Reduced Mortality and Radiation Necrosis After Surgery With Postoperative Stereotactic Radiation in Patients With Multiple Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although stereotactic radiation has frequently supplanted whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in treating patients with multiple brain metastases, the role of surgery for these patients remains unresolved. No randomized trials have compared surgical resection with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) to SRS/SRT alone. Previous studies addressing surgery for patients with multiple brain metastases are often limited by small sample sizes, a lack of appropriate comparison groups, or a focus on patients treated before recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We compared outcomes in patients with multiple brain metastases treated with surgical resection and postoperative SRS/SRT to those treated with SRS/SRT alone. METHODS: We studied 734 patients with multiple newly diagnosed brain metastases (surgery with SRS/SRT, n = 228; SRS/SRT alone, n = 506) from 2011 to 2022 in a retrospective, single-institution cohort. Patients who received upfront whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for overall survival and additional intracranial outcomes. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, surgery with postoperative SRS/SRT was associated with decreased all-cause mortality compared with SRS/SRT alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67, 95% CI [0.50-0.89], P = 5.56 × 10 -3 ). The association between surgical resection and overall survival was replicated in a subset of the cohort after cardinality matching (HR: 0.64, 95% CI [0.46-0.88], P = 6.68 × 10 -3 ). Patients with melanoma benefited significantly less from surgical resection compared with patients with other tumor types, most notably non-small-cell lung cancer. Compared with definitive SRS/SRT, cavity SRS/SRT was associated with a significantly reduced risk of both symptomatic radiation necrosis (HR: 0.22, 95% CI [0.08-0.59], P = 2.70 × 10 -3 ) and radiographic radiation necrosis (HR: 0.23, 95% CI [0.09-0.57], P = 1.43 × 10 -3 ) in multivariable models. CONCLUSION: In patients with multiple brain metastases, surgical resection before SRS/SRT is associated with reduced mortality and radiation necrosis. Prospective studies may further delineate patient populations that benefit from aggressive local, brain-directed treatment even with significant intracranial disease burden.

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in treating cauda equina syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) in treating cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted, searching relevant databases for studies investigating MIS and/or OS in treating CES. Pooled outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were meta-analyzed via random-effects models. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled mean operation times were shorter for MIS (75.4 min; 95 %CI: 40.8, 110.0) than OS (155.1 min; 121.3, 188.9). Similarly, mean hospital stay was shorter for MIS (4.08 days; 2.77, 5.39 vs. 8.85 days; 6.56, 11.13). Mean blood loss was smaller for MIS (71.7 mL; 0, 154.5 vs. 366.5; 119.1, 614.0). Mean post-op lumbar/back visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower for MIS (3.65; 2.75, 4.56 vs. 5.80; 4.55, 7.05). Mean post-op leg VAS score was 1.27 (0.41, 21.4) for MIS and 1.29 (0.47, 2.12) for OS. Mean complete bladder recovery rate was 81.0% (55.0%, 94.0%) for MIS and 75.0% (44.0%, 92.0%) for OS. Mean complete motor recovery rate was larger for MIS (70.0%; 48.0, 85.0 vs. 42.0%; 34.0, 51.0). Mean percentages of "excellent" patient outcomes were equal for MIS (64.0%; 48.0%, 77.0%) and OS (64.0%; 22.0%, 92.0%). CONCLUSION: MIS for CES was associated with reduced operative time, length of stay, and blood loss, compared to OS. MIS was also associated with better post-operative lumbar/back and leg VAS scores and complete motor and bladder recovery rates. MIS and OS produced an equal average percentage of "excellent" patient outcomes.

