Choice of DNA extraction method affects detection of bacterial taxa from retail chicken breast.

BACKGROUND: Sequence-based methods for the detection of bacteria such as 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and metagenomics can provide a comprehensive view of the bacterial microbiome of food. These methods rely on the detection of gene sequences to indicate the presence of viable bacteria. This indirect form of detection can be prone to experimental artefacts. Sample handling and processing are key sources of variation that require standard approaches. Extracting sufficient quantities of high quality DNA from food matrices is challenging because target bacterial species are usually minor components of the microbiota and foods contain an array of compounds that are inhibitory to downstream DNA applications. Here, three DNA extraction methods are compared for their ability to extract high quality bacterial DNA from retail chicken breast rinses, with or without enrichment. Method performance was assessed by comparing ease of use, DNA yield, DNA quality, PCR amplicon yield, and the detection of bacterial taxa by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. RESULTS: All three DNA extraction methods yielded DNA of sufficient quantity and quality to perform quantitative PCR and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The extraction methods differed in ease of use, with the two commercial kits (PowerFood, PowerSoil) offering considerable time and cost savings over a hybrid method that used laboratory reagents for lysis and commercial column based kits for further purification. Bacterial richness as determined by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was similar across the three DNA extraction methods. However, differences were noted in the relative abundance of bacterial taxa, with significantly higher abundance of Gram-positive genera detected in the DNA samples prepared using the PowerFood DNA extraction kit. CONCLUSION: The choice of DNA extraction method can affect the detection of bacterial taxa by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing in chicken meat rinses. Investigators should be aware of this procedural bias and select methods that are fit for the purposes of their investigation.

Isolation of third generation cephalosporin resistant Enterobacteriaceae from retail meats and detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase activity.

Various methods have been described to isolate third generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistant Enterobacteriaceae from foods, but it is not known how comparable they are between studies. Here, the performance of five enrichment broths and two selective agars are compared for their ability to isolate 3GC resistant Enterobacteriaceae from retail chicken, beef, pork, and veal samples. The results showed equivalence between Enterobacteriaceae enrichment broth (EE), lauryl sulfate broth (LST), and modified typtone soy broth (mTSB). Lower isolation rates were observed when LST and mTSB were supplemented with the 3GC antibiotic cefotaxime. The overall performance of MacConkey agar supplemented with cefotaxime and a proprietary selective agar (ESBL CHROMagar) was equivalent, although differences linked to the microbiota of specific meat commodities were noted. Regardless of the isolation method, further screening was required to confirm the taxonomy and resistance of the presumptive positive strains. Approximately 40% of confirmed 3GC resistant foodborne Enterobacteriaceae strains tested positive for extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) activity. Strains that were resistant to ceftriaxone and susceptible to cefoxitin were more likely to test positive for ESBL activity, as were strains that possessed either of two ESBL genes (blaSHV or blaTEM). Based on our results, we recommend using an antibiotic-free enrichment broth, two selective agars, and an isolate screening strategy to isolate 3GC resistant Enterobacteriaceae from retail meats. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and/or PCR screening for blaSHV or blaTEM can then be used to identify ESBL producing strains among the 3GC resistant meat isolates. The adoption of this approach by the research community will enable more effective monitoring of antibiotic resistance rates and trends among foodborne Enterobacteriaceae over time and across jurisdictions.

Comparative assessment of qPCR enumeration methods that discriminate between live and dead Escherichia coli O157:H7 on beef.

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) is a molecular method commonly used to detect and quantify bacterial DNA on food but is limited by its inability to distinguish between live and dead cell DNA. To overcome this obstacle, propidium monoazide (PMA) alone or with deoxycholate (DC) was used to prevent dead cell detection in qPCR. qPCR methods were used to detect strains of Escherichia coli O157, which can cause infection in humans with an infectious dose of less than 10 cells. A 5 strain E. coli O157:H7 cocktail was inoculated onto beef steaks and treated with interventions used in meat facilities (lactic acid (5%), peroxyacetic acid (200 ppm) or hot water (80 °C for 10 s)). Treatment of PMA or PMA + DC was applied to samples followed by DNA extraction and quantification in qPCR. RNA was also quantified in addition to conventional plating. For lactic acid intervention, qPCR DNA quantification of E. coli O157:H7 yielded 6.59 ±â€¯0.21 and 6.30 ±â€¯0.11 log gene copy #/cm2 for control and lactic acid samples, respectively and after treatment with PMA or PMA + DC this was further reduced to 6.31 ± 0.21 and 5.58 ± 0.38, respectively. This trend was also observed for peroxyacetic acid and hot water interventions. In comparison, RNA quantification yielded 7.65 ± 0.13 and 7.02 ± 0.38 log reverse transcript/cm2 for rRNA control and lactic acid samples, respectively, and for plating (LB), 7.51 ±â€¯0.06 and 6.86 ±â€¯0.32 log CFU/cm2, respectively. Our research determined that treatment of PMA + DC in conjunction with qPCR prevented dead cell DNA detection. However, it also killed cells injured from intervention that may have otherwise recovered. RNA quantification was more laborious and results had higher variability. Overall, quantification with conventional plating proved to be the most robust and reliable method for live EHEC detection on beef.