RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and degenerative thoracic myelopathy (DTM) present with leg, bladder and bowel symptoms. If imaging confirms spinal cord compression both conditions are usually managed surgically. Surgical timing is important in patient management as it affects post-operative recovery and long-term outcomes. This service evaluation aims to explore whether that patients with DTM are more likely to be treated urgently than those with DCM and to examine whether any differences in management are justified. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation was registered and approved by the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) Clinical Audit Department (Clinical Project ID4455 PRN10455). All patients who had undergone surgery for DTM at CUH from January 2015 until April 2022 were included. Comparison was made to a cohort of DCM patients who underwent surgery at CUH from June 2016 to January 2019. Data analysis was conducted in R. RESULTS: A total of 130 DCM patients and 78 DTM patients were included. Our DCM and DTM patient cohorts had comparable demographics, but DTM patients had fewer spinal levels affected. Despite equivalent disease severity, DTM patients had a shorter time to diagnosis, shorter wait for surgery and were more likely to be operated on as an emergency case. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comparable demographics and pathophysiology, DTM was diagnosed and managed more quickly than DCM. Better defined diagnostic pathways for degenerative spinal myelopathy may hold opportunities to optimise diagnosis and management, ensuring consistent high quality, efficient and equitable care.
Assuntos
Compressão da Medula Espinal , Doenças da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , PescoçoRESUMO
Bilateral upper limb paraesthesia and pain are common symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Such symptoms instigate investigation by cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This was the case for our patient, who was 72-years-in age and otherwise fit and well. During the scan he unfortunately developed sudden onset quadriplegia secondary to an intervertebral disc prolapse. This necessitated intubation due to respiratory failure and urgent transfer to the neurosciences critical care unit at a tertiary neurosciences centre. Despite prompt surgical decompression, he did not regain function. Extubation was unsuccessful on three occasions. Following discussion between the patient and his family, ventilation was withdrawn, and he died the following day. This case highlights the potentially devastating consequences of DCM and poses questions about the aetiology of DCM.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy is a progressive slow-motion spinal cord injury. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Baseline disability predicts surgical recovery; therefore, timely treatment is critical to restoring function. However, current challenges mean most patients present with advanced disease and are instead left with life changing disabilities. While short-term mortality is rarely reported, the long-term effects of this on life expectancy are unknown, including whether function could be modifiable with timely treatment. This article investigates the effect of DCM on life expectancy. METHODS: The survival of patients from an observational study of patients undergoing surgery from 1994 to 2007 was compared to their expected survival using a gender- and aged -matched cohort. Comparisons were made by one sample log-rank test and standardised mortality ratios. Factors associated with survival were explored using a Cox regression analysis, including disease severity. RESULTS: A total of 357 patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 15.3 years, 135 of 349 patients had died; 114.7 deaths would have been expected. The DCM cohort had an increased risk of death compared to the non-DCM cohort (standardised mortality ratio 1.18 [95% CI: 1.02-1.34]. Age at operation 1.08 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.1, p < 0.001) and severe DCM 1.6 (95% CI: 1.06 to 2.3, p = 0.02) were associated with worse survival (N = 287). In those surviving at least 2 years after surgery, only severe DCM was associated with conditional survival (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.04 2.4, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Life expectancy is reduced in those undergoing surgery for DCM. This is driven by premature mortality among those left with severe disability. As disability can be reduced with timely treatment, these findings reinforce the need for collective and global action to raise awareness of DCM and enable early diagnosis.
Assuntos
Doenças da Medula Espinal , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Idoso , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Pescoço , Expectativa de VidaRESUMO
AIM: Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) is a disabling condition arising from arthritic compression and consequent injury of the cervical spinal cord. Stratification of CSM severity has been useful to inform clinical practice and research analysis. In the UK the Myelopathy Disability Index (MDI) is a popular assessment tool and has been adopted by the British Spinal Registry. However, no categories of severity exist. Therefore, the aim of this study was to define categories of mild, moderate and severe. METHOD: An anchor-based analysis was carried out on previously collected data from a prospective observational cohort (N = 404) of patients with CSM scheduled for surgery and assessed pre-operatively and at 3, 12, 24 and 60 months post-operatively. Outcomes collected included the SF-36 version-1 quality of life measure, visual analogue scales for neck/arm/hand pain, MDI and Neck Disability Index (NDI). A Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis, using the NDI for an anchor-based approach, was performed to identify MDI thresholds. RESULTS: Complete data was available for 404 patients (219 Men, 185 Women). The majority of patients underwent anterior surgery (284, 70.3%). ROC curves plotted to identify the thresholds from mild to moderate to severe disease, selected optimal thresholds of 4-5 (AUC 0.83) and 8-9 (AUC 0.87). These MDI categories were validated against domains of the SF36 and VAS scores with expected positive linear correlations. CONCLUSION: Categories of mild, moderate and severe CSM according to the MDI of 4-5 and 8-9 were established based on the NDI.