A genomic score to predict local control among patients with brain metastases managed with radiation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical predictors of local recurrence following radiation among patients with brain metastases (BrM) provide limited explanatory power. We developed a DNA-based signature of radiotherapeutic efficacy among patients with BrM to better characterize recurrence risk. METHODS: We identified 570 patients with 1487 BrM managed with whole-brain (WBRT) or stereotactic radiation therapy at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (2013-2020) for whom next-generation sequencing panel data (OncoPanel) were available. Fine/Gray's competing risks regression was utilized to compare local recurrence on a per-metastasis level among patients with versus without somatic alterations of likely biological significance across 84 genes. Genes with a q-value ≤ 0.10 were utilized to develop a "Brain-Radiation Prediction Score" ("Brain-RPS"). RESULTS: Genomic alterations in 11 (ATM, MYCL, PALB2, FAS, PRDM1, PAX5, CDKN1B, EZH2, NBN, DIS3, and MDM4) and 2 genes (FBXW7 and AURKA) were associated with decreased or increased risk of local recurrence, respectively (q-value ≤ 0.10). Weighted scores corresponding to the strength of association with local failure for each gene were summed to calculate a patient-level RPS. On multivariable Fine/Gray's competing risks regression, RPS [1.66 (1.44-1.91, P < .001)], metastasis-associated edema [1.60 (1.16-2.21), P = .004], baseline size [1.02 (1.01-1.03), P < .001] and receipt of WBRT without local therapy [4.04 (2.49-6.58), P < .001] were independent predictors of local failure. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a genomic score to quantify local recurrence risk following brain-directed radiation. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study to systematically correlate DNA-based alterations with radiotherapeutic outcomes in BrM. If validated, Brain-RPS has potential to facilitate clinical trials aimed at genome-based personalization of radiation in BrM.

Minimizing Intracranial Disease Before Stereotactic Radiation in Single or Solitary Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in multiple fractions (typically ≤5) can effectively treat a wide range of brain metastases, including those less suitable for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Prior prospective studies on surgical resection with stereotactic radiation have focused exclusively on SRS, and retrospective studies have shown equivocal results regarding whether surgery is associated with improved outcomes compared with SRT alone. We compared resection with postoperative cavity SRT or SRS to SRT alone in patients with 1 brain metastasis, while including patients receiving SRS alone as an additional reference group. METHODS: We studied 716 patients in a retrospective, single-institution cohort diagnosed with single or solitary brain metastases from 2007 to 2020. Patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy were excluded. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for overall survival and additional intracranial outcomes. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, surgery with cavity SRT/SRS was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.39, 95% CI [0.27-0.57], P = 1.52 × 10 -6 ) compared with SRT alone, along with lower risk of neurological death attributable to intracranial tumor progression (HR: 0.46, 95% CI [0.22-0.94], P = 3.32 × 10 -2 ) and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.15, 95% CI [0.06-0.36], P = 3.28 × 10 -5 ). Surgery with cavity SRS was also associated with decreased all-cause mortality (HR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.35-0.78], P = 1.46 × 10 -3 ), neurological death (HR: 0.30, 95% CI [0.10-0.88], P = 2.88 × 10 -2 ), and radiation necrosis (HR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.03-0.74], P = 2.07 × 10 -2 ) compared with SRS alone. Surgery was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and neurological death in cardinality-matched subsets of the cohort. Among surgical patients, gross total resection was associated with extended overall survival (HR: 0.62, 95% CI [0.40-0.98], P = 4.02 × 10 -2 ) along with lower risk of neurological death (HR: 0.31, 95% CI [0.17-0.57], P = 1.84 × 10 -4 ) and local failure (HR: 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.75], P = 7.08 × 10 -3 ). CONCLUSION: In patients with 1 brain metastasis, minimizing intracranial disease specifically before stereotactic radiation is associated with improved oncologic outcomes.

