Endurance training and insulin therapy need to be associated to fully exert their respective beneficial effects on oxidant stress and glycemic regulation in diabetic rats.

In type 1 diabetic subjects, hyperglycemia-induced oxidant stress (OS) plays a central role in the onset and development of diabetes complications. This study aimed to assess the benefits of an endurance training program and insulin therapy, alone or in combination, on the glycemic regulation, markers for OS, and antioxidant system in diabetic rats. Forty male Wistar rats were divided into diabetic (D), insulin-treated diabetic (D-Ins), diabetic trained (D-Tr), or insulin-treated diabetic trained (D-Ins+ Tr) groups. An additional healthy group served as control group. Insulin therapy (Lantus, insulin glargine, Sanofi) and endurance training (a treadmill run of 60 min/day, 25 m/min, 5 days/week) were initiated 1 week after streptozotocin-induced diabetes (45 mg/kg) and lasted for 8 weeks. At the end of the protocol, blood glucose and fructosamine levels, markers for skeletal muscle OS (CML, isoprostanes, GSH/GSSG) and antioxidant system (SOD and GPx activity, ORAC) were assessed. In diabetic rats, the glycemic control was altered and OS marker levels were increased, while the antioxidant system activity remained unchanged. Insulin treatment improved the glycemic regulation, the pro-antioxidant status, and contributed to the reduction of OS marker levels. Endurance training decreased OS marker levels without improving the antioxidant enzyme activity. Endurance training and insulin therapy acted independently (by different ways), but their association prolonged the insulin action and allowed a better adaptation of the antioxidant system. To conclude, our results demonstrate that combination of insulin treatment and endurance training leads to greater benefits on the glycemic regulation and oxidant status.

Superoxide production pathways in aortas of diabetic rats: beneficial effects of insulin therapy and endurance training.

Superoxide (O 2 (·-) ) overproduction, by decreasing the nitric oxide ((·)NO) bioavailability, contributes to vascular complications in type 1 diabetes. In this disease, the vascular O 2 (·-) can be produced by the NADPH oxidase (NOX), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and xanthine oxidase (XO). This study aimed to determine the contribution of each enzymatic pathway in hyperglycemia-induced O 2 (·-) overproduction, and the effects of an endurance training program and insulin therapy, associated or not, on the O 2 (·-) production (amount and related enzymes) in diabetic rats. Forty male Wistar rats were divided into diabetic (D), diabetic treated with insulin (D-Ins), diabetic trained (D-Tr), or diabetic insulin-treated and trained (D-Ins + Tr) groups. An additional healthy group was used as control. Insulin therapy (Glargine Lantus, Sanofi) and endurance training (treadmill run: 60 min/day, 25 m/min, 5 days/week) started 1 week after diabetes induction by streptozotocin (45 mg/kg), and lasted for 8 weeks. At the end of the protocol, the O 2 (·-) production in aorta rings was evaluated by histochemical analyses (DHE staining). Each production pathway was studied by inhibiting NOX (apocynin), NOS (L-Name), or XO (allopurinol) before DHE staining. Diabetic rats exhibited hyperglycemia-induced O 2 (·-) overproduction, resulting from NOX, NOS, and XO activation. Insulin therapy and endurance training, associated or not, decreased efficiently and similarly the O 2 (·-) overproduction. Insulin therapy reduced the hyperglycemia and decreased the three enzymatic pathways implicated in the O 2 (·-) production. Endurance training decreased directly the NOS and XO activity. While both therapeutic strategies activated different pathways, their association did not reduce the O 2 (·-) overproduction more significantly.

Evaluation of patients' attitudes towards stroke prevention and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation.

Patient's values and preferences regarding the relative importance of preventing strokes and avoiding bleeding are now recognised to be of great importance in deciding on therapy for the prevention of stroke due to atrial fibrillation (SPAF). We used an iPad questionnaire to determine the minimal clinically important difference (Treatment Threshold) and the maximum number of major bleeding events that a patient would be willing to endure in order to prevent one stroke (Bleeding Ratio) for the initiation of antithrombotic therapy in 172 hospital in-patients with documented non-valvular atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulant therapy was being considered. Patients expressed strong opinions regarding SPAF. We found that 12% of patients were "medication averse" and were not willing to consider antithrombotic therapy; even if it was 100% effective in preventing strokes. Of those patients who were willing to consider antithrombotic therapy, 42% were identified as "risk averse" and 15% were "risk tolerant". Patients required at least a 0.8% (NNT=125) annual absolute risk reduction and 15% relative risk reduction in the risk of stroke in order to agree to initiate antithrombotic therapy, and patients were willing to endure 4.4 major bleeds in order to prevent one stroke. In conclusion, there was a substantial amount of inter-patient variability, and often extreme differences in opinion regarding tolerance of bleeding risk in the context of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences when deciding on SPAF therapy.

Serial measures of sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodal function in ambulatory patients.

We hypothesized that the outpatient assessment of SA and AV nodal (SAN, AVN) function could be a useful tool to determine the effectiveness of drugs and other treatments. We sought to examine the reproducibility, safety and ease of acquiring serial measurements of these parameters. Ten patients with permanent pacemakers underwent low current chest wall stimulation while their device was programmed to unipolar atrial triggered mode. Measurements at multiple conditioning drive train frequencies were obtained for: sinus nodal recovery time (SNRT); corrected sinus nodal recovery time (CSNRT); SA conduction time (SACT); AVN block cycle length (AVNBCL); and AVN effective refractory period (AVNERP). AVN function curves were also constructed. All studies were repeated after 2 weeks. Measures of sinus nodal and AVN function did not show significant differences between the two studies. The following co-efficients of correlation were obtained: SNRT800, r = 0.79; CSNRT800, r = 0.71; SNRT600, r = 0.71; CSNRT600, r = 0.44; SACT, r = 0.75; AVNBCL, r = 0.98; AVNERP800, r = 0.55; and AVNERP600, r = 0.99. AVN function curves did not significantly differ between week 1 versus week 2 at conditioning drive trains of either 800 ms or 600 ms. These data suggest that serial noninvasive electrophysiological measures of AVN and SAN function are reproducible over 2 weeks. Using data in this study, estimates of the sample size necessary for the evaluation of the effects of investigational drugs on the SAN and AVN in future studies are possible.

Quality-specific differences in rat taste detection performance as a function of stimulus volume.

Taste detection performance for representatives of the four taste qualities as a function of stimulus volume (5 x 10(-4) to 1 x 1(-1) ml) was examined in rats using high-precision gustometry, computer-controlled operant procedures, nonparametric signal detection measures of sensitivity and responsivity, and blind control procedures. The overall sensitivity index was positively related to stimulus volume (rs = .60), with optimal detection performance attained with a 5 x 10(-3) ml stimulus volume for salty tastants and a 1 x 10(-2) ml stimulus volume for the other taste qualities. The overall responsivity index was inversely related to stimulus volume (rs = -.47), especially for sour and bitter tastants. These results are consistent with prior observations and demonstrate that operant methods using small tastant samples produce sensitive estimates of the rat's taste detection performance and response bias.