Long-term efficacy and tolerance of a technique for postmastectomy electron beam radiation therapy of the unreconstructed chest wall and lymph node areas for non-metastatic breast cancers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term tolerance and outcome of patients irradiated with an electron beam technique used since 2007 on the chest wall and lymph node areas after mastectomy for non-metastatic locally advanced breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients irradiated with an improved electron beam technique after mastectomy for non-metastatic breast carcinoma between 2007 and 2011 at Institut Curie (France) were included in this descriptive study. The technique has already been described in other studies, as has its 5-year tolerance and non-inferiority compared to photon irradiation. Acute and chronic toxicity were collected using CTCAE v 3.0. A clinical examination was carried out each week during the radiotherapy and at each 6 months consultation with one mammogram per year at the Institut Curie for at least 5 years. The patients then continued to be followed either at the Institut Curie or in private practice with a good transmission of outpatient consultations, thanks to a system of forms to be completed and integrated into the electronic files. Quantitative and qualitative data are defined by mean and proportion. Statistical comparisons were made by computer using the Chi2 test and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Recurrence-free survival was defined as the time between the end of treatment and the date of recurrence or death. Overall survival was defined in the same way without taking into account recurrences. Patients who did not report any events were censored at the date of last news. RESULTS: Of the 796 patients included, 51.3% had multifocal lesions, 10.1% had triple negative status, and 18.8% displayed overexpression of the Her2 receptor, 196 (24.6%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 208 (26.1%) systemic treatment during radiotherapy (chemotherapy or targeted therapy); 514 (64.6%) had at least one positive lymph node. The internal mammary chain (IMC) was irradiated in 85.6% of cases, the supraclavicular areas in 88.3% of cases, the infraclavicular in 77.9% of cases and the axillary area in 14.9% of cases. With a median follow-up of 113 months (range: 2-164 months), locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall 10-year survival was respectively 94.02%, (95% CI: 92.13-98.94) and 79.84% (95% CI: 76.83-82.97). Median survival was not reached. In the long term, 29.6% of patients had telangiectasias (grade 1: 23.3%, grade 2: 5.2%, grade 3: 1.1%). There were 279 patients (35.1%) with secondary breast reconstruction on average 21 months after all treatments. IMC irradiation was not associated with a majority of pulmonary toxicity. Thirty-five patients developed chronic heart disease after radiotherapy, 30 of whom had received anthracyclines and 9 had received traztuzumab. Three of these reported a coronary ischaemic event, including 2 irradiated on the left and 1 on the right, the 4 were irradiated in the vicinity of the IMC and the other lymph node areas, but presented many other cardiovascular risk factors (between 2 and 4). During follow-up, 4.9% of patients had a contralateral recurrence (n=39) and 5.5% had a second non-breast cancer (n=44), of the 6 bronchopulmonary cancers diagnosed, none appeared to be related to chest wall radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the improved postmastectomy electron beam radiation therapy technique is well-tolerated after nearly 10 years of follow-up.

Institut Curie guidelines on breast target volume delineation for patients treated in lateral position.

PURPOSE: To develop guidelines for and describe the delineation of breast for patients treated in lateral position and to transform this three-dimensional technique based on the virtual simulation to volume-based modern intensity-modulated irradiation technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our department, during the daily delineation, radiation oncologists specialized in breast cancer treatment sought consensus on the delineation of clinical treatment volume of the breast through dialogue based on cases. A radiation oncologist delineated clinical treatment volumes on CT scans of five to 20 patients, followed by a discussion and adaptation of the delineation between all radiation oncologists of the team. The consensus established between clinicians was discussed, corrected and improved. All patients were delineated in treatment position; skin markers were used to visualize the breast tissue after careful palpation. RESULTS: Breast clinical treatment volume was situated and delineated between pectoral muscle and 5mm below the skin (dosimetric considerations), within the space outlined by skin markers, that showed the limits of the palpable breast tissue. In lateral position some vessels were very useful to define the limits as rami mammarii (from thoracica interna) for the internal one and thoracica lateralis for the external. This is the first atlas proposed for the delineation of the breast clinical treatment volumes for breast cancer using alternative technique of breast irradiation (lateral). CONCLUSION: This atlas will be helpful for the volume definition in our daily practice of breast irradiation in lateral position and can open perspectives to develop also atlases for other alternative techniques as treatment in prone position.

Extensive pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: identification of predictors of associated infiltrating carcinoma and lymph node metastasis before immediate reconstructive surgery.

AIM: To identify predictors for infiltrating carcinoma and lymph node involvement, before immediate breast reconstructive surgery, in patients with an initial diagnosis of extensive pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2009, 241 patients with pure extensive DCIS in preoperative biopsy had underwent mastectomy. Axillary staging (sentinel node and/or axillary dissection) was performed in 92% (n = 221) of patients. Patients with micro-invasive lesions at initial diagnosis, recurrence or contralateral breast cancer were excluded. RESULTS: Respectively 14% and 21% of patients had a final diagnosis of micro-invasive carcinoma (MIC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Univariate analysis showed that the following variables at diagnosis were significantly correlated with the presence of either MIC or IDC in the mastectomy specimen: palpable tumor (p = 0.002), high grade DCIS (p = 0.002) and detection of an opacity by mammography (p = 0.019). Axillary lymph node (ALN) involvement was reported in 9% of patients. Univariate analysis suggested that a body mass index higher than 25 (p = 0.007), a palpable tumor (p = 0.012) and the detection of an opacity by mammography (p = 0.044) were associated with an increased rate of ALN involvement. CONCLUSION: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBRS) has become increasingly popular, especially for patients with extended DCIS of the breast. This study confirmed that extended DCIS is associated with a substantial risk of finding MIC or IDC on the surgical specimen but also ALN involvement. Adjuvant systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy could be indicated for some of these patients after the surgery. Patients should be informed of the rate of 1) complications associated to IBRS that will potentially delay the introduction of systemic or local therapy 2) complications associated to radiotherapy after IBRS.