Incidence proportion and prognosis of leptomeningeal disease among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a relatively uncommon manifestation of advanced cancer. Patients with LMD carry a poor prognosis and often decline rapidly, complicating inclusion in clinical trials. Identification of LMD subsets of greater incidence and more favorable prognosis might facilitate dedicated clinical trials in the future. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer may represent such a population and sought to assess the relative incidence and prognosis of LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries. METHODS: We identified 2411 patients with intracranial metastases secondary to breast (N = 501) and non-breast (N = 1910) primaries at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1996 and 2020, of whom 112 presented with and an additional 161 subsequently developed LMD. A log-rank test and Cox modeling were used to compare outcomes in patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries. RESULTS: Among patients with newly diagnosed intracranial disease, the incidence proportion of concurrent LMD was 11.4% vs. 2.9% among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (P < .001). Development of LMD among initially LMD-naïve patients was also more common among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (HR = 1.49 [1.05-2.11], P = .03). Patients with LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries displayed lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 [0.52-0.93], P = .01; median survival: 5.2 vs. 2.4 months, respectively), with a greater numerical difference observed in patients with LMD at intracranial involvement (7.4 vs. 2.6 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer and LMD may represent an ideal population for clinical trials given the higher incidence and potentially more favorable prognosis seen in this population.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors that are challenging to treat via traditional methods; however, its safety and efficacy are not yet well validated in the literature. The objectives of the study were to assess the available evidence of the indications and adverse events (AEs) of LITT and 1-year progression-free survival and 1-year overall survival in the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until October 2021. Comparative and descriptive studies, except for case reports, were included in the meta-analysis. Separate analyses by tumor type (high-grade gliomas, including World Health Organization grade 4 astrocytomas [which include glioblastomas] as a specific subgroup; low-grade gliomas; and brain metastases) were conducted. Pooled effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated via random-effects models. RESULTS: Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 826 patients for meta-analysis. There were 829 lesions in total, of which 361 were classified as high-grade gliomas, 116 as low-grade gliomas, 337 as metastatic brain tumors, and 15 as nonglial tumors. Indications for offering LITT included deep/inaccessible tumor (12 studies), salvage therapy after failed radiosurgery (9), failures of ≥2 treatment options (3), in pediatric patients (4), patient preference (1); indications were nonspecific in 12 studies. Pooled incidence of all (minor or major) procedure-related AEs was 30% (95% CI, 27%-40%) for all tumors. Pooled incidence of neurologic deficits (minor or major) was 16% (12%-22%); postprocedural edema 14% (8%-22%); seizure 6% (4%-9%); hematoma 20% (14%-29%); deep vein thrombosis 19% (11%-30%); hydrocephalus 8% (5%-12%); and wound infection 5% (3%-7%). One-year progression-free survival was 18.6% (11.3%-29.0%) in high-grade gliomas, 16.9% (11.6%-24.0%) among the grade 4 astrocytomas; and 51.2% (36.7%-65.5%) in brain metastases. One-year overall survival was 43.0% (36.0%-50.0%) in high-grade glioma, 45.9% (95% CI, 37.9%-54%) in grade 4 astrocytomas; 93.0% (42.3%-100%) in low-grade gliomas, and 56.3% (47.0%-65.3%) in brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS: New neurologic deficits and postprocedural edema were the most reported AEs after LITT, albeit mostly transient. This meta-analysis provides the best statistical estimates of progression and survival outcomes based on the available information. LITT is generally a safe procedure for selected patients, and future well-designed comparative studies on its outcomes versus the current standard of care should be performed.

Use of First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Association With Overall Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Melanoma in the Anti-PD-1 Era.