Assuntos
Doenças da Medula Espinal , Espondilose , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Cervicalgia , Qualidade de Vida , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Espondilose/complicações , Espondilose/diagnóstico , Espondilose/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The degree of disability that is acceptable to patients following traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be debated. While the dichotomization of outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE) into 'favourable' and 'unfavourable' continues to guide clinical decisions, this may not reflect an individual's subjective experience. The aim of this study is to assess how patients' self-reported quality of life (QoL) relates to objective outcome assessments and how it compares to other debilitating neurosurgical pathologies, including subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and cervical myelopathy. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of over 1300 patients seen in Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK with TBI, SAH and patients pre- and post- cervical surgery was performed. QoL was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyse the difference in SF-36 domain scores between the four unpaired patient groups. To determine how the point of dichotomization of GOSE into 'favourable' and 'unfavourable' outcome affected QOL, SF-36 scores were compared between GOSE and mRS. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the median Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) of SF-36 between the three neurosurgical pathologies. Patients with TBI and SAH scored higher on most SF-36 domains when compared with cervical myelopathy patients in the severe category. While patients with Upper Severe Disability on GOSE showed significantly higher PC and MC scores compared to GOSE 3, there was a significant degree of variability in individual responses across the groups. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients following TBI and SAH have better self-reported QOL than cervical spine patients and patients' subjective perception and expectations following injury do not always correspond to objective disability. These results can guide discussion of treatment and outcomes with patients and families.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although mostly used in the management of spinal trauma, hard collar immobilisation is also used as an adjunct to recovery after elective cervical spine surgery. Many surgeons believe that bracing reduces the risk of non-union and pain and provides a subjective sense of security for patients. There is little if any, evidence for this practice and immobilisation can be a direct cause of adverse events. The primary aim of this study was to provide an updated assessment of post-operative bracing practice in UK spinal surgeons, including the indications, rationale and perspectives on compliance and complications. METHODS: Neurosurgeons and spinal orthopaedic surgeons completed a web-based survey distributed by email to members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) and the British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS). Professional information captured included level of experience and whether surgeons had a specialist interest in spinal surgery. Questions first focused on the frequency and duration of hard collar immobilisation for common decompressive procedures. Later questions captured surgeon rationale, perceptions of patient compliance, complications, and collar removal. RESULTS: A total of 86 surgeons completed the survey, of whom 83% were spinal specialists. In total, 33 (38%) surgeons recommend a hard collar following at least one of the elective procedures listed. Collars were most commonly recommended following cervical corpectomy (30%). The support of fusion and bone healing was the most common rationale (82%), with post-operative pain (45%) and limiting patient activity (39%) also considered. Most surgeons (69%) believed that their patients were compliant. All listed types of complications were reported, with impaired activities of daily living (41%) and impaired sleep (34%) the most frequently cited. CONCLUSIONS: Current post-operative use of hard collars is much lower in the United Kingdom than previously reported in the United States. Surgeon decision-making is inconsistent and may benefit from greater standardisation. Future work is needed to help develop guidelines as a move away from arbitrary to evidence-based practice.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Atividades Cotidianas , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgiaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematically the complications of prolonged cervical immobilisation in a hard collar. METHODS: Following registration with PROSPERO, a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE) was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened the search results according to pre-determined search criteria. Data was extracted and tabulated. Joanna Briggs Institute checklists were used for assessing the quality of included studies. RESULTS: The search identified 773 articles. A total of 25 studies were selected for final inclusion. The results largely comprised a mixture of case reports/series, cohort studies and reviews. The most commonly reported complications were pressure ulcers, dysphagia and increased intracranial pressure. A pressure ulcer pooled prevalence of 7% was calculated. There was insufficient data for quantitative analysis of any other complication. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant morbidity from prolonged hard collar immobilisation, even amongst younger patients. Whilst based upon limited and low-quality evidence, these findings, combined with the low-quality evidence for the efficacy of hard collars, highlights a knowledge gap for future research.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of complications from lumbar decompression ± discectomy surgery for cauda equina syndrome (CES), assessing whether time of day is associated with a change in the incidence of complications. METHODS: Electronic clinical and operative notes for all lumbar decompression operations undertaken at our institution for CES over a 2-year time period were retrospectively reviewed. "Overnight" surgery was defined as any surgery occurring between 18:00 and 08:00 on any day. Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical technique, and peri/post-operative complications were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 81 lumbar decompression operations were performed in the 2-year period and analysed. A total of 29 (36%) operations occurred overnight. Complete CES (CESR) was seen in 13 cases (16%) in total, 7 of whom underwent surgery during the day. Exactly 27 complications occurred in 24 (30%) patients. The most frequently occurring complication was a dural tear (n = 21, 26%), followed by post-operative haematoma, infection, and residual disc. Complication rates in the CESR cohort (54%) were significantly greater than in the CES incomplete (CESI) cohort (25%) (p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, overnight surgery was independently associated with a significantly increased complication rate (OR 2.83, CI 1.02-7.89). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar decompressions performed overnight for CES were more than twice as likely to suffer a complication, in comparison to those performed within daytime hours. Our study suggests that out-of-hours operating, particularly at night, must be clinically justified and should not be influenced by day-time operating capacity.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Cauda Equina , Cauda Equina , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral , Polirradiculopatia , Cauda Equina/cirurgia , Síndrome da Cauda Equina/complicações , Síndrome da Cauda Equina/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Cauda Equina/cirurgia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Polirradiculopatia/complicações , Polirradiculopatia/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common syndrome of acquired spinal cord impairment caused by canal stenosis secondary to arthritic changes of the spine. International guidelines consider physiotherapy an option for mild, stable DCM; however, few studies have been conducted on nonoperative management. The objective was to determine current usage and perceptions of nonoperative physiotherapy for DCM. METHODS: Persons with DCM were recruited to a web-based survey. Participants with complete responses that had not received surgery were included (n = 167). Variables included symptom duration, treatment history, current disability, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Disease and demographic characteristics were equivalent between those who did and did not receive physiotherapy. In all, 19.5% of physiotherapy recipients reported subjective benefit from physiotherapy. Those perceiving benefit had significantly higher mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association) scores, lower neck pain scores, and shorter symptom duration. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, those with mild DCM were more likely to perceive benefit than those with severe DCM, as were those with moderate DCM (to a lesser extent). Individuals whose diagnosis was delayed 1 to 2 years were less likely to perceive benefit than those that waited 0 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of nonoperative physiotherapy in the management of DCM is inconsistent and appears to differ from international guidelines. Few patients perceived benefit from physiotherapy; however, this was more likely in those with mild DCM and in those with shorter symptom durations. Further work is needed to establish the appropriate role of physiotherapy for this population.
RESUMO
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) results from compression of the cervical spine cord as a result of age related changes in the cervical spine, and affects up to 2% of adults, leading to progressive disability. Surgical decompression is the mainstay of treatment, but there remains significant variation in surgical approaches used. This survey was conducted in order to define current practice amongst spine surgeons worldwide, as a possible prelude to further studies comparing surgical approaches. METHODS: An electronic survey was developed and piloted by the investigators using SurveyMonkey. Collected data was categorical and is presented using summary statistics. Where applicable, statistical comparisons were made using a Chi-Squared test. The level of significance for all statistical analyses was defined as pâ¯<â¯0.05. All analysis, including graphs was performed using R (R Studio). RESULTS: 127 surgeons, from 30 countries completed the survey; principally UK (66, 52%) and North America (15, 12%). Respondents were predominantly Neurosurgeons by training (108, 85%) of whom 84 (75%) reported Spinal Surgery as the principal part of their practice. The majority indicated they selected their surgical procedure for multi-level DCM on a case by case basis (62, 49%). Overall, a posterior approach was more popular for multi-level DCM (74, 58%). Region, speciality or annual multi-level case load did not influence this significantly. However, there was a trend for North American surgeons to be more likely to favour a posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: A posterior approach was favoured and more commonly used to treat multi-level DCM, in an international cohort of surgeons. Posterior techniques including laminectomy, laminectomy and fusion or laminoplasty appeared to be equally popular.