A modern view of LGL leukemia.

Large granular lymphocytic (LGL) leukemia is a rare lymphoproliferative chronic disorder characterized by expansion of either T- or NK- cytotoxic cells. Contrary to EBV-induced aggressive NK-LGL leukemia, chronic T- and NK-LGL leukemia are indolent diseases affecting elderly patients with a median age of 66.5 years old. LGL leukemia is frequently associated with autoimmune disorders, most frequently rheumatoid arthritis. An auto/allo antigen is tentatively implicated in disease initiation. LGLs expansion is then triggered by proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL) IL-15, MIP-1, and RANTES. This proinflammatory environment contributes to deregulation of proliferative and apoptotic pathways. Following the initial description of the JAK-STAT pathway signaling activation in the majority of patients, recurrent STAT3 gain of function mutations have been reported. The JAK-STAT pathway plays a key role in LGL pathogenesis by promoting survival, proliferation and cytotoxicity. Several recent advances have been made towards understanding the molecular landscapes of T and NK LGL leukemia, identifying multiple recurrent mutations affecting the epigenome, such as TET2 or KMT2D, and crosstalk with the immune microenvironment, such as CCL22. Despite an indolent course, published series suggest that the majority of patients will eventually need treatment. However, it is noteworthy that many patients may have a long-term observation period without ever requiring therapy. Treatments rely upon immunosuppressive drugs, namely cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and cyclosporine. Recent advances have led to the development of targeted approaches, including JAK-STAT inhibitors, cytokine targeting and hypomethylating agents, opening new developments in a still-incurable disease.

Remission after CAR T-cell therapy: Do lymphoma patients recover a normal life?

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) can induce prolonged remission in a substantial subset of patients with relapse/refractory lymphoma. However, little is known about patients' life after CAR T-cell therapy. We prospectively assessed the multidimensional recovery of lymphoma patients in remission, before leukapheresis, before CAR T-cell infusion, and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Validated tools were used to measure lymphoma-related and global health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma [FACT-Lym] and EQ-5D-5L), cognitive complaint (FACT-Cognition), fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue subscale), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-Traumatic Check List Scale), and sexuality (Relationship and Sexuality Scale). Beyond 12 months of remission, we also surveyed physical, professional, sexual, and general life status. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 53, 35, and 23 patients were evaluable, respectively. Improvement in lymphoma-related HRQoL was clinically relevant at 3, 6, and 12 months with a mean change from baseline of 10.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8; 16.1), 12.2 (95% CI: 4.2; 20.1), and 11.72 (95% CI: 2.06; 21.38), respectively. Improvement in global HRQoL, fatigue, and anxiety was clinically relevant, but 20%-40% of patients experienced persistent fatigue, psychological distress, and cognitive complaints over time. Beyond 12 months after CAR T cells, 81.8% of 22 evaluable patients were satisfied with their daily life. Physical activity, professional, sexual, and global well-being had returned to prediagnosis levels in nearly half of the patients. We found an improvement in HRQoL after CAR T-cell therapy including anxiety, depression, sexual satisfaction, and general well-being. However, not all patients recover a "normal life." Further research is needed to determine which patients are at risk of quality-of-life impairment to improve recovery after CAR T-cell infusion.

Impact on survival through consolidation radiotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Rituximab has improved response rates and overall survival in B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for lymphomas, but there is uncertainty on its use as consolidation after chemo-immunotherapy mainly in advanced stages. We evaluated its efficacy with a comprehensive meta-analysis and a systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and abstracts from ASCO, ASH, ESMO and ASTRO published from June 1966 and December 2018. We identified 11 trials that evaluated consolidation radiotherapy following chemotherapy in a randomized fashion in 4'584 patients. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was PFS. As three of the eleven trials were retracted, this data is based on 2414 patients. For the primary endpoint (PFS), we found a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (0.51 to 1.17, pooled (tau2: 0.25; I2: 85%), and a HR of 0.80 (0.53 to 1.21, pooled (bivariate meta-analysis). For overall survival, the HR is 0.93 (0.61 to 1.40; pooled (tau2: 0.25; I2: 74%) and 0.86 (0.58 to 1.27) in a bivariate meta-analysis. The lack of benefit did not change over time (p-value: 0.95 (tau2: 0.32; I2: 88%), and was also absent for PFS when stratifying for chemotherapy, the use of Rituximab, age, the dose of radiotherapy, application to patients in complete remission and with bulky disease. None of the trials used a PET-guided approach. This meta-analysis revealed no survival benefit when consolidation radiotherapy is given to unselected DLBCL patients following chemotherapy. These results need to be considered in future trials in the PET-CT era.

