Predictive value of diffusion MRI-based parametric response mapping for prognosis and treatment response in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of treatment response is important for the management of patients with malignant brain tumors such as glioblastoma to assure good quality of life in relation to therapeutic efficacy. AIM: To investigate whether parametric response mapping (PRM) with diffusion MRI may provide prognostic information at an early stage of standard therapy for glioblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 31 patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma WHO grade IV, planned for primary standard postoperative treatment with radiotherapy 60Gy/30 fractions with concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide. MRI follow-up including diffusion and perfusion weighting was performed at 3 T at start of postoperative chemoradiotherapy, three weeks into treatment, and then regularly until twelve months postoperatively. Regional mean diffusivity (MD) changes were analyzed voxel-wise using the PRM method (MD-PRM). At eight and twelve months postoperatively, after completion of standard treatment, patients were classified using conventional MRI and clinical evaluation as either having stable disease (SD, including partial response) or progressive disease (PD). It was assessed whether MD-PRM differed between patients having SD versus PD and whether it predicted the risk of disease progression (progression-free survival, PFS) or death (overall survival, OS). A subgroup analysis was performed that compared MD-PRM between SD and PD in patients only undergoing diagnostic biopsy. MGMT-promotor methylation status (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) was registered and analyzed with respect to PFS, OS and MD-PRM. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients analyzed: 21 were operated by resection and ten by diagnostic biopsy. At eight months, 19 patients had SD and twelve had PD. At twelve months, ten patients had SD and 20 had PD, out of which ten were deceased within twelve months and one was deceased without known tumor progression. Median PFS was nine months, and median OS was 17 months. Eleven patients had methylated MGMT-promotor, 16 were MGMT unmethylated, and four had unknown MGMT-status. MD-PRM did not significantly predict patients having SD versus PD neither at eight nor at twelve months. Patients with an above median MD-PRM reduction had a slightly longer PFS (P = 0.015) in Kaplan-Maier analysis, as well as a non-significantly longer OS (P = 0.099). In the subgroup of patients only undergoing biopsy, total MD-PRM change at three weeks was generally higher for patients with SD than for patients with PD at eight months, although no tests were performed. MGMT status strongly predicted both PFS and OS but not MD-PRM change. CONCLUSION: MD-PRM at three weeks was not demonstrated to be predictive of treatment response, disease progression, or survival. Preliminary results suggested a higher predictive value in non-resected patients, although this needs to be evaluated in future studies.

Efficacy of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation for Control of Prunus Replant Disease.

Prunus replant disease (PRD) is an important soilborne complex that suppresses growth and productivity of replanted stone fruit and nut orchards. It is effectively managed with preplant soil fumigation but, due to regulatory challenges, nonfumigant-based control strategies for PRD and other soilborne disease problems may become increasingly important, especially in California. We examined the potential of preplant anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) for control of PRD in four repeated orchard replant trials on sandy loam soil near Parlier, CA. After removal of the old orchard trees, alternative ASD treatments, all using rice bran as the main carbon source, were implemented, starting in late September. The alternative treatments incorporated rice bran at (i) 20 t ha-1, alone, in 3.0-m-wide row strips; (ii) 20 t ha-1, preceded by incorporation of a sudangrass cover crop and followed by drip application of molasses (10 t ha-1), in 3.0-m-wide row strips; (iii) 20 t ha-1, alone, in 1.8-m-wide strips; or (iv) 12 t ha-1, alone, in 1.8-m-wide strips. All ASD-treated areas were covered with clear tarp and drip irrigated with 25 cm of water. Tarps remained for 6 weeks, during which the soil moisture level was kept at or above field capacity by drip irrigation. All trials included nontreated control and fumigated standard treatments. ASD raised temperature and reduced redox potential in soil at 15- and 46-cm depths for 6 weeks. Fumigation and ASD treatments both nearly eradicated bioassay inoculum of Pythium ultimum in the soil before almond trees were replanted and significantly affected almond tree root communities of fungi and oomycetes after planting. Fumigation treatments and ASD treatments with rice bran at 20 t ha-1 in 3.0-m strips increased tree growth significantly and by similar magnitudes. Among repeated experiments, mean increases in trunk cross-sectional area growth due to fumigation ranged from 137 to 264%, while the increases due to ASD at 20 t ha-1 in 3.0-m strips ranged from 148 to 214%, compared with controls. ASD offers effective control of PRD and is worthy of further optimization and testing for management of PRD and additional orchard replant problems.

Survival and growth of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 30 in almond orchard soils.