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Internacionalidade , Neurocirurgiões , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Descompressão Cirúrgica/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Laminectomia/métodos , Laminectomia/tendências , Laminoplastia/métodos , Laminoplastia/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurocirurgiões/tendências , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/tendências , Doenças da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/tendênciasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) is a structural abnormality of the hindbrain characterised by the descent of the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum. The management of patients with CM1 remains contentious since there are currently no UK or international guidelines for clinicians. We therefore propose a collaborative, prospective, multicentre study on the investigation, management and outcome of CM1 in the UK: the UK Chiari 1 Study (UKC1S). Our primary objective is to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with a new diagnosis of CM1 managed either conservatively or surgically at 12 months of follow-up. We also aim to: (A) determine HRQoL 12 months following surgery; (B) measure complications 12 months following surgery; (C) determine the natural history of patients with CM1 treated conservatively without surgery; (D) determine the radiological correlates of presenting symptoms, signs and outcomes; and (E) determine the scope and variation within UK practice in referral patterns, patient pathways, investigations and surgical decisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The UKC1S will be a prospective, multicentre and observational study that will follow the British Neurosurgical Trainee Research Collaborative model of collaborative research. Patients will be recruited after attending their first neurosurgical outpatient clinic appointment. Follow-up data will be collected from all patients at 12 months from baseline regardless of whether they are treated surgically or not. A further 12-month postoperative follow-up timepoint will be added for patients treated with decompressive surgery. The study is expected to last three years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The UKC1S received a favourable ethical opinion from the East Midlands Leicester South Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 20/EM/0053; IRAS 269739) and the Health Research Authority. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals, presented at scientific conferences, shared with collaborating sites and shared with participant patients if they so wish.
Assuntos
Malformação de Arnold-Chiari , Qualidade de Vida , Malformação de Arnold-Chiari/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Reino UnidoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The mainstay treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is surgical decompression. Not all cases, however, are suitable for surgery. Recent international guidelines advise surgery for moderate to severe disease as well as progressive mild disease. The goal of this study was to examine the factors in current practice that drive the decision to operate in DCM. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: 1 year of cervical spine MRI scans (N = 1123) were reviewed to identify patients with DCM with sufficient clinical documentation (N = 39). Variables at surgical assessment were recorded: age, sex, clinical signs and symptoms of DCM, disease severity, and quantitative MRI measures of cord compression. Bivariate correlations were used to compare each variable with the decision to offer the patient an operation. Subsequent multivariable analysis incorporated all significant bivariate correlations. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients identified, 25 (64%) were offered an operation. The decision to operate was significantly associated with narrower non-pathological canal and cord diameters as well as cord compression ratio, explaining 50% of the variance. In a multivariable model, only cord compression ratio was significant (p = 0.017). Examination findings, symptoms, functional disability, disease severity, disease progression, and demographic factors were all non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Cord compression emerged as the main factor in surgical decision-making prior to the publication of recent guidelines. Newly identified predictors of post-operative outcome were not significantly associated with decision to operate.
Assuntos
Medula Cervical/fisiopatologia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/patologia , Idoso , Medula Cervical/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomada de Decisões , Descompressão Cirúrgica , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Compressão da Medula Espinal/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gold-standard for investigating Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM), a disabling disease triggered by compression of the spinal cord following degenerative changes of adjacent structures. Quantifiable compression correlates poorly with disease and language describing compression in radiological reports is un-standardised. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: 1) Identify terminology in radiological reporting of cord compression and elucidate relationships between language and quantitative measures 2) Evaluate language's ability to distinguish myelopathic from asymptomatic compression 3) Explore correlations between quantitative or qualitative features and symptom severity 4) Investigate the influence of quantitative and qualitative measures on surgical referrals. METHODS: From all cervical spine MRIs conducted during one year at a tertiary centre (N = 1123), 166 patients had reported cord compression. For each spinal level deemed compressed by radiologists (N = 218), four quantitative measurements were calculated: 'Maximum Canal Compromise (MCC); 'Maximum Spinal Cord Compression' (MSCC); 'Spinal Canal Occupation Ratio' (SCOR) and 'Compression Ratio' (CR). These were compared to associated radiological reporting terminology. RESULTS: 1) Terminology in radiological reports was varied. Objective measures of compromise correlated poorly with language. "Compressed" was used for more severe cord compromise as measured by MCC (p<0.001), MSCC (p<0.001), and CR (p = 0.002). 2) Greater compromise was seen in cords with a myelopathy diagnosis across MCC (p<0.001); MSCC (p = 0.002) and CR (p<0.001). "Compress" (p<0.001) and "Flatten" (p<0.001) were used more commonly for myelopathy-diagnosis levels. 3) Measurements of cord compromise (MCC: p = 0.304; MSCC: p = 0.217; SCOR: p = 0.503; CR: p = 0.256) and descriptive terms (p = 0.591) did not correlate with i-mJOA score. 4) The only variables affecting spinal surgery referral were increased MSCC (p = 0.001) and use of 'Compressed' (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Radiological reporting in DCM is variable and language is not fully predictive of the degree of quantitative cord compression. Additionally, terminology may influence surgical referrals.
