High efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A cohort study conducted in Vietnam.

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment through their high cure rates and improved safety profiles. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety, and identify the optimal combination, of DAAs for the treatment of chronic HCV. A retrospective study was conducted of 613 patients with chronic HCV who were treated with DAAs. Demographic, HCV genotype, treatment regimen, virological response, and adverse drug event (ADE) data were collected at the initial visit and 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks later. The rapid virologic response (RVR) and sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 90.4% and 97.8% for HCV genotype 1, 89.2% and 98.7% for genotype 6, 92.8% and 99% for genotype 2, and 90.9% and 100% for mixed genotype 2/6 or unspecified genotypes, respectively. There were no significant differences in the RVR and SVR rates for the various DAA regimens. The mean ALT, AST, and GGT activities decreased, and the PLT count increased during the treatments. ADEs occurred in 8% of the patients. The commonest ADEs were itching (3.1%), fatigue (1.8%), and dizziness (1.1%). None of the patients discontinued treatment because of an ADE. Posttreatment disease progression occurred in 7.7% of the patients, including liver fibrosis (3.6%), cirrhosis (1.1%), hepatocellular carcinoma (1.1%), and high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (1%). The factors associated with the achievement of RVR were low viral load, the use of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir or sofosbuvir/daclatasvir regimens, and a treatment duration of 12 weeks. No specific factors were found to be associated with the achievement of SVR. Posttreatment disease progression was associated with a high AFP and the use of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. Thus, DAAs are highly effective and well-tolerated means of treating chronic HCV, and significantly improve patient outcomes. Their high efficacy and favorable safety profiles highlight the importance of early diagnosis and the use of personalized treatment strategies.

Validating the CHAMPS Score: A Novel and Reliable Prognostic Score of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Introduction: The Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, in-Hospital onset, Albumin <2.5 g/dL, altered Mental status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status ≥2, Steroid use (CHAMPS) score is a novel and promising prognostic tool. We present an initial external validation of the CHAMPS score for predicting mortality in acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) across multiple clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients with NVUGIB admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology between November 2022 and June 2023. The CHAMPS score performance in predicting in-hospital outcomes was evaluated by employing area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, followed by a comparative analysis with five pre-existing scores. Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the study. The CHAMPS score showed its highest performance in predicting mortality rates (AUROC = 0.89), significantly outperforming the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS) as well as the Albumin level <3.0 mg/dL, International normalized ratio >1.5, altered Mental status, Systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg, and age >65 years (AIMS65) score (AUROC = 0.72 and 0.71, respectively; all p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis for bleeding-related and non-bleeding-related mortality further confirmed the robust predictive capability of the CHAMPS score (AUROC = 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). The CHAMPS score failed to predict rebleeding and intervention reliably, exhibiting AUROC values of 0.43 and 0.55, respectively. The optimal CHAMPS score cutoff value for predicting mortality was 3 points, achieving 100% sensitivity and 71.2% specificity. In the low-risk category defined by both CHAMPS and GBS scores, mortality and rebleeding rates were 0%. However, within the CHAMPS score-based low-risk group, 58.8% required intervention, contrasting with a 0% intervention rate for the GBS score-based low-risk group (GBS score ≤1). Conclusion: The CHAMPS score consistently demonstrated a robust predictive performance for mortality (AUROC > 0.8), facilitating the identification of high-risk patients requiring aggressive treatment and low-risk patients in need of localized treatment or safe discharge after successful bleeding control.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Caused by Rupture of Pancreatic Pseudoaneurysms.

Pseudoaneurysm rupture in patients with pancreatitis is a rare but fatal etiology of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We report a rare case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a patient who presented simultaneously with two pseudoaneurysms, a potential cause of severe gastrointestinal bleeding. Angiography was successfully performed with coil embolization of the target arteries and both pseudoaneurysmal sacs. The patient was discharged 9 days after admission without further events within a 3-month follow-up period.