AIMS: To evaluate factors potentially contributing to the long-term persistence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type (PT) 30 in an almond orchard. METHODS AND RESULTS: Surface and subsurface soil temperatures, and air temperatures in a radiation shelter, were recorded during a 12-month period, and were used to identify relevant storage temperatures (20 or 35 degrees C) for microcosms of two different soil types (clay and sandy loams) with moisture levels near saturation or near field capacity. Salmonella Enteritidis PT 30 was inoculated into the microcosms at 6 log CFU g(-1) dry weight. Between 14 and 180 days of incubation, counts of S. Enteritidis PT 30 decreased rapidly at 35 degrees C and were significantly different (P < 0.05) from counts at 20 degrees C, regardless of the soil type or moisture level. Salmonella was detected by enrichment of 10-g samples from all microcosms after 180 days of incubation at 20 degrees C, but from none of the microcosms held at 35 degrees C. To measure the potential for the growth of S. Enteritidis PT 30 in clay loam soil, an aqueous extract of almond hulls (containing 1.6% mono and disaccharides) or equivalent volume of water was added 7 days after inoculation. Significant (P < 0.05) growth of S. Enteritidis PT 30 was observed within 8 or 24 h of adding hull extract, but not water, to soil. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities may exist for S. Enteritidis PT 30 to survive for an extended time in almond orchard soils and to grow in these soils where hull nutrients are released. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Temperature has a significant impact on the long-term survival of S. Enteritidis PT 30 in soil, and nutrients leached from almond hulls may result in Salmonella growth. These factors should be considered in the design of Good Agricultural Practices for almonds.

Physiological effects of kaolin applications in well-irrigated and water-stressed walnut and almond trees.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Kaolin applications have been used to mitigate the negative effects of water and heat stress on plant physiology and productivity with variable results, ranging from increased to decreased yields and photosynthetic rates. The mechanisms of action of kaolin applications are not clear: although the increased albedo reduces leaf temperature and the consequent heat stress, it also reduces the light available for photosynthesis, possibly offsetting benefits of lower temperature. The objective of this study was to investigate which of these effects are prevalent and under which conditions. METHODS: A 6% kaolin suspension was applied on well-irrigated and water-stressed walnut (Juglans regia) and almond (Prunus dulcis) trees. Water status (i.e. stem water potential, psi(s)), gas exchange (i.e. light-saturated CO2 assimilation rate, Amax; stomatal conductance, g(s)), leaf temperature (T(l)) and physiological relationships in treated and control trees were then measured and compared. KEY RESULTS: In both species, kaolin did not affect the daily course of psi(s) whereas it reduced Amax by 1-4 micromol CO2 m(-2) s(-1) throughout the day in all combinations of species and irrigation treatments. Kaolin did not reduce g(s) in any situation. Consequently, intercellular CO2 concentration (C(i)) was always greater in treated trees than in controls, suggesting that the reduction of Amax with kaolin was not due to stomatal limitations. Kaolin reduced leaf temperature (T(l)) by about 1-3 degrees C and leaf-to-air vapour pressure difference (VPD(l)) by about 0.1-0.7 kPa. Amax was lower at all values of g(s), T(l) and VPD(l) in kaolin-treated trees. Kaolin affected the photosynthetic response to the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in almond leaves: kaolin-coated leaves had similar dark respiration rates and light-saturated photosynthesis, but a higher light compensation point and lower apparent quantum yield, while the photosynthetic light-response curve saturated at higher PAR. When these parameters were used to model the photosynthetic response curve to PAR, it was estimated that the kaolin film allowed 63% of the incident PAR to reach the leaf. CONCLUSIONS: The main effect of kaolin application was the reduction, albeit minor, of photosynthesis, which appeared to be related to the shading of the leaves. The reduction in T(l) and VPD(l) with kaolin did not suffice to mitigate the adverse effects of heat and water stress on Amax.

A simple method to estimate photosynthetic radiation use efficiency of canopies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Photosynthetic radiation use efficiency (PhRUE) over the course of a day has been shown to be constant for leaves throughout a general canopy where nitrogen content (and thus photosynthetic properties) of leaves is distributed in relation to the light gradient. It has been suggested that this daily PhRUE can be calculated simply from the photosynthetic properties of a leaf at the top of the canopy and from the PAR incident on the canopy, which can be obtained from weather-station data. The objective of this study was to investigate whether this simple method allows estimation of PhRUE of different crops and with different daily incident PAR, and also during the growing season. METHODS: The PhRUE calculated with this simple method was compared with that calculated with a more detailed model, for different days in May, June and July in California, on almond (Prunus dulcis) and walnut (Juglans regia) trees. Daily net photosynthesis of 50 individual leaves was calculated as the daylight integral of the instantaneous photosynthesis. The latter was estimated for each leaf from its photosynthetic response to PAR and from the PAR incident on the leaf during the day. KEY RESULTS: Daily photosynthesis of individual leaves of both species was linearly related to the daily PAR incident on the leaves (which implies constant PhRUE throughout the canopy), but the slope (i.e. the PhRUE) differed between the species, over the growing season due to changes in photosynthetic properties of the leaves, and with differences in daily incident PAR. When PhRUE was estimated from the photosynthetic light response curve of a leaf at the top of the canopy and from the incident radiation above the canopy, obtained from weather-station data, the values were within 5 % of those calculated with the more detailed model, except in five out of 34 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of estimating PhRUE is valuable as it simplifies calculation of canopy photosynthesis to a multiplication between the PAR intercepted by the canopy, which can be obtained with remote sensing, and the PhRUE calculated from incident PAR, obtained from standard weather-station data, and from the photosynthetic properties of leaves at the top of the canopy. The latter properties are the sole crop parameters needed. While being simple, this method describes the differences in PhRUE related to crop, season, nutrient status and daily incident PAR.