Assuntos
Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Lumbar radiculopathy (LR) often manifests as pain in the lower back radiating into one leg (sciatica). Unsuccessful back surgery is associated with significant healthcare costs and risks to patients. This review aims to examine the diagnostic accuracy of selective nerve root blocks (SNRBs) to identify patients most likely to benefit from lumbar decompression surgery. DESIGN: Systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research articles using a patient population with low back pain and symptoms in the leg, SNRB administered under radiological guidance as index test, and any reported reference standard for the diagnosis of LR. INFORMATION SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Biosis, LILACS, Dissertation abstracts and National Technical Information Service from inception to 2018. METHODS: Risk of bias and applicability was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed random-effects logistic regression to meta-analyse studies grouped by reference standard. RESULTS: 6 studies (341 patients) were included in this review. All studies were judged at high risk of bias. There was substantial heterogeneity across studies in sensitivity (range 57%-100%) and specificity (10%-86%) estimates. Four studies were diagnostic cohort studies that used either intraoperative findings during surgery (pooled sensitivity: 93.5% [95% CI 84.0 to 97.6]; specificity: 50.0% [16.8 to 83.2]) or 'outcome following surgery' as the reference standard (pooled sensitivity: 90.9% [83.1 to 95.3]; specificity 22.0% [7.4 to 49.9]). Two studies had a within-patient case-control study design, but results were not pooled because different types of control injections were used. CONCLUSIONS: We found limited evidence which was of low methodological quality indicating that the diagnostic accuracy of SNRB is uncertain and that specificity in particular may be low. SNRB is a safe test with a low risk of clinically significant complications, but it remains unclear whether the additional diagnostic information it provides justifies the cost of the test.
Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso/normas , Radiculopatia/diagnóstico , Ciática/diagnóstico , Descompressão Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Região Lombossacral , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of ventrally located intradural cysts is difficult and controversial. Laminectomy with division of the denticulate ligaments and gentle cord mobilization remains the standard approach but risks further neurologic deterioration secondary to cord manipulation. Our purpose is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a midline cord-splitting approach as an alternative for treating ventral thoracic intradural cysts. METHODS: We describe 2 patients who were treated for ventral intradural cysts causing progressive and severe myelopathy. Under general anesthesia and continuous neurophysiologic monitoring, laminectomy, durotomy, and cord splitting through a midline approach gave direct access to both lesions. Cyst drainage was supplemented by a cystopleural shunt in 1 case. RESULTS: Cyst collapse and cord reexpansion were documented in both patients with a magnetic resonance imaging scan 1 week after surgery. In both cases there was a significant neurologic improvement, which was maintained 2 years postoperatively. Intraoperative monitoring recorded no loss of somatosensory or motor potentials during surgery. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans 2 years postoperatively showed no evidence of cyst recurrence, and both patients remained neurologically improved and stable. CONCLUSIONS: We have been able to drain 2 ventral intradural cysts using a cord-splitting technique. This has allowed safe access to purely ventrally located lesions, which were inaccessible dorsally or dorsolaterally. By using this method we have been able to avoid a more invasive ventral transthoracic approach necessitating vertebrectomy and reconstruction and risking serious complications.
