Transjugular diagnostics in acute liver failure including measurements of hepatocentral venous biomarker gradients.

AIM: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a syndrome of severe liver injury that may need urgent liver transplantation and is associated with significant risk of death. Early outcome prediction and further possibilities to increase accuracy of prognosis scores are important. METHODS: We examined 30 patients with ALF, according to the novel criteria of the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Diseases Study Group, who underwent transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and investigated the relevance of histology for correct diagnosis and etiology. We assessed the suitability of necrosis (%), hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPG), and hepatocentral venous gradients of serum biomarkers for outcome prediction. For this purpose, we calculated the difference of biomarker levels between hepatic vein (HV) and superior vena cava (SVC) blood samples. RESULTS: Histology of TJLB specimens contributed to finding the etiology in 83%. Necrosis (%) and HVPGs were not significantly different between outcome groups. In gradient measurements, caspase 3/7 activity and total cytokeratin 18 (CK-18) (M65) had significant and relevant levels different from zero. Although they were not accurate for outcome prediction, differences between outcome groups were detected in caspase activation: levels of caspase 3/7 activity in the HV and caspase-cleaved CK-18 (M30) in the SVC were significantly higher in spontaneously recovered patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results underline the role of caspase activation in spontaneous recovery from ALF. Furthermore, the calculation of hepatocentral venous biomarker gradients could represent a new diagnostic tool whose clinical potential needs to be further investigated.

Long-term results after adult ex situ split liver transplantation since its introduction in 1987.

BACKGROUND: Split liver transplantation is still discussed controversially. Utilization of split liver grafts has been declining since a change of allocation rules for the second graft abolished incentives for German centres to perform ex situ splits. We therefore analysed our long-term experiences with the first ex situ split liver transplant series worldwide. METHODS: A total of 131 consecutive adult ex situ split liver transplants (01.12.1987-31.12.2010) were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality rates and 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 13, 76.3, and 66.4 %, respectively. One- and three-year graft survival rates were 63.4 and 54.2 %, respectively. The observed 10-year survival rate was 40.6 %. Continuous improvement of survival from era 1 to 3 was observed (each era: 8 years), indicating a learning curve over 24 years of experience. Patient and graft survival were not influenced by different combinations of transplanted segments or types of biliary reconstruction (p > 0.05; Cox regression). Patients transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis had better survival (p = 0.021; log-rank), whereas all other indications including acute liver failure (13.6 %), acute and chronic graft failure (9.1 %) had no significant influence on survival (p > 0.05; log-rank). Biliary complications (27.4 %) had no significant influence on patient or graft survival (p > 0.05; log-rank). Hepatic artery thrombosis (13.2 %) had a significant influence on graft survival but not on patient survival (p = 0.002, >0.05, respectively; log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: Split liver transplantation can be used safely and appears to be an underutilized resource that may benefit from liberal allocation of the second graft.