i. in patients with rheumatoid arthritis indicating patient variability; similarly, the salivary and lacrimal glands showed variable uptake in patients with Sjögren's syndrome, Behçet's disease and sarcoidosis. Inflammatory disease with particular characteristics showed specific uptake in inflammatory lesions, such as, dermatopolymyositis patients showed moderate to high skin uptake, a sarcoidosis patient showed moderate lung uptake, a Behçet's disease patient showed high oral mucosa uptake and a polychondritis patient showed moderate uptake in neck cartilages. In one patient with systemic lupus erythematosus, we did not find any non-physiological uptake. CONCLUSION: Rituximab can be efficiently labelled with (99m)Tc with high labelling efficiency. The results suggest that this technique might be used to assess B lymphocyte infiltration in affected organs in patients with autoimmune diseases; this may provide a rationale for anti-CD20 therapies.

Cyclosporine A in the long-term management of systemic lupus erythematosus.

To retrospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with Cyclosporine A (CSA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) poorly responsive to treatment with corticosteroids (CCS) and/or conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), SLE patients who had received CSA-based induction and maintenance regimens according to disease activity were recorded. Efficacy was assessed using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and laboratory analyses. Forty SLE patients (including 18 with lupus nephritis, 11 with neurological involvement and 7 with overlap syndromes (4 Sjögren's syndrome, 2 myasthenia gravis and 1 Behçet's disease) were recorded. According to baseline SLEDAI, 30 patients had severe and 10 moderate SLE. Mean SLEDAI scores and relevant laboratory values significantly reduced from baseline (22∓10 vs 5∓6; P < 0.002) during the follow-up period (8∓2 years; range 1-15). Twenty-three (57.5 percent) patients achieved excellent (improvement in the range 70-100 percent) response to treatment (10 of whom were subsequently maintained on CSA monotherapy), 14 (35 percent) had good-fair (improvement in the range 25-69 percent) response and 3 (7.5 percent) had to interrupt therapy (including CSA) for disease worsening. Mild and transient adverse events occurred in 15 (37 percent) patients, including hypertrichosis (17.5 percent), gum hypertrophy (17.5 percent) hypertension (12.5 percent), abdominal pain (7.5 percent), and dyslipidemia (5 percent), but treatment interruption was not required. Low-dose CSA together with other drugs is effective to induce, or as monotherapy to maintain, long-term (at least 2 years) remission, and is generally well tolerated in patients with moderate or severe SLE poorly responsive to CCS and/or conventional DMARDs. Furthermore, the favourable effect of CSA treatment may allow to spare more cytotoxic drugs.

A new chance to maintain remission induced by anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis patients: CYnAR study II of a 12-month follow-up.

The advent of biological therapies represented the beginning of a new era in the therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), as demonstrated in several studies, but still many questions about their safety, especially in long term use, and correct administration time remain unanswered. Once remission is achieved, the orientation of clinicians regarding the maintenance of biological therapy or the switch to another immunosuppressive therapy is still uncertain. In our previous study 21 patients affected by RA who reached remission by the use of a combined therapy of anti-TNF drugs and methotrexate (MTX) underwent CyA-MTX combination therapy for maintaining remission state and were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. The present study aims to investigate these data by a longer follow-up (12 months) and on a larger population. Fifty-three RA patients, with a disease duration of less than 3 years and DAS28<3.2 that reached a level of low disease activity within 6-8 months from the beginning of anti-TNF and methotrexate therapy, were enrolled in the study. By the suspension of anti-TNF therapy, patients underwent A-Cyclosporine (2-3 mg/kg/day) and methotrexate (15mg/week) therapy. DAS28, Pain VAS, Erythrosedimentation rate (ESR), C Reactive Protein (CRP) were all tested at time 0 and every 2 months after the interruption of the anti-TNF therapy and the beginning of A-Cyclosporine and methotrexate therapy, as well as liver and kidney profiles. Side effects were also recorded. Of 53 patients, 50 completed the study with a 12-month follow-up. Twenty-one (42%) patients maintained clinical parameters within low disease activity values at 12 months, while 29 (58%) patients showed an increase in DAS28 and other parameters: 16 (32%) patients at the 6-month control, 13 (26%) patients at the 12-month control. Our data show that 42% of the patients undergoing A-Cyclosporin and Methotrexate therapy maintained low disease activity parameters of rheumatoid arthritis, obtained after 6-8 months of anti-TNF therapy. Further studies on larger populations are necessary in order to confirm such results and identify predictor factors for different responses.

Hip viscosupplementation under ultra-sound guidance riduces NSAID consumption in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis patients in a long follow-up. Data from Italian registry.