Assuntos
Cistos do Sistema Nervoso Central/cirurgia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Adulto , Cistos do Sistema Nervoso Central/complicações , Cistos do Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais , Drenagem , Dura-Máter , Feminino , Humanos , Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/complicações , Neoplasias Meníngeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Vértebras TorácicasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Lumbar synovial cysts are relatively infrequent. Historically, these benign lesions have been treated with open excision, sometimes associated with fusion. The aim of this study is to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open surgery (OS) for the treatment of lumbar synovial cysts. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive or open excision of lumbar synovial cysts. Clinical outcomes, recurrence rate, and surgical complications were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 37 cases were identified, of which 24 were MIS and 13 were OS. MIS was significantly more effective in improving leg pain and radicular symptoms. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with regard to improvements of back pain and neurogenic claudication. Postoperative length of hospital stay and postoperative pain were significantly reduced in the MIS group (15 hours vs. 24 hours and 0.9/10 vs. 4.7/10 respectively, P < 0.5). There were no statistical differences in duration of surgery, intra- or postoperative complications, no recurrence of cyst in either of the 2 groups, and no patients required fusion at a later stage. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, MIS for the treatment of lumbar synovial cysts appears to be more effective than OS in relieving radicular symptoms. Furthermore, MIS is better tolerated by patients and is potentially cost saving for the Health Service, due to the reduction in hospital stay and the reduced requirement for painkillers.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Cisto Sinovial/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor nas Costas/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Cisto Sinovial/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a potentially devastating insult to the brain with high rates of fatality and neurological deficits. TBI can result in substantial costs to the centre providing care. We sought to present the experience of a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) and ascertain the financial implications of this healthcare provision, in particular detailed costs, reimbursement and the surplus or deficit accrued by the centre. DESIGN: All cranial non-elective neurosurgical admissions with a TBI over 4.5 months (26 October 2014 to 15 March 2015) were analysed retrospectively, excluding cases of chronic subdural haematoma, at an MTC in England. Demographic data were collected alongside detailed cost and income data. RESULTS: Ninety four patients were identified. The majority of patients presented with more than one diagnosis of cranial trauma. Average length of stay was 18.8 ± 21.6 days. Total deficits as a result of treating this cohort amounted to £558,034. There was a significant association between (i) more complex presentations and (ii) a longer length of stay and the deficit accrued by the centre. The major drivers of the financial outcome were costs associated with wards, medical staffing and overheads. CONCLUSION: There was a substantial deficit accrued as a result of the management of patients with TBI at an MTC. The more complex the presentation, extensive the intervention, and lengthy the stay, the greater the deficit accrued by the centre. The current tariff payment system is not effectively reflecting the severity of injury or intensity of management of patients with TBI.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/economia , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Adulto , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Redução de Custos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Inglaterra , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/economia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Spinal Dural Fistulas (SDAVF) are the most common Spinal Vascular Malformation. The management of SDAVFs involves diagnosis and localisation with MRI and spinal angiography and subsequent embolisation or surgical interruption. We report our experience in treating these fistulas in which we undertake endovascular treatment, if technically feasible, with recourse to surgery only if occlusion is not possible. METHOD: This retrospective study reviews the management of 38 patients treated for SDAVFs over a 13-year period (1997-2010). Patient demographics, procedure and follow-up over a 6-12-month period (mean of approximately 10 months) were analysed and a qualitative assessment of patient outcome was made. RESULTS: Patient ages ranged from 20 to 86 (mean 63.5), with 27 male and 11 female patients. A total of 28 patients managed with a combination of embolisation and surgery report either with improved symptoms or a return to normal. The presence of bladder and bowel symptoms indicated more severe disability and their presence at presentation was associated with lack of improvement following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We report a treatment strategy for SDAVF involving primary endovascular intervention and reserving surgery for those patients in whom endovascular treatment is not possible.
Assuntos
Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula Arteriovenosa/terapia , Dura-Máter/irrigação sanguínea , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Medula Espinal/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: One of the objectives of this review is to summarize the important features of a good scale. A second aim is to conduct a systematic review to identify scales that can detect the presence of cervical myelopathy and to determine their psychometric properties including validity, reliability and responsiveness. METHODS: A thorough literature search was performed using MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Articles were included in this study if they compared scale measurements between a control and a myelopathic patient population or if they discussed any psychometric property of a scale. RESULTS: An ideal scale should be one that is quantifiable, valid, sensitive, responsive and easy to perform, has high inter/intra-rater reliability, internal consistency and a suitable distribution, and is one-dimensional and relevant. In the context of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, it is essential that the scale also addresses the pathophysiology, its key signs and symptoms as well as its natural history. For the systematic review, the search yielded 5,745 citations. Of these, 37 met inclusion criteria, 10 explored the ability of a scale to detect myelopathy, 23 examined validity by assessing correlation between scales, 10 reported reliability, 8 analyzed responsiveness, and 6 discussed internal consistency. The most frequently reported scale was short form-36 (n = 16) followed by Nurick grade (n = 14), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (n = 13), (modified) Japanese Orthopaedic Association (n = 7) and grip and release test (n = 6). Four studies each presented results on the Cooper, Harsh and 30-m walking test. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes outcome measures used to assess the presence and severity of cervical myelopathy. It includes several validation studies as well as those that have reported the responsiveness and reliability of various measures.