Importance: In 2015, first-line programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended for patients with stage IV melanoma. Few studies have assessed the overall survival (OS) and usage rate associated with first-line ICI following 2015. Objective: To determine the rates of ICI use for metastatic melanoma following FDA approval in 2015 and characterize OS associated with first-line ICI use in this patient population. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, adult patients (≥20 years of age) with newly diagnosed stage IV cutaneous melanoma from 2010 to 2019 were identified using the US National Cancer Database (NCDB). Data were released by NCDB in March 2022 and analyzed in June 2022. Interventions: Patients were compared based on first-line ICI receipt vs not. Main Outcomes and Measures: The OS and use of first-line ICI in 2016 to 2019 were assessed using multivariable Cox and logistic regression, respectively. To account for immortal time bias in receiving ICI, landmark time points were used (the 50th and 75th percentile times from diagnosis to ICI initiation). Results: Among 16 831 patients with stage IV melanoma, 11 435 (67.9%) of patients were male; 116 (0.69%) were Asian or Pacific Islander, 475 (2.82%) were Hispanic, 270 (1.60%) were non-Hispanic Black, 15 711 (93.55%) were non-Hispanic White, and 145 (0.86%) were other race and ethnicity; the median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 64 (54-73) years. First-line immunotherapy use increased from 8.9% (127 of 1429) in 2010 to 38.8% (685 of 1766) in 2015, and 62.5% (1223 of 1958) in 2019. Median OS improved from 7.7 months (95% CI, 7.1-8.6 months) in 2010 to 17.5 months (95% CI, 14.9-19.8 months) in 2018. For patients diagnosed in 2016 or later, OS improved with first-line ICI (median OS using the 78-day landmark: 43.7 months [95% CI, 38.1-49.1 months] vs 16.1 months [95% CI, 13.5-19.3 months] for targeted therapy or chemotherapy; adjusted P < .001)-even after adjusting for patient, disease, and treatment factors. Results were similar for the 48-day landmark. This included patients presenting with brain metastases (first-line ICI median OS using the 78-day landmark: 19.9 months [95% CI, 17.2-25.0 months] vs 10.7 months for targeted therapy [95% CI, 9.5-12.3 months], adjusted P = .001). First-line ICI use varied by patients' age, insurance status, zip code-level household income, and treating hospital type. Conclusions and Relevance: Following anti-PD-1 approval in 2015, first-line ICI was associated with substantial OS improvements for patients with stage IV melanoma, including those with brain metastases. As of 2019, 38% of patients still were not receiving first-line ICI in the US, with use varying by patients' socioeconomic factors.

Audiovestibular symptoms and facial nerve function comparing microsurgery versus SRS for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery and radiosurgery represent the most common treatment options for vestibular schwannoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the outcomes of surgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: The Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched through 01/2021 to find all studies on surgical and stereotactic procedures performed to treat vestibular schwannoma. Using a random-effects model, pooled odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing post- to pre-intervention were derived for pre-post studies, and pooled incidence of adverse events post-intervention were calculated for case series and stratified by intervention type. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (18 pre-post design; three case series) with 987 patients were included in the final analysis. Comparing post- to pre-intervention, both surgery (OR: 3.52, 95%CI 2.13, 5.81) and SRS (OR: 3.30, 95%CI 1.39, 7.80) resulted in greater odds of hearing loss, lower odds of dizziness (surgery OR: 0.10; 95%CI 0.02, 0.47 vs. SRS OR: 0.22; 95%CI 0.05, 0.99), and tinnitus (surgery OR: 0.23; 95%CI 0.00, 37.9; two studies vs. SRS OR: 0.11; 95%CI 0.01, 1.07; one study). Pooled incidence of facial symmetry loss was larger post-surgery (14.3%, 95%CI 6.8%, 22.7%) than post-SRS (7%, 95%CI 1%, 36%). Tumor control was larger in the surgery (94%, 95%CI 83%, 98%) than the SRS group (80%, 95%CI 31%, 97%) for small-to-medium size tumors. CONCLUSION: Both surgery and SRS resulted in similar odds of hearing loss and similar improvements in dizziness and tinnitus among patients with vestibular schwannoma; however, facial symmetry loss appeared higher post-surgery.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Short-term outcomes associated with temozolomide or PCV chemotherapy for 1p/19q-codeleted WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas: A national evaluation.