INTRODUCTION: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) consumption is strictly related to a high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rate. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommendations in patients with symptomatic hip or knee OA stated that NSAIDs should be used at the lowest effective dose but their long-term use should be avoided if possible. OARSI guidelines for the treatment of the hip OA include the use of viscosupplementation, which aims to restore physiological and rheological features of the synovial fluid. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this multicentric, open and retrospective study is to investigate if NSAID consumption may be reduced by the use of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of several hyaluronic acid (HA) products in hip joint administered in patients affected by symptomatic hip OA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients affected by mono or bilateral symptomatic hip OA according to American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, radiological OA graded II-IV (Kellgren and Lawrence) entered the study and were administered with ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid products. As a primary endpoint, consumption of NSAIDs was evaluated by recording the number of days a month (range 0-30) the patient had used NSAID during the previous month, reported at each visit during the 24 months follow-up period. Secondary endpoints included further analysis for subgroups of patients categorized for Lequesne index score, Kellgren-Lawrence score, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, ultrasound pattern, age, hyaluronic acid used. RESULTS: 2343 patients entered the study. Regarding primary endpoint, the consumption of NSAIDs was reduced of 48.2% at the third month when compared with baseline values. This sparing effect increased at 12th and 24th month with a reduction respectively of 50% and 61% in comparison to baseline values. These differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These data point out that intraarticular hyaluronan preparations provide OA pain relief and reduce NSAIDs consumption in a large cohort of patients for a long period of follow-up. Multiple courses of viscosupplementation (vs) are required to maintain low dose of NSAID consumption over time. NSAIDs consumption is strictly related to an high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rate, instead HA intra-articular treatment is well tolerated and is associated with a low incidence of adverse effects. For these reasons further studies evaluating cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of VS in the management of hip OA are required.

Hyper-IgM, neutropenia, mild infections and low response to polyclonal stimulation: hyper-IgM syndrome or common variable immunodeficiency?

A young woman presenting respiratory infections, polyarthritis, severe neutropenia, and increased serum IgM was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) with good clinical and laboratory outcome followed by a loss of efficacy. The increased serum IgM associated to recurrent infections and autoimmune manifestations suggested the diagnosis of a hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGMs). The frequency of peripheral T cells, the expression of CD40 on the patients' B cells and CD40L on T cells and the activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) at mRNA level was comparable to controls. In contrast, the frequency of B cells was one half of the healthy control and all cells showed an atypical phenotype. Although AID and UNG were normal, class-switch recombination was not very efficient because circulating switched memory were reduced and, once stimulated with CpG, generated less antibody-secreting cells than controls. An increase in serum B Lymphocytes stimulator (BLyS) was also found. The patient presented a peculiar clinical and immunological phenotype fitting for many aspects of both HIGM4 and Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID). These findings underline the need to better explore the complex link between these two diseases.

Interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a severe manifestation in connective tissue diseases (CTD), with an overall incidence of 15%, and it is still a challenge for clinicians evaluation and management. ILD is the most common manifestation of lung involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), observed in up to 80% of biopsies, 50% of chest Computed Tomography (CT) and only 5% of chest radiographs. Histopatological patterns of ILD in RA may present with different patterns, such as: usual interstitial pneumonia, non specific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, organizing pneumonia, and eosinophilic infiltration. The incidence of ILD in RA patients is not only related to the disease itself, many drugs may be in fact associated with the development of pulmonary damage. Some reports suggest a causative role for TNFα inhibitors in RA-ILD development/worsening, anyway, no definitive statement can be drawn thus data are incomplete and affected by several variables. A tight control (pulmonary function tests and/or HRCT) is mandatory in patients with preexisting ILD, but it should be also performed in those presenting risk factors for ILD and mild respiratory symptoms. Biologic therapy should be interrupted, and, after excluding triggering infections, corticosteroids should be administered.

Comparison of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire with the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Physical disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often assessed by questionnaires. We compared the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) in a cohort of RA patients. The aim of this study was to obtain information on several aspects of construct validity of these measures. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentre study was carried out among patients with RA who were attending hospital outpatient clinics. The patient group included 196 patients partially or not responding to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. For the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the ROAD in comparison with HAQ-DI this population has been compared to another cohort of 247 outpatients with RA who were participating in a long-term observational study. All patients completed the ROAD and HAQ-DI. Additional comparator composite indices of disease activity were analysed. The ROAD structural validity was first assessed using exploratory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was analysed by Spearman's correlations and cross-tabulations. Discriminant validity to distinguish patients with active and non-active disease was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. For agreement analysis Bland and Altman plots were calculated. RESULTS: Factor analysis yielded a two-factor ROAD score that accounted for 68.74% of the explained variance in the questionnaire. The first factor, namely upper extremity function/activity daily living and work (ROAD-upper) accounted for 55.6% of the explained variance. The second factor, namely lower extremity function (ROAD-lower) accounted for 13.1% of the explained variance. Significant correlations were found between the scores of the ROAD and the other clinical variables with a high ability to measure pain and disease activity, supporting the concept of convergent construct validity. The discriminatory power of both questionnaires to assess inactive and active RA patients was good, without significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: ROAD is a good alternative to the HAQ-DI for the assessment of physical disability in RA. Use of the ROAD makes it easier and less costly to collect data and reduces the burden on RA patients and should be applied in both clinical trials and routine clinical care settings.