Reproductive performance in two organic sheep farming systems differing by the number of mating sessions in and out of the breeding season.

Hormonal treatments to control ovulation and the intensification of reproduction rhythm are usual strategies to increase ewe productivity. However, in organic farming the use of hormones is banned, making any increase of reproduction rhythm an inappropriate practice. This work tested if increasing the number of mating sessions per year could improve ewe annual productivity, while maintaining a non-intensive reproduction rhythm of one lambing per ewe per year. Reproductive performance was studied over five years in two organic sheep farming systems differing by the number of mating sessions (MS) per year, two (2MS) or four (4MS). The 4MS system included two mating sessions in the breeding season (September and November) and non-breeding season (April and June). The 2MS system included mating in November and April. Non-pregnant ewes were recycled one (2MS) or two times (4MS system) on consecutive mating sessions. Considering all mating attempts per ewe individually (n = 1366), the time elapsed from mating to lambing (159 ± 0.2 days), fertility (86%), prolificacy (166%) and productivity (143%) did not differ between the systems (P > 0.05). Fertility, prolificacy and productivity were higher in the breeding than the non-breeding season (P ≤ 0.05), and in adults than young ewes (P ≤ 0.05), without interaction with the systems (P > 0.05). In the non-breeding season, fertility, prolificacy and productivity did not relate to ewe cyclic status (P > 0.05), whereas the time elapsed from mating to lambing was shortened in cyclic ewes (P ≤ 0.05). Good ewe body condition at lambing and mating and dynamic gain in body condition from drying to mating improved productivity (P ≤ 0.05) by increasing fertility or prolificacy regardless of the system (P > 0.05). On a yearly scale, the number of lambed ewes was higher in the 4MS than the 2MS system (91% vs 85%; P ≤ 0.05) leading to higher ewe annual productivity (154% vs 141%; P ≤ 0.05). The percentage of ewes that were recycled on consecutive mating sessions was higher in the 4MS than the 2MS system (24% vs 18%; P ≤ 0.05), possibly explaining the 4MS increase of ewe annual productivity by extending mating opportunities for the ewes. The increase in the number of mating sessions per year is a hormone-free strategy suitable for organic sheep farming systems to improve annual ewe productivity on a basis of one lambing per ewe per year. This approach proved beneficial to compensate for lower fertility in the non-breeding season, especially for young ewes.

Constraints under organic farming on French sheepmeat production: a legal and economic point of view with an emphasis on farming systems and veterinary aspects.

Ovine meat production in France, which is continually regressing due to economic difficulties, is based on two main production systems. The first system is located in plains in which one part of the lambs born in the spring are fed grass, and the other part of the lambs are from out of the season parturitions following hormonal treatments and are fattened in sheep houses. The second system is represented by farms in the mountains using hardy breeds which have a natural faculty for out of the season breeding and whose lambs are fattened indoors, whatever the season of birth. Amongst the sanitary problems encountered, parasitism in particular of young animals, is crucial, especially for farms on plains practising grass fattening. These farmers systematically use conventional anthelmintic treatments, in particular against Moniezia and Strongyles. With organic farming, the limited number of conventional anthelmintic treatments is a strong constraint, especially for the management of young grass-fed animals. A study of 10 organic farming farms or farms converting to organic farming (six in the mountains and four in the plains) showed that the size of these farms is inferior to that of conventional ones and have technical performances which are comparable to the average with 20 to 30% extra over-prices on lamb sales. Despite this, the gross margins per ewe in organic farming are equal to the average of those for conventional farms. This is due to the high consumption of concentrate at a high cost (50 to 100% greater than that for conventional farms). Finally, to prevent sanitary risks, certain organic farmers use important amounts of feed supplements containing phytotherapy products whose costs burden a part of the financial results of the farm. On the contrary, other organic farmers are able, by adapting breeding and grazing managements, to significantly decrease animal health costs without increasing feed supplements nor decreasing zootechnical performances.