Background: The optimal chemotherapy regimen between temozolomide and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) remains uncertain for WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma (Olig3) patients. We therefore investigated this question using national data. Methods: Patients diagnosed with radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. The overall survival (OS) associated with first-line single-agent temozolomide vs multi-agent PCV was estimated by Kaplan-Meier techniques and evaluated by multivariable Cox regression. Results: One thousand five hundred ninety-six radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 patients were identified: 88.6% (n = 1414) treated with temozolomide and 11.4% (n = 182) with PCV (from 5.4% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2018) in the first-line setting. The median follow-up was 35.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20.7-60.6 months) with 63.3% of patients alive at the time of analysis. There was a significant difference in unadjusted OS between temozolomide (5-year OS 58.9%, 95%CI: 55.6-62.0) and PCV (5-year OS 65.1%, 95%CI: 54.8-73.5; P = .04). However, a significant OS difference between temozolomide and PCV was not observed in the Cox regression analysis adjusted by age and extent of resection (PCV vs temozolomide HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.59-1.11, P = .18). PCV was more frequently used for younger Olig3s but otherwise was not associated with patient's insurance status or care setting. Conclusions: In a national analysis of Olig3s, first-line PCV chemotherapy was associated with a slightly improved unadjusted short-term OS compared to temozolomide; but not following adjustment by patient age and extent of resection. There has been an increase in PCV utilization since 2010. These findings provide preliminary data while we await the definitive results from the CODEL trial.

Frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls among patients with brain metastases: A population- and institutional-level analysis.

Background: Falls in patients with cancer harbor potential for serious sequelae. Patients with brain metastases (BrM) may be especially susceptible to falls but supporting investigations are lacking. We assessed the frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls in patients with BrM using 2 data sources. Methods: We identified 42 648 and 111 patients with BrM utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data (2008-2016) and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) institutional data (2015), respectively, and characterized falls in these populations. Results: Among SEER-Medicare patients, 10 267 (24.1%) experienced a fall that prompted medical evaluation, with cumulative incidences at 3, 6, and 12 months of 18.0%, 24.3%, and 34.1%, respectively. On multivariable Fine/Gray's regression, older age (≥81 or 76-80 vs 66-70 years, hazard ratio [HR] 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11-1.25], P < .001 and HR 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04-1.17], P < .001, respectively), Charlson comorbidity score of >2 vs 0-2 (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03-1.13], P = .002) and urban residence (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16], P = .03) were associated with falls. Married status (HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.98], P = .004) and Asian vs white race (HR 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99], P = .03) were associated with reduced fall risk. Identified falls were more common among BWH/DFCI patients (N = 56, 50.4% of cohort), resulting in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, fractures, and intracranial hemorrhage in 33%, 23%, 11%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Falls are common among patients with BrM, especially older/sicker patients, and can have deleterious consequences. Risk-reduction measures, such as home safety checks, physical therapy, and medication optimization, should be considered in this population.

Incidence and Predictors of Neurologic Death in Patients with Brain Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Neurologic death is the most serious consequence of intracranial disease among patients with brain metastases. Identifying patients with brain metastases at increased risk of neurologic death can improve care and guide further research. We sought to delineate factors predictive of neurologic death among patients with brain metastases. METHODS: We identified 1218 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases managed at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2008-2015. Factors predictive of neurologic death were assessed via univariable and multivariable Fine and Gray competing risks regression. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, neurologic death was associated with number of brain metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 per 1 metastasis increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001) and 3 primary tumor sites (reference=non-small cell lung cancer): melanoma (HR 4.67, 95% CI 3.27-6.68, P < 0.001), small cell lung cancer (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.47-3.68, P < 0.001), and gastrointestinal cancer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.28-3.82, P = 0.005). Conversely, a reduction in neurologic death was found in patients with good Karnofsky performance status (90-100 vs. 30-80, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.95, P = 0.03) and progressive extracranial metastases at diagnosis of intracranial disease (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.67, P = 0.001). Among patients with breast primaries, HER2+ patients displayed increased neurologic death relative to the reference of HR+/HER2- (univariable analysis only: HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.00-5.84, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with melanoma, small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and HER2+ breast cancer primaries, as well as greater intracranial versus extracranial disease burden, harbor significant risk of neurologic death. Future research investigating novel intracranial approaches should focus on these populations.

