Quality of life, functioning and participation of adult patients with an amputation following complex regional pain syndrome I or brachial plexus injury: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: This planned scoping review aims to provide insight into current literature regarding perceived quality of life (QoL), functioning and participation of patients with upper limb amputations (ULA) because of therapy-resistant debilitating complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) or brachial plexus injury (BPI). It is important to gain insight into these outcomes, so we can properly inform and select patients eligible for amputation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Reviews guidelines and Arksey and O'Malley's framework will be used. Studies regarding adult patients with either BPI or CRPS-I who underwent ULA will be considered for inclusion. Studies should include one or more of the following topics: QoL, functioning or participation and should be written in English, German or Dutch. Searches will be conducted in the Cochrane database, PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar. Search strings will be provided by a licenced librarian. All relevant literatures will be considered for inclusion, regardless of published date, in order to give a full scope of available literature. Studies will be selected first by title, then abstract and finally by full article by two reviewers who will discuss after every round. A third reviewer will make final decisions to reach consensus if needed. Data will be presented as brief summaries and in tables using a modified data extraction table. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required since no original data will be collected. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at (inter)national conferences.

Themes and methods of research presented at European General Practice Research Network conferences.

BACKGROUND: The World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca) defined core characteristics of general practice and general practitioners' competencies. It is unclear to which extent research has addressed these issues so far. OBJECTIVE: To determine themes and research methods of general practice research as reflected by presentations at the European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) meetings. METHODS: Descriptive and retrospective study. All abstracts presented at each of the 14 EGPRN conferences between June 2001 and October 2007 were analysed for content and study design/methodology. Categories for content were developed inductively; a predefined hierarchical scheme was used for study designs. RESULTS: A total of N=614 abstracts were classified. The main research topics were related to GP/health service issues (n=232), clinical (n=148) and patient-related themes (n=118). Original data (n=558) were mainly derived from cross-sectional designs (38.7%). Intervention studies (11.0%), longitudinal designs including case-control and cohort studies (13.3%) as well as instrumental research (2.2%) were less common. More than one-fourth of all original studies were qualitative studies (27.6%). Stratified analysis revealed that cross-sectional designs were less frequent in the second half of conferences. Analysis by country showed that, in contrast to different quantitative designs, the proportion of qualitative studies was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: To test effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions under primary care conditions, a higher proportion of experimental studies would be preferable. This could increase the acceptance of general practitioners' specific approaches and provide clear guidance on approaches and procedures, especially in health care systems not predominantly based on primary care.