First-line treatment of double-hit and triple-hit lymphomas: Survival and tolerance data from a retrospective multicenter French study.

Historically, double or triple hit lymphoma (DHL and THL) have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy, but there is currently no guideline. We report the French experience in managing DHL and THL in first line using collective data on both survival and tolerance. All consecutive patients with newly diagnosis of large B-cell lymphoma with MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangements, as determined by FISH between January 2013 and April 2019 were included. Based on the eligibility criteria, 160 patients were selected among the 184 patients identified. With a median follow-up of 32 months, 2- and 4-year progression free survival (PFS) rates were 40% and 28% with R-CHOP compared with 57% and 52% with intensive chemotherapy (P = .063). There was no difference in overall survival (OS). For advanced stages, PFS was significantly longer with intensive chemotherapy than with R-CHOP (P = .029). There was no impact of autologous stem cell transplantation among patient in remission. For patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement, the 2-year PFS and OS rate was 21% and 39%, vs 57% and 75% without CNS disease (P = .007 and P < .001). By multivariate analysis, elevated IPI score and CNS disease were strongly and independently associated with a poorer survival, whereas treatment was not significantly associated with OS. This is the largest series reporting the treatment of DHL and THL in Europe. The PFS was significantly longer with an intensive regimen for advanced stage, but no difference in OS, supporting the need for a prospective randomized trial.

Intensive haemodialysis using PMMA dialyser does not increase renal response rate in multiple myeloma patients with acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Intensive haemodialysis (IHD) in addition to bortezomib-based chemotherapy might be efficient to rapidly decrease serum immunoglobulin-free light chains removal in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and to improve renal prognosis and survival. METHODS: The aim of this retrospective multi-centre study was to compare the efficacy (renal recovery rate) of IHD and of standard haemodialysis (SHD) in patients with MM and dialysis-dependent acute kidney injury (AKI), concomitantly treated with bortezomib-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: We selected 41 patients with MM and dialysis-dependent AKI, most likely due to myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN), and who were treated in eight French hospitals between January 2007 and June 2011. Patients were classified in two groups according to dialysis regimen: IHD [n = 21, with a mean of 11.3 dialysis sessions all with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) membranes for 13.2 days] and SHD (n = 20 patients, mostly three times per week, 31% with PMMA membrane). The main outcome was dialysis-independence at 3 months. At 3 months, 15 patients could stop dialysis: 8 (38.1%) in the IHD and 7 (35%) in the SHD group (P = 1). Moreover, 14 (56%) of the 25 patients who did show haematological response and only one of the 16 patients who did not were dialysis-independent (P = 0.002) at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this retrospective study did not show any clear renal benefit of IHD in patients with MM and MCN compared with SHD. Conversely, they underline the importance of the haematological response to chemotherapy for the renal response and patient prognosis.

Regulatory CD4+CD25hi T cells conserve their function and phenotype after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment in human hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), mediated by CD4(+) and CD8(+) effector T cells, is a life-threatening complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. CD4(+)CD25(hi) regulatory T cells (T(reg)) have been shown to modulate tolerance to aGVHD in murine models. Based on these observations, we examined their role in the prevention of aGVHD in patients who underwent transplantation with peripheral blood-mobilized hematopoietic stem cells after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The effects of the G-CSF on the phenotype, frequency, and function of CD4(+)CD25(hi) T cells were analyzed in grafts and after transplantation to determine whether these cells were regulatory T cells. CD4(+)CD25(hi) T cells could be detected at the same frequency before and after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration in the donors' peripheral blood. The isolation of these cells from the grafts or from the recipients' peripheral blood after transplantation revealed that they were suppressive to the same extent as T(reg) isolated from healthy volunteers. Their number and frequency were estimated in the grafts and the results indicated that protection against aGVHD was not dependent on the T(reg) amount transferred to the recipients. Similarly there was no correlation between the number of circulating CD4(+)CD25(hi) T cells in the recipients' peripheral blood during the early period after transplantation and the outcome of aGVHD.