The epidemiology of primary and metastatic brain tumors in infancy through childhood.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the epidemiology of primary and metastatic pediatric brain tumors in the United States according to the WHO CNS 4th and 5th editions classifications. METHODS: Pediatric patients (age ≤ 14) presenting between 2004 and 2017 with a brain tumor were identified in the National Cancer Database and categorized by NICHD age stages. Patients' age, sex, race/ethnicity, overall survival, and tumor characteristics were evaluated according to WHO CNS 4th and 5th editions. RESULTS: 23,978 pediatric brain tumor patients were identified. Overall, other (i.e. circumscribed) astrocytic gliomas (21%), diffuse astrocytic/oligodendroglial gliomas (21%; 64% of which were midline), and embryonal tumors (16%) predominated. A minority of brain tumors were of ependymal (6%), glioneuronal & neuronal (6%), germ cell tumor (GCT; 4%), mesenchymal non-meningothelial (2%), cranial nerve (2%), choroid plexus (2%), meningioma (2%), pineal (1%), and hematolymphoid (0.4%) types. GCTs were more likely in patients of Asian/Pacific Islander race/ethnicity. Brain metastases were exceedingly rare, accounting for 1.4% overall, with the most common primary tumor being neuroblastoma (61%) and non-CNS sarcoma (16%). Brain metastatic, choroid plexus, and embryonal tumors peaked during infancy and toddlerhood; whereas diffuse gliomas peaked in middle-late childhood. GCTs and glioneuronal & neuronal tumors uniquely displayed bimodal distributions, with elevated prevalence in both infancy and middle-to-late childhood. CONCLUSION: We systematically described the epidemiology of pediatric brain tumors in the context of contemporary classification schema, thereby validating our current understanding and providing key insights.

Practice Variation in Perioperative Steroid Dosing for Brain Tumor Patients: An International Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Steroids are commonly used to treat peritumoral edema and increased intracranial pressure in patients with brain tumors. Despite widespread use of steroids, relatively little evidence is available about their optimal perioperative dosing scheme. This study aimed to increase insight into practice variation of perioperative steroid dosing and tapering schedules used in the neurosurgical community. METHODS: An electronic survey comprising 27 questions regarding steroid dosing, tapering schedules, and adverse events was administered to neurosurgeons between December 6, 2019, and June 1, 2020. The survey was distributed through the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies and social media platforms. Collected data were assessed for quantitative and qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The survey obtained 175 responses from 55 countries across 6 continents, including 30 from low- or middle-income countries; 152 (87%) respondents completed all questions. Of respondents, 130 (80%) indicated prescribing perioperative steroids. Reported doses ranged from 2 to 64 mg/day in schedules ranging from 1 to 4 times daily. The most prescribed steroid was dexamethasone in doses of 16 mg/day (n = 49; 31%), 12 mg/day (n = 31; 20%), and 8 mg/day (n = 18; 12%). No significant association was found between prescribed dose and physician and institutional characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Steroids are commonly prescribed perioperatively in patients with brain tumors. However, there is great practice variation in dosing and schedules among neurosurgeons. Future investigation in a prospective and preferably randomized manner is needed to identify an optimal dosing scheme and implement international/national guidelines for steroid use.

Emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations among older patients with brain metastases: a dual population- and institution-level analysis.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with brain metastases (BrM) commonly experience symptoms that prompt acute medical evaluation. We characterized emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalizations in this population. METHODS: We identified 17 789 and 361 Medicare enrollees diagnosed with BrM using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2010-2016) and an institutional database (2007-2016), respectively. Predictors of ED visits and hospitalizations were assessed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: The institutional cohort averaged 3.3 ED visits/1.9 hospitalizations per person-year, with intracranial disease being the most common reason for presentation/admission. SEER-Medicare patients averaged 2.8 ED visits/2.0 hospitalizations per person-year. For patients with synchronous BrM (N = 7834), adjusted risk factors for ED utilization and hospitalization, respectively, included: male sex (rate ratio [RR] = 1.15 [95% CI = 1.09-1.22], P < .001; RR = 1.21 [95% CI = 1.13-1.29], P < .001); African American vs white race (RR = 1.30 [95% CI = 1.18-1.42], P < .001; RR = 1.25 [95% CI = 1.13-1.39], P < .001); unmarried status (RR = 1.07 [95% CI = 1.01-1.14], P = .02; RR = 1.09 [95% CI = 1.02-1.17], P = .01); Charlson comorbidity score >2 (RR = 1.27 [95% CI = 1.17-1.37], P < .001; RR = 1.36 [95% CI = 1.24-1.49], P < .001); and receipt of non-stereotactic vs stereotactic radiation (RR = 1.44 [95% CI = 1.34-1.55, P < .001; RR = 1.49 [95% CI = 1.37-1.62, P < .001). For patients with metachronous BrM (N = 9955), ED visits and hospitalizations were more common after vs before BrM diagnosis (2.6 vs 1.2 ED visits per person-year; 1.8 vs 0.9 hospitalizations per person-year, respectively; RR = 2.24 [95% CI = 2.15-2.33], P < .001; RR = 2.06 [95% CI = 1.98-2.15], P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with BrM commonly receive hospital-level care secondary to intracranial disease, especially in select subpopulations. Enhanced care coordination, closer outpatient follow-up, and patient navigator programs seem warranted for this population.