Prediction of axillary lymph node status in male breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether predictive factors of axillary lymph node metastasis in female breast cancer (BC) are similar in male BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1994 to May 2011, we recorded 80 non-metastatic male BC treated at Institut Curie (IC). We analysed the calibration and discrimination performance of two nomograms [IC, Memorian Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)] originally designed to predict axillary lymph node metastases in female BC. RESULTS: About 55% and 24% of the tumours were pT1 and pT4, respectively. Nearly 46% demonstrated axillary lymph node metastasis. About 99% were oestrogen receptor positive and 94% HER2 negative. Lymph node status was the only significant prognostic factor of overall survival (P = 0.012). The area under curve (AUC) of IC and MSKCC nomograms were 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.79) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.52-0.76), respectively. The calibration of these two models was inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-variate models designed to predict axillary lymph node metastases for female BC were not effective in our male BC series. Our results may be explained by (i) small sample size (ii) different biological determinants influencing axillary metastasis in male BC compared with female BC.

Cost comparison of axillary sentinel lymph node detection and axillary lymphadenectomy in early breast cancer. A national study based on a prospective multi-institutional series of 985 patients 'on behalf of the Group of Surgeons from the French Unicancer Federation'.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the global cost of the sentinel lymph node detection [axillary sentinel lymph node detection (ASLND)] compared with standard axillary lymphadenectomy [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)] for early breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional, observational, cost comparative analysis. Cost calculations were realized with the micro-costing method from the diagnosis until 1 month after the last surgery. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty nine patients were included in the ASLND group and 146 in the ALND group. The cost generated for a patient with an ASLND, with one preoperative scintigraphy, a combined method for sentinel node detection, an intraoperative pathological analysis without lymphadenectomy, was lower than the cost generated for a patient with lymphadenectomy [€ 2947 (σ = 580) versus € 3331 (σ = 902); P = 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: ASLND, involving expensive techniques, was finally less expensive than ALND. The length of hospital stay was the cost driver of these procedures. The current observational study points the heterogeneous practices for this validated and largely diffused technique. Several technical choices have an impact on the cost of ASLND, as intraoperative analysis allowing to reduce rehospitalization rate for secondary lymphadenectomy or preoperative scintigraphy, suggesting possible savings on hospital resources.

[Nipple and areola reconstruction by tattooing, "F" and "Z" flaps]. / La reconstruction de la plaque aréolo-mamelonnaire par tatouage, lambeaux << F >> et << Z >>

Nipple and areola reconstruction is very important in the evaluation of the quality of breast reconstruction. It can be done during the primary or secondary breast reconstruction or later. We have performed the techniques of nipple reconstruction routinely since 1992. Under local anesthesia during a second operative time or general anesthesia during breast reconstruction, the local "F" and "Z" skin flaps and tattooing grant a quality result in the wound and the long-term projection. They are easily reproduced, rapid and as there is no graft the choice of the incisions grants a good tolerance. Complications are rare and it is always possible to use other techniques in case of poor result. We also present the main techniques of nipple and areola reconstruction with their advantages and limits.

[Preoperative location of microcalcifications after macrobiopsy: failure of lipiodol]. / Repérage du site de prélèvement de microcalcifications par mammotome: échec du lipiodol.

Accurate mark of macrobiopsy site, carried out borderline or malignant lesions, is very important for surgeons. We report a woman case, 68 year's old, who presents intraductal carcinoma diagnoses on macrobiopsy. On postbiopsy X-ray, we can note lipiodol used instead of clip to reaper macrobiopsy site. Our observation shows how lipiodol use is not adapted into this indication.

[Evaluation of asymetric implants in breast cancer]. / Evaluation des prothèses asymétriques en reconstruction mammaire.

Since more than twenty years, methods of breast reconstruction using implants have continued to evolve in order to improve their aesthetic results. Shapes and materials of these implants have also evolved to obtain contours similar to that of the natural opposite breast. Therefore it can be considered that the use of asymmetric implants is the last step in implant technology before using made to measure implants. Asymmetric implants allow obtaining different contours in harmony to the different breast shapes according to the side, left or right, of the reconstructed breast which maximise the naturalness of the result. Such implants have an axis directed towards the exterior and lower part of the chest wall, are wider than high with a thinner part on their inner edge and a concave rear side moulding the curves of the chest wall. In our own experience, we placed more than 500 asymmetric implants. When analysing retrospectively the medical records of 156 patients, no distinctive features were observed when compared to symmetric classic implants in easiness in the surgical procedure or in complications except a slightly higher rate of seroma formation. When compared to usual implants the main benefits of asymmetric implants are: to offer a wider breadth, to slope down gently on their upper and inner sides according to their concave rear side, and therefore to better match subtle curves of a normal breast. Moreover such contours allow a distribution of the volume which fit better to the usual natural breast configuration of patients who underwent surgery for breast carcinoma. At last, such implants are easy to place and a very low rate of secondary rotation has been observed. In summary, for all these reasons, asymmetric implants, can be considered to be the class one in the choice of implants for breast reconstruction after breast surgery.