Outcome and Toxicity of Proton Therapy for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of proton radiotherapy in vestibular schwannoma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review and volumetric MRI-analyses. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Vestibular schwannoma patients treated with protons between 2003 and 2018. INTERVENTION: Proton radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor control was defined as not requiring salvage treatment. Progressive hearing loss was defined as a decrease in maximum speech discrimination score below the 95% critical difference in reference to the pretreatment score. Hearing assessment includes contralateral hearing and duration of follow-up. Dizziness and/or unsteadiness and facial and trigeminal nerve function were scored. Patients who had surgery prior to proton radiotherapy were separately assessed. RESULTS: Of 221 included patients, 136 received single fraction and 85 fractionated proton radiotherapy. Actuarial 5-year local control rate was 96% (95% CI 90-98%). The median radiological follow-up was 4.5 years. Progressive postirradiation speech discrimination score loss occurred in 42% of patients with audiometric follow-up within a year. Facial paresis was found in 5% (usually mild), severe dizziness in 5%, and trigeminal neuralgia in 5% of patients receiving protons as primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Proton radiotherapy achieves high tumor control with modest side effects aside from hearing loss in vestibular schwannoma patients. Limited and heterogeneous outcome reporting hamper comparisons to the literature. Potential sequelae of radiation therapy impacting vestibular function, cognitive function, and quality of life warrant further evaluation. Subgroups that benefit most from proton radiotherapy should be identified to optimize allocation and counterbalance its costs.

Visual Outcomes after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: Our Institutional Experience.

Objectives Visual dysfunction in patients with pituitary adenomas is a clear indication for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS). However, the visual outcomes vary greatly among patients and it remains unclear what tumor, patient, and surgical characteristics contribute to postoperative visual outcomes. Methods One hundred patients with pituitary adenomas who underwent EETS between January 2011 and June 2015 in a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. General patient characteristics, pre- and postoperative visual status, clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, hormone production, radiological features, and procedural characteristics were evaluated for association with presenting visual signs and visual outcomes postoperatively. Suprasellar tumor extension (SSE) was graded 0 to 4 following a grading system as formulated by Fujimoto et al. Results Sixty-six (66/100) of all patients showed visual field defects (VFD) at the time of surgery, of whom 18% (12/66) were asymptomatic. VFD improved in 35 (35%) patients and worsened in 4 (4%) patients postoperatively. Mean visual acuity (VA) improved from 0.67 preoperatively to 0.84 postoperatively ( p = 0.04). Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) and Fujimoto grade were independent predictors of preoperative VFD in the entire cohort ( p = 0.02 and p < 0.01 respectively). A higher grade of SSE was the only factor independently associated with postoperative improvement of VFD ( p = 0.03). NFPA and Fujimoto grade 3 were independent predictors of VA improvement (both p = 0.04). Conclusion EETS significantly improved both VA and VFD for most patients, although a few patients showed deterioration of visual deficits postoperatively. Higher degrees of SSE and NFPA were independent predictors of favorable